A few things jumped out at me when I read that article:
1) Those speaking FOR Gamergate are successful people who are taken seriously in their chosen fields. This stands in stark contrast to the jobless, Patreon-begging failures who are only peripherally connected to the industries they claim to be a part of(i.e., Wu calling himself a "game designer") who are speaking AGAINST Gamergate.
2) The arguments presented FOR Gamergate in the article are coherent and make good sense. Compare this to the hysterical, inconsistent rhetoric from distinguished mentally-challenged SJWs.
3) The worst looking chick shown in that article still looks better and more feminine than the crazy, slovenly sows with multicolored unwashed hair (not to mention the freakish, unnerving cheeseburgers) that represent the SJWs.