Author Topic: Which next gen FPS impressed you most? Choose 3 (Read 1866 times)

Cerveza mas fina · « **on:** June 11, 2013, 03:31:21 PM »

It's a hard choice really.

Bottom of the list for me is COD.

Battlefield looks cool, but it's squad based and that kind of sucks.

Killzone 4 seems like it's a great improvement over the others with the controls, sound is amazing in the trailer. But it is Killzone so who knows if it will be good.

Destiny could be good if it's less floaty then HALO, but is it just like Borderlands or will we get some real MP too?

Titanfall is probably cod with mechs, very promising BUT lol@source engine

and it does look very very coddy. Still the trailer had oomph.

Madrun Badrun · « **Reply #1 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:32:35 PM »

Titanfall and Destiny look great. TF is multiplayer only which is a downside to me though.

headwalk · « **Reply #2 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:34:24 PM »

An Error Has Occurred!

You didn't select a vote option.

Cerveza mas fina · « **Reply #3 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:34:42 PM »

I think there will be SP in titanfall?

They said it would have *moments*

treythemovie · « **Reply #4 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:36:31 PM »

Destiny has looked awful everytime its been shown but I remain cautiously optimistic that it'll actually be fun to play. Doesn't seem like the kinda game to trailer well at all.

Stoney Mason · « **Reply #5 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:37:06 PM »

Titanfall and Battlefield.

Destiny could be interesting.

Killzone has never really interested me and now it no longer has the graphic edge it had last gen so meh.

COD Ghosts is the real low point for that franchise.

Rufus · « **Reply #6 on:** June 11, 2013, 03:42:57 PM »

Titanfall looks fun. High mobility + Mechs.

Destiny could be cool, it certainy looks neat, but I'm not a Halo fan, so if it feels a lot like that then eh.

Battlefield 4 is Battlefield 3+ and I've played a good amount of that, but eventually tired of it. I'd rather play this over CoDog or Killzone 4, though.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #7 on:** June 11, 2013, 04:10:41 PM »

Killzone looks amazing, but they have to show something more interesting than that E3 trailer thingy to get me psyched about a KZ game. Titanfall, lol. Looked like shit, almost as shitty as shit-COD. Destiny will probably be neat.

So meh. I want either another Bulletstorm or that Rainbow Six game that will never surface.

Cerveza mas fina · « **Reply #8 on:** June 11, 2013, 04:16:40 PM »

Could anyone confirm that Destiny will have normal deathmatch and such?

iconoclast · « **Reply #9 on:** June 11, 2013, 05:17:27 PM »

I don't like the Call of Duty formula much, but I'll probably play Titan Fall because it looks like it adds some fun new gimmicks. I'll also play Destiny if my friends get it, otherwise I don't really care. At least it looks better than Borederlands.

Purple Filth · « **Reply #10 on:** June 11, 2013, 05:30:44 PM »

Killzone: I just can't hate the game

Destiny: Looked cool and i like Bungie
Titanfall: While the COD looking stuff is really off-putting i'm digging the mech stuff and that relationship with the character.

tiesto · « **Reply #11 on:** June 11, 2013, 06:14:14 PM »

Where's the choice for Mirror's Edge 2? That's technically an FPS, right?

Bebpo · « **Reply #12 on:** June 11, 2013, 06:23:52 PM »

Whichever one has a good single player campaign.

spoiler (click to show/hide)

So realistically, none of them.

[close]

Raban · « **Reply #13 on:** June 11, 2013, 06:27:06 PM »

y'all already know my answer

Titanfall

dying to get my hands on that Game Informer

Hitler Stole My Potato · « **Reply #14 on:** June 11, 2013, 06:28:25 PM »

Destiny looked fucking awesome, surprisingly. Just seems to be the most interesting out of the bunch.

Battlefield 4 was very pretty to look at, I'll give it that.

Huff · « **Reply #15 on:** June 11, 2013, 06:41:43 PM »

both titan and destiny are multiplayer only right? that kinda sucks

Beezy · « **Reply #16 on:** June 11, 2013, 06:56:30 PM »

Eh. Single player has only been a been a brief distraction in fps games for the past couple of years anyway.

