Author Topic: Phoenix Dark's platform for America (Read 2991 times)

Phoenix Dark · « **on:** January 18, 2007, 06:30:13 PM »

Since some people think I'm a far right conservative in the closet I figured I'd make this thread. Ask me about my political stances

Note: I'm somewhat conservative on social issues lolz

Cheebs · « **Reply #1 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:31:14 PM »

Abortion
Evolution
Gay Marriage

Go.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #2 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:31:36 PM »

Is it true that you whack it to dudes?

Cheebs · « **Reply #3 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:32:00 PM »

GLOBAL WARMING that one too

And the troop surge in Iraq and the other side wanting to pull out

ANALYZE BOTH SIDES OF THIS

TVC15 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:35:26 PM »

Quote from: Willco on January 18, 2007, 06:31:36 PM

Is it true that you whack it to dudes?

Yes, I can forward you the pornography he sent me. You will be, well, NOT SHOCKED at how prominently giant black cocks are featured whereas hot naked women are kinda, well, not so prominent.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #5 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:36:21 PM »

Not shocked is a good way to describe it.

Cheebs · « **Reply #6 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:38:36 PM »

He ran away from his own thread and wont admit these views

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #7 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:39:37 PM »

I had heard PD uses the thumb rule to block out the chick in the pic, when its supposed to be used on the dudes cock :tsc . Come on PD

Quote from: Cheebs on January 18, 2007, 06:38:36 PM

He ran away from his own thread and wont admit these views

That or hes typing out one of the longest responses that will ever grace Evilbore.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #8 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:46:23 PM »

Quote from: Cheebs on January 18, 2007, 06:31:14 PM

Abortion
Evolution
Gay Marriage

Go.

Abortion:

I support abortion, but I would like to see a pluto on partial birth abortions unless the mother's life is in danger (which is rare) and late late trimester abortions.

Evolution:

I don't support evolution but I fully understand why it is taught in schools and I have no problem with that. It's up to students to make up their minds about it, not me

Gay Marriage:

I feel homosexuals should get equal treatment under the law with respect to marriage.

Global Warming:

There's no denying global warming but I question those who propogate the idea that man's negative influence on it is extremely critical. That being said I do support more research into the issue so we can all confirm what's going on, and find ways to change.

Troops:

After we defeated Iraq's "army" most generals agreed that we didn't have enough troops to secure the country. We paid for that mistake. Today Bush wants to send more troops to do what should have been done 3 years ago. Wil this work? Honestly I don't know. If I had to vote on this I'd vote against a troop increase at this time.

At the same time I do not feel we should pull out of Iraq as soon as possible. We attacked Iraq, killed many of its people, and have left the country in shambles in many ways. It would be against my morals to merely leave that country to rot in its current state. We may not be able to "win" this war, but there are things we can do. We can get Iraq's water supplies running throughout the country. We can fix the power problems that plauge Baghdad and much of the country. We can continue to build schools there that will be filled with boys and girls. I do not believe for a second that we cannot do these things before we leave. This plan could still be put into effect now and meet the 6 month deadline some are calling for with respect to troop withdrawl.

Cheebs · « **Reply #9 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:54:07 PM »

Ignore that 2000 McCain ever existed. If 2006 McCain showed up at your FRAT HOUSE would you wouldn't you want to punch him in the face

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #10 on:** January 18, 2007, 06:56:00 PM »

Quote from: Cheebs on January 18, 2007, 06:54:07 PM

Ignore that 2000 McCain ever existed. If 2006 McCain showed up at your FRAT HOUSE would you wouldn't you want to punch him in the face

I would watch 24 with him instead. If you showed up I'd probably punch you in the face

Yeti · « **Reply #11 on:** January 19, 2007, 02:55:59 AM »

topics not yet covered:

-immigration
-guns/gun laws
-death penalty

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #12 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:08:06 AM »

Quote from: Yeti on January 19, 2007, 02:55:59 AM

topics not yet covered:

-immigration
-guns/gun laws
-death penalty

Immigration:

I'm very...hardline on immigration. I want to see tougher border security and fines for businesses that are caught taking advantage of illegal aliens. It's not just about the economics of the issue: it's about security as well. The prudent thing for our country to do would be to get rid of any possible area we could be attacked at. Many Democrats have complained about Bush's lax interest in port security and plane cargo checks, but they seem to act like the border is some sacred topic that needs to be handled with political correctness. When protecting this country we shouldn't be worried about what is politically correct: we should worry about what's the best (and legal) way to protect citizens

Gun Laws:

Although the meaning of the second amendment is debatable, I don't want to take people's gun rights away. But at the same time, there's no reason why someone should have an assault rifle or machine gun. I would like to renew the ban on automatic weapons.

