The Supreme Court passed several 5-4 rulings, two of which directly contradict one another.
In one case, it upheld
a pro-life group is exempt from the McCain-Feingold Act (I am XYZ and I approve this message) . Chief Justice Roberts exclaimed, "We give the benefit of the doubt to speech, not censorship."
In another case, it ruled against the
Bong Hits 4 Jesus student. "'It provides no support'' for any restriction that goes to political or social issues, Alito and Kennedy added" according to the article. Apparently speech related to Jesus and drug laws is neither social nor political.
The bong hits 4 jesus kid is an 18 year old who skipped school to go to the passing of the olympic torch (public event) even though his school was going on a field trip to watch it because he couldn't bring his banner that said bong hits 4 jesus to school. He didn't do anything wrong except skip school and that's not illegal if you're over 18.