Author Topic: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?  (Read 4050 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« on: August 26, 2006, 07:30:20 PM »
I found it to be entertaining, but ultimately they were shallow films :(

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2006, 07:33:28 PM »
You have some competition Phoenix Dark.

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2006, 07:34:15 PM »
You have some competition Phoenix Dark.
:lol
AMC

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2006, 07:49:00 PM »
We all know what Coppola's greatest film was:


morphix

  • Let's make a deal
  • Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2006, 08:01:02 PM »
never seen them.


I hear Godfather insists upon itself...
BUN

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2006, 08:52:21 PM »
You have some competition Phoenix Dark.

What do you mean by that :(

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2006, 09:05:54 PM »
Shallow films?
PSP

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2006, 09:06:50 PM »

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2006, 09:19:03 PM »
Shallow films?

All glamour, culture, and cool guys speaking their native tounge. Patton was more complex, etc. :(

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2006, 09:22:45 PM »
Well, to be fair, if they're based off the books, then they probably are pretty shallow.  The books got railed for that by critics.

Of course, I have never seen the movies, so I can only assume they blow.
serge

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2006, 09:25:58 PM »
The internet never ceased to amaze me. What the Christ.
AMC

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2006, 09:29:47 PM »
Well, to be fair, if they're based off the books, then they probably are pretty shallow.  The books got railed for that by critics.
Of course, I have never seen the movies, so I can only assume they blow.
Essentially it's the actors making something trashy seem like high art.

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2006, 10:18:03 PM »
You have some competition Phoenix Dark.
Argh, beaten! :lol
BKO

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2006, 10:27:38 PM »
Is Phoenix Dark regarged as simple-minded and childish? HAHAHAH HA I get that :(

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2006, 10:28:18 PM »
Is Phoenix Dark regarged as simple-minded and childish? HAHAHAH HA I get that :(
He's a gay black man with the worst taste this side of stale brocolli.
BKO

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2006, 10:33:51 PM »
Did anyone find my sad faces funny? Or does it not make sense...I guess I don't know how to convey funny :(

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2006, 10:35:00 PM »
I understood them, but they made me feel bad for you more than make me laugh  :(
BKO

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2006, 10:44:02 PM »
awww why do you heve to shay that  :(

pitohui

  • great poison god bird
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2006, 10:48:06 PM »
I love 'em, they're among my favorite movies.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2006, 11:37:46 PM »
 :lol

The OP's views are quite disturbing, and borderline blasphemy.
010

Shuri

  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2006, 12:18:22 PM »
never seen them.


I hear Godfather insists upon itself...
??? :o put down the animu dvds and buy the trilogy  :D

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #21 on: August 27, 2006, 12:42:56 PM »
??? :o put down the animu dvds and buy the trilogy Part I and Part II  :D

Fixed.
PSP

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #22 on: August 27, 2006, 12:54:46 PM »
??? :o put down the animu dvds and buy the trilogy Part I and Part II  :D

Fixed.
That's what I did.

Still haven't seen the third, though.
AMC

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #23 on: August 27, 2006, 01:34:02 PM »
The third one is not a terrible movie. It's not great either, but I certainly don't understand why people absolutely hate it.

It's setting is what really makes it worse than the other movies for me. The first Godfather's setting was mainly on the Corleone family, while the second was set around the casino. The third's Catholic church setting is rather bland, as is some of the acting (mainly Coppola's daughter). But Andy Garcia is amazing in the movie imho.

It's like a 7.5/10 movie imo. And of course Robert Duvall's absense in the movie really hurts it.
010

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #24 on: August 27, 2006, 04:24:05 PM »
It's setting is what really makes it worse than the other movies for me. The first Godfather's setting was mainly on the Corleone family, while the second was set around the casino. The third's Catholic church setting is rather bland, as is some of the acting (mainly Coppola's daughter). But Andy Garcia is amazing in the movie imho.

