THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Great Rumbler on October 31, 2010, 10:06:12 PM

Title: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on October 31, 2010, 10:06:12 PM
First episode's on right now, AMC's not skimping on the violence apparently.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on October 31, 2010, 10:28:08 PM
Saw it like a week ago :pirate
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on October 31, 2010, 10:31:32 PM
Saw it like a week ago :pirate

Nobody cares about you and your piracy.

Show's awesome so far, by the way.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on October 31, 2010, 10:33:21 PM
excited to watch rerun after East Bound and Down

sleep and being rested for classes tomorrow :piss2
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on October 31, 2010, 11:00:03 PM
Can't believe I'm getting all misty-eyed over a show about zombies.  :'(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Tauntaun on October 31, 2010, 11:07:07 PM
YES!  I am so excited for this series.  :rock
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on October 31, 2010, 11:18:41 PM
I just picked up the Omnibus of the comic to this before I sit and watch the pilot. What a ridiculously involved book. I can't believe a book about zombies can tug at my emotions so strongly, not to mention this is the second book about zombies to do so, the first being World War Z.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on October 31, 2010, 11:20:55 PM
fuckin time warner cable sucks. my AMC and USA both frequently cut out and sometimes simply dont come in - today being the latter.  >:(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on October 31, 2010, 11:44:22 PM
It was alright, nothing spectacular. Book doesn't really pick up for a while anyways.


BIG SPOILERS
spoiler (click to show/hide)
when shane dies it gets better
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on October 31, 2010, 11:44:34 PM
By the way, those are BIG SERIES SPOILERS
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Nintendosbooger on November 01, 2010, 12:06:27 AM
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 12:08:57 AM
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.


They don't run in the comic.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Nintendosbooger on November 01, 2010, 12:20:47 AM
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.


They don't run in the comic.

Oh, I wasn't aware that it was based on a comic book series. Well, since I'm a big proponent of honest book-to-movie translations, I'll let it go.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mr. Gundam on November 01, 2010, 12:38:20 AM
Great pilot.

I love the fact that even though you can outrun them, these slow creatures manage to overwhelm you with their numbers. That's scary.

Giving them the ability to run ruins that.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Disposable White Guy on November 01, 2010, 12:42:02 AM
Second the motion on lumbering zombies.  Fuckers will sneak right up on your ass.  Besides, they're not entirely slow and have that Romero-esque bloodcraze speed when the shit hits the fan.

Pilot was awesome though.  Perfect way to end Halloween.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 01, 2010, 01:02:35 AM
first episode was really great

and agreed on the slow zombies.  When they run, you lose those great scenes when the person questions whether they use the last bullet for their own head as these slow monsters stumble towards them.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BlueTsunami on November 01, 2010, 01:56:10 AM
Hmm, not a bad episode. Going to wait to see how the characters develop before I pick out which of them to hate/love/not care about.

I don't like the developing love triangle conflict. Why did they have to inject it here? Another thing I would have preferred are the running zombies as opposed to the lumbering ones, but I suppose it costs more to hire fit zombies.


They don't run in the comic.

Oh, I wasn't aware that it was based on a comic book series. Well, since I'm a big proponent of honest book-to-movie translations, I'll let it go.

Here's a collection of twitter feed items about the rules regarding Zombies (stolen from GAF)...

Quote
Zombie Rule #1: Ability to run is based on the amount of time a zombie has been undead, and how much decay has set in.

Zombie Rule #2: Zombies decay but at a much slower rate than humans, and it’s still possible to differentiate between young and old zombies.

Zombie Rule #3: Zombies are like lions: if they’ve eaten, you can walk by them without fear, but a pack of hungry zombies will attack you.

Zombie Rule #4: The quickest speed of any zombie is a shambling run. see Night of the Living Dead. NO sprinters exist.

Zombie Rule #5: Zombies are not dexterous. They cannot pick up or use any items more complex than a rock or a stick.