Death Penalty:

I'm against capitol punishment. I don't think mankind is qualified to enact capitol punishment; it should be left to an all knowing being, and considering no man is all knowing I wouldn't risk the execution of one innocent person.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #13 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:11:13 AM »

What's wrong with assault rifles or machine guns? It's not like there's a problem if you give the person a background check.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #14 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:15:02 AM »

Why would someone need a machine gun?

demi · « **Reply #15 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:17:56 AM »

As a known racist, do you find my stance on african americans frivolous or within reason?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #16 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:20:06 AM »

Quote from: demi on January 19, 2007, 03:17:56 AM

As a known racist, do you find my stance on african americans frivolous or within reason?

I hate AIDS and violence too and no one calls me racist

brawndolicious · « **Reply #17 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:20:34 AM »

They wouldn't. It's for hobbies. If a peson wants to kill somebody, they go to a gunshow and buy one without any credit card or background check and throw the gun away when they're done. Only about 15% of guns used by criminals are bought in retail stores.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #18 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:26:03 AM »

What hobbies demand the purchase or a machine gun?

brawndolicious · « **Reply #19 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:29:52 AM »

Doesn't matter, they can have that freedom and it won't make a big difference since most guns used to kill people are small and concealable. If you want to disarm murderers, you make it not allowed for people to sell guns without a license and without giving background checks.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #20 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:31:31 AM »

That's a very good idea in fact

brawndolicious · « **Reply #21 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:38:16 AM »

and you didn't know it!

pwned

Murderers should be killed though. Would you rather somebody be wrongly killed or raped up the ass for the rest of their life?

TVC15 · « **Reply #22 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:47:20 AM »

Quote from: am nintenho on January 19, 2007, 03:38:16 AM

and you didn't know it!

pwned

Murderers should be killed though. Would you rather somebody be wrongly killed or raped up the ass for the rest of their life?

Wrong. It is never right to take a human life, even if it is when killing a murderer. Fuck, ESPECIALLY when killing a murderer.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #23 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:52:59 AM »

Quote from: TVC 15 on January 19, 2007, 03:47:20 AM

Wrong. It is never right to take a human life, even if it is when killing a murderer. Fuck, ESPECIALLY when killing a murderer.

But there's no reason to do that other then give a bulletin point for that we kept really low sack of shit alive.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #24 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:53:26 AM »

Quote from: TVC 15 on January 19, 2007, 03:47:20 AM

Quote from: am nintenho on January 19, 2007, 03:38:16 AM
and you didn't know it!

pwned

Murderers should be killed though. Would you rather somebody be wrongly killed or raped up the ass for the rest of their life?

Wrong. It is never right to take a human life, even if it is when killing a murderer. Fuck, ESPECIALLY when killing a murderer.

I agree. It's not a good practice. And Nintenho do you realize how much tax money is wasted on these idiots waiting 15-30 years on death row?

brawndolicious · « **Reply #25 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:55:47 AM »

It would be more expensive to support them for the rest of their life.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #26 on:** January 19, 2007, 04:02:20 AM »

Actually, that's not true which I know doesn't make sense.

My dad has his own dental practice but he also works as a head dentist for one of state of Michigan's (state government) mental facilities/prisons. Basically when someone is on death row they're moved to a more maximum security prison area that costs a shit ton to operate. These guys stay there for at least a decade in many cases

brawndolicious · « **Reply #27 on:** January 19, 2007, 04:09:46 AM »

My issue is with letting people who won't want to rehabilitate themselves immediately after commiting the crime (i.e: confessing and not going to trial) live the rest of their lives just in a concrete room. If you want to reduce the amount of unnecessary lives being ruined then get rid of the three strikes law, THAT is a load of bullshit that self-righteous shitfuckers say helps something and ends up making most of the people in maximum security prisons serving long terms in there for non-violent crimes.

Cheebs · « **Reply #28 on:** January 19, 2007, 08:50:16 AM »

I do feel assault rifle and machine guns should be plutoed. What warrants needing dangerous weapons? The same logic for "hobbies" can be used to say I want a rocket launcher. Or that I want to collect nuclear bombs for a hobby.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #29 on:** January 19, 2007, 10:40:03 AM »

Exactly. "Bearing arms" is a very broad criteria, but it must be ironed out in order to protect people. The vast majority of second amendment activists are hunters, and generally seem to be good people; there's certainly nothing wrong with hunting. But not one hunter needs a machine gun to hunt in this country. Or an assault rifle.

