Author Topic: Titanfall thread of WHY ISN'T THERE A THREAD ALREADY (Read 5647 times)

Raban · « **on:** June 10, 2013, 04:16:18 PM »

THIS GAME LOOKS SO FUCKING GOOD HOLY SHIT ~~I WANNA EMBED VIDEO BUT I CAN'T FIND ANY LINKS SO FUCK YOU~~, COME OVER HERE AND JOIN THE ORGY HNNNNNNNNG

Quote from: Stoney Mason on June 10, 2013, 05:12:02 PM

Also if you go to the website

http://www.titanfall.com/

You can download a 60fps 1080p version of that trailer in the op.

Steve Contra · « **Reply #1 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:18:14 PM »

demi · « **Reply #2 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:18:57 PM »

lol, you're backing this horse and not DR3? LMAO

Raban · « **Reply #3 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:20:50 PM »

I thought I was done with shooters, but the footage of this game is giving me arena-shooter flashbacks. I grew up on that genre and I'd be happy to return to it.

Quote from: demi on June 10, 2013, 04:18:57 PM

lol, you're backing this horse and not DR3? LMAO

I already have two Dead Risings, how many Titanfalls do I have? HUH, WHAT'S THAT? NONE? FUCKING RIGHT.

demi · « **Reply #4 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:23:20 PM »

You've got plenty of mech shooters. LMAO

Raban · « **Reply #5 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:24:19 PM »

None of them look like this! Whatever bitch, my jimmies can't be rustled by you. You'll just have to take them off of me

Rahxephon91 · « **Reply #6 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:26:21 PM »

What mech shooters do we have? Hawken?

Yeah this game looks awesome. Loving the traversal options. Dosen't look like it will suck to be out of a mech.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #7 on:** June 10, 2013, 04:55:33 PM »

shooterzzzz

Rufus · « **Reply #8 on:** June 10, 2013, 05:06:07 PM »

Quote from: Rahxephon91 on June 10, 2013, 04:26:21 PM

What mech shooters do we have? Hawken?

Yeah this game looks awesome. Loving the traversal options. Dosen't look like it will suck to be out of a mech.

And the F2P Mech Warrior. Blacklight Retribution has mechs, but you're better off not launching one in most cases.

Huff · « **Reply #9 on:** June 10, 2013, 05:07:10 PM »

Quote from: Great Rumbler on June 10, 2013, 04:55:33 PM

shooterzzzz

go back to your garbage eurojank and let us bro out in here

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #10 on:** June 10, 2013, 05:09:07 PM »

looks amazing

PC

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #11 on:** June 10, 2013, 05:12:02 PM »

Thought it looked awesome. Futuristic but fast paced. Looked to retain the good stuff from COD while re-inventing things. I'm excited for it. Especially since I don't plan to buy the non-Treyarch COD games anymore.

Also if you go to the website

http://www.titanfall.com/

You can download a 60fps 1080p version of that trailer in the op.

Cerveza mas fina · « **Reply #12 on:** June 10, 2013, 05:21:40 PM »

Will play on ps4 maybe

Wonder how long the exclusivity will last

Raban · « **Reply #13 on:** June 10, 2013, 05:22:42 PM »

Quote from: Stoney Mason on June 10, 2013, 05:12:02 PM

Also if you go to the website

http://www.titanfall.com/

You can download a 60fps 1080p version of that trailer in the op.

added this to the OP

tiesto · « **Reply #14 on:** June 10, 2013, 06:55:12 PM »

Ehhhh, looks like Halo and COD had a baby...

Madrun Badrun · « **Reply #15 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:03:07 PM »

I'm ok with that.

Raban · « **Reply #16 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:07:48 PM »

Quote from: tiesto on June 10, 2013, 06:55:12 PM

Ehhhh, looks like Halo and COD had a baby...

problem?

mjemirzian · « **Reply #17 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:46:54 PM »

Looks like a cross between Tribes, CoD, and Mechwarrior.

Beezy · « **Reply #18 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:52:03 PM »

Quote from: tiesto on June 10, 2013, 06:55:12 PM

Ehhhh, looks like Halo and COD had a baby...

Soooo... perfect?

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #19 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:53:31 PM »

The main thing for me is it looks very fast paced. I like that they seem to have maintained their strengths from COD. MY only real concern is the source engine. I've never really liked that engine or how it felt. But I have faith that the guys behind COD 4 aren't going to make a game with sloppy controls.

