Author Topic: Call of Duty: WWII  (Read 3970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Call of Duty: WWII
« on: March 28, 2017, 01:37:14 PM »


Quote
Eurogamer has since verified this does indeed relate to this year's game.

After declining sales of the series came to a head last year with the widely-disliked Infinite Warfare, Activision suits recently reassured investors that COD would head "back to its roots".

Sledgehammer Games co-founder Michael Condrey has also previously expressed interest in making a World War 2-set game - three years ago, in late 2014. Call of Duty games are on a three-year development cycle, shared between Activision's three COD studios (Sledgehammer, Infinity Ward and Treyarch).

"A next generation game with the latest production values and robustness in a World War 2 setting like Band of Brothers would be amazing," Condrey said.

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2017, 02:10:10 PM »
 :larry

Make Killing Nazis Fun Again

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Secret Service pls.  :doge
[close]
©ZH

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2017, 02:13:16 PM »
Interested since it's Sledgehammer and I liked Advanced Warfare MP.
ど助平

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2017, 03:46:52 PM »
Sledge Hammer the best team doing it now but still expect a ton of expensive dlc and a loot system.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2017, 04:01:48 PM »
Heart-wrenching and harrowing tale about sacrifice and character bonds among a group of men during the most important moment in modern history in the single player. :usacry

Neon camouflage painted weapons, pot leaf dog tags and crotch chop taunts acquired from loot supply drops in the multiplayer. :lawd

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2017, 04:06:30 PM »
that said, the setting alone is really going to take a sledgehammer* to the weapon and scorestreak unlocks, i can't imagine them fitting in 15 different SMG unlocks this time especially if the game goes back to being U.S.-Germany-centric which would drop out all the Commonwealth and Soviet weapons they used to pad things out back in the day

edit: actually the scorestreak and perk situation would be the one thing i'd most look forward to about multiplayer, they've never really had a chance to go back to 1940s technology and deal with everything those have done to the series, WaW (understandably given the dev cycle) basically just renamed/reskinned MW's which were incredibly simplistic to what we've been running around with the last decade since, even the first Blops only started to scratch the surface of that and was still cold war era tech which is a leap

*:teehee
« Last Edit: March 28, 2017, 04:11:28 PM by benjipwns »

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2017, 04:17:12 PM »
Literally calling it COD:WWII is so fucking dumb. It's such an assumption that people are too stupid to catch on that this isn't a modern or space shooter that they have to just slap the most generic title card on it.

nat

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2017, 04:27:38 PM »
I offer these free of charge to Sledgehammer and Activision for naming any future Call of Duty's:

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2017, 05:38:57 PM »
A WW2 setting is so boring.

Let's Cyber

  • Banned (duration pending)
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2017, 06:22:06 PM »
I have enough warm and fuzzy nostalgia for the first Call of Duty that I might be interested in this when it drops to $20 at some point in 2018.

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2017, 08:44:11 PM »
Man, there aren't nearly enough WWII FPS on the market!  :doge
^_^

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2017, 08:52:23 PM »
Right now? There actually aren't any that I can think of besides Heroes & Generals (F2P Battlefield-like) and Day of Defeat (ancient Half-Life, then Source mod). I guess World of Tanks counts as a WW2 shooter, but it's not an FPS.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2017, 09:47:03 PM »
Sledgehammer makes a decent campaign so it will probably be fine in that regard but the multiplayer will be the same declining returns its been for years. 

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2017, 10:19:24 PM »
Sledgehammer makes a decent campaign so it will probably be fine in that regard but the multiplayer will be the same declining returns its been for years.

And that's where I check out. The multiplayer won't reign itself in at all and will just disappoint me if I buy it. So I won't.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #14 on: March 28, 2017, 11:50:48 PM »
Right now? There actually aren't any that I can think of besides Heroes & Generals (F2P Battlefield-like) and Day of Defeat (ancient Half-Life, then Source mod). I guess World of Tanks counts as a WW2 shooter, but it's not an FPS.
Day of Infamy from the Insurgency guys just came out last week. And the Sniper Elite games are all set during WWII. Rising Storm/Red Orchestra 2 recently got a new approved mod (ala Mare Nostrum) for it.

But, yeah, in no way like it once was with seemingly EA and Activision and Ubisoft all putting out a new one every year. Along with all the smaller titles.

And Day of Defeat and Day of Defeat: Source aren't mods and haven't been for a long time, they're standalone superior to Counter-Strike games that don't require Half-Life. :ufup

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2017, 11:58:34 PM »
Right now? There actually aren't any that I can think of besides Heroes & Generals (F2P Battlefield-like) and Day of Defeat (ancient Half-Life, then Source mod). I guess World of Tanks counts as a WW2 shooter, but it's not an FPS.
Day of Infamy from the Insurgency guys just came out last week. And the Sniper Elite games are all set during WWII. Rising Storm/Red Orchestra 2 recently got a new approved mod (ala Mare Nostrum) for it.
I should have thought of both Sniper Elite and Red Orchestra, but Day of Infamy completely eluded me. Huh.

And Day of Defeat and Day of Defeat: Source aren't mods and haven't been for a long time, they're standalone superior to Counter-Strike games that don't require Half-Life. :ufup
Alright, alright. It was kind of pointless of me to bring them up since they're relics. Though I'm sure you can still find well populated servers for DoD: Source.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #16 on: March 29, 2017, 12:10:23 AM »
RELICS

I NEVER

Quote from: top steam review for DoD:S
Don't bother buying this game in 2017. It's been dead for years. What remains are about 8 servers with "videogame is srs bsns" roleplay nerds
Quote from: top steam review for DoD
the only people still playing this game are angry dads
So nothings changed in ten years.

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #17 on: March 29, 2017, 02:57:33 AM »
I liked the future and modern settings because it allows them limitless imagination to create settings, set-species, and wars.

A WW2 setting is'nt going to allow for Remember the Burger Town, Running through Space Lazered San Francisco, Sabotaging giant capitol ship boosters, fighting through future Dubai, and what not. WWII may not be a tired setting right now, but it's something we've still seen a lot of.

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2017, 10:53:54 AM »
Maybe we need War on Coal

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2017, 10:57:03 AM »
I'll buy this.  I don't think there's been a large budget WWII shooter in a while.
püp

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2017, 11:43:39 AM »
ww2 is only cool if there's nazi occult monsters around
pcp

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #21 on: March 29, 2017, 05:14:18 PM »
ww2 is only cool if there's nazi occult monsters around

New Wolfenstein when?
dog

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #22 on: March 29, 2017, 08:01:07 PM »
ww2 is only cool if there's nazi occult monsters around

New Wolfenstein when?

probably 2018, they started teasing it last year iirc

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #23 on: March 31, 2017, 10:59:29 AM »
Quote from: top steam review for DoD
the only people still playing this game are angry dads


I'm not angry. Pwnin' n00bz never gets old.  :doge
©ZH

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Call of Duty: WWII
« Reply #24 on: March 31, 2017, 05:39:55 PM »
Use the PIAT!