THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: demi on August 18, 2008, 12:21:26 AM

Title: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 12:21:26 AM
(http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/8725/17872491pf4.jpg)

Am I the only one buying it here? Sound off fellow Dyack cocksuckers
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 12:25:55 AM
Holla if the story is good. If the story is not good, i'm not buying.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 18, 2008, 12:34:57 AM
Nah, it's too fugly.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Grecco on August 18, 2008, 12:35:53 AM
Thought the combat was janky in the demo, and hated the skating from enemy to enemy. So yeah ill be passing. Probably will bite if it drops in price.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 12:55:17 AM
shining force neo > turd human
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: pilonv1 on August 18, 2008, 01:17:08 AM
too busy playing civ4
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Bildi on August 18, 2008, 01:28:40 AM
I'll be waiting for a price drop at least.  Maybe get it early next year if releases slow right down as usual.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Greatness Gone on August 18, 2008, 01:28:47 AM
I'm interested because I fucking love hack & slashing, dungeon crawling, and loot collecting, but the animation is horrendous. God, it looks like everyone is a fucking robot.

And I heard the story sucks enormous amounts of balls. I have no problem with a generic, well written story, but if it really sucks that much...

BTW, it's hilarious that Dennis Dywhatever is crying over GAF tearing this game apart. IF YOU SAY YOUR GAME IS ON A FUCKING SHAKESPEAREAN LEVEL OF AWESOMENESS, THEN YOU BEST DELIVER.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: trippingmartian on August 18, 2008, 03:30:54 AM
I want it because I liked ED and I'm curious to see the next original game from SK, but I'm going to wait because I probably won't feel like playing this genre of console game any time soon.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Grecco on August 18, 2008, 09:42:17 AM
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3169393

EGM Review


Uh Oh. Shoulda gotten Shane Bettenhausen on review.  :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 09:43:31 AM
I probably won't be buying this, or at least not at full price, but I do hope that it fails enough to ensure they actually go back and fix problems I saw in the combat, yet still succeed enough to have a sequel.  The idea of having a loot based game with good combat would be awesome, but Too Human had worse combat than Diablo.

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Hitler Stole My Potato on August 18, 2008, 09:48:33 AM
I'm renting just out of curiosity.

I was going to buy it but that demo.....oh man.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 09:49:54 AM
360 finally gets it Heavenly Sword, Liar, Genji 2 etc.


I think this is on the same scale as Genji 2.  Better than Lair, worse than Heavenly Sword.  Anything is better than Lair.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Greatness Gone on August 18, 2008, 09:54:21 AM
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3169393

EGM Review
This game won't even be worth renting or even buying at the price of $10 dollars after the price drop in three months. Sounds like trash.

Thank gyllengod Demi is taking the fall for me.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 10:09:12 AM
Quote
But the most disappointing thing, by far, is the loot factor. The game offers no shortage of weapons and armor -- which is good -- but the fact that you're always finding better equipment makes even crafted blueprint items seem ordinary. Nothing's worse than saving money and leveling up to craft a powerful weapon or sturdy armor only to go back into the inventory and see that you already have new blueprints for an even more powerful weapon or even stronger armor.

This was one of the problems I hoped was only present in the demo.  It is a same concern I have for Borderlands.

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 10:14:14 AM
TOO HUMAN DELIVERS

I am buying it and fully expecting it to be crappy, but fun for co-op.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 10:29:12 AM
Holla if the story is good. If the story is not good, i'm not buying.

You wouldn't buy a dungeon grinder because the story sucked?

That's like passing on a porn because the story sucked.

u gay?

Dungeon Grinder is very much like jerking off. Story is pretty much the mental image you create that makes you want to jerk off.

Jerking off without that "story", ammounts to just fucking your hand. That's what a Dungeon Grinder is without a story that appeals you, fucking your hand.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 10:33:50 AM
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3169393

EGM Review


Uh Oh. Shoulda gotten Shane Bettenhausen on review.  :lol

By : Giancarlo Varanini

Who the fuck is this guy?

This motherfucker is a Ps3fajjit

http://www.1up.com/do/my1Up?publicUserId=5380090

(http://www.1up.com/media?id=3047866&type=lg) (http://www.1up.com/media?id=3047852&type=lg)

Fuck him.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Third on August 18, 2008, 11:28:14 AM
No worth downloading.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 11:32:48 AM
If I sign up for Gamefly today or tomorrow, this might be the first game I try out.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 11:35:40 AM
WTF IS THIS

Quote
From what I gather, you can't play through co-op the first time through. You cannot select a co-op level without first completing it in the 1-player campaign (page 18 of the instruction manual). Not an awful design, but I'm not sure why they really did it -- just so they could force you to watch the cutscenes?

No way, this could be a dealbreaker for me

It would make sense though since it actually matters and the 1up writer did not mention anything about in the review.
:piss games journalism :piss2
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Purple Filth on August 18, 2008, 11:38:20 AM
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3169393

EGM Review


Uh Oh. Shoulda gotten Shane Bettenhausen on review.  :lol

By : Giancarlo Varanini

Who the fuck is this guy?

This motherfucker is a Ps3fajjit

http://www.1up.com/do/my1Up?publicUserId=5380090

(http://www.1up.com/media?id=3047866&type=lg) (http://www.1up.com/media?id=3047852&type=lg)

Fuck him.

Apparently he was from OPM. Gamespot, Gametap
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 11:38:34 AM
Did 1up score the online exclusive for this one?  :lol

Any word on when IGNs review promo will hit?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 11:40:01 AM
No way, this could be a dealbreaker for me

It would make sense though since it actually matters and the 1up writer did not mention anything about in the review.
:piss games journalism :piss2

Most times when people review games they don't get the manual or anything with it and tend to just play it through in a linear fashion.  But hey, he did praise co-op, so he could have tried that after finishing single player or whatever.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 11:40:33 AM
What do you care duckman? You don't even have a 360.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Mupepe on August 18, 2008, 11:51:42 AM
I'll be getting it.  Not really sure what to expect.  I'm hoping I'll be pleasantly surprised.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 11:59:04 AM
What do you care duckman? You don't even have a 360.

Yes I do.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=331102&page=14 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=331102&page=14)

The bottom is hilarious.

Denis is proven wrong by his own manual.

I'm assuming you have to have played the first level, and then the co-op will flow from there. It'd be fucking distinguished mentally-challenged if it didn't work that way.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: bork on August 18, 2008, 12:03:10 PM
No thanks, I'll wait for Sacred 2 to hit 360-- same type of "Diablo" game, but with *gasp* FOUR PLAYERS ONLINE!  UNPOSSIBLE!!!!   :o :o :o :o
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 12:06:28 PM
^^Thank the (norse)Gods

I thought that I was going to be throwing my money away on a shitty game there for a minute
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 12:18:24 PM
The best part about Too Human is that it shows that Xbox fans can be as insecure and defensive as Sony fans.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 12:29:14 PM
From Jeff Green at gaf:

Quote
The other 2 reviews that go with this for EGM magazine---written by guys you apparently know better--don't veer much away from this score at all.

 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Bacon on August 18, 2008, 12:48:42 PM
SK isn't worried since they will be getting all the profits from Gears of War lol.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Greatness Gone on August 18, 2008, 12:55:44 PM
Dennis Dyack just really needs, like, 2 years off so he can regain his motherfucking sanity (pun intended) and make what we all really want: Eternal Darkness 2.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 12:59:52 PM
Do you really want ED2?

Imo, SK just doesn't have what it takes to make a game this gen, a big budget game at least. They are incompetent in too many ways, and a look at their cut scene animations says all there needs to say about the ability of the team to make a game that lives up to the expectations of being on a next gen system.

They should've stayed with Nintendo.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: BamYouHaveAids on August 18, 2008, 01:04:34 PM
well this thread made my ignore list nice and fat
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 01:06:48 PM
I am buying it -- there was just something weirdly compelling about the demo.  Plus, how can you not be there on Day 1 of the Too Human Apocalypse that we're only beginning to see now?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 01:06:55 PM
Hey, Border:

Quote
"Giancarlo wants to hold Too Human up to the highest standards of the action-genre and the RPG-genre, but the game is a hybrid so that doesn't seem entirely fair."


I don't get this attitude. Even if we were to ignore Dyack's own claims of Too Human's excellence in every way (yes, he did tout it as a remarkable action game, and name-dropped well known games in that genre), shouldn't the favorable result be the best of each component built into something great with this selected wunderputty? In this case, it seems to work the other way; we apparently should not demand a great action game component from this, due to precedence and because, hey, it's a hybrid.

And if one was to, as several critics already have, mention shortcomings in the story, one would soon hear that one should not expect a great story either, because hey, it's a bit of everything, and apparently, nothing in a bit of everything can actually be great, or in this case even good. That doesn't make much sense to me, or at least it does not when it's used to excuse elements of mediocrity.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 01:08:45 PM
They should've stayed with Nintendo.
Pretty sure it wasn't their decision.

Were they actually ever tied to Nintendo, as in multi-game contracts and such? I never really understood the "second party" set-up.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 01:19:13 PM
I got ignored because I'm buying Too Human? Grow up, loser
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Trent Dole on August 18, 2008, 01:22:28 PM
Nice title change.  :lol Not buying this, nyah nyah.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 01:25:34 PM
They should've stayed with Nintendo.
Pretty sure it wasn't their decision.

Were they actually ever tied to Nintendo, as in multi-game contracts and such? I never really understood the "second party" set-up.


Well, it was like Insomniac. Insomniac isn't tied with Sony, but they make games for Sony. That was what SK was for nintendo, until they said to nintendo they wanted to make game A and B (Too Human i'm sure), Nintendo must've said they were out of their mind, and they bounced.

Shane Kim baited, as the fool he is, and here we are.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 18, 2008, 01:33:31 PM
Well, it was like Insomniac. Insomniac isn't tied with Sony, but they make games for Sony. That was what SK was for nintendo, until they said to nintendo they wanted to make game A and B (Too Human i'm sure), Nintendo must've said they were out of their mind, and they bounced.

Shane Kim baited, as the fool he is, and here we are.

Maybe Too Human will do OK financially?  After a couple of really negative reviews, doom and gloom were predicted for Assassin's Creed as well but look at how that turned out. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 01:35:32 PM
Too Human is going to sell a ton. Games tend to sell on that system, irrespective of quality.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 01:36:45 PM
Too Human is going to sell a ton. Games tend to sell on that system, irrespective of quality.


Which is the polar opposite on the PS3.

Yeah.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 01:37:42 PM
Uh Galaga Legions is this week, moran
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 01:37:59 PM
Well, it was like Insomniac. Insomniac isn't tied with Sony, but they make games for Sony. That was what SK was for nintendo, until they said to nintendo they wanted to make game A and B (Too Human i'm sure), Nintendo must've said they were out of their mind, and they bounced.

Shane Kim baited, as the fool he is, and here we are.

Maybe Too Human will do OK financially?  After a couple of really negative reviews, doom and gloom were predicted for Assassin's Creed as well but look at how that turned out. 

Assassins creed had some great reviews, great marketing, great pre launch hype, and it just looked balla.

Too Human is like, the opposite.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 01:42:56 PM
I don't get this attitude. Even if we were to ignore Dyack's own claims of Too Human's excellence in every way (yes, he did tout it as a remarkable action game, and name-dropped well known games in that genre), shouldn't the favorable result be the best of each component built into something great with this selected wunderputty? In this case, it seems to work the other way; we apparently should not demand a great action game component from this, due to precedence and because, hey, it's a hybrid.

Measuring the game against a developer's claims is not really standard practice, so I don't see why the 1Up reviewer should be doing that.

The standard-bearers for this particular genre (Diablo, Phantasy Star Online, Monster Hunter) are not known for precise and visceral twitch-action gameplay, nor are they known for epic and memorable storytelling.  Their aim is for a level of accessibility that disappears when you turn your game into Ninja Gaiden or Devil May Cry.