Zombie Rule #6: Zombies have poor eyesight but they do have a strong sense of smell.

Zombie Rule #7: Zombies cannot speak but can communicate by pack mentality. The herd tends to move together if they sight food.

Zombie Rule #8: There is no overt recognition of people or places, there is a sense of familiarity that can dictate where a zombie moves.

Zombie Rule #9: There’s no known cause of the zombie mutation, but it’s suspected to be a virus or infection.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 04:18:00 AM
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on November 01, 2010, 07:27:36 AM
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

I think pretty much the exact opposite of this.  I liked it a lot, thought it followed the first issue of the graphic novel well.  But the sfx were cheesy.  Kinda to be expected.  I still give it two thumbs up.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 01, 2010, 08:35:16 AM
I just picked up the Omnibus of the comic to this before I sit and watch the pilot. What a ridiculously involved book. I can't believe a book about zombies can tug at my emotions so strongly, not to mention this is the second book about zombies to do so, the first being World War Z.
Because zombie movies are really about human relations, more than anything else. It's always about who we become after the shit has hit the fan, and what people are really like when society isn't forcing them into a certain shape. The comic is incredibly moving, because Kirkman gets that.


Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.
You should probably give it an episode or four before judging. Morgan's not a dickhead, he's a guy who is defending his son, trying to figure out what's next. I thought the change in tone is well-explained by him questioning the source of Rick's injury. I think the pilot did a fantastic job of navigating some tricky stuff.

I'll be happy if they can find a way to make Rick's wife more tolerable. In the comic, she's a borderline shrew.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 01, 2010, 09:50:59 AM
I really hope they changes they make are more than "lets add some melodramatic backstory to this character" this show will be pretty boring if you know who lives and dies and how.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Bloodwake on November 01, 2010, 12:19:51 PM
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 01, 2010, 01:29:46 PM
ugh is that spoiler is true I hope they don't drag that triangle shit for too long.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 01:43:32 PM
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH

Pretty much. My personality isn't cut out for television dramas. I should probably stop giving them chances. Movies are great, don't get me wrong, it's impossible to take a graphic novel and cram it into a 2 hour film without something going wrong, but when you have a television show and a graphic novel, I don't see why things would get lost in translation.

I'm pretty sure I just can't watch television, ever.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 01, 2010, 01:44:30 PM
Green Man you shoudl prob label those are HUGE SERIES SPOILERS so people don't click those unless they've read the comics
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 01, 2010, 01:51:12 PM
Holy shit this pilot is fucking awful. They managed to not just fuck up a little, but fuck literally every single thing up. After a half hour the show hasn't proceeded past the first six pages. Why is Morgan such a dickhead? He was a friendly black man, not some ghetto-ass. Did the writers even read the fucking comic? Jesus. The special effects are fantastic, but not much else is really noteworthy here. Normally I wouldn't mind some creative liberty if it was for the better, but if they're shitting on some of the most basic things, and royally fucking with the more or less flawless exposition and pacing in the comic, I don't even want to know how fucking terrible it gets later on.

However on second thought, it's been proven to me that normally pilots barely manage to represent a TV show by the time it hits its stride, so maybe it'll get better.

tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH

Pretty much. My personality isn't cut out for television dramas. I should probably stop giving them chances. Movies are great, don't get me wrong, it's impossible to take a graphic novel and cram it into a 2 hour film without something going wrong, but when you have a television show and a graphic novel, I don't see why things would get lost in translation.

I'm pretty sure I just can't watch television, ever.