Cheebs · « **Reply #30 on:** January 19, 2007, 11:54:25 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on January 19, 2007, 10:40:03 AM

Exactly. "Bearing arms" is a very broad criteria, but it must be ironed out in order to protect people. The vast majority of second amendment activists are hunters, and generally seem to be good people; there's certainly nothing wrong with hunting. But not one hunter needs a machine gun to hunt in this country. Or an assault rifle.

Agreed. To bear arms one does not need a machine gun, it makes no sense. I highly doubt the founding fathers created this for people to collect dangerous weapons for the hell of it.

Hunting/protecting your family/etc is fine, but there is no reason you need a machine gun for that

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #31 on:** January 19, 2007, 12:20:38 PM »

The second amendment refers to the upkeep of a militia in case of foreign invasion. Today there is need for a militia, but I don't know if that could be used to go against the constitution. I don't think the founding fathers would ever consider taking people's guns away, and I don't want to either.

If guns are your hobby fine. If hunting is your hobby fine. But just as you don't need a grenade launcher for both, you don't need a machine gun either

Cheebs · « **Reply #32 on:** January 19, 2007, 12:23:28 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on January 19, 2007, 12:20:38 PM

But just as you don't need a grenade launcher for both, you don't need a machine gun either

Anyone who argues against that view is insane

brawndolicious · « **Reply #33 on:** January 19, 2007, 03:47:30 PM »

Well you said you wouldn't take people's guns away and machine guns are legal. There's a big difference between using bullets and high explosives.

Yeti · « **Reply #34 on:** January 19, 2007, 04:12:24 PM »

okay, another hot topic, assissted suicide.

Cheebs · « **Reply #35 on:** January 19, 2007, 05:14:34 PM »

Quote from: am nintenho on January 19, 2007, 03:47:30 PM

Well you said you wouldn't take people's guns away and machine guns are legal. There's a big difference between using bullets and high explosives.

you can have guns, guns for hunting and "protecting" your family and the like. You do not need machine guns for that. Name something useful that you need a machine gun for that a more "accepted" gun can't achieve.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #36 on:** January 19, 2007, 05:40:02 PM »

It's not a factor, criminals prefer handguns to automatics. I really don't see what saying "automatics are teh dangerous" is going to mean.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #37 on:** January 19, 2007, 10:53:43 PM »

Quote from: am nintenho on January 19, 2007, 05:40:02 PM

It's not a factor, criminals prefer handguns to automatics. I really don't see what saying "automatics are teh dangerous" is going to mean.

How about the fact that when Clinton signed the automatic weapon ban violent crime sharply decreased? Obviously that wasn't the only factor in crime falling (freakonomics is interesting) but there wasn't one police chief in this country who disagreed with the bill. Of course Dubya didn't renew it last year

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #38 on:** January 19, 2007, 11:03:44 PM »

Do you think ID should be included in science textbooks?

Yeti · « **Reply #39 on:** January 20, 2007, 12:01:44 AM »

*ahem* I asked about assissted suicide *ahem*

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #40 on:** January 20, 2007, 12:07:50 AM »

Quote from: malek4980 on January 19, 2007, 11:03:44 PM

Do you think ID should be included in science textbooks?

No. I would leave that up to the parents as well as the student to explore in the comfort of their own home or church.

Assisted Suicide: I have no problem with it, but if I was a politician I'd never admit that. If someone is on the verge of death and asks you to pull the plug, you should be able to without fear of murder charges.

etiolate · « **Reply #41 on:** January 20, 2007, 03:38:00 AM »

I couldn't vote for you PD! Sorry.

TVC15 · « **Reply #42 on:** January 20, 2007, 03:57:58 AM »

PD, what is your stance on gigantic black dicks?

Cheebs · « **Reply #43 on:** January 20, 2007, 08:25:34 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on January 20, 2007, 12:07:50 AM

Quote from: malek4980 on January 19, 2007, 11:03:44 PM
Do you think ID should be included in science textbooks?

No. I would leave that up to the parents as well as the student to explore in the comfort of their own home or church.

Assisted Suicide: I have no problem with it, but if I was a politician I'd never admit that. If someone is on the verge of death and asks you to pull the plug, you should be able to without fear of murder charges.

wtf both are my stances exactly.

Human Snorenado · « **Reply #44 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:05:00 AM »

Obviously, your platform for America is inferior to mine. We have ice cream every Tuesday in my America. Soft serve. I saw no mention of ice cream here. Failure total.

News:

Author Topic: Phoenix Dark's platform for America (Read 2991 times)