For all the complaints surrounding the game, nobody  explains how it fails in comparison to its peers.  Giancarlo is on to something with his criticisms about the meaningless loot and poor inventory management, but the review is so short and slight that he never really gets into it.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: BamYouHaveAids on August 18, 2008, 01:51:54 PM
i don't like the fact that i can still read the thread titles of ignored users; better get on that willco.

i'm 5 deep, now my eyes will no longer be marred by insincere too human praise. don't worry denial is just the first stage when you reach stage 5 you will be unignored.

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 18, 2008, 01:52:50 PM
You barely post here anyways.  I doubt Wilco will give a fuck what you think. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 01:53:06 PM
Galaga Legions is fuck amazing, Castle Crashers is boooring.

You're boring and answer my PM you skeeze
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 18, 2008, 01:54:45 PM
Too Human is going to sell a ton. Games tend to sell on that system, irrespective of quality.



I know Two Worlds sold on X360 but whatever not all game sell on the console. And i havent seen a single TV add for this game. Im not so sure its gonna selll that well. Ill be shocked if it outsells what Bioshock did last Aug.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: BamYouHaveAids on August 18, 2008, 02:06:44 PM
You barely post here anyways.  I doubt Wilco will give a fuck what you think. 
his bitchass is ignored until he does.


Too Human is going to sell a ton. Games tend to sell on that system, irrespective of quality.

i'm doubtful. this games has no marketing whatsoever. hell, i visit message boards and i had no idea what this games release date was until a week ago and the demo didn't do the game any favors.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 18, 2008, 02:20:02 PM
Are my eyes deceiving me or does Dyack really have a "Too Human Defense Forse" avatar?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 02:25:25 PM
Amazing. The old "Did the author even play the whole game?" has now become "Did the author really play the whole game several times?"
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 02:44:06 PM
Post his GAF avatar here folks. I don't visit that site anymore.

(http://i38.tinypic.com/2e64oqt.jpg)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: MCD on August 18, 2008, 02:47:16 PM
100x100 is against the rules.

report him lulz.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: AdmiralViscen on August 18, 2008, 02:48:28 PM
100x100 is against the rules.

report him lulz.

Someone do this, but PM him our link first.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 02:49:38 PM
:bow Fable 2 :bow2
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 02:53:15 PM
100x100 is against the rules.

report him lulz.

Someone do this, but PM him our link first.

Someone draft a hilarious PM and I'll do it
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Vrolokus on August 18, 2008, 02:53:41 PM
Buying it, but only because I'm reviewing it.

I'd love to be pleasantly surprised... but not banking on it.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 02:55:48 PM
I don't get why people are complaining about this review lacking in content. That's what nearly all 1up reviews are like. Or are they just now noticing the short form, budget format, because it's a score they disagree with?

When viewed as buyer's guides, 1up reviews are pretty much at the bottom of the barrel.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 02:58:55 PM
Would also like a link set to Dyack, so he can see my manboy mutual love for him
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 03:06:14 PM
Would also like a link set to Dyack, so he can see my manboy mutual love for him

Which post would you like him to read? I'll pm him.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 03:07:37 PM
Just tell him to register here. I want to talk about his interpretation of Norse mythology, after I'm done with the game. I still think separating the mythology from its cultural roots and environments (and replacing elemental creatures with robots) is a fundamental blunder, but it can't be worse than the Japanese "interpretations," ie. borrowing some names, relevance be damned.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 03:07:43 PM
The one where I say I want to suck his cock
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 03:18:44 PM
Is this alright

(http://s4.tinypic.com/29cx8ba.jpg)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 03:20:53 PM
Dude evilb0re wont work wtf

Use an image or something

Is disillusioned a bad word? We're awesome don't smear us you cunt
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 03:21:35 PM
Dude evilb0re wont work wtf

That's only the text. The actual link is through tinyurl because even that is filtered to ****
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 03:21:43 PM
Quick, everyone put on their Too Human defense avatar and their cleanest shorts, dignitaries be browsing these street corners soon enough!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 03:22:48 PM
I sent one as well.  I don't get why evilbore is a censored word over there.

And while I don't have Gamefly yet, I probably will by the end of this week and will get Too Human as my first game.  Hopefully someone else is up for co-op.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 03:23:50 PM
Just tell him that it'd bug the living shit out of NeoGAF administration if he joined our cult community.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 03:24:00 PM
I don't get why people are complaining about this review lacking in content. That's what nearly all 1up reviews are like. Or are they just now noticing the short form, budget format, because it's a score they disagree with?

Just browsing around the site -- abortions like Alone in the Dark and Shadowrun got 1000-1200 word reviews.  The Too Human review is barely 600.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 03:31:01 PM
Fair enough. It still reads like any other 1up review to me, equally as bad as most other reviews on that site when it comes to being a buyer's guide. And I'm not also not getting why it's assumed that a "high profile" game should automatically get a longer, more "fleshed out" review than smaller, less anticipated titles. I'm not going to argue that this is not what it usually is like, but it's not something that reasonable people should ask for. Unless of course they have no real use for the review other than as more reading material for an anticipated game. If anything, the less known title should get more coverage, to offer more information on the game.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 03:31:06 PM
Shadowrun was good, hater!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 03:35:35 PM
Here is the final product, with a link to the font page of this thread

(http://s4.tinypic.com/14xnkpj.jpg)

and here is receipt confirmation that he read it

(http://s4.tinypic.com/4q3mua.jpg)

:drudge DYACK INCOMING :drudge

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 03:42:46 PM
Haha that would be sweet if he registered just to say FUCK YOU HATERS
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 03:43:54 PM
Quick, someone make a banner for the OP.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 18, 2008, 03:48:37 PM
Quick, someone make a banner for the OP.
:lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 03:52:44 PM
(http://i36.tinypic.com/f2uhqd.jpg)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 03:55:15 PM
Welcome, Dennis!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 04:00:10 PM
Omg omg omg

Somebody pick that Ninja Gaiden 2 banner, and write Too Human over it, quick
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 04:00:30 PM
Dyack should post about his experience with his head stuck between two sets of funbags. Did he pop a chub?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 18, 2008, 04:02:25 PM
Dyack should post about his experience with his head stuck between two sets of funbags. Did he pop a chub?

:rofl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Greatness Gone on August 18, 2008, 04:04:24 PM
If he joins, I will bitch endlessly until he makes Eternal Darkness 2. And takes some medication for his craziness before development.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 04:12:59 PM
Let's have 2 banners!

(http://i37.tinypic.com/n5hhf9.gif)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 04:13:53 PM
:rofl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: CurseoftheGods on August 18, 2008, 04:16:36 PM
Let's have 2 banners!

http://i37.tinypic.com/n5hhf9.gif

:rofl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 04:22:56 PM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12439583&postcount=478

Can someone remind Benji here of that it took him several attempts to actually like the demo?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 04:24:07 PM
ok i made a banner
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 04:26:43 PM
Hey fuck off asshole, what do you care, you were gonna not buy it because of a $15 game

You are not  Too Human-ite
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 04:28:08 PM
ok i updated it, how's that
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 18, 2008, 04:31:18 PM
ok i updated it, how's that
:rofl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 04:43:11 PM
360 finally gets it Heavenly Sword, Liar, Genji 2 etc.

Finally? Mass Effect came out last year
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tabasco on August 18, 2008, 05:09:24 PM
I sent one as well.  I don't get why evilbore is a censored word over there.

And while I don't have Gamefly yet, I probably will by the end of this week and will get Too Human as my first game.  Hopefully someone else is up for co-op.


If you don't have new release in your Q on it's ship date, you will be looking at a long wait.  What I'm saying is, if you join Gamefly later this week, it's going to take them a few days to get your copy of Too Human in the mail.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: T-Short on August 18, 2008, 05:12:53 PM
i'll buy it when it hits the bargain bins. will play co-op for the LULZ
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 18, 2008, 05:16:24 PM
I sent one as well.  I don't get why evilbore is a censored word over there.

And while I don't have Gamefly yet, I probably will by the end of this week and will get Too Human as my first game.  Hopefully someone else is up for co-op.


If you don't have new release in your Q on it's ship date, you will be looking at a long wait.  What I'm saying is, if you join Gamefly later this week, it's going to take them a few days to get your copy of Too Human in the mail.

No rush.  I have enough games to play anyway.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 18, 2008, 06:19:23 PM
i'll buy it when it hits the TheBlackStallion is hysterical. will play co-op for the LULZ
:lol
What's that? Is there a list of filtered words somewhere?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 06:21:58 PM
It means shit-bin (minus the -)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 18, 2008, 06:23:20 PM
Does the term offend Wilco or something?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 06:25:54 PM
Back in the day everyone would say to put the thread in the shit-bin, meaning delete it, get it out of here so it got turned into TBS is hysterical, which is an actual poster, who is in fact not hysterical
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 06:40:45 PM
Another review!  :hyper

Quote
Too Human feels painfully average and was hardly worth the wait.

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/games/archives/2008/08/19/too_human_review.html
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on August 18, 2008, 06:45:27 PM
The negative and lukewarm Too Human reviews makes me feel all giddy inside.

Edit: cigarillo, shitbin
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Barry Egan on August 18, 2008, 06:48:42 PM
Another review!  :hyper

Quote
Too Human feels painfully average and was hardly worth the wait.

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/games/archives/2008/08/19/too_human_review.html


 :hyper :hyper :hyper
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: muckhole on August 18, 2008, 07:01:11 PM
Omg omg omg

Somebody pick that Ninja Gaiden 2 banner, and write Too Human over it, quick

Sorry it took me so long. I wasn't paying attention.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v331/hotgraham/TooHobo.jpg)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 18, 2008, 07:38:47 PM
How do you open the other classes on the demo?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: UnoIllNino on August 18, 2008, 07:47:25 PM
Time released, Dreamer.  Set your clock ahead on your 360.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 18, 2008, 08:27:17 PM
Milky just posted at the gaf thread


Not good. When EGMs resident Loot Whore and Xfag himself thinks its shitty. Well thats the kiss of death. Will wait for Fable
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 08:42:42 PM
Quote
If you're looking for a cheap copy of the game, I'd wait about two days, then go visit your nearest EB or Gamestop.

 :hyper
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 08:43:26 PM
um... that still wont be cheap, they'll mark it up for near-retail anyway
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 09:42:21 PM
IGN review

Quote
7.5 Presentation
The story has its moments and is woven into the game well, but that’s the extent of it.

8.0 Graphics
Streaming everything to do away with load times does come with its drawbacks, but the art design is quite good.

9.0 Sound
Excellent voice acting and music, only slightly marred by a few sound bugs and repetitive battle chatter.

7.5 Gameplay
Deep customization options and heaven for loot drop fans. The forgiving death system and auto-scaling enemies make the combat feel unrewarding.

7.5 Lasting Appeal
If you get hooked, you’ll be here for months. People who don’t love collecting random loot won’t get hooked.

7.8

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/899/899826p1.html


What the hell is "art design" anyway? Is it supposed to refer to artistic value, quality and craftsmanship?


If it wasn't obvious already that IGN was grasping for ways to not give this game shit, here is another good one:

Quote
The animations aren't the smoothest, but the visuals look crisp, especially when you consider how much of this game is streamed in the background to do away with load screens.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bildi on August 18, 2008, 09:48:39 PM
I haven't read the IGN review, but that sounds pretty fair to me - from the demo it struck me as a 7/10 game.  As in it's OK, some might like it, but it's far from great.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 09:49:03 PM
Omg omg omg

Somebody pick that Ninja Gaiden 2 banner, and write Too Human over it, quick

Sorry it took me so long. I wasn't paying attention.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v331/hotgraham/TooHobo.jpg)

Here's a fucking decent banner. Demi cmon, take that taco shit from the OP, this is the true deal.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bildi on August 18, 2008, 09:51:14 PM
I didn't see muckhole's banner before - the Baldur makeover is awesome.  :rofl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 09:51:23 PM
Holy shit Gamespot hit it with a 5.5 :lol

http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/toohuman/index.html?tag=result;title;0

Another one for the curriculum of Shane Kim.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 09:53:08 PM
Art design is, uh, art design.  It refers more to cohesiveness of vision rather than component parts.