Comics have an entirely different flow than movie and TV series, even books.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 02:05:24 PM
From what little I know about plot exposition and writing a story, the pilot explained everything in a much more convoluted, drawn-out fashion compared to how quickly the comic book got the same points across, and with so much more simplicity. Like I said, I just don't get television show construction. I've never liked a live-action television drama, except maybe the first three seasons of House.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 01, 2010, 02:17:20 PM
The only part I felt that about was the conversation near the beginning between Shane and Andrew, which went on too long. Other than that, I thought it worked fine, but I don't have the comic book for reference.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 02:38:39 PM
I got the comics for Secret Santa last year and loved them, but found that once it gets to the
spoiler (click to show/hide)
prison
[close]
its gets a little wild and loses a bit of the focus as a study on the human condition. It becomes and action drama essentially.

I didn't feel that way until
spoiler (click to show/hide)
The Governor storms the prison on a fucking tank
[close]
when I flipped to that page I literally put the book down and facepalmed.

Just fyi, GIGANTIC plot spoilers in that tag, do not open.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 04:00:56 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
I even found Michonne a little too much. The woman was a lawyer and now she's some sort of ninja? That's a huge amount of suspension of disbelief required.
[close]

Her character kind of makes sense though, since
spoiler (click to show/hide)
the author felt it necessary to put the cast into really impossible situations, like the rape and imprisonment, so might as well have an impossible character to fight those dangers away. She is too much. WAY too much. I really didn't like where the book went once they got to Woodbury.
[close]
Shit just got stupider and stupider and like you said, it became more of an action drama. It reminds me a lot of A History Of Violence. The book, obviously.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: drew on November 01, 2010, 04:43:57 PM
which came first with the waking up from a coma angle - 28 days later or the walking dead comic and or book?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: CajoleJuice on November 01, 2010, 04:53:33 PM
which came first with the waking up from a coma angle - 28 days later or the walking dead comic and or book?

28 Days Later

The comic book author says he started writing the comic before that, though.  ::)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 01, 2010, 07:07:56 PM
It's not like it's some genius plot device, it's a pretty obvious one to slowly bring the reader/viewer into the world.

I guess they could've made him into a Korean who stayed in an internet cafe for a month straight and didn't notice the zombie apocalpyse around - but even then he would've wondered why everyone was afk.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 01, 2010, 07:17:37 PM
:lol

Please. Make that movie.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 01, 2010, 09:11:41 PM


tl;dr - ITS NOT THE GRAPHIC NOVEL TELEVISION AND MOVIES SUCK I HATE CREATIVE LIBERTIES AAARGH

my mind was crafting this reply almost to the letter as I was reading his post. i even added the "AAARRGH" at the end in my mind  :lol


the pilot -
loved it. it knew when to stick close to the pages and when to take some liberties. really awesome stuff.

I really do hope the first season is the only one that sticks close to the novel. it would be boring watching this show when you know pretty much where the plot is going to go.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
going up to where Carl kills Shane is a good point to divert itself from the pages and go it's own route. tbh the prison storyline would be kind of boring on screen
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 09:16:24 PM
I really must have a TV-unfriendly brain. You guys are applauding this thing and I couldn't stand it when I was watching it. It has nothing to do with comic book loyalty, I think Scott Pilgrim was better than the books, off the top of my head I can't think of more examples.

I'm far from a comic-book nerd, but whatever. The characters just seemed like any other television drama character transplanted into a zombie apocalypse. There was nothing likable for me. Oh well.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 01, 2010, 09:23:41 PM
i think you're giving waaaayy to much credit to the characterization in the book. early on none of the characters where anything more then by the numbers. just like any medium it's over time where they start to develop. did you really like any of the characters when you first read the very first issue of TWD? you may have grown to like Rick or grown to hate him over time but after the very first issue? I doubt it.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 09:47:03 PM
I'm not saying the characterization is fantastic in the comic, far from it, but they're established pretty clearly early on. From the first chapter I already knew what kind of character Rick was, and the way they handeled Morgan in the book was simple and straightforward. I agree, characters should be developed over time, but right in the first 10 minutes of the pilot it's clear Shane is a douche and the writers tried REALLY hard to drive this point home. It was insulting how blunt the exposition was, where in the comic at least there's subtlety and build-up.

