Pretty pointless conference, since it had 3 games to show, all of which they had already announced, plus a CGI for Far Cry 6.
Watch Dogs Legion and AC:V look how you'd expect, i'm liking them, but with the reservations i already had.
I think Valhalla i'll enjoy more than Ghost of Tsushima (which for some reason gets a pass as an open world collectathon
) but i still think the setting is looking a bit bland, and those character models look worse than Odyssey.
Legion looks like it's taking a page from Hitman, and it's an interesting twist that's better than trying to be B-team GTA like all these games try to be.
Far Cry 6 not even worth commenting, since they didn't show anything, and i hate the "makes shift weapons" aesthetic.
As usual people trip over themselves to point out how bad Ubisoft is, but some comments i find hilarious, like "where is Skull & Bones?!", you mean the game everybody shat on for being a shitty spi-off form an unfun AC secondary mechanic? It's like people crying about Scalebound, when every showing of the game, it was shat on for looking like a turd of a game.
Same with people crying about AC number 18069, and then wanting another Rayman 2D platformer or Prince of Persia, truly fresh ideas.
I wasn't expecting a new Splinter Cell, so i'm no too bummed about it, even though i thought Blacklist was fun as shit, Chaos Theory people are a bit like Blood Money people, they'll never be happy with anything new, and always go on and on about just how perfect their rose tinted game was, ignoring all the dated aspects (like drop down menus, and characters that move like grannies).
Still, the concerns regarding a new Splinter Cell being amalgamated into the new Ubi World Order are valid and reasonable.
They seem like they really want to strike gold with every game now, and they already killed Rainbow Six (though people don't mind about that, for whatever reason).