Seems like a bastard term to me, though. Until it started showing up in game reviews and previews, I had literally never heard anyone combine the two like that. I think I almost preferred it when "art direction" was the most often misused catch-all phrase.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 09:53:21 PM
how about no, sock wiper
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 18, 2008, 09:54:47 PM
Holy shit Gamespot hit it with a 5.5 :lol

Long, detailed review too. Best buyer's guide for Too Human so far, assuming they are honest of course.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 09:58:06 PM
yeah, that gamespot review was pretty thorough -- and scathing. there'll be quite a few empty hostess endcaps in toronto tonight!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 09:58:54 PM
how about no, sock wiper

Fine keep the fucking ball.

The video review of Too Human at IGN was cool, but, i don't know. 5.5 from gamespot? Smells like a shit game.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Barry Egan on August 18, 2008, 10:04:45 PM
there'll be quite a few empty hostess endcaps in toronto tonight!

 :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Vizzys on August 18, 2008, 10:07:26 PM
that banner just keeps getting better and better
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:13:15 PM
yeah, of all the game subgenres to implement level scaling in, hack-and-slash is the worst possible choice. i can almost understand squeenix and bethesda being distinguished mentally-challenged in this fashion with respect to their subgenres, but ANY developer creating a diablo clone that likewise implements level scaling should be drug into the street and have liquid aids forcibly poured down his gullet.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 10:20:45 PM
Is it that important to be able to go back to some low-level area and blow everything up?  I mean, I might do that once or twice in an RPG, but it's not a big deal.  If the enemies are scaled to your stats and gear that seems bad, but if it's just to your level then there is still going to be a purpose for collecting useful items.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 18, 2008, 10:21:21 PM
It sounds like TH scales enemies with the character, which nullifies LEWTZ COLLETIN'

smh

Good grief...

Welp, I ain't buying it now. I wanted to believe, but the mediocre scores don't justify $60 when there are a ton of better games coming later this fall. Maybe if they had released it in June.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 18, 2008, 10:22:52 PM
I'm sure Shakespeare got some bad reviews in his day. We'll have to wait four-hundred years before we can truly judge Too Human.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:23:09 PM
the POINT to collecting loot is to not only stay on the crest of the difficulty curve, but to blow it out of the fucking water when you get that one uberdrop. and yes, it is very fun to deal death in earlier levels as a minmaxed cybergod*.

* see, dyack's shitty design even obliterates a potential metaphor! SHAKESPEARE MY ASS.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 10:23:59 PM
Quote from: Twinkie House Dyack
Too Human is... I guess I would categorize it as so innovative, people might find it difficult to understand at first.

http://play.tm/story/20315 (http://play.tm/story/20315)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 18, 2008, 10:25:30 PM
I'm still in. This is history in the making.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:25:45 PM
Quote from: Twinkie House Dyack
Too Human is... I guess I would categorize it as so innovative, people might find it difficult to understand at first.

http://play.tm/story/20315 (http://play.tm/story/20315)

Quote from: dyack where's the twinkies nom nom nom
When Miyamoto-san created Mario 64,

oh god oh god
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: TVC15 on August 18, 2008, 10:27:02 PM
Is it that important to be able to go back to some low-level area and blow everything up?  I mean, I might do that once or twice in an RPG, but it's not a big deal.  If the enemies are scaled to your stats and gear that seems bad, but if it's just to your level then there is still going to be a purpose for collecting useful items.

The whole point of loot-based games with stats and the inherent min-maxing of your character is to eventually become a walking, unkillable god.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 10:28:58 PM
the POINT to collecting loot is to not only stay on the crest of the difficulty curve, but to blow it out of the fucking water when you get that one uberdrop. and yes, it is very fun to deal death in earlier levels as a minmaxed cybergod*.

I think the main problem is that you can't go help a friend level up during early sections.  Since everything gets scaled to the highest level player, your newbie friend just gets to die again and again while you slog through enemies they have no hope of killing.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 10:32:16 PM
This guy is too much.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: drohne on August 18, 2008, 10:33:06 PM
what would be more gratifying: hearing dyack try to spin this in the press, or total radio silence as he loses his specious newsworthiness?

a meltdown would of course be more fun, but imagine the subtle sweetness of not knowing what denis dyack thinks about preview methodology or miyamoto-sama or brain drain in small canadian towns
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 10:33:51 PM
The whole point of loot-based games with stats and the inherent min-maxing of your character is to eventually become a walking, unkillable god.

Assuming that the scaling is only in regards to level (and not to gear/stats), shouldn't that still be possible at maximum level if the loot is good enough?

My only min-maxing experience is with WoW, where due to game balance you can't become an unkillable god.  How far can you push the envelope in Diablo and TQ?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:34:28 PM
it's pretty obvious that dyack doesn't even remotely understand the hack-and-slash subgenre if he's trying to dmc it up with aerial raves and combos. hack-and-slash is all about building a character, and the challenge should be fixed in order to test your build skills at that level -- not your reflexes or timing. you pick a class, you pick a specialty weapon, and then you focus your kit/loadout around specific skills or abilities -- and then you try to make it work, where "work" is defined as successfully clearing an area of fixed-level and smartly-designed enemies with as little effort as possible, because reduced effort means your build rocks. you pick assassin, you go spears, you go poison, you pick an active skill or a set of passive skills (or some combo thereof) to focus on, and then you try to make that work. it's all about gambling and minmaxing, not racking up a combo meter or aiming for a score/rating.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:36:23 PM
diablo and tq can let you become utterly fucking invinicible with either enough cleverness (exploiting the deep interconnectedness and interoperation of skills and loot), game knowledge (if pindleskin has a 5% drop rate of an ultra rare,  i have a good chance of picking up the item i need to complete my build in x farming runs), or patience (hur hur level 99 uber alles).
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 18, 2008, 10:36:43 PM
Quote from: dyack where's the twinkies nom nom nom
When Miyamoto-san created Mario 64,

oh god oh god

How is this surprising? That's tame compared to these gems from Twin Snakes' development:

Quote
There's a three-way collaboration there, and it's really exciting -- the relationship itself. It's a meeting of the minds -- I always say Miyamoto's like Aristotle and Kojima's like Socrates, so you have these two great masters working together.

http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3109703

Quote
In our opinion, Kojima-san's group is one of the best in the world and an ongoing relationship between Nintendo and Konami would be a great thing in our opinion. I personally would love to see Socrates (Kojima-san) and Aristotle (Miyamoto-san) continue to work together in the future. This would be good for gamers and good for our industry.

http://cube.ign.com/articles/445/445991p1.html
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 18, 2008, 10:37:20 PM
Is it that important to be able to go back to some low-level area and blow everything up?  I mean, I might do that once or twice in an RPG, but it's not a big deal.  If the enemies are scaled to your stats and gear that seems bad, but if it's just to your level then there is still going to be a purpose for collecting useful items.

The whole point of loot-based games with stats and the inherent min-maxing of your character is to eventually become a walking, unkillable god.

And also grinding like crazy to make it through the next act.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 10:38:27 PM
Dyack-san says a lotta things:

"I think Too Human will have a lot of legs, unlike some games that sell in the first few months and that's it, you're going to see Too Human have a long life-span."
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:39:16 PM
DYACK-SAMA, BE MY DESU DESU MOE-CHAN
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 18, 2008, 10:40:38 PM
DYACK-SAMA, BE MY DESU DESU MOE-CHAN UGUU~ °A°

Fixed.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 18, 2008, 10:40:57 PM
Not hard to have a long tail when your game hits $20 within a few months of release

Too Hubris 2: Wrath of the Twinkies
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 18, 2008, 10:43:13 PM
but if the enemies scale the loot is that much less effective.

At that point you're basically just looking for good loot to keep up with the curve, rather than staying a step or two ahead.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 18, 2008, 10:43:56 PM
Quote from: dyack where's the twinkies nom nom nom
When Miyamoto-san created Mario 64,

oh god oh god

How is this surprising? That's tame compared to these gems from Twin Snakes' development:

Quote
There's a three-way collaboration there, and it's really exciting -- the relationship itself. It's a meeting of the minds -- I always say Miyamoto's like Aristotle and Kojima's like Socrates, so you have these two great masters working together.

http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3109703

Quote
In our opinion, Kojima-san's group is one of the best in the world and an ongoing relationship between Nintendo and Konami would be a great thing in our opinion. I personally would love to see Socrates (Kojima-san) and Aristotle (Miyamoto-san) continue to work together in the future. This would be good for gamers and good for our industry.

http://cube.ign.com/articles/445/445991p1.html


 :rofl

It's hard to combine that level of pretentiousness and sycophancy.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Also, I assume he meant Plato, not Socrates.
[close]

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:44:45 PM
he meant PLATO-SAN and ARISTOTLE-SAMA
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 18, 2008, 10:45:05 PM
Yeah, Socrates probably drank that hemlock when he got to Act 5 of MGS4.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 18, 2008, 10:45:22 PM
Too Humanu-kun
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 18, 2008, 10:46:05 PM
he meant PLATO-SAN and ARISTOTLE-SAMA

PURETO-SAN and ARISATATORU-SAMA, baka gaijin.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 18, 2008, 10:47:00 PM
NANI??!??!??!!?!??!!?!?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 18, 2008, 10:47:27 PM
he meant PLATO-SAN and ARISTOTLE-SAMA

PURETO-SAN to ARISATATORU-SAMA, baka gaijin.

Come on, dude.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 18, 2008, 10:48:48 PM
Dyack: Too Human will be sugoi*!

TL Note: "sugoi" means "great" or "wow"
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 18, 2008, 10:50:27 PM
TL: "Pureto-san" means "Mr. Plato".
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 18, 2008, 11:06:43 PM
Adding to what Prole said a good loot based game will have certain skills that reward a patient player, so hording stat points early on will reward the player later when they can dump them in a high level skill, but for that to work the early game has top be designed in such a way that rarer drops will compensate for the skills you are holding off on (it should be harder early on still), but if the enemies scale the loot is that much less effective.

I didn't think Diablo had that much going on -- I just assumed it was WoW with a simpler interface, instanced world, and some random dungeons.  I think it's pretty clear Dyack is after a WoW-model.  The game has talent trees and EZ re-specs, so there is no point in hording skill points.  You can't just dump everything into some high-level talent because you're required to dump points into all the talents that precede it.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 18, 2008, 11:21:42 PM
Quote
Playing a videogame shouldn't feel like being a factory robot assembling cars.

http://xbox360.gamespy.com/xbox-360/too-human-part-1/899899p1.html
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 18, 2008, 11:29:22 PM
Well, to be fair, Titan's Quest had easy respeccing too.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 19, 2008, 12:12:30 AM
So do you think, at some point, Dyack realized the game's failings and just decided he ought to try and sell the game with controversy?  At some point, Microsoft probably came to him and said something to the extent of "This isn't testing well, finish up what you've got and we'll dump it in late August with limited marketing support."  Do you think he suspected that the reaction of game critics was going to be this apathetic and polarized?

Or does he still earnestly believe that this game is a triumph of the medium, and we will now be subject to months of Derek Smart-ish arguments with the enthusiast press?  Or will he take his lumps, realize the problems and compromises made, and maintain dignified silence?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: pilonv1 on August 19, 2008, 12:19:04 AM
Well, to be fair, Titan's Quest had easy respeccing too.

indeed it did. im still not at the point where im an unkillable god though :(
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: TVC15 on August 19, 2008, 12:33:02 AM
So do you think, at some point, Dyack realized the game's failings and just decided he ought to try and sell the game with controversy?  At some point, Microsoft probably came to him and said something to the extent of "This isn't testing well, finish up what you've got and we'll dump it in late August with limited marketing support."  Do you think he suspected that the reaction of game critics was going to be this apathetic and polarized?

Or does he still earnestly believe that this game is a triumph of the medium, and we will now be subject to months of Derek Smart-ish arguments with the enthusiast press?  Or will he take his lumps, realize the problems and compromises made, and maintain dignified silence?