Something I love in the book was that the opening scene started right away with action, ended abruptly and threw you into the middle of the situation just as Rick had been. In the show we have a zombie child picking up a stuffed animal, a drawn out, pointless conversation, and a boring, tensionless shootout filled with completely superfluous characters. The exact same information the pilot took 20 minutes to reveal could've been transmitted within a minute, but instead we get endless scenes where absolutely nothing happens.

I'm not trying to sound superior here, but most televisons shows don't impress me because the writing is marketed to the lowest common denominator. Nothing is ever illustrated with any grace or tact, it's all just tied into a bundle and shoved down your throat.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 10:14:05 PM
Do you honestly think anybody who doesn't like zombies will become fans of this show? Pass that joint, brotha.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mupepe on November 01, 2010, 10:18:37 PM
my wife doesn't like zombie movies but she liked the pilot.  a zombie show has way more potential than a zombie movie because it gives more of a chance of attachment as opposed to movies where it's hard to see past the horror factor.

anyways, i really liked it.  i have the novels but never got around to reading them.  but i don't get how shane is a douche in the show.  he seemed okay to me.  not really good or bad.  *shrug*
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 10:21:07 PM
Mupepe you used to be my bro on entertainment, now we're always at odds :fbm
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 01, 2010, 10:22:59 PM
my mom watched this and now I can't watch ita nymore  :fbm
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 01, 2010, 10:25:42 PM
She won't let you watch it because of the violence?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 01, 2010, 10:26:25 PM
no I can't watch something that my mom finds cool it's not hip
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mupepe on November 01, 2010, 10:28:28 PM
Mupepe you used to be my bro on entertainment, now we're always at odds :fbm
sorry boo boo.  maybe because i never read the novels.  but i really liked it :fbm
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 01, 2010, 10:37:39 PM
startselect didn't like the pilot because it took more than one minute to set up the world, introduce the characters, and explain the zombies.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 01, 2010, 10:38:17 PM
Don't like zombies?! Why were you a RE freak in middle school?!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 01, 2010, 10:42:23 PM
Holy Shit, some whiney bitches here.

If a shot by shot recreation of the graphic novels with them as storyboard is the only thing that will satisfy you, then grab your copies and a flashlight and reread them under the covers.

Let some adults talk about what this show is accomplishing, and maybe some adult discussion about how the contrasts to the original work are necessary and either add or detract to the original story - or maybe just how the changes were necessiated by the medium.

Otherwise, all I see is your soggy vagina is dripping on my shoe.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: demi on November 01, 2010, 10:49:01 PM
Is it worth watching the show if u never read the book (as far as the pilot is concerned). This sounds worth sitting down to after a hard day's work.

I hate reading btw. So boring.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 01, 2010, 10:58:31 PM
Watch Fringe instead.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: demi on November 01, 2010, 11:08:21 PM
Isnt that the LOST clone? No thanks... want to watch something else.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mr. Gundam on November 01, 2010, 11:10:25 PM
Is it worth watching the show if u never read the book (as far as the pilot is concerned). This sounds worth sitting down to after a hard day's work.

I hate reading btw. So boring.

I've never read the comic, and I really enjoyed it. Give it a shot.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 01, 2010, 11:11:15 PM
Is it worth watching the show if u never read the book (as far as the pilot is concerned). This sounds worth sitting down to after a hard day's work.

I hate reading btw. So boring.

watch this

leper malek

ban startselect
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: demi on November 01, 2010, 11:12:32 PM
Aight I'll snag it sometime this week. Is it a weekly airing? Guess I could google that
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 01, 2010, 11:19:54 PM
Isnt that the LOST clone? No thanks... want to watch something else.

