christ i hope some scientist manages to resurrect a stegosaur so it fucks you to death
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No lie, a Gunnotine would be interesting to see. If only because of the mass casualties from the blade going through one person to another before hitting walls.
you've got it all wrong, it's a tall wooden construction that drops guns onto the necks of people
Hundreds...
This is going to look really great in 2 weeks when like 200 million people are dead
Quote from: thisismyusername on May 20, 2020, 12:31:20 AMNo lie, a Gunnotine would be interesting to see. If only because of the mass casualties from the blade going through one person to another before hitting walls. you've got it all wrong, it's a tall wooden construction that drops guns onto the necks of people
Or Jeb!
Quote from: Atramental on May 20, 2020, 12:16:09 AMI’m buying an AR15 pretty soon.Enough is enough.is no one going to comment on this?
I’m buying an AR15 pretty soon.Enough is enough.
Quote from: hhkcvaoitsso on May 20, 2020, 01:43:50 AMQuote from: Atramental on May 20, 2020, 12:16:09 AMI’m buying an AR15 pretty soon.Enough is enough.is no one going to comment on this? fbi is going to have a field day reading this forum for mass shooter motivations
I don't think violent protest provides the same easy dopamine fix as shaming/dunking on people on twitter does.
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)yeah revolution
C'mon man you know we have a rule about keeping garbage in the garbage thread
I'd say the odds of an organic violent social upheaval that carpets American cities red with blood are so low it's not worth buying a gun for.
things I've ever learned was that the adoption of surnames was for the purposes of taxation
And what percentage of the population had adopted surnames for that purpose before the administrative state?
I found it... came from James Scott's Seeing Like a State
Stanford University political scientist David Laitin described it as "a magisterial book." But he said there were flaws in the methodology of the book, saying the book "is a product of undisciplined history. For one, Scott’s evidence is selective and eclectic, with only minimal attempts to weigh disconfirming evidence... It is all too easy to select confirming evidence if the author can choose from the entire historical record and use material from all countries of the world
magisterial, huh... guess that means it's right
Just to get this thread back on track, I absolutely believe we are not talking nearly enough about atra giving us advance notice that he's going to blow something up