Raban · « **Reply #20 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:54:13 PM »

Quote from: Eschaton on June 10, 2013, 07:51:12 PM

Looks like Killzone

Really? Because it doesn't look like the player is moving underwater. Actually it looks quite the opposite.

You guys, just because a gun is on the bottom-right of the screen doesn't mean it's like every other FPS out there. You can clearly see what sets this apart from other shooters, but if you don't care about the genre at all... why are you in this thread?

Raban · « **Reply #21 on:** June 10, 2013, 07:59:52 PM »

Quote from: Eschaton on June 10, 2013, 07:57:39 PM

I didnt mean it as an insult. I like grey shootybangs with mechs and i'll buy this one.

it's okay, I didn't take it as one

looking forward to skating around in a mech with you and the rest of the BOREsquad next year

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #22 on:** June 11, 2013, 04:37:09 AM »

Quote from: Borys on June 11, 2013, 04:30:59 AM

Quote from: Stoney Mason on June 10, 2013, 07:53:31 PM
The main thing for me is it looks very fast paced. I like that they seem to have maintained their strengths from COD. MY only real concern is the source engine. I've never really liked that engine or how it felt. But I have faith that the guys behind COD 4 aren't going to make a game with sloppy controls.

If I didn't know I'd be sure this was the COD engine. It looked and "felt" the same as COD4 to me. Very fast, very fluid. All in all a pretty amazing showing for this game.

You should download the 60 fps version of the 5 minute video. I must have watched the damn video like 10 times. It's eerily smooth. Not the sharpest looker ever but man its so fluid it makes up for it.

Raban · « **Reply #23 on:** June 11, 2013, 04:37:19 AM »

There are a bunch of neat little details I noticed in that 60FPS 1080p trailer. I love how the mechs help you get inside them, and the little animations when players skitter up ledges.

God, I need this game so bad. Lemme pre-order it on Origin or Steam or wherever the fuck you wanna put it, goddamnit just take my fucking money, EA

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #24 on:** June 11, 2013, 04:41:06 AM »

Quote from: Raban on June 11, 2013, 04:37:19 AM

There are a bunch of neat little details I noticed in that 60FPS 1080p trailer.

There is a part where a guy ejects from one of the mechs high up into the air and then another mech rail guns him as he is falling. It's amazing in 60fps. Battlefield in the fall. This in the spring. My shooter needs are set.

Activision was nuts to alienate these guys and force them out.

Bebpo · « **Reply #25 on:** June 11, 2013, 04:46:46 AM »

To be fair, most console gamers don't play PC games. So it basically will be exclusive to the average joe.

Momo · « **Reply #26 on:** June 11, 2013, 11:56:47 AM »

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Raban · « **Reply #27 on:** June 11, 2013, 11:57:33 AM »

Momo · « **Reply #28 on:** June 11, 2013, 12:06:13 PM »

Quote from: Raban on June 11, 2013, 11:57:33 AM

(Image removed from quote.)

duckman2000 · « **Reply #29 on:** June 11, 2013, 02:52:28 PM »

Assy looking shit game

Raban · « **Reply #30 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:42:22 PM »

0/10 troll harder

Raban · « **Reply #31 on:** June 21, 2013, 11:39:24 PM »

so I just got the Game Informer with the cover story of this game and I'll only show you my favorite part

Himu · « **Reply #32 on:** June 21, 2013, 11:45:55 PM »

I'm still not impressed with this game. The only part that had my eyes wide in the gameplay video was the end when he safety jumped out of his mech and then landed on the enemy's mech. I'm not seeing the supposed Quake vibes aside from the fact you jump high. Watching the gameplay demo, Borys' Quake comparison is nothing short of hyperbole.

Then again, I can't stand modern fps games.

Stoney said it's fast paced I watch it and I'm like, what? I think it's slow as fuck. Will stick with TF2.

Himu · « **Reply #33 on:** June 21, 2013, 11:47:51 PM »

How does this remind anyone of an arena shooter? I'm confused.

brob · « **Reply #34 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:12:45 AM »

wall-run chaining sold me.

Getting to jump on a mech being all like HOLD DEEZ NUTS NICCA while digging around in it's exposed brain computer is a neat bonus. even if it turns out to be scripted and/or useless.