Fringe is nothing like lost, for example lost is shit and Fringe is not there are many more differences but that is pretty much the main one.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: demi on November 01, 2010, 11:21:10 PM
That's not what I heard but, you are wrong about lots of things... dont let me ruin your streak

: *
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mr. Gundam on November 01, 2010, 11:30:56 PM
Aight I'll snag it sometime this week. Is it a weekly airing? Guess I could google that

Yep. Sundays at 10pm on AMC.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 01, 2010, 11:46:20 PM
Holy Shit, some whiney bitches here.

If a shot by shot recreation of the graphic novels with them as storyboard is the only thing that will satisfy you, then grab your copies and a flashlight and reread them under the covers.

Let some adults talk about what this show is accomplishing, and maybe some adult discussion about how the contrasts to the original work are necessary and either add or detract to the original story - or maybe just how the changes were necessiated by the medium.

Otherwise, all I see is your soggy vagina is dripping on my shoe.

Sounds like you're the soggy vagina. I never said I want a shot by shot recreation, I'm not a comic nerd, and I don't give a fuck about staying faithful to a comic book I just fucking read not one day ago.

What I did say is that, for a television drama it's uninteresting pap + zombies, that TV shows' habit of appealing to a mass audience by sacrificing good writing is impossible for me to overcome, and that the introduction of themes and characters within the show, based on that pilot, isn't compelling.

You and too many others throw "adults" around like some badge you're proud of when in most cases the lot of you act more childish than the US government. Talk to me like a goddamn man and tell me why I'm wrong other than having a different opinion than you.

And if you're just trolling, then:
Quote
Let some adults talk about what this show is accomplishing, and maybe some adult discussion about how the contrasts to the original work are necessary and either add or detract to the original story - or maybe just how the changes were necessiated by the medium.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Nintendosbooger on November 02, 2010, 12:08:31 AM
The only character I like at this point is the dude w/ son. He showed some real emotion there when he struggled to keep the cross-hairs on his wife. I'm looking forward to seeing him develop.

The cop is obviously the central character, but he isn't anything special.

Everyone in that camp with the cop's wife, including his former partner and the wife herself, sucks. That partner is an asshole. How can you not agree to put warning signs outside of Atlanta, knowing that any other survivor out there would probably unknowingly head that way? Awful leadership on his part, and an asshole move.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mupepe on November 02, 2010, 12:41:59 AM
Don't like zombies?! Why were you a RE freak in middle school?!
huh? i love zombies. never said i didn't
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 02, 2010, 12:45:58 AM
Wow what a great show, knew nothing about it going into the pilot other than that a bunch of people pirated it a week ago.  I guessed that it was going to be a drama since it's on AMC but it really seems to be a good show for everybody.  Nice mix of action throughout the pilot.

anyways, i really liked it.  i have the novels but never got around to reading them.  but i don't get how shane is a douche in the show.  he seemed okay to me.  not really good or bad.  *shrug*
He said a few colorful jokes that weren't that bad but maybe it's because he is having an affair with his partner's wife within what seems like a few weeks of the outbreak.  No doubt his own wife/girlfriend that he was bitching about became a zombie though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 02, 2010, 03:36:58 AM
smh
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 02, 2010, 04:38:26 AM
my wife doesn't like zombie movies but she liked the pilot.  a zombie show has way more potential than a zombie movie because it gives more of a chance of attachment as opposed to movies where it's hard to see past the horror factor.

anyways, i really liked it.  i have the novels but never got around to reading them.  but i don't get how shane is a douche in the show.  he seemed okay to me.  not really good or bad.  *shrug*

Shane's basically being a manly-man in the car conversation with Rick, clearly trying to expose some feelings in an effort to get Rick to open up. Not because he's planning on putting a move on Lori at that point, but because he's Rick's best friend, Rick seems to have it together better than he does. Shane feels a little inferior because Rick is married and has a kid, so maybe he also wants to hear that not everything is perfect. Or maybe he's just voicing concern.