I think he knows his game is mediocre, but that maybe he was thinking he could coast to better than average reviews?  Up until this game, the press has been kind to his very mediocre games, and this sort of dungeon crawl is under-represented on consoles, so maybe he though reviewers would put up with the jankiness.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bildi on August 19, 2008, 12:38:57 AM
So do you think, at some point, Dyack realized the game's failings and just decided he ought to try and sell the game with controversy?  At some point, Microsoft probably came to him and said something to the extent of "This isn't testing well, finish up what you've got and we'll dump it in late August with limited marketing support."  Do you think he suspected that the reaction of game critics was going to be this apathetic and polarized?

Or does he still earnestly believe that this game is a triumph of the medium, and we will now be subject to months of Derek Smart-ish arguments with the enthusiast press?  Or will he take his lumps, realize the problems and compromises made, and maintain dignified silence?

I think you're overthinking it (I feel like I'm at gaf).  I think he just thinks his game is great.

"Think" is a weird word when you overuse it like I just did.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 12:47:23 AM
Denis should just release Too Human on the PC and keep patching it until it becomes the AAA game that he envisioned.

It's not like he'll be busy in the next decade.   :P
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Positive Touch on August 19, 2008, 12:53:22 AM
SK doesn't have the talent to make an A game, no matter how much money/time they have
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Barry Egan on August 19, 2008, 12:55:50 AM
So do you think, at some point, Dyack realized the game's failings and just decided he ought to try and sell the game with controversy?  At some point, Microsoft probably came to him and said something to the extent of "This isn't testing well, finish up what you've got and we'll dump it in late August with limited marketing support."  Do you think he suspected that the reaction of game critics was going to be this apathetic and polarized?

Or does he still earnestly believe that this game is a triumph of the medium, and we will now be subject to months of Derek Smart-ish arguments with the enthusiast press?  Or will he take his lumps, realize the problems and compromises made, and maintain dignified silence?

I think you're overthinking it (I feel like I'm at gaf).  I think he just thinks his game is great.

"Think" is a weird word when you overuse it like I just did.

see, I just don't buy that someone who's shown the composure of a shrieking American Idol reject will suddenly gain his autonomy and rest contented with his own work.  It's a guarantee that he's internally boiling right now.  Oh man!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 19, 2008, 01:03:13 AM
see, I just don't buy that someone who's shown the composure of a shrieking American Idol reject will suddenly gain his autonomy and rest contented with his own work.  It's a guarantee that he's internally boiling right now.  Oh man!

Well, I think Microsoft PR will probably keep him reined in anyway.  As a PC developer that doesn't need huge budgets, someone like Derek Smart probably has more room to give very candid responses to criticism.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: bork on August 19, 2008, 01:13:17 AM
DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU DYACK DESU
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Barry Egan on August 19, 2008, 01:17:06 AM
you can already see him playing the self-satisfied angle in the other Too Human GAF thread.  Internally though? Liquid hot.  My schadenfreudar rarely misses.   8)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:01:49 AM
That IGN thread galloped away like crazy, so... has Dyack posted in it yet? I want to see how he deals with this educated criticism. Remember, previews and blind hate (yet somehow, not blind love) of work in progress are of the schmutz devil, but reviews of finished games are supposedly fuck awesome.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 19, 2008, 02:04:39 AM
http://www.nzgamer.com/x360/reviews/742/too-human.html (http://www.nzgamer.com/x360/reviews/742/too-human.html)

The player is supported (in single player) by a host of human "wolves" (and a bear)

Do you still get the bear, if you're only curious?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:07:45 AM
Quote
Deprived of a decent storyline, innovative mechanics, and limited variation in either enemies or environments, Too Human is barely worthy of a weekend rental. It's an extremely repetitive treadmill set in a world you'll never get a chance to actually learn anything about thanks to the almost complete lack of exposition. Whatever points it scores for its somewhat interesting approach to combat are almost instantly retracted once you perform them for the umpteenth time on the same robot that fights in the same way. Unfortunately, Too Human can't even provide decent graphics at a consistent framerate, as graphical hitches and choppy visuals are a regular occurrence. All of these negatives leave little reason to recommend Too Human.

http://xbox360.gamespy.com/xbox-360/too-human-part-1/899899p1.html
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tabasco on August 19, 2008, 02:10:18 AM
That Too Human thread on GAF is so sad.  Dyack has sequestered himself in a troll free thread making 30 posts.  It's like he's gleefully riding the GAF-built short bus.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 02:12:38 AM
Gaf posting frequency is inversely proportional to a developer's skills.

See Nostrosmo, Falafel whatever, Marty Chinn, Dyack for examples. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:26:02 AM
Hahaha, now Arstechnica is the best. I wonder how many years of their lives the TH fanboys have lost in sheer stress over reviews in these past 12 hours. A new review on the horizon can be either a sweet moment of safety, or another sharp punch to their already inflamed e-testicles.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 02:31:25 AM
I don't know if I'd trust Arstechnica on anything.  Their hardware articles are often full of crap. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:43:08 AM
I habitually do not trust critics in general. There's something about being so sure of your right and ability* to judge that you want to pursue it as a career that really bothers me.

But some create better buyers guides than others, and that's what matters. I was very disappointed after catching Eurogamers fuck-up, as I thought those guys authored some of the best "buy or avoid" articles.


*An ability that is, evidently**, not what it should be.
** See all the damned meaningless terms invented and/or overused by these clownfuckers when they reach the limit of their writing ability, or their knowledge of the medium.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Jansen on August 19, 2008, 04:34:49 AM
holy fuck this game is getting killed.

i think i'll even forgo renting it for now. too many good games coming out that i want to play.



Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 09:20:30 AM
Man I forgot most games dont come in until Wednesday...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FFXIII360 on August 19, 2008, 09:49:02 AM
 :lol :lol
It doesnt look like its as bad as haze or lair but the guy sure is bitter. But yeah, 10 years in the making and now really bad reviews? All it needs now is it turns out to be a commercial failure and the guy will really go loco. The people @ GAF must be scared shit since he already stalked some of their members. Shame that wont happen since 360 owners buy all games no mather how bad they are.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 09:57:46 AM
Haze didn't look that bad, and the demo for it actually was probably on par, if not a bit better than the Too Human one.  No way is Too Human any worse than Lair...that isn't possible.  It is more Untold Legends or Genji 2 quality.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FFXIII360 on August 19, 2008, 10:02:16 AM
Haze didn't look that bad, and the demo for it actually was probably on par, if not a bit better than the Too Human one.  No way is Too Human any worse than Lair...that isn't possible.  It is more Untold Legends or Genji 2 quality.

Haze looked and played bad. AI and the guns were terrible.  Anyways is TH still a trilogy?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 10:04:36 AM
As one of the few people who beat Haze, I am extremely certain that Too Human is in fact better than it
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: T-Short on August 19, 2008, 10:06:34 AM
Quote
Even basic elements like an item inventory are absent. The game will happily slurp up runes and trousers called Proficient Web-Brace Greaves of Toughness by the dozen, but there's no way of stockpiling a simple health orb. Nor are there any items to counteract the various status effects that enemies inflict on you. This means that when your health is low, all you can do is plough onwards and hope that you get some health in a loot drop. If you find yourself poisoned with low health, you might as well just wait to die - there's nothing you can do. Oh, and when you die? I hope you enjoy the unskippable 30-second animation of a cyborg valkyrie descending from the sky and lifting you to Valhalla. You'll see it a lot.

ouch

that's from the Eurogamer review, btw
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 10:08:01 AM
Is Haze really that bad? the demo felt like Halo .5 or something.  It actually made me appreciate, and even want to go play Halo 3 (which I did for that week)

I wanted to rent it.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FFXIII360 on August 19, 2008, 10:10:39 AM
:lol :lol
It doesnt look like its as bad as haze or lair but the guy sure is bitter. But yeah, 10 years in the making and now really bad reviews? All it needs now is it turns out to be a commercial failure and the guy will really go loco. The people @ GAF must be scared shit since he already stalked some of their members. Shame that wont happen since 360 owners buy all games no mather how bad they are.

Who the hell are you?

Some guy from italy that you probably know
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 10:11:03 AM
Do you have a big cock like me? It is good being Italian
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FFXIII360 on August 19, 2008, 10:14:44 AM
Do you have a big cock like me? It is good being Italian

Dont know. Never seen your cock before
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FFXIII360 on August 19, 2008, 10:15:26 AM
:lol :lol
It doesnt look like its as bad as haze or lair but the guy sure is bitter. But yeah, 10 years in the making and now really bad reviews? All it needs now is it turns out to be a commercial failure and the guy will really go loco. The people @ GAF must be scared shit since he already stalked some of their members. Shame that wont happen since 360 owners buy all games no mather how bad they are.

Who the hell are you?

Some guy from italy that you probably know

You have the worst username I have ever seen.

Yeah so? Fuck do I care
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 10:15:49 AM
Do you have a big cock like me? It is good being Italian

Dont know. Never seen your cock before

Want to compare?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FFXIII360 on August 19, 2008, 10:17:39 AM
Do you have a big cock like me? It is good being Italian

Dont know. Never seen your cock before

Want to compare?

Hellz yeah!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 19, 2008, 10:21:01 AM
:lol :lol
It doesnt look like its as bad as haze or lair but the guy sure is bitter. But yeah, 10 years in the making and now really bad reviews? All it needs now is it turns out to be a commercial failure and the guy will really go loco. The people @ GAF must be scared shit since he already stalked some of their members. Shame that wont happen since 360 owners buy all games no mather how bad they are.

Who the hell are you?



Some guy from italy that you probably know

Chef Boyardee? :omg
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 19, 2008, 10:41:27 AM
Hellz yeah!

Are you one of those racist squirrels from the PSP commercials a few years back?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 11:06:44 AM
Holy shit, a low score from TeamXbox?  :lol

Someone should remind the author of NeoGAFs official Too Human thread to update the OP with review excerpts, perhaps in place of the preview stuff. It's what The Dyack would want.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 11:13:30 AM
No
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 11:43:18 AM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 19, 2008, 11:49:04 AM
:lol :lol
It doesnt look like its as bad as haze or lair but the guy sure is bitter. But yeah, 10 years in the making and now really bad reviews? All it needs now is it turns out to be a commercial failure and the guy will really go loco. The people @ GAF must be scared shit since he already stalked some of their members. Shame that wont happen since 360 owners buy all games no mather how bad they are.

Who the hell are you?

Isn't he the guy that got banned from GAF a few days ago for making a bunch of stupid posts?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 11:49:08 AM
Normally, 6-7 is "good". I don't know what kind of skewed metrics you use.

Blame the critics, they are the ones that have traditionally abused it to the point where a score of 6-7 indicates mediocrity. Regardless, it's a shit score for a "high profile" game that had everything going for it.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 11:53:26 AM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.

The release of Too Human showed that Xbox fans can be as insecure and defensive as Sony fans.  Reading some of the comments after the reviews trickled out were hilarious.  Shit like "oh, but clearly this is a love it or hate it game, so other reviews will love it" was so bogus, even before other reviews down on the game came out.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: maxy on August 19, 2008, 11:54:27 AM
Fanboy metric=everything bellow 9 is crap.Even 9 is not too good,i have seen some meltdowns over MGS4 scoring 9 :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 11:54:38 AM
Well my defense is that the guy who reviewed Too Human on GameSpot apparently gave Blue Dragon a low score too (McDragon told me this I think), so that guy's opinion is fucktarded.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 11:58:36 AM
Fanboy metric=everything bellow 9 is crap.Even 9 is not too good,i have seen some meltdowns over MGS4 scoring 9 :lol

Blame the school system.

Everyone is used to the 90-100 = A, 80-90 = B, 70-80 = C, and everything below that meaning you done did bad.  People can't grasp that on every review scale that 5 is the average, so 6 to 10 are all technically good scores.  And by people, I also mean the stupid reviewers who apparently can't follow their own metric.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 19, 2008, 11:59:53 AM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.

Normally, 6-7 is "good". I don't know what kind of skewed metrics you use.

But for Too Human, its bad, because it was hyped to the skies.

When you're paying $60 for a game, would you rather have something that gets 6 or 7 when there's plenty of games that get 8's and 9's out there? I'll rent a DVD that gets 6's or watch a movie that gets 6's because I might end up enjoying it, but this is a bit different.

