Author Topic: Why is Disney such shit? Cinderella III? You have to be kidding me. (Read 1755 times)

Himu · « **on:** February 09, 2007, 03:36:32 PM »

Does anyone give a shit enough to get this? Why does Disney do this bullshit? Their animated movies fucking suck now.

PhoenixWright · « **Reply #1 on:** February 09, 2007, 03:39:41 PM »

It doesn't matter if adults want it. If enough kids see it in a store and nag their parents into buying it, it'll sell. Kids will only see the Cinderella character on the front, since half the target audience probably hasn't learned to read yet anyway.

ToxicAdam · « **Reply #2 on:** February 09, 2007, 03:43:58 PM »

My wife is one of those wierdos that has to buy any Disney movie they put out. Regardless of its complete lack of charm or quality. I'm sure she is not alone.

whiteACID · « **Reply #3 on:** February 09, 2007, 03:58:38 PM »

Wait, there is a Cinderella II?

Himu · « **Reply #4 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:12:08 PM »

Yeah!

Cheebs · « **Reply #5 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:13:25 PM »

When Pixar took over they canceled all of the straight to dvd sequels of classic disney films. They made it well known when they took over Disney's animation that Cinderella III is the last one. The only reason this was not cancelled was that it was too far along.

Thank God for Pixar's take over at Disney.

Himu · « **Reply #6 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:20:47 PM »

I want a return of traditional animation god fucking dammit. Fuck this cg circle jerk. The only ones that get it right is pixar anyways.

Mondain · « **Reply #7 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:34:21 PM »

those fucking animated features with talking 3D animals doing silly things will never end, that's MUCH worse than obscure direct to video sequels

it's a novelty that got old like ten years ago

Himu · « **Reply #8 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:37:37 PM »

Quote from: Mondain on February 09, 2007, 04:34:21 PM

those fucking animated features with talking 3D animals doing silly things will never end, that's MUCH worse than obscure direct to video sequels

Finally we agree on something.

Vizzys · « **Reply #9 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:45:27 PM »

The future is blended 3d

Tauntaun · « **Reply #10 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:48:48 PM »

Pixar should do a mature film and their first project should be a miniseries from the manga Blame!

I would so saf on that.

Fresh Prince · « **Reply #11 on:** February 09, 2007, 04:58:40 PM »

Sadly 2D is now the domain of anime and quirky shorts.

BlueTsunami · « **Reply #12 on:** February 09, 2007, 06:59:15 PM »

What I gauged from the commercial. It seems like the plot is around the event when Cinderella meets the Prince being changed because one of her wicked step sisters uses the witches wand for time travel.

xnikki118x · « **Reply #13 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:05:53 AM »

I hate when they make sequels that don't really set up for a sequel to begin with. Example: Cinderella II, Little Mermaid II, Fox and the Hound II.

Catz · « **Reply #14 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:39:35 AM »

Quote from: BlueTsunami on February 09, 2007, 06:59:15 PM

What I gauged from the commercial. It seems like the plot is around the event when Cinderella meets the Prince being changed because one of her wicked step sisters uses the witches wand for time travel.

Cinderella and the Prince are destined to be together, but have you ever wondered what would have happened if the glass slipper that was left behind after the royal ball fit someone other than Cinderella? Cinderella's Stepmother and Stepsisters Anastasia and Drisella change history when Anastasia steals the Fairy Godmother's magic wand and her mother uses it to turn back time and then cast a spell on the glass slipper so that it will fit on Anastasia's foot. The Prince immediately realizes that something is amiss, but a quick zap from the magic wand convinces him that Anastasia is his rightful bride-to-be and it looks like nothing that Cinderella or her mouse friends Jaq and Gus can do will set things right. Two questions remain: what will become of Cinderella and can Anastasia ever find true happiness by marrying someone who will never love her for who she really is? This 74-minute animated tale follows the classic Cinderella and its sequel Cinderella II--Dreams Come True and features nice animation, new conflicts between familiar secondary characters like the evil cat Lucifer and mouse friends Jaq and Gus, lots of new songs, a suspenseful story line and an all new song filled orgy ending sequence sung by the cast to the tune of "Fergalicious."

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #15 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:43:53 AM »

The worst offense, by far, was BAMBI II.