In the pilot and in the comic, Shane and Lori both in this weird spot where the affair occurred when they were sure Rick was alive but being cared for. But in the comic, it was a one-time thing, and Lori tells Shane it was a mistake and won't ever happen again; but IIRC that's after Rick shows up at camp. The timeline's different here, because we see Shane and Lori before they see Rick alive and healthy again.

In either case, Shane has still put the moves on his best friend's wife while he's looking after her because that friend is ill. That's dickish.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mupepe on November 02, 2010, 10:55:42 AM
ah shit.  my bad.  i had a brainfart and got rick confused with shane.  I was wondering why you guys were talking shit about him. 
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: bud on November 02, 2010, 12:50:14 PM
i dig the zombipacolypse subject and the production vales are terrific; all in all, it was a good pilot. but i'm getting a ''been there, done that vibe'' from it. hopefully, that'll change in the following episodes. doubt it, though.

methodis, i read your spoiler. fml. does that happen fairly soon? hope it happens in this season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Disposable White Guy on November 02, 2010, 01:19:52 PM
Re-watched it this morning, and I still dig this show a lot already.  The shot outside of the hospital after Rick wakes up was fucking great, and so was the scene where

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Morgan goes to the bedroom window and tries to kill his wife.
[close]

:bow Frank Darabont :bow2

:bow AMC :bow2
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on November 02, 2010, 03:17:53 PM
I hoped that by now, the zombie craze would be dead and buried but I guess we'll have to suffer for a little longer yet...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 02, 2010, 03:26:46 PM
I hoped that by now, the zombie craze would be dead and buried but I guess we'll have to suffer for a little longer yet...

:teehee
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: GilloD on November 02, 2010, 08:45:42 PM
Pilot was awesome. Sorry it wasn't for comic nerds. BU BU BU ON PAGE 17 RICKS SHIRT IS CLEARLY TORN ON THE LEFT IN TEH PILOT ITS TORN ON THE RIGHT IS NITHING SACRED
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 02, 2010, 08:56:52 PM
The biggest difference between the pilot and the first issue of the comic is that the comic wasn't fucking boring.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 02, 2010, 08:58:32 PM
The biggest difference between the pilot and the first issue of the comic is that the comic wasn't fucking boring.

:daps

My man :smug
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 02, 2010, 09:03:17 PM
The biggest difference between the pilot and the first issue of the comic is that the comic wasn't fucking boring.

:daps

My man :smug

You know you're in trouble when your main supporter is Diunx.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Hey, Diunx!
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 02, 2010, 09:04:59 PM
I didn't need support, but since dissenting opinions usually get gang banged on this forum GAF style I'll take all the support I can get :D
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 02, 2010, 09:14:29 PM
Don't mind GR he is a Tron fan.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 02, 2010, 09:20:48 PM
The premiere TRIPLED Mad Men's, Breaking Bad's, and Dexter's highest ever ratings
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 02, 2010, 09:22:51 PM
I like Tron too :(
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 02, 2010, 09:26:02 PM
I like Tron too :(

And thus does the startselect/Diunx partnership crumble to ruin.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 02, 2010, 09:31:59 PM
The CW is already working on Zombie Blógs.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 02, 2010, 09:35:52 PM
I like Tron too :(

And thus does the startselect/Diunx partnership crumble to ruin.

:gloomy

I have no friends!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on November 02, 2010, 11:22:18 PM
I've started reading the graphic novel again, looks like I was further in than I though.  Still, it's pretty friggin awesome.  So far I'm to the part where
spoiler (click to show/hide)
they're getting kicked out of the prison.
[close]

Can't wait to see what happens.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 03, 2010, 08:40:08 AM
I've started reading the graphic novel again, looks like I was further in than I though.  Still, it's pretty friggin awesome.  So far I'm to the part where
spoiler (click to show/hide)
they're getting kicked out of the prison.
[close]

Can't wait to see what happens.

It's pretty harsh. I nearly stopped reading there. Curiosity dragged me back with a fierceness once the next trade paperback came out.

