I forgot Boogie is the internet public affairs officer for all police forces in North America. You're really going to give these guys a pat on the back for taking a guy out at point blank range by firing 54 rounds on a public road--some of those from inside a car and behind a windshield? smh
For one, I can't tell whether or how many rounds were fired behind the windshield, Rumbler says he was firing from behind the windshield and I don't see where he gets that from. In any case, it is immaterial. He responded immediately and got rounds downrange. That's what matters.
Second, waving that "54 rounds, OMG" factoid around shows that you're talking out your ass. To use a sports analogy, Hockey and lacrosse goalies look a lot alike. Similar equipment, they protect a similarly-sized goal, and they faced shots from similarly-sized objects. But you wouldn't compare save percentages between the two. You wouldn't call a lacrosse goalie with a 60% save percentage "shit", and you wouldn't call a hockey goalie with an 80% save percentage "amazing". Because they are different. fucking. sports.
In the big picture, hit rates for police-involved shootings are pretty consistently in the 25-40% range. There are dozens of factors that go into that, from the range at which police shootings occur to the fact that police shootings are almost 100% of the time reactive, with the suspect having the initiative, etc, etc etc.
So no, I do not bat an eye to hear that two officers fired off 54 rounds between them to take down someone who jumped out of his car with a fucking AK and started firing away at them during a traffic stop.
edit: also, that sure as hell isn't "point blank" range for pistols. And even if it was, almost all police shooting incidents occur from 0-21 feet. In 2006, NYPD fired 252 shots from closer than 6 feet, hitting 107 times for a 43% hit rate.
This is simply the nature of the beast for police lethal use of force incidents.