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #17 on:** June 11, 2013, 07:06:49 PM »

Destiny

Titanfall

Battlefield 4

Human Snorenado · « **Reply #18 on:** June 11, 2013, 07:10:04 PM »

Which one had THE FAT LEWTZ

Destiny, bros. Destiny.

Beezy · « **Reply #19 on:** June 11, 2013, 07:22:21 PM »

fastpaced + mechas > lewt

spoiler (click to show/hide)

I'm getting both anyway

[close]

Himu · « **Reply #20 on:** June 11, 2013, 07:24:40 PM »

I'm leaning on Destiny, but maybe get Titanfall for pc.

naff · « **Reply #21 on:** June 11, 2013, 07:24:46 PM »

I'll try Respawns thing on PC. Did you check out Natural Selection 2 Raban? Haven't played it for a while but I really enjoyed it for a month or so it's full of mechs, aliens, jetpacks and wall running. No doubt it's more janky and obtuse than Titan Fall will be, but great once you get the hang of it. This definitely feels more in that vein of strategic shooter VS the pure arena shooters of yore.

Destiny looked really good, a lot like halo; run through corridors taking out a few dudes, jump into an open area DROPSHIP, firefight event. I like mashing up multi and single player elements, though I'd certainly want heavy PvP elements in a Bungie game. Would be disappointed if it's all just broderlands style grindan fo guns, though the enemies didn't seem like bullet sponges so a big +1 for Destiny there.

There was nothing else of interest

Raban · « **Reply #22 on:** June 11, 2013, 07:32:53 PM »

I've been curious about Natural Selection for a while, but I'm scared of the RTS elements. I'm awful at that genre, and I'm not sure how it'd help me enjoy a shooter.

naff · « **Reply #23 on:** June 11, 2013, 08:10:32 PM »

That's the catch with that game. Though you don't ever have to be a commander, but once you learn it's good to be able to jump in for a round every now and again. It makes for really vocal games too and mostly (at least in most games I played) people actually get into the strategy and discuss what's going on with only the occassional asshole shitting things up

Raban · « **Reply #24 on:** June 11, 2013, 08:20:00 PM »

have you joined The Bore's steam group? When it goes on sale next I might pick it up. We could play together!

naff · « **Reply #25 on:** June 11, 2013, 08:27:24 PM »

Yah - quietID.

Rahxephon91 · « **Reply #26 on:** June 11, 2013, 08:47:28 PM »

It's really all about Battlefield and well at 60fps now, I'm not sure why CoD still exists.

But Titanfall looked cool because of the mechs.

And, Destiny has great art design and a mmo-ish Boarderlands sounds cool. I can deal with Halo-esqe gameplay, have so for like 5 games nows.

Raban · « **Reply #27 on:** June 11, 2013, 09:38:39 PM »

Quote from: Butt Seriously on June 11, 2013, 08:27:24 PM

Yah - quietID.

oh I didn't know that was you

name changes!

mjemirzian · « **Reply #28 on:** June 11, 2013, 09:59:47 PM »

BF4 looked great. Titanfall looks like a cool mixup of Tribes, CoD, and Mechwarrior.

If I can't play a shooter on mouse/kb I pretty much write it off.. sorry Destiny and Killzone.

Vizzys · « **Reply #29 on:** June 11, 2013, 10:27:45 PM »

destiny - its bungie and theyve been working on it forever, I have high hopes
titanfall - jetpacks and mechs also it runs on source so i could (however unlikely sdk access) make maps for it? thatd be cool
battflefield 4 - looks like what bf3 should have been, kinda lazy in that regard

Cerveza mas fina · « **Reply #30 on:** June 12, 2013, 01:34:18 PM »

I just watched 1080p 60fps version of Titanfall gameplay, it looks really bad. I mean it looks current gen :/

Hype -50%

News:

Poll

So, you can choose 3 so we have a ranking.

Author Topic: Which next gen FPS impressed you most? Choose 3 (Read 1866 times)