While gross, she has a point.
And that is? Men don't shave their faces, wax their backs, pluck their unibrows, and trim their pubes because grooming is fun.
The point is it's weird we expect females to be shaved all over, while men can let everything grow. I'm sorry you feel the need to pluck your eyebrows, thats mad homo man.
Do I want my fiancee to have armpit hair? No. This doesn't change the fact its a cultural crazy thing (just like anoerexia models etc.).
Men are naturally hairier than women--it makes sense that double standards regarding sexual attractiveness of body hair would develop.
Women prefer men with broad shoulders.
Women prefer men who are significantly taller than they are.
Women prefer men with large penises.
Women prefer men with low body fat.
Women prefer men with shaved faces or stubble.
Misandry. 
Culture.
The use of super-thin models is a narrow cultural phenomenon as evidence by the fact that 99% of men find women with significantly more body fat much more attractive--regardless of race or culture.
Looking around it seems women are far more likely to trade on "physical" preferences than the reverse.
To expand on this I see all kinds of hot women with guys who don't even fit that criteria but they can't win regardless. If the guy is tall, she's with him because he's tall. If the guy has money, it's that. If the guy is built it's that. Or he's ugly, must have a huge dick. There's all kinds of insecure people who make shit up just to feel good but more often than not I see guys I consider ugmo with a pretty fine lady. Dunno what people are whiny about.