Raban · « **Reply #35 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:20:44 AM »

Quote from: Formerly Known As Himuro on June 21, 2013, 11:47:51 PM

How does this remind anyone of an arena shooter? I'm confused.

if you've actually played modern FPS games, you'd know that they're a lot slower and not at all vertical like this game. The jump button is more like an obstacle in the typical FPS, especially in CoD and BF.

In this game, not only is jumping useful, it seems to be necessary for survival and is only one of many agile maneuvers. Another thing you might notice is the importance of switching between an assortment of weapons that are attuned to dispatching either a titan or pilot. Both of these things echo some of Quake 3's core concepts like a wide variety of situational weaponry and its emphasis on player mobility.

If the most modern FPS you've played is TF2, then maybe fast movement speed and weapon variety isn't all that novel to you, but know that TF2 was the last time a multiplayer FPS did those things, and it came out in 2007.

pilonv1 · « **Reply #36 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:23:01 AM »

Has anyone made a gif of the transition from foot to mech? I thought it looked cool at e3

Himu · « **Reply #37 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:26:00 AM »

Quote from: Raban on June 22, 2013, 12:20:44 AM

Quote from: Formerly Known As Himuro on June 21, 2013, 11:47:51 PM
How does this remind anyone of an arena shooter? I'm confused.
if you've actually played modern FPS games, you'd know that they're a lot slower and not at all vertical like this game. The jump button is more like an obstacle in the typical FPS, especially in CoD and BF.

In this game, not only is jumping useful, it seems to be necessary for survival and is only one of many agile maneuvers. Another thing you might notice is the importance of switching between an assortment of weapons that are attuned to dispatching either a titan or pilot. Both of these things echo some of Quake 3's core concepts like a wide variety of situational weaponry and its emphasis on player mobility.

If the most modern FPS you've played is TF2, then maybe fast movement speed and weapon variety isn't all that novel to you, but know that TF2 was the last time a multiplayer FPS did those things, and it came out in 2007.

The most modern FPS I've played was Farcry: Blood Dragon.

When I think of an arena shooter, I think of 1. fast movement, 2. fast shooting, 3. open ended, large levels with varying layers of vertacality. I saw none of this in that video.

Looks pretty boring aside from the wall running and boosting.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #38 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:29:38 AM »

Seriously, you can rip someone out of a mech suit, throw them in the air, and shoot them to shit. IF that doesn't interest you then you suck

Raban · « **Reply #39 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:32:14 AM »

I'm talking about multiplayer FPS, dingus.

And you should do a little more research, because everything you just listed is all that Respawn keeps talking about with regards to this game. I don't understand how you think those stages are small, or the shooting is slow, but whatever -shrug- did you even watch the 60fps video in the OP? I'd consider giving that a look before you comment on the game's speed.

Himu · « **Reply #40 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:36:27 AM »

Last multiplayer fps I played was BLOPS.

As for the speed, the rate of fire is astounding. But movement is pretty standard modern fps. I prefer my shooters to feel like I'm gliding. Like Scout in TF2.

Raban · « **Reply #41 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:38:25 AM »

you can tell how a game feels by looking at it?

Himu · « **Reply #42 on:** June 22, 2013, 12:41:34 AM »

Quote from: Raban on June 22, 2013, 12:38:25 AM

you can tell how a game feels by looking at it?

Yes.

For reference:

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #43 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:01:00 AM »

My personal fear is that it has that sliding feel I hate in most of the source engines games I've played. I hate that. It always feels weird to me.

I'm hoping that's not an engine thing.

pilonv1 · « **Reply #44 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:06:46 AM »

Quote from: Oscar the Grouch on June 22, 2013, 12:40:20 AM

god are we going to have to hear about this for the next six months?

all this positive buzz is firing up my trolling engines, hardcore

More than six months, it's not due until 2014

Raban · « **Reply #45 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:16:33 AM »

I'm just really excited for this game, y'all. And if you (by which I mean anyone) aren't, why even post in this thread? You don't see me strollin' into a game's official thread only to spend multiple posts tearing it down. I just wanna circlejerk with some FPSbros :'( Nothing about this game seems suspect to me, it all adds up to "no-brainer guaranteed fun". The talent behind MW1 + EA's money + Source engine + jetpacks + robots, if all of that isn't enough to set this game apart from the sea of shooters out there, then maybe just ignore this thread?