And considering what most high profile games get these days, a 6 or 7 is low.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 19, 2008, 12:12:01 PM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.

Normally, 6-7 is "good". I don't know what kind of skewed metrics you use.

But for Too Human, its bad, because it was hyped to the skies.

When you're paying $60 for a game, would you rather have something that gets 6 or 7 when there's plenty of games that get 8's and 9's out there? I'll rent a DVD that gets 6's or watch a movie that gets 6's because I might end up enjoying it, but this is a bit different.

And considering what most high profile games get these days, a 6 or 7 is low.

GTA4 got a meta critic of 98. 98!!!!! I paid full price for a game with super high scores and I fucking hated it.
Crackdown has a meta critic of 83 and I paid full price for it, and its the game I played the most (besides EDF) this generation by far.

Reviews scores can't dictate how I'll enjoy the game.

My problem with Too Human is the complaints people have with the game. They are things that make me realize how amateur the whole game is, so a 6.5 avg seems fitting.

but GTA4 at 9.8??

Give me a fucking break.

Don't get me wrong, if there's a game I really want I'll use take the plunge even if the reviews aren't too favorable. And I got burned on GTA4 just like a lot of other people did.

But I've been on the fence about Too Human and seeing a lot of at-best lukewarm reviews has convinced me to pass on it. Plus, I thought the demo was really bland.

I still think that on the whole games that get 8-9 are significantly better than those that get 6-7. Not all the time, certainly, but mostly so.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 12:19:46 PM
That love it / hate it argument is so fucking distinguished mentally-challenged.

The love/hate argument is a love it or hate it affair.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 12:33:47 PM
And considering what most high profile games get these days, a 6 or 7 is low.

10= Best Ever
9= Great
8= Awesome to Decent
7= Somewhat decent, but with plenty of shit-stains
6= Shitty Shit
5= Smelly Shitty Shit
1 through 5 offers little more than a lulz & punishment range

That's how the system really works, at least among US publications/sites. Whether you agree or disagree with their judgment, that's a different matter. But the 6-7 range does in no way indicate "good"
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 12:41:06 PM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=331932

I wonder if this means that the Official Thread will be open for trolling?  :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 12:45:22 PM
And considering what most high profile games get these days, a 6 or 7 is low.

10= Best Ever
9= Great
8= Awesome to Decent
7= Somewhat decent, but with plenty of shit-stains
6= Shitty Shit
5= Smelly Shitty Shit
1 through 5 offers little more than a lulz & punishment range

That's how the system really works, at least among US publications/sites. Whether you agree or disagree with their judgment, that's a different matter. But the 6-7 range does in no way indicate "good"


A 7 on Gamespot and Cnet still indicate that a product is good.  Which is kinda dumb since we're all trained to think of 70% as the passing minimum. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 12:46:55 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 12:48:51 PM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.

Some sfags were praising Lair's sixaxis controls for its realistic simulation of dragon riding!  I doubt we'd ever see anything that stupid coming from Xbots. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 12:50:44 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.

Okay, calling him out was stupid, but banning him? Christ, that's just childish.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 12:50:51 PM
Before that new thread, I would say that gaf as a whole slightly had more face...but now it is all kinds of sad.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 12:51:53 PM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.

Some sfags were praising Lair's sixaxis controls for its realistic simulation of dragon riding!  I doubt we'd ever see anything that stupid coming from Xbots. 

Perhaps not, but on the flipside, I doubt the hardened Xbots have it in them to disown a game that so clearly deserves to be disowned. Force training, it'll be good on the 4th run! As said, Xbots have more of a Cubite thing going on, and it all smells suspiciously of Kirby Air Ride and its fans.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 12:52:51 PM
That ban is almost as arbitrary as Maf banning Ichi for PMing him one too many times.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 12:53:17 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.

Okay, calling him out was stupid, but banning him? Christ, that's just childish.

I wonder though how many GAFers would have been banned had Dyack been an admin. Seems fair to me, but also stupid. It just gives him a convenient exit.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 19, 2008, 12:53:29 PM
Dyack got banned.  :lol

So how long before he becomes a regular here?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 12:55:27 PM
If Dyack is reading, you are always welcome here - so I can ask you inappropriate questions
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 12:55:58 PM
It'll be mighty amusing to watch Xbots cling to Play, or something. We're already seeing claims that 6-7/10 is "good" as opposed to "crap" (never mind the fact that the current high score comes from Maxim), and I'm sure some of the Xbots will fall in line with Dyack's latest claim, that people just don't get Too Human. Perhaps it's just too hardcore? This is not their Lair or Haze, it's their Kirby Air Ride.

Some sfags were praising Lair's sixaxis controls for its realistic simulation of dragon riding!  I doubt we'd ever see anything that stupid coming from Xbots.  

Perhaps not, but on the flipside, I doubt the hardened Xbots have it in them to disown a game that so clearly deserves to be disowned. Force training, it'll be good on the 4th run! As said, Xbots have more of a Cubite thing going on, and it all smells suspiciously of Kirby Air Ride and its fans.


Yeah, it was pretty clear the game was going to be average at best.  You're gonna be wasting a lot of money in this expensive hobby if you can't tell that much.  
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 19, 2008, 01:02:38 PM
What a douchebag. GAF officially becomes a totalitarian state. Everybody knows Dyack was a major fucktard in those GAF threads, why did Tyler have to stoop even lower

And thank Baldur that I invited Denis yesterday instead of waiting until today. Phew
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Purple Filth on August 19, 2008, 01:05:43 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.

Okay, calling him out was stupid, but banning him? Christ, that's just childish.

I wonder though how many GAFers would have been banned had Dyack been an admin. Seems fair to me, but also stupid. It just gives him a convenient exit.


Sadly the argument on both side seems to have impulsive man-children that don't like their babies getting slandered which makes it more sad.

The banning just adds to it and as you said gives Dyack a new excuse ("see they even banned me, wha, wha, wha")
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 01:06:34 PM
Do your part to keep Dyack around by buying Too Human :canada
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 01:10:16 PM
What a douchebag. GAF officially becomes a totalitarian state. Everybody knows Dyack was a major fucktard in those GAF threads, why did Tyler have to stoop even lower

It's "funny" though, how fast people jump on the opportunity to praise the banning of others. Yeah man, you sure showed him, go the police! Banzored lulz. Not saying that Dyack hasn't done his share of stupid somersaults over there, but this group mentality of praising administrative action and subsequently its effect on debate, regardless of how lame the debate is, is just disturbing.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 01:11:47 PM
I'll give Dyack one of my sock accounts... where can I contact him at
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 19, 2008, 01:13:47 PM
I agree Ducky. Did you see what EL said to skip(1up podcast guy) in that thread?

Quote from: skip
a new level of sad.

Quote from: EvilLore
As sad as several of your coworkers sitting in silence on 1up Yours for an hour of one-sided Dyack tripe, too dumbfounded to provide any sort of critical examination of his points? Hopefully not as sad as that, because then I'd be pretty embarrassed.

Major sand in vagina
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 01:14:56 PM
Even worse is that these idiots, the common GAFers who have been blindly flaming the game simply because that's the kind of douchebags that they are, seem to think that they won something. By their stinking, worthless trolling "efforts" and their association with a forum that likes to, you know, ban people. Remarkably, I remember when I recommended that place to another dude on the basis that it was a free forum with an administration that didn't mind heated discussion and mostly banned apparent douchebags.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 19, 2008, 01:19:25 PM
Hey look, I fit in perfectly

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337)

fucking mindless distinguished mentally-challenged fellows
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 01:27:57 PM
Hey look, I fit in perfectly

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337)

fucking mindless distinguished mentally-challenged fellows

Thanks for reminding me why I don't read that forum.

But I did get some laughs from seeing Sporsk still angling to be remodded.  What a cigarillo.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 01:31:11 PM
:lol Man I'm gonna have to make a new thread tomorrow just for the game itself at this point...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 01:33:00 PM
Demi, can't you get Dyack's email from the info you've got at work?  Email him directly about your admiration for him. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 01:33:30 PM
Nah I got it covered, I sent him a message
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 01:34:25 PM
I agree Ducky. Did you see what EL said to skip(1up podcast guy) in that thread?

Quote from: skip
a new level of sad.

Quote from: EvilLore
As sad as several of your coworkers sitting in silence on 1up Yours for an hour of one-sided Dyack tripe, too dumbfounded to provide any sort of critical examination of his points? Hopefully not as sad as that, because then I'd be pretty embarrassed.

Major sand in vagina

Yeah, that comment was just really just pathetic on so many levels.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: maxy on August 19, 2008, 01:36:15 PM
Wow,i knew that gaf was full of fanboy distinguished mentally-challenged fellows,but this is really new low.
Ban him,he said something bad about us,that will show him for sure :lol
Next step ban the words Dennis,Dyack,Too,Human :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bocsius on August 19, 2008, 01:38:21 PM
Dyack never should have concerned himself with what GAF thinks. Having said that, EviLore is such a baby. Grow some thicker skin, the both of you.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 01:39:58 PM
Wow,i knew that gaf was full of fanboy distinguished mentally-challenged fellows,but this is really new low.
Ban him,he said something bad about us,that will show him for sure :lol
Next step ban the words Dennis,Dyack,Too,Human :lol

It goes beyond that. Yes, we accomplished something, our mindless bashing and hateful remarks really made a difference! We're The NeoGAF, and our lord has banished Him who angered us (by criticizing our nasty contributions).
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 01:41:46 PM
Dyack never should have concerned himself with what GAF thinks. Having said that, EviLore is such a baby. Grow some thicker skin, the both of you.

Yeah... it's not that I think Dyack is innocent here, but the group attitude in that thread is just down right disgusting. No, motherfuckers, you accomplished nothing. Having your admin exercise his "influence" by ways of banning someone isn't a great victory.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 01:44:36 PM
Why do Gaffots treat Evilore like God?  He can't even afford a PC 1/2 as expensive as mine. 


(http://www.forgotten-gamer.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/hippolol4dv38gb.gif)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: AdmiralViscen on August 19, 2008, 01:46:31 PM
So are there more than a handful of people at GAF who are actually trying to say this game is excellent, or is AA shadowboxing again?

Hey look, I fit in perfectly

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337)

fucking mindless distinguished mentally-challenged fellows

Thanks for reminding me why I don't read that forum.

But I did get some laughs from seeing Sporsk still angling to be remodded.  What a cigarillo.

This I'll glance at GAF for, link plz
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on August 19, 2008, 01:46:59 PM
Dyack never should have concerned himself with what GAF thinks. Having said that, EviLore is such a baby. Grow some thicker skin, the both of you.

Yeah... it's not that I think Dyack is innocent here, but the group attitude in that thread is just down right disgusting. No, motherfuckers, you accomplished nothing. Having your admin exercise his "influence" by ways of banning someone isn't a great victory.



Sort of like leppering someone isnt a great victory either...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 01:52:42 PM
So are there more than a handful of people at GAF who are actually trying to say this game is excellent, or is AA shadowboxing again?

Hey look, I fit in perfectly

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452150&postcount=337)

fucking mindless distinguished mentally-challenged fellows

Thanks for reminding me why I don't read that forum.

But I did get some laughs from seeing Sporsk still angling to be remodded.  What a cigarillo.

This I'll glance at GAF for, link plz

Just read all of Sporks' posts in that thread.  He's brown-nosing Evilore in each post.  
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Purple Filth on August 19, 2008, 01:55:43 PM
oh my god.

I knew Tyler was fucking pathetic, but this just really proves it.

gonna be your quartertothree material?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 01:58:43 PM
:lol

REVELATIONS ABOUND
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 19, 2008, 02:01:13 PM
"Tyler is my hero."

 ::)

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Ganhyun on August 19, 2008, 02:01:41 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.

I thought skip would get banned too for somewhat arguing with him there.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 19, 2008, 02:11:08 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.

I thought skip would get banned too for somewhat arguing with him there.

Yeah, he was realllllly close!

Imagine what banning Skip would do to 1up!

It would be the final nail in their coffin!