Yes but the third movie is based upon real events that not many people know about.  It's about the Vatican Bank and Banco Ambrosiano scandal, which altered the international funding between many international baddie organizations, from Propaganda Due to the US mafia, right?  It's also theorized that Pope John Paul I was assassinated because of the scandal (he was going to make the Vatican's bank records public, which would've shown that known mafia folks and P2 folks were using the Vatican bank to slush money into all sorts of illicit behavior).
serge

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #25 on: August 27, 2006, 04:52:56 PM »
It's setting is what really makes it worse than the other movies for me. The first Godfather's setting was mainly on the Corleone family, while the second was set around the casino. The third's Catholic church setting is rather bland, as is some of the acting (mainly Coppola's daughter). But Andy Garcia is amazing in the movie imho.

Yes but the third movie is based upon real events that not many people know about.  It's about the Vatican Bank and Banco Ambrosiano scandal, which altered the international funding between many international baddie organizations, from Propaganda Due to the US mafia, right?  It's also theorized that Pope John Paul I was assassinated because of the scandal (he was going to make the Vatican's bank records public, which would've shown that known mafia folks and P2 folks were using the Vatican bank to slush money into all sorts of illicit behavior).

All the movies are based around a real story though; but of course Hollywood and Puzo's books fictionalized a lot of things.
010

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #26 on: August 27, 2006, 09:41:27 PM »
All the movies are based around a real story though; but of course Hollywood and Puzo's books fictionalized a lot of things.

Things like the Mob being full of people who had it together and stuff. Most of the time they're loosersih and simplistic. Goodfellas was better in that respect  >:(

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #27 on: August 27, 2006, 10:15:26 PM »
Because the mob did have it together and it was like a family.  You have to remember, this film is not set today like Goodfellas.  When the Italians immigrated over here to New York, the mafiosa really looked out for their own people (as well as shook them down).  It wasn't really until the rise of the drug trade, and power hungry spoiled brats, that the mob undid itself and allowed the FBI to really crack it down.  I mean, did you see either of these two fucking movies?
PSP

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #28 on: August 27, 2006, 10:16:50 PM »
Because the mob did have it together and it was like a family.  You have to remember, this film is not set today like Goodfellas.  When the Italians immigrated over here to New York, the mafiosa really looked out for their own people (as well as shook them down).  It wasn't really until the rise of the drug trade, and power hungry spoiled brats, that the mob undid itself and allowed the FBI to really crack it down.  I mean, did you see either of these two fucking movies?

Yeah, I can really see The Sopranos as being a modern day continuation of what happened to a Godfather-esque dynasty after the drug trade infested it and rotted it from the inside.
serge

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #29 on: August 27, 2006, 10:18:20 PM »
Tony versus Michael - who would win?
PSP

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #30 on: August 27, 2006, 10:34:49 PM »
Tony versus Michael - who would win?

I'd have to say Tony, but I really don't have any good reasons.  Oh, Al Pacino generally sucks, that's why.
serge

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #31 on: August 27, 2006, 10:43:04 PM »
Because the mob did have it together and it was like a family.  You have to remember, this film is not set today like Goodfellas.  When the Italians immigrated over here to New York, the mafiosa really looked out for their own people (as well as shook them down).  It wasn't really until the rise of the drug trade, and power hungry spoiled brats, that the mob undid itself and allowed the FBI to really crack it down.  I mean, did you see either of these two fucking movies?

Yes, I have seen both of the movies. They spoke Italain while sipping expensive wines in both of of them. In the first one, they choose to make sicily into some sort of wonderland, and Little Italy in the second one. Oh, they pushed around a lot of non-wiseguys who were stupid enough to mess with  "teh family". I'm not an expert, but I don't buy "The Godfather" himself. In reality, their personal lives and careers were proabably closer to Al Capone, or the many of Latino gang leaders sitting in prison today.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #32 on: August 27, 2006, 10:49:54 PM »
Because the mob did have it together and it was like a family.  You have to remember, this film is not set today like Goodfellas.  When the Italians immigrated over here to New York, the mafiosa really looked out for their own people (as well as shook them down).  It wasn't really until the rise of the drug trade, and power hungry spoiled brats, that the mob undid itself and allowed the FBI to really crack it down.  I mean, did you see either of these two fucking movies?