Quote from: Oscar the Grouch on June 22, 2013, 12:40:20 AM

god are we going to have to hear about this for the next six months?

all this positive buzz is firing up my trolling engines, hardcore

Gonna give the shilling a rest now, I'm as tired of it as you probably are. The new issue of Game Informer was just the infodump I needed to sedate myself until the next press release.

Himu · « **Reply #46 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:30:02 AM »

What? No one is strolling and trolling in this thread. We are discussing the game. That is what forums are for. It just happens that fps is my least favorite genre and this game got the IGN game of the show award. I don't see why people shouldn't be able to discuss their complete apathy towards one of gamings current saving graces.

Raban · « **Reply #47 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:35:35 AM »

I didn't accuse anyone of trolling, re-read my post.

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #48 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:36:08 AM »

meh. who gives a shit either way. It's pretty clear on the board who tends to gravitate towards mp shooters and who doesn't. It's no big deal to have interest or no interest in one. Drew was annoying in that other thread because he wanted to console troll in a thread about a game. But expressing interest or lack of interest in a game thread is fine. As long as people don't turn things in vendettas.

Battlefield 4 and Titanfall were far and away the most exciting games of E3 to me but then I'm a pretty big shooter fan.

Himu · « **Reply #49 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:38:54 AM »

It's not that I don't like shooters, I'm just really picky about them. It takes a lot for me to like an mp fps. If movement in the game were about 50% faster I'd probably like it.

Raban · « **Reply #50 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:39:52 AM »

Quote from: Formerly Known As Himuro on June 22, 2013, 01:38:54 AM

It's not that I don't like shooters, I'm just really picky about them. It takes a lot for me to like an mp fps.

same here, but I guess where we differ is that I find this game incredibly appealing. Was there any FPS you felt hype for outta E3?

Himu · « **Reply #51 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:40:52 AM »

Destiny looks cool because you can pop in and out of people's games and it has a class system and open world.

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #52 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:41:11 AM »

Quote from: Formerly Known As Himuro on June 22, 2013, 01:38:54 AM

It's not that I don't like shooters, I'm just really picky about them. It takes a lot for me to like an mp fps.

In the same way that some people on here play most of the fighting games I tend to play most of the shooters. Only a few tend to reach an elite status in my mind but I tend to like at least some aspects of all them and its interesting to see how different devs approach fps design.

pilonv1 · « **Reply #53 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:41:52 AM »

Quote from: Formerly Known As Himuro on June 22, 2013, 01:40:52 AM

Destiny looks cool because you can pop in and out of people's games and it has a class system and open world.

Also has loot and /dance

Himu · « **Reply #54 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:42:11 AM »

Sounds like me an rpgs.

Himu · « **Reply #55 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:42:32 AM »

Quote from: pilonv1 on June 22, 2013, 01:41:52 AM

Quote from: Formerly Known As Himuro on June 22, 2013, 01:40:52 AM
Destiny looks cool because you can pop in and out of people's games and it has a class system and open world.

Also has loot and /dance

Forgot about loot. LOOT will change me.

Raban · « **Reply #56 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:46:24 AM »

Quote from: Oscar the Grouch on June 22, 2013, 01:42:15 AM

i was going to troll

i might still, depending

you should go for it, I'm genuinely interested in an Oscar-quality troll about this game

Raban · « **Reply #57 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:55:29 AM »

yeah, one of the things they say in the GI story is how their sci-fi influences are stuff like Blade Runner and District 9, as if nearly every sci-fi game isn't drawing from the exact same well

at least Destiny has a more unique look, but honestly a lot of it kinda looks like a cross between rejected Star Wars and Halo concepts

Himu · « **Reply #58 on:** June 22, 2013, 01:55:50 AM »

In any case, I like the idea of Titanfall. Guys with boosters and wall jumping is up my alley. Maybe they have a class system where you play as a super light soldier. Fuck mechs. Give me GunValkyrie in fps form.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #59 on:** June 22, 2013, 03:23:40 AM »

Quote from: Raban on June 22, 2013, 01:16:33 AM

I'm just really excited for this game, y'all. And if you (by which I mean anyone) aren't, why even post in this thread?

What is this, GAF?

News:

Author Topic: Titanfall thread of WHY ISN'T THERE A THREAD ALREADY (Read 5647 times)