Then everybody at GAF would be like:

"Wooo, yeah EviLore, you're so awesome, have my babies! Skip got fuckowned, that's what he gets for having a crappy podcast. BANHAMMER! PWNED! startrek.gif"
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 19, 2008, 02:11:58 PM
Wow, he actually banned Dyack. What a fucking loser. Dyack with the checkmate.

I thought skip would get banned too for somewhat arguing with him there.

Yeah, he was realllllly close!

Imagine what banning Skip would do to 1up!

It would be the final nail in their coffin!

Then everybody at GAF would be like:

"Wooo, yeah EviLore, you're so awesome, have my babies! Skip got fuckowned, that's what he gets for having a crappy podcast. PWNED! startrek.gif"

That about sums it up.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Snuflupagulus on August 19, 2008, 02:12:56 PM
is this eviload's revenge on the 'bore?

are all those banned going to show up here?  really, the cream of the xboxxen tribe is already present.  can evilbore survive the flood of xbotten-lite?  do you want squatingyeti clones to incessantly agree with you?  really? trying times at teh evilbore. trying times.

oh well.  welcome denis and you're too shitty-shitty game.  you'll like it here better, so sign-up.   :elf
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 02:14:12 PM
is this eviload's revenge on the 'bore?

are all those banned going to show up here?  really, the cream of the xboxxen tribe is already present.  can evilbore survive the flood of xbotten-lite?  do you want squatingyeti clones to incessantly agree with you?  really? trying times at teh evilbore. trying times.

oh well.  welcome denis and you're too shitty-shitty game.  you'll like it here better, so sign-up.   :elf

BlackStallion this account ASAP.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 02:15:02 PM
I can only hope QT3 responds by banning Evilore with a similar thread.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 02:15:31 PM
Snuflupagulus (i think you spelled that wrong) - Nah I doubt that will happen. Besides I doubt they will be as mental as JustinP with his Analog tirade. I'm willing to give a user a second chance to not be a fucktarded nerdlinger. You dont see Crushed acting as fucktarded as he did before. We can change you... change you
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Snuflupagulus on August 19, 2008, 02:22:54 PM
Snuflupagulus (i think you spelled that wrong) - Nah I doubt that will happen. Besides I doubt they will be as mental as JustinP with his Analog tirade. I'm willing to give a user a second chance to not be a fucktarded nerdlinger. You dont see Crushed acting as fucktarded as he did before. We can change you... change you
oh, i'm with you :hump.  just worried that lurking won't be as enjoyable as I have to separate wheat from chaff.

I'll play too human as soon as dfyb releases the LBP level.  right now, i've got to make some more money for that million dollar house in Fable.

smooth groove  :-*.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tundra on August 19, 2008, 02:25:24 PM
It's difficult to see who is the winner or the loser here...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 19, 2008, 02:29:31 PM
It was a big win for people with IQs of less than 80, a loss for everyone higher.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Snuflupagulus on August 19, 2008, 02:31:52 PM
It was a big win for people with IQs of less than 80, a loss for everyone higher.
(http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll15/Snuflupagulus/ForTheKids.jpg)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bocsius on August 19, 2008, 02:33:18 PM
Dyack wins. Even if he wants to communicate directly with GAF, he can't. How could he possibly fail this one? Er..

Note to Dyack: Do not use one of demi's alts.

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:34:04 PM
Some people I used to consider reasonable characters are cheering Evilore on. I guess it's a good thing I never bothered steering them in this direction. :(
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 02:34:12 PM
Is Cartman the greatest character ever? I'm inclined to agree. If only he were older.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 19, 2008, 02:37:47 PM
Quote from: lawblob
By virtue of GAF's admissions & membership process and TOS, it is probably the best gaming forum in terms of overall quality and breadth of discussion.
:lol :lol

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12453430&postcount=669 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12453430&postcount=669)

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 02:46:56 PM
At the risk of sounding like a gaftard cheerleader. I have no problems with Dyacks banning. After that shitty interview where he shat on the entire forum why not ban him?

The Guy is a delusional twat. Should have been banned weeks ago instead of letting him shill his mediocre game in a sanitized official thread.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 02:49:53 PM
I called EB and they said tomorrow... man this is going to be a long wait
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:51:17 PM
At the risk of sounding like a gaftard cheerleader. I have no problems with Dyacks banning. After that shitty interview where he shat on the entire forum why not ban him?

The Guy is a delusional twat. Should have been banned weeks ago instead of letting him shill his mediocre game in a sanitized official thread.

I'm not even questioning the ban in itself, or Evilores actions, but I am wondering where this air of righteousness among common GAFers comes from. The whole debacle started in part because GAFtards were being themselves, shitting on the game and Dyack as a person. That does not warrant them any sense of pride, or any pats on the back for a job well done. This is just the final word in debacle in which most of these twits contributed little more than baseless insults and group-minded attack patterns. Dyack may be a pompous, delusional man who has now lost it, but most of these dudes who are now celebrating this administrative action are much worse, and much less, than that.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 02:55:12 PM
i see skip realized which side his podcast bread is buttered on
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 02:55:58 PM
At the risk of sounding like a gaftard cheerleader. I have no problems with Dyacks banning. After that shitty interview where he shat on the entire forum why not ban him?

The Guy is a delusional twat. Should have been banned weeks ago instead of letting him shill his mediocre game in a sanitized official thread.

its not the banning, but the thread made to celebrate it.

Dyak should have been banned long ago.


If i had the chance to publically call out the head of a multi million dollar company because he was being a dumbfuck on a messageboard i would certainly do it.

So would I.

banning someone so they can't argue isn't the same.


Any Dyack Banning Had to be public, if not the tards in the official thread would have found out and caused a shit storm, or Dyack hismelf would have gone on another interview and bitched about it.

On Evillores chest pumping. It all boils down to the bet that he offered Dyack that Dyack chickened out on. Had Dyack accepted i bet you wouldnt see that silly sort of self congratulating. Heck a Charity would be better off right now. But Dyack refused to accept.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 02:57:00 PM
Duckman:  They are anonymous forum posters, he is responsible for the jobs of 140 people, and he has chosen to spend a good chunk of his pr time, not to mention the press goodwill that until recently he enjoyed on waging a war upon a small gaming forum. 

I'm not at all defending Dyack in this, just saying... these anonymous message board twits didn't win anything. They may feel like their actions have been justified and that they were right to be pond scum, but really, no. A douchebag is a still a douchebag, and these guys are definitely douchebags. Douchebags that admire stern administrative action, at that.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 02:59:51 PM
I called EB and they said tomorrow... man this is going to be a long wait

try the big chain stores.

every one I called said they were getting it between 3 and 4 today.

No luck, I already reserved at EB anyway for the armor codes
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 03:00:09 PM
i see skip realized which side his podcast bread is buttered on

I agree that 1up has generally been very soft on Denis, especially Garnett.

i was talking about his bubububu backpedalling to evilore here:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12452118&postcount=324

heh-heh, no hard feelings, "tyler" ole buddy ole pal

1up has been pandering to the gaf crowd on a douchechill level for quite some time
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: TVC15 on August 19, 2008, 03:01:30 PM
i see skip realized which side his podcast bread is buttered on

iirc, skip (that's Pfister) used to be a GAF mod, too, way back.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 03:09:37 PM
"we were unprepared, had we known, etc."

i call bullshit, i remember that episode of 1upyours clearly because it was so WTF i actually stopped working to pay more attention to all the raving

it's a recorded show, at any point they could have paused the recording and asked dyack to ease up on the manifesto - instead they kind of egged the dude on, with several of them offering very vocal agreement to what dyack was saying

also, they announced at the beginning of the podcast that it was going to provoke, they knew all about it

that was purely for the controversy and the download hits, and i don't believe for a second dyack hijacked the podcast
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 03:12:49 PM
Shanes Man Love for Dyack is just an extension of his Man love for Kojima.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 03:16:07 PM
i still think dyack had a few good points on that podcast, but they were awash in the spittle of flailing loopiness
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:18:16 PM
You guys are so against Dyack. You need to check yourselves
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:20:36 PM
He has the love, you can feel it with his words. He enjoys what he does. I can respect that.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 03:20:41 PM
"we were unprepared, had we known, etc."

i call bullshit, i remember that episode of 1upyours clearly because it was so WTF i actually stopped working to pay more attention to all the raving

it's a recorded show, at any point they could have paused the recording and asked dyack to ease up on the manifesto - instead they kind of egged the dude on, with several of them offering very vocal agreement to what dyack was saying

also, they announced at the beginning of the podcast that it was going to provoke, they knew all about it

that was purely for the controversy and the download hits, and i don't believe for a second dyack hijacked the podcast

The first half of the podcast was taped after the second part.

I also cut skip and others at 1up some slack considering that this is their job, their income, and part of their lives.  It isn't some childish hobby where they can shit on Dyack's face in person and not face repercussion from Microsoft or some other source; they have to be reasonably diplomatic in those types of interviews.  Ubisoft blacklisted them when they weren't in their favor, so they probably won't want that shit happening too much anymore.

I do think that Shane came off as a 'tard in that podcast.  That podcast made it seem like Shane would dive in a puddle if it meant Dyack's cleats wouldn't get wet.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 03:22:19 PM
You guys are so against Dyack. You need to check yourselves

nah, i feel sorry for the guy in a lot of ways, it's easy to get swept up in messboard douchebaggery

not interested in too human, haven't even played the demo

i don't think the guy is hitler or anything just because he made what appears to be a mediocre game and showed his ass on a forum and in a few interviews

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:22:31 PM
When you're as much of a hard worker as Dyack, a veteran to this wicked industry, you too may one day have a voice to echo others sentiments.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:25:25 PM
(http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll15/Snuflupagulus/ForTheKids.jpg)

Denis Dyack - A True Visionary
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:26:14 PM
How does Dyack give SK a bad name? Is it not those unspoken workers who create the game that gets slandered?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 03:27:19 PM
i'm just saying i don't buy this "we didn't know" thing at all

you don't have to shit in someone's face to suggest to them that what they're saying may not be in their best interest

like when a friend is being a shithead in public, and you pull that friend aside and suggest that he tone it down

again, podcasts are recorded, there are no surprises
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 03:31:05 PM
SK is not Denis Dyak, SK is everyone that worked 60-80 hour weeks to make this game. All of that work is seemingly wasted on Denis' stunts.

Then again, Denis doesn't occupy all professions at SK. I'm sure they are happy to have him as a public catch-all, lest some of that rotten fruit might hit, say, the artist who came up with the brilliant idea of building mythological credibility by plastering everything in runes.

And I really don't think any of this has affected critical reception, at least not a noteworthy level. His rants and message board mingling aside, the game just plain doesn't seem very good. So in that sense, I guess Dyack is a fitting captain for this doomed ship.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 19, 2008, 03:31:17 PM
(http://i36.tinypic.com/fxf8s1.gif)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:31:56 PM
Someone in my list is playing Too Human.... a Canadian

DO WANT... envy
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 03:35:08 PM
I'm surprised that Evilore actually linked to this article (http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3167513) in his thread:

Quote
The thing everyone's really looking for (and this is where the bloodshed comes in) is a scandal, a batch of bad screenshots to joyously tear apart or a misspoken, out-of-context quote from an industry VIP ragging on the competition. Like chum in a shark tank, these occasional events can provoke impromptu swarms of violence, page upon page of whining, yelling, and piss taking, usually to comic effect.

better ban 1up evilore


oh wait he banned me for two days when i posted a thread about it, because facetiously quoting that in the thread title was apparently some kind of evil plot of mine to "stir up anger" even though nobody took it seriously
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 19, 2008, 03:36:42 PM
Man...what a disaster.

If you want to ban him - fine.
If you want to make a thread saying you banned him - fine.

But, the self-congratulatory length Evilore went to publically stone him is ridiculous.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: TVC15 on August 19, 2008, 03:39:47 PM
I agree with drohne in that the fat jokes should be allowed to come back.  Those stupid Nintendo fans ruined things for everyone, just like they're ruining gaming.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 03:42:11 PM
Nintendo fans get unfairly blamed for that.

Sony fans ruined it with their Gabe Newell jokes AFTER the Twilight Princess Gerstman fiasco. But nobody blames Sony Fans.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 19, 2008, 03:45:04 PM
I agree with drohne in that the fat jokes should be allowed to come back.  Those stupid Nintendo fans ruined things for everyone, just like they're ruining gaming.

