don't make the mistake of thinking I want to discuss bullshit like this seriously
0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=93731415This thread is killing me. This guy was also throwing a fit in the thread about the metal ants.
Quote from: PigSpeakers on December 15, 2013, 12:47:21 PMhttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=93731415This thread is killing me. This guy was also throwing a fit in the thread about the metal ants.Christmas trees are harvested. God.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=93715495&postcount=384thread delivering some feels, and not pants feels.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=734843
Suck my hairy cunt.
but fuck pirates.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=734911
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=734957Fun fact: Jay-Z hasn't done anything worth listening to since he got out of retirement. It was purely a business decision and it shows now more than ever.
i like it when he raps about tom ford and margiela
Hopefully you understand the words "narrative" and "dissonance". Now we just throw in a "ludo" in front of "narrative" and OMG MY BRAIN STOP IT YOU PRICK!
Quote from: nudemacusers on December 16, 2013, 12:28:33 AMi like it when he raps about tom ford and margiela Looks like we found his target market.
This disagreement has been called the ludology vs. narratology debates. The narratological view is that games should be understood as novel forms of narrative and can thus be studied using theories of narrative (Murray, 1997; Atkins, 2003). The ludological position is that games should be understood on their own terms. Ludologists have proposed that the study of games should concern the analysis of the abstract and formal systems they describe. In other words, the focus of game studies should be on the rules of a game, not on the representational elements which are only incidental (Aarseth, 2001; Eskelinen, 2001; Eskelinen, 2004). The idea that a videogame is "radically different to narratives as a cognitive and communicative structure"[9] has led the development of new approaches to criticism that are focused on videogames as well as adapting, repurposing and proposing new ways of studying and theorizing about videogames.[10][11] A recent approach towards game studies starts with an analysis of interface structures and challenges the keyboard-mouse paradigm with what is called "ludic interfaces".Jesper Juul's Half-Real explores how videogames blend formal rules with the imaginative experiences provided by fictional worlds. He describes the tensions faced by games studies scholars when choosing to focus on the game or the player of the game. "We can examine the rules as they are found mechanically in the game program or in the manual of a board game, or we can examine the rules as something that players negotiate and learn. We can also treat the fictional world as a set of signs that the game presents, and we can treat the fictional world as something that the game cues the player into imagining and that players then imagine in their own ways (Juul, 2005)." Ian Bogost's comparative approach to videogame criticism also stands out as one of the more recent steps in the direction of proposing new ways of studying and theorizing about games. In Unit Operations, Bogost argues for explicating videogames through a new form of criticism that encompasses the programmatic and algorithmic underpinnings of games together with the cultural and ideological units (2006).
I remember when JayZ did a song with Linkin Park, I remember referring to it as the unholy union of shit music.
Jay Z did an entire album with Linkin Park. And Encore is the shit
Lol, "wanna play some halo?"Fuck that noise
