This 'trial by internet' is madness.
0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.
Great time to tell that speech
Meh
In 1972 there were over 340,000 battle-deaths from state-based armed conflicts. In 1982, there were over 250,000, and in 1992 over 100,000. By 2002 there were less than 20,000 ― the lowest total since 1927
Quote from: duckman2000 on August 17, 2008, 10:50:02 PMQuote from: Hitler Stole My Potato on August 17, 2008, 10:41:33 PMI'm sure you would've made the most beautiful Haze thread the world has ever seen and all of the unwashed masses would've been in awe of your accomplishment.I certainly had no interest in making an official thread for that game, even if I hadn't already assumed it'd be a mediocre game. For a while, I made fairly well structured, informative Haze threads, initially because I thought the game concept sounded wicked, and later because no one else had the e-balls to make even basic informative threads about that game. Most of the time, though, was spent arguing with fatheaded morons whose brilliant contribution began and ended with "generic - why don't they look like normal soldiers - Halo killer lulz," and random dolts who claimed that I was a viral marketer, even as I was ripping into Ubisoft over the exclusivity bullshit. Bloody morons.Whatever you say now - it doesn't matter. A couple of us douchebags here will always remember you as "the Haze guy". Sucks to be you after the Haze fiasco, AA.
Quote from: Hitler Stole My Potato on August 17, 2008, 10:41:33 PMI'm sure you would've made the most beautiful Haze thread the world has ever seen and all of the unwashed masses would've been in awe of your accomplishment.I certainly had no interest in making an official thread for that game, even if I hadn't already assumed it'd be a mediocre game. For a while, I made fairly well structured, informative Haze threads, initially because I thought the game concept sounded wicked, and later because no one else had the e-balls to make even basic informative threads about that game. Most of the time, though, was spent arguing with fatheaded morons whose brilliant contribution began and ended with "generic - why don't they look like normal soldiers - Halo killer lulz," and random dolts who claimed that I was a viral marketer, even as I was ripping into Ubisoft over the exclusivity bullshit. Bloody morons.
I'm sure you would've made the most beautiful Haze thread the world has ever seen and all of the unwashed masses would've been in awe of your accomplishment.
[youtube=425,350]P_bd5RyaiRg[/youtube]?
Give me a fucking break man, goddamnit shit.Time out bitches.
Cant stop laughing.(Image removed from quote.)
Quotehttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=331211oh the moral outrage! There are people starving in africa ! QuoteBut then again, I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it due to some weird paranoia about "competition" or some such crap.the most obvious/probable is that the title of the site references GAF's owner (or i assume it does).the only other theory i can think of is that there is is that long term GAF posters are all falling quiet in the face of the hordes of quacking Gamefaq-esque spazducks and a mass evacuation may establish an outlet for ex-GAFfers which may one day grow to something that could become a decent place for gaming discussion. Basically - it could be come an early GAF. other than that, pass - don't know, don't care.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=331211
But then again, I wouldn't be surprised if they kept it due to some weird paranoia about "competition" or some such crap.
http://www.ga-forum.com/showpost.php?p=12437280&postcount=24
[youtube=425,350]OpxZwzlYMk4[/youtube]keane this is pretty awesome
(Image removed from quote.)
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=331932Here we gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
I've created something, but I'm not sure I want to be permabanned today (Image removed from quote.)
WTFhttp://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452404&postcount=433
go for it. should be some lolz
Drohne's always been against Dyack for some reason.
Quote from: demi on August 19, 2008, 02:01:44 PMDrohne's always been against Dyack for some reason.Rivals in hyperbole and flowery language.
Dyack doesn't paradigm shift. He just shoves mediocre software out the door and jack off to himself.
I have no faith in Too Human or in Silicon Knights themselves.Best case scenario is that the game will get 6s and 7s across the board.My proof is their underwhelming Game Cube efforts. Eternal Darkness was not good. It was boring and the sanity effects, although a nice touch, couldn't salvage a game so pointless as Eternal Darkness. Twin Snakes was no great shakes either.Not to forget that the game has been in development since the mid-late 1990s. I just don't buy the fact that this game will be anything good, let alone worth the excessively long wait.I'll buy it if it is good as I have nothing to gain by not playing Too Human (assuming its good). With a solid holiday lineup, Dyack can't afford to shove out some half baked effort. If this game is a flop, he should just give up making games and just become a philanthropist. He does a better job bragging about himself than he is at making games.