If you can't ridicule fatties, then whom can you ridicule?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 03:47:31 PM
Nintendo fans get unfairly blamed for that.

Sony fans ruined it with their Gabe Newell jokes AFTER the Twilight Princess Gerstman fiasco. But nobody blames Sony Fans.

They all helped out in the random railing against someone for arbitrary reasons not relating to the product or anything we are reviewing.

Although in Gerstmann's case, calling him fat was actually a valid point to bring up.  The guy docked the game because you had to move your hand, but then the Gamecube review was still less than the Wii review...what?

And then this:

[youtube=425,350]mWtwxLlzvw8[/youtube]

WHAT
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:48:06 PM
Shouldn't this go to the Outside Link Thread?

smh

Relax, I got it taken care of
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 03:50:28 PM
that video is awesome

that's how i play wii games

fuck getting off the couch
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 03:52:44 PM
Ryan Davis :heartbeat
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bocsius on August 19, 2008, 03:53:23 PM
I agree with drohne in that the fat jokes should be allowed to come back.  Those stupid Nintendo fans ruined things for everyone, just like they're ruining gaming.

If you can't ridicule fatties, then whom can you ridicule?

Nintendo fans.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 03:55:38 PM
that video is awesome

that's how i play wii games

fuck getting off the couch

So do I for the most part, but how you gonna compare it to real golf when you are sitting on a damn sofa? that doesn't work.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tundra on August 19, 2008, 03:57:10 PM
It's not all too difficult to get disgusted at this forum angry mob mentality. I have seen this too often lately, and frankly, i think it sucks.

Especially when directed against people who have been in the industry since forever.

I remember when :bow JEFF MINTER  :bow2 complained in his blog about the fact, that Frogger sold more than Space Giraffe, and a million little cockboys who haven't been even born at the time Minter was already GOD took this as a chance to piss on his name and legacy.

It's like nothing's holy anymore.
Yeah, i am an old fart complaining here, but well, what gives...

I agree that Dyack took this to an extreme, and probably deserved some flak for his displayed intellectual arrogance, but he is still onehundred times the man than those anonymous cocksuckers hiding behind their names could ever hope to be.

And now they are having a circle jerk about how they have shown him...Those manly men...


::)

... honestly...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: drohne on August 19, 2008, 04:03:58 PM
I agree with drohne in that the fat jokes should be allowed to come back.  Those stupid Nintendo fans ruined things for everyone, just like they're ruining gaming.

DUDE

MAKE IT SO
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 04:05:03 PM
Haha, Jaffe chiming in... what a riot

Hey guys did you forget that his team didnt like him either and publically called him out on it? Did you not see he left his job at Sony? Did you not see that he got plump and started smoking weed? Hey why not tell some other people to fuck their mothers loose cunt, Jaffe.

Morons



Sorry had to post that.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: TVC15 on August 19, 2008, 04:06:22 PM
I agree with drohne in that the fat jokes should be allowed to come back.  Those stupid Nintendo fans ruined things for everyone, just like they're ruining gaming.

DUDE

MAKE IT SO

I'm doing what I can!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: laesperanzapaz on August 19, 2008, 04:10:54 PM
i weep for the internet
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 04:14:00 PM
Not to start anything, but

"I mean, I always answer questions about them and correct people if they have some info on our games that is not correct, but I don't look at Neogaf as a PR tool." -Jaffe

Jaffe has as far as I know not always been honest about what has happened to his games, so it'd seem to me that him going around correcting people and telling people what's what, not always in absolute honesty, would fall under using NeoGAF as a PR tool.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Jansen on August 19, 2008, 04:15:48 PM
http://toohuman.net/index.php?option=com_joomlaboard&func=view&id=68469&catid=2#68469

:lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 19, 2008, 04:17:46 PM
It's not all too difficult to get disgusted at this forum angry mob mentality. I have seen this too often lately, and frankly, i think it sucks.

Especially when directed against people who have been in the industry since forever.

I remember when :bow JEFF MINTER  :bow2 complained in his blog about the fact, that Frogger sold more than Space Giraffe, and a million little cockboys who haven't been even born at the time Minter was already GOD took this as a chance to piss on his name and legacy.

It's like nothing's holy anymore.
Yeah, i am an old fart complaining here, but well, what gives...

I agree that Dyack took this to an extreme, and probably deserved some flak for his displayed intellectual arrogance, but he is still onehundred times the man than those anonymous cocksuckers hiding behind their names could ever hope to be.

And now they are having a circle jerk about how they have shown him...Those manly men...


::)

... honestly...


 Agree 100%
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 04:18:57 PM
There was nothing to elicit a lol in that thread, Laharl... you lame
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 04:20:03 PM
I know, I just let you keep your pride
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 04:21:20 PM
you know it'd be funny if evilore actually played too human and it turned out that he really liked it
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Jansen on August 19, 2008, 04:25:06 PM
There was nothing to elicit a lol in that thread, Laharl... you lame

i'm sorry you didn't find the "they just lost one of the best hooks they had" amusing. :(

you know it'd be funny if evilore actually played too human and it turned out that he really liked it

how would anyone ever find out if he liked it? truth serum injection?

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 04:28:37 PM
Someone should make a thread titled, "Too Human review thread of scoring the same as Turok (BIISH)"
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 04:30:44 PM
There was nothing to elicit a lol in that thread, Laharl... you lame

i'm sorry you didn't find the "they just lost one of the best hooks they had" amusing. :(


I didn't see anything wrong with that. When your name (NeoGAF) is plastered all over the internet, people will look. When have you seen something like this propagate in a huge manner?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tabasco on August 19, 2008, 04:43:45 PM
If GAF is bringing back the fat jokes I want the gay jokes back too.  Sick of everyone being all offended by stupid stuff.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 04:57:15 PM
Today, 04:46 PM: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12455622&postcount=1101

Today, 04:48 PM: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12455642&postcount=1103

Come on, it's sort of funny.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bocsius on August 19, 2008, 04:58:57 PM
I chuckled.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 04:59:36 PM
Oh my god, it's actually written by Paladino.  :lol

Someone should ask them if they wouldn't prefer if he just came in there to gush about it.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Mr. Gundam on August 19, 2008, 05:00:22 PM
The other posters are just ignoring mifune's comment.  :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 05:01:11 PM
paladino used to be pretty funny on the video game show podcast
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 05:03:36 PM
The other posters are just ignoring mifune's comment.  :lol

This fails to surprise me. I guess if you can't get good reviews to slaver over, you might as well go read some totally honest impressions from Microsoft PR dudes.

You'd think the obvious PR stuff like "Banjo Kazooie: Nuts & Bolts ... Pre-Order Today!" or "Too Human - Get it! Got it? Good!" would have tipped them off. But hey, better hype through force denial.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 19, 2008, 05:17:01 PM
well, to be fair, paladino has always presented himself as community pr on gaf from what i recall
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 19, 2008, 05:30:29 PM
As opposed to the Insomniac dude rite duck.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 05:31:44 PM
And the dude who works for an advertising company who makes professional threads for Killzone, Resistance, and MGS4.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 05:35:42 PM
well, to be fair, paladino has always presented himself as community pr on gaf from what i recall

For sure. I'm not saying anything about the source, but it's comical that it's being quoted as, you know, just some game impressions from some dude.

As opposed to the Insomniac dude rite duck.

Stevenson? He posts in the form of an Insomniac community manager, a bit like when Frankie posted about Bungie related stuff. If either of those posted their game impressions on a blog and people actually quoted these impressions as, you know, just some impressions from some dudes, then it'd be funny too. But that has, as far as I know, not occurred. You guys suck at this.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Kestastrophe on August 19, 2008, 05:49:50 PM
Btw demi, I was wrong. the big chains are only getting it tomorrow it seems.

I called my BB last night and they said it would be in by 10 this morning. I went at 3:30 and those distinguished retail fellows said that it doesn't get in until tomorrow at 2.  :maf :maf :maf
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: drohne on August 19, 2008, 06:26:19 PM
using microsoft pr to counterbalance the negative reviews is honestly a step up from using russian maxim

not just maxim

not just a russian publication

but RUSSIAN MAXIM
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: gibletsngravy on August 19, 2008, 06:28:29 PM
Someone should post a gif of like evillore as the 300 dude kicking dyack as the persian down the hole!!! omg so aweomse!!! Wooooooooooowoooooo  neogaf motherfucker!!!!
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 06:39:38 PM
Did Dyack even break the ToS at all?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 19, 2008, 06:44:02 PM
Doesn't anyone care about St. Catharines' economy?  :cancry
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: drohne on August 19, 2008, 06:47:05 PM
by not buying too human i am not only striking a blow against shit games but helping provide young canadian engineers with the impetus to leave their miserable provincial backwaters :american

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Vrolokus on August 19, 2008, 06:54:09 PM
Maybe someone else already raised this question, but:

Does anyone think Dyack might not have been banned if Too Human turned out to be a critical success?  I mean, banning a guy who hates you and makes mediocre games is pretty easy.  But what if those early reviews had been more positive?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: drohne on August 19, 2008, 06:58:51 PM
seems pretty clear that the ban was set in motion by that 'worst forum ever' interview, which was presumably conducted before the reviews came in

but if too human was a critical success it probably wouldn't be such a shit game, and if it wasn't a shit game mark mcdonald wouldn't have written that e3 06 preview, and that preview seems to have given dyack's teetering mental health a decisive push -- so in a roundabout way you're right
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Vrolokus on August 19, 2008, 07:04:40 PM
seems pretty clear that the ban was set in motion by that 'worst forum ever' interview, which was presumably conducted before the reviews came in

but if too human was a critical success it probably wouldn't be such a shit game, and if it wasn't a shit game mark mcdonald wouldn't have written that e3 06 preview, and that preview seems to have given dyack's teetering mental health a decisive push -- so in a roundabout way you're right

True.  I guess I just don't see Malka (or any of the GAF mods) banning a developer who makes games the majority of the board likes

The one thing that gives those guys - and most of the community there - a full, raging hard-on is the idea that developers and publishers give a shit what they say and visit the site.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 07:11:11 PM
Remember that thread Evilore made about the evil of groupthink at GAF?   :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 07:21:43 PM
Its so fucking sad that G4 is reporting on this.  :lol What else can be said about the channel that has Ninja Warrior, Cheaters, and Hurl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 07:21:52 PM
The one thing that gives those guys - and most of the community there - a full, raging hard-on is the idea that developers and publishers give a shit what they say and visit the site.

How true.  Sadly, for those delusional posters, few relevant devs or publishers really give a crap about that forum.  I'm sure quite a few famous industry people sometimes post there to pass some free time but the majority of them are nobodies like the small time Sony devs that try to come off as being smarter than John Carmak and Gabe Newell.  
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 07:22:54 PM
Its so fucking sad that G4 is reporting on this.  :lol What else can be said about the channel that has Ninja Warrior, Cheaters, and Hurl

You're joking, right? this isn't actually on TV...that would just be wrong.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 07:30:35 PM
A lot of devs I know used to read GAF (mainly before the full NPD was cut off), but it seems Kotaku actually garners the most dev hits.

I could believe that but I doubt few of them take those GAF jokers seriously.  Or at least they shouldn't.

All the devs I've seen on GAF that've engaged in serious discussion should have spent more time on their shitty games instead of posting.  
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 07:31:01 PM
Quote
A lot of devs I know used to read GAF


it's weird that a whole slew have stopped huh?
like there was some event that tipped everyone over the edge.


Bowing down to the NPD masters and their Attorney Armies does that.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 07:36:44 PM
Dyack really  is a fucking idiot.  He doesn't have to take that crap.

Look at CliffyB for example.  I've seen him popped in a few times but he never bothers arguing with the fanboys that nitpick his game to death.  

Why bother when you're already at where those fuckers dream they would be?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: MCD on August 19, 2008, 07:45:40 PM
Dyack really  is a fucking idiot.  He doesn't have to take that crap.