I'd really love Pixar to tackle something like Courage the Cowardly Dog.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #16 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:45:18 AM »

Quote from: Mondain on February 09, 2007, 04:34:21 PM

those fucking animated features with talking 3D animals doing silly things will never end, that's MUCH worse than obscure direct to video sequels

it's a novelty that got old like ten years ago

Doesn't stop Pixar from doing similar shit, which their fans refuse to admit. Cars isn't any different than the big eyed bullshit animal CGI shit fests of yester year

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #17 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:46:13 AM »

What. Their track record is stellar. You make it sound like they pump out movies like Cars.

Mondain · « **Reply #18 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:47:16 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 10, 2007, 12:45:18 AM

Quote from: Mondain on February 09, 2007, 04:34:21 PM
those fucking animated features with talking 3D animals doing silly things will never end, that's MUCH worse than obscure direct to video sequels

it's a novelty that got old like ten years ago

Doesn't stop Pixar from doing similar shit, which their fans refuse to admit. Cars isn't any different than the big eyed bullshit animal CGI shit fests of yester year

yep, Pixar features blow, don't understand the big fucking cult about their stuff

only Toy Story films were decent to me, but then again it was more for the novelty of the original than for anything else

Catz · « **Reply #19 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:48:25 AM »

I dunno guys, sounds like a riveting story. Give it a chance

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #20 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:48:44 AM »

Toy Story=awesome
Incredibles=awesome
Toy Story=great
Bug's Life=ok
Monster's Inc=shit
Finding Nemo=meh
Cars=shit

The good far outweighs the bad and they're still ahead of everyone at what they do imo. But their fans need to stop with teh bullshit

Mondain · « **Reply #21 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:51:06 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 10, 2007, 12:48:44 AM

The good far outweighs the bad and they're still ahead of everyone at what they do imo. But their fans need to stop with teh bullshit

what is there to be ahead of, frankly, in this world of corny, stereotypical Hollywood BS

xnikki118x · « **Reply #22 on:** February 10, 2007, 01:41:31 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 10, 2007, 12:48:44 AM

Toy Story=awesome
Incredibles=awesome
Toy Story=great
Bug's Life=ok
Monster's Inc=shit
Finding Nemo=meh
Cars=shit

The good far outweighs the bad and they're still ahead of everyone at what they do imo. But their fans need to stop with teh bullshit

I love Finding Nemo!

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #23 on:** February 10, 2007, 01:45:04 AM »

You love a troll too. Your judgement is questionable

Fresh Prince · « **Reply #24 on:** February 10, 2007, 03:15:40 AM »

Finding Nemo and Cars are shit. Monsters Inc was good if a little bit sickly sweet.

xnikki118x · « **Reply #25 on:** February 10, 2007, 04:41:44 AM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 10, 2007, 01:45:04 AM

You love a troll too. Your judgement is questionable

Cheebs · « **Reply #26 on:** February 10, 2007, 08:24:08 AM »

wtf. Monster's Inc's is FANTASTIC.

Toy Story = 10/10
A Bug's Life = 8/10
Toy Story 2 = 10/10
Monster's Inc = 9/10
Finding Nemo = 7.5/10
The Incredibles = 9.5/10
Cars = 7/10

The Sceneman · « **Reply #27 on:** February 10, 2007, 08:31:23 AM »

Quote from: Himuro on February 09, 2007, 04:20:47 PM

Fuck this cg circle jerk.

Holy shit theres a CG circle jerk? I wants in

Himu · « **Reply #28 on:** February 10, 2007, 12:25:09 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 10, 2007, 12:45:18 AM

Quote from: Mondain on February 09, 2007, 04:34:21 PM
those fucking animated features with talking 3D animals doing silly things will never end, that's MUCH worse than obscure direct to video sequels

it's a novelty that got old like ten years ago

Doesn't stop Pixar from doing similar shit, which their fans refuse to admit. Cars isn't any different than the big eyed bullshit animal CGI shit fests of yester year

I somewhat agree, but the difference between Pixar and the others is that Pixar movies are quality. The others use all these stupid pop culture references and it's lame, but Pixar knows how to tell a good story.

The Incredibles > all other cg movies

News:

Author Topic: Why is Disney such shit? Cinderella III? You have to be kidding me. (Read 1755 times)