Yes, I have seen both of the movies. They spoke Italain while sipping expensive wines in both of of them. In the first one, they choose to make sicily into some sort of wonderland, and Little Italy in the second one. Oh, they pushed around a lot of non-wiseguys who were stupid enough to mess with  "teh family". I'm not an expert, but I don't buy "The Godfather" himself. In reality, their personal lives and careers were proabably closer to Al Capone, or the many of Latino gang leaders sitting in prison today.

Pretty much everyone gets their hands dirty in the Godfather.  The only two people that are hands off the hard dirty things are Don Vito and Tom Hagen.

And I'm ??? about them making Sicily a wonderland.  I must've missed that part when I watched the movie last night.  Yeah, Michael runs to Italy, but Sicily is never put on a huge pedestal.  Family is, but not Sicily.
serge

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #33 on: August 27, 2006, 11:24:09 PM »
But when they get their hands dirty, they're just so cool about it and the victims never see it coming. And the Godfather, he loves all his sons, but him and Michael are super cool with some special "knowing". Actually, they were good movies, but there are scenes all of it is too much. Patton was more balanced about cinematic illusion and reality. I wouldn't even say that it was a fault. Just irks me a bit.

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #34 on: August 27, 2006, 11:24:17 PM »
I'm not an expert, but I don't buy "The Godfather" himself. In reality, their personal lives and careers were proabably closer to Al Capone, or the many of Latino gang leaders sitting in prison today.

Yeah, there's your problem.  First off, they were nothing like Al Capone, who was never an East Coast mobster.  And furthermore, Al Capone, albeit not the most sophisticated mobster in the world, was incredibly cunning and ruthless.

This is about second/third generation Italian immigrant mafiosa, and it's pretty good in that respect.  Yes, they speak Italian, most East Coast-based mafias did, because they had to communicate back and forth to Sicily.  Also, Vito Corleone is based on actual mobster, Frank Costello, who was born in Italy, carried some of the same mannerisms and whose life parallels Vito Corleone.  I think Puzo has said that he's also based on Vito Genovese (gasp - also born in Italy!), who tried to put a hit on Costello and failed, leading to his early retirement from the mafia.

Point being, the mafia was like that.  They were cunning and ruthless and nobody did see it coming, and it was until the 70s that the authorities were finally able to break the mafia down and that was mostly due to inner turmoil.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2006, 11:27:35 PM by Willco »
PSP

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #35 on: August 27, 2006, 11:27:10 PM »
And the Godfather, he loves all his sons, but him and Michael are super cool with some special "knowing".

This is no secret, Vito says himself that he always had political ambitions for Michael, hence his special treatment and the lack of derision he received not being part of the family business.  Vito had special plans for him.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2006, 11:28:55 PM by TVC 15 »
serge

dunce cap

  • Has left the building...
  • Junior Member
Re: What's everyone's take on Godfather I and II?
« Reply #36 on: August 27, 2006, 11:44:47 PM »
I'm not an expert, but I don't buy "The Godfather" himself. In reality, their personal lives and careers were proabably closer to Al Capone, or the many of Latino gang leaders sitting in prison today.

Yeah, there's your problem.  First off, they were nothing like Al Capone, who was never an East Coast mobster.  And furthermore, Al Capone, albeit not the most sophisticated mobster in the world, was incredibly cunning and ruthless.

This is about second/third generation Italian immigrant mafiosa, and it's pretty good in that respect.  Yes, they speak Italian, most East Coast-based mafias did, because they had to communicate back and forth to Sicily.  Also, Vito Corleone is based on actual mobster, Frank Costello, who was born in Italy, carried some of the same mannerisms and whose life parallels Vito Corleone.  I think Puzo has said that he's also based on Vito Genovese (gasp - also born in Italy!), who tried to put a hit on Costello and failed, leading to his early retirement from the mafia.

Point being, the mafia was like that.  They were cunning and ruthless and nobody did see it coming, and it was until the 70s that the authorities were finally able to break the mafia down and that was mostly due to inner turmoil.

Ok, I belive you since you're more read up. I was drawing parallels based documentaries about Latin gangs. :-[

Quote
Vito had special plans for him.

I was alluding to the fact the the movie presented thier elightment about gangster affairs as the ulimate truth, rather than something that saw them both as sorry, tragic characters. Not enough of that stuff.