Look at CliffyB for example.  I've seen him popped in a few times but he never bothers arguing with the fanboys that nitpick his game to death.  

Why bother when you're already at where those fuckers dream they would be?
(http://i36.tinypic.com/2rniryp.jpg)
put up or shut up.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 07:47:37 PM
Quote
Why bother when you're already at where those fuckers dream they would be?

yup, responding and arguing it out is going to do nothing. once someone has decided you are a douche and your game is shit, how on earth do you reverse that ?!

Devs should know better and just stay above this.

:bow Xfag Emperor :bow2

I bet your salary is 10x more than the Gaf Emperor will ever make. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 08:24:00 PM
Quote
A lot of devs I know used to read GAF


it's weird that a whole slew have stopped huh?
like there was some event that tipped everyone over the edge.

It was npd, that and the forum generally went to shit after they started to act self important.

Uh, EXCUSE ME, but according to the Venerable Owninator of Epic Win Evilore, LOTS of devs are still around.

They just don't want to post openly because of how stupid YOU all are, they don't want to be hassled by your dumbness.*




*Yes, he actually said something along these lines, that tons of important devs were still registering in SECRET. :shh
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Mrbob on August 19, 2008, 08:38:47 PM
EB don't let me down with your brutal honesty.

On a scale of 1 to 10 with one being shit and ten being really, really shitty where does Too Human rank? 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 19, 2008, 08:44:57 PM
I know of at least three cases of people getting fucked over pretty bad for posting at GAF. :'(

damn...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: pilonv1 on August 19, 2008, 09:22:59 PM
can we get names/companies/hints? ;)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 19, 2008, 09:29:25 PM
I know of at least three cases of people getting fucked over pretty bad for posting at GAF. :'(
Damn that is awful.  :'(
Did they let the cat out of the bag or something?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 09:32:31 PM
"It is a love or hate game."

My ass. The highest praise the game has gotten is "not bad"; not a single "serious" critic, not even the most Dyack-friendly among them, has managed to express "love" for the game. Not sure about "hate," either, but it's evidently not a very polarizing experience.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 09:36:01 PM
Yeah, this 'love it/hate it game' shit is really stupid.

The only times when it kinda works is when talking about a very specific genre, which Too Human isn't.  It would work for some obscure Japanese game, or a survival horror game, or other things like that.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 09:49:30 PM
EB don't let me down with your brutal honesty.

On a scale of 1 to 10 with one being shit and ten being really, really shitty where does Too Human rank? 

7.7
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Grecco on August 19, 2008, 09:49:38 PM
I know a guy from Blue Castle used to post at Gaf,  and one of the guys from Tiger Hill posted there
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 19, 2008, 09:54:36 PM
This easily the best defense of Too Human I have seen on gaf:

Quote from: Polari
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 19, 2008, 10:01:39 PM
I think this is the worst wait I've had to endure for a game... COME ON ALREADY
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 19, 2008, 10:10:46 PM
:lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 19, 2008, 10:11:17 PM
This easily the best defense of Too Human I have seen on gaf:

Quote from: Polari
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
 

 :rofl
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: duckman2000 on August 19, 2008, 10:12:45 PM
Brilliant
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 19, 2008, 10:14:26 PM
This easily the best defense of Too Human I have seen on gaf:

Quote from: Polari
Since when did 3/5 = 6/10?
 

Maths are hard.  :'(
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: siamesedreamer on August 19, 2008, 10:18:14 PM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12459246&postcount=1603 (http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12459246&postcount=1603)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Bocsius on August 19, 2008, 10:26:36 PM
3 out of 5

6 out of 10

Nope, not seeing the connection.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Crushed on August 19, 2008, 10:35:13 PM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 19, 2008, 10:54:54 PM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
And at what point do the lulz stop?
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 19, 2008, 11:03:06 PM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
And at what point do the lulz stop?

I'm not sure you quite grasp the seriousness of what transpired, nor the necessity for a representative of neoGAF to respond.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: border on August 19, 2008, 11:47:28 PM
I still can't entirely see why scaling enemies is a horrifyingly bad design-decision for a dungeon hack-n-slash game, but given my inexperience with the genre I guess I can't do much but defer to the experts around here.  WoW's Heroic Dungeons (which scaled leveling dungeons into max-level dungeons with better loot) only improved the game, IMO.  So long as the loot and difficulty scales upward, why should old content be made obsolete by leveling?  I can understand how scaling might fuck up a game like Oblivion, because then it's difficult just to navigate even the newbie zones in the overworld without running into monsters that you have to stop and kill.  But if only the instances scale (as in Too Human or WoW), I don't really see the problem.

Anyhow, here's an SK designer to talk about how the scaling works.  Enemies scale to your level, but this does not take into account your gear and enchants:

http://toohuman.net/index.php?option=com_joomlaboard&Itemid=28&func=view&id=69557&catid=2



    - Your level (levels in coop) determine the "spread" of the enemy's levels that will spawn. You will often be fighting enemies below, at, and above your level.

    - Levels are pretty much base stats for you and the enemies. You can use all of the game's bonuses to go beyond that base. So for example, the Bioengineer can not 1hit kill a Melee Goblin of the same level (without a crit) at level 1 (if of course these are the stats/skills you want to focus on). You can easily power-up/loot your bioengineer enough to 1hit kill Melee Goblins of your same level at later/higher levels in the game.

    - XP in coop is essentially split, with a reasonable cap for the lower level player. There's potential to level a bit faster like this but nothing of "power leveling" type. Do expect a pretty strong challenge if you're of much lower level though.

    - At level 50 you will incredibly powerful, but the enemy tactics will alter along the way to keep them challenging. Here are some examples of evolving tactics:

        - Enemies will not circle you as long and go if for attack much faster at higher levels.
        - Enemies will have a greater chance of being a polarity, the higher their level is.
        - Telegraphs (pauses before their attacks) will be decreased, making them more ravenous.
        - Enemies will come in bigger packs, and more will attack you at once.
        - Missile Goblins will fire more missiles, that are more accurate, and travel faster.


    These are just some examples.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 20, 2008, 12:04:03 AM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
And at what point do the lulz stop?

I'm not sure you quite grasp the seriousness of what transpired, nor the necessity for a representative of neoGAF to respond.

http://www.evilbore.com/forum/index.php?topic=6017.msg615322#msg615322

What the fuck man.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 20, 2008, 01:55:12 AM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
And at what point do the lulz stop?

I'm not sure you quite grasp the seriousness of what transpired, nor the necessity for a representative of neoGAF to respond.

http://www.evilbore.com/forum/index.php?topic=6017.msg615322#msg615322

What the fuck man.

It was the first post I read when I clicked on that thread.  The serious tone of that post just made me ROFL.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Vrolokus on August 20, 2008, 03:22:16 AM
I'm not sure you quite grasp the seriousness of what transpired, nor the necessity for a representative of neoGAF to respond.

I saw that post too, and was immediately struck with a migraine. 

I'm toying with writing up a piece on GAF for the blog I work for... if anyone has dirt to dish, pm me. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: JustinP on August 20, 2008, 03:31:58 AM
pretty lame for neogaf to ban dyack.  not unexpected though. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: demi on August 20, 2008, 03:32:09 AM
Nah you shouldnt bother with that, it will probably get you censored... or banned

lol
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tundra on August 20, 2008, 03:39:42 AM
If you are even just a little bit in the spotlight, posting on a forum is just a very bad idea. You can only try to suck everybodies balls or at least avoid stepping on anybodies toes like your life depends on it (like Jaffe is doing on Gaf for instance).

You have to stay diplomatic at all times, yet those unwashed hordes of internet forum monkeys can throw whatever feces they desire at your head.

It's a lose-lose situation for the devs...
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on August 20, 2008, 07:09:41 AM
If you are even just a little bit in the spotlight, posting on a forum is just a very bad idea. You can only try to suck everybodies balls or at least avoid stepping on anybodies toes like your life depends on it (like Jaffe is doing on Gaf for instance).

You have to stay diplomatic at all times, yet those unwashed hordes of internet forum monkeys can throw whatever feces they desire at your head.

It's a lose-lose situation for the devs...


What the fuck?

A lot of developers do fine on GAF but Dyack made many mistakes:

- Treated trolling as a serious call out to his game, causing him to act like a batshit nutter.

- Never talked about anything other than his own stuff.  Other developers will at least talk about things other than their own games.  Dyack did not do this.  He amounts to nothing more than a shill.  Only twist is that he developed the games so he isn't like some random Sfag.  Still, if you look at his post history, all of his posts are about his games.

- Acted like a general douche.  If it was anyone other than Dyack, they would have been banned long ago.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: The Sceneman on August 20, 2008, 07:14:02 AM
That guy has to be a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow.

he isnt, hes one of my best friends in real life, and he was clearly talking about point scales
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tundra on August 20, 2008, 08:31:23 AM
If you are even just a little bit in the spotlight, posting on a forum is just a very bad idea. You can only try to suck everybodies balls or at least avoid stepping on anybodies toes like your life depends on it (like Jaffe is doing on Gaf for instance).

You have to stay diplomatic at all times, yet those unwashed hordes of internet forum monkeys can throw whatever feces they desire at your head.

It's a lose-lose situation for the devs...


What the fuck?

A lot of developers do fine on GAF but Dyack made many mistakes:

- Treated trolling as a serious call out to his game, causing him to act like a batshit nutter.

- Never talked about anything other than his own stuff.  Other developers will at least talk about things other than their own games.  Dyack did not do this.  He amounts to nothing more than a shill.  Only twist is that he developed the games so he isn't like some random Sfag.  Still, if you look at his post history, all of his posts are about his games.

- Acted like a general douche.  If it was anyone other than Dyack, they would have been banned long ago.

I wasn't writing about Dyack in my post. I think you are right about that his approach was counterproductive...

My post was just a general observation...It's a very bad idea to post on a forum as a "celebrity", because either you try to please the "horde hive mind", or you are lost. I have seen it's couple of times in other places as well.

If you think you are on even terms as a known person with a bunch of anonymous people on a forum you clearly have no experience. There will be always some people testing you and your nerves, and some small cocksuckers who want to play big by shooting you down...

Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: cool breeze on August 20, 2008, 09:11:39 AM
That guy has to be a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow.

he isnt, hes one of my best friends in real life, and he was clearly talking about point scales

He could have worded it a lot better, and that is coming from an illiterate bastard like myself.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Brehvolution on August 20, 2008, 09:16:49 AM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
And at what point do the lulz stop?

I'm not sure you quite grasp the seriousness of what transpired, nor the necessity for a representative of neoGAF to respond.
???wut
Does 3/5 not translate to 6/10?? That is what I was laughing about anyway.
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Tundra on August 20, 2008, 09:18:24 AM
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=332081

GAF shitting on Dave Perry (Earthworm Jim, MDK) now.

Wonder how much chance he would stand if he posted now in that thread..  ::)
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Smooth Groove on August 20, 2008, 10:09:46 AM
He was talking about 5 point review scales versus 10 point review scales.
And at what point do the lulz stop?

I'm not sure you quite grasp the seriousness of what transpired, nor the necessity for a representative of neoGAF to respond.
???wut
Does 3/5 not translate to 6/10?? That is what I was laughing about anyway.

I just wanted to use that quote, lol.

And, no, 3/5 does not translate to 6/10.  A 3/5 stars film, hotel, or restaurant is universally accepted as being good while 6/10 is considered a D by most standards. 
Title: Re: The Too Human Thread of BamYouHaveAids is a loser
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 20, 2008, 11:16:50 AM

And, no, 3/5 does not translate to 6/10.  A 3/5 stars film, hotel, or restaurant is universally accepted as being good while 6/10 is considered a D by most standards. 

This is a slight of hand. Because critics are not afraid to use zeros and ones, hotel and film ratings tend to vary a lot more than videogame ratings. Thus a three star hotel will be stylish, comfortable and clean and most three star movies will still be enjoyable. But most videogames that are 3 star equivalents (or 60%) are shit.

Videogame reviews do not effectively use the entire rating system. As an example, out of the 112 average scores for 2008 Xbox 360 releases on metacritic, only 12 are rated under 50%. The median aggregate score is 72.476%!