There's some good (but shocking) stuff after that as well.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: GilloD on November 03, 2010, 08:48:27 PM
Everything after the jail is kind of goofy. It was very OHMYGOD CAN YOU BELIEVE I JUUST WROTE THAT I AM A SHOCKING WRITER.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Saint Cornelius on November 03, 2010, 09:49:11 PM
It was a cool show.

But you all should watch TERRIERS tonight on FX. 10PM.  please!!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 03, 2010, 09:52:40 PM
I think he's going after shock, but only insofar as to show how messed up everyone becomes in this situation. Maggie's decision, the direction the twin boys go, and how hardened Carl is becoming, it's all down to "yeah, if the world ends, it's going to be hard to keep it together."

I keep going back to McCarthy's The Road as a parallel to this story. They're both father/son stories about how far we'll go to protect our offspring, convinced that the world is horrible, even as they grow up knowing no other world. However, I wouldn't put it past Kirkland to take that away in the end, though I believe if Carl dies, it would be the end of Rick.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: bud on November 05, 2010, 11:21:24 AM
methodis, i read your spoiler. fml. does that happen fairly soon? hope it happens in this season.

can someone answer this one?

it's about
spoiler (click to show/hide)
shane's death
[close]
, assuming methodis wasn't lying.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 06, 2010, 02:49:34 AM
It happens in like issue 5 or 6.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 06, 2010, 09:07:45 AM
Yeah, it happens in the first trade paperback collection, so it's an early thing. However, who knows what they'll do in the TV series?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 07, 2010, 01:54:37 PM
it started getting really comic-booky right around the prison issues

samurai/ninja assassin type new character, supervillain "mayor," fallout-style sadistic "raider" group, cannibals, etc

he's since taken a step back from that and gotten better, but he probably ought to wrap it up within a year or so as there is quite a bit of wheel-spinning and he's been leaning heavily on standard cliches for a while
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 07, 2010, 02:07:46 PM
If they are starting to plan for 5+ seasons I wouldn't be surprised if they most stayed faithful to the comics, but started cutting and pasting some of the storylines around, maybe skipping some arcs entirely.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 07, 2010, 06:15:46 PM
it started getting really comic-booky right around the prison issues

samurai/ninja assassin type new character, supervillain "mayor," fallout-style sadistic "raider" group, cannibals, etc

he's since taken a step back from that and gotten better, but he probably ought to wrap it up within a year or so as there is quite a bit of wheel-spinning and he's been leaning heavily on standard cliches for a while

I must admit, while I still think this is the best zombie comic evar, and some of the best zombie fiction I've seen, I'm entirely inclined to agree with you. It's using more comic book tropes than before. But as long as no-one shows up in tights and a cape, I think I'm OK with it. The Woodbury incident was probably my favorite arc to-date.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
The Governor is clearly meant as an example of what Rick could theoretically become if things had gone another way, or where he still might go if he isn't careful. They didn't have to give the Governor a child in his care, they didn't have to remove an arm; those things are there to draw parallels.
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Cormacaroni on November 07, 2010, 06:52:46 PM
It's not gonna wrap up in a year - he's got it planned out through #150 at least.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 07, 2010, 10:19:38 PM
They used the "N"-word! :omg
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 07, 2010, 11:00:46 PM
That episode was MUCH beter, i'd say amazing BUT

god damn Angela's casting is fuckign terrible. She's supposed to be a hot, slim, 20 year old, not some 40 year old hag.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 07, 2010, 11:02:29 PM
short round is the best character
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 07, 2010, 11:06:04 PM
It's not gonna wrap up in a year - he's got it planned out through #150 at least.

Where'd you see that?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 07, 2010, 11:08:12 PM
SHORT ROUND
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 07, 2010, 11:32:31 PM
short round is the best character

"Where's Glenn?"

:lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on November 08, 2010, 09:22:50 AM
Episode 2 was AWESOME.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Zombie gut rub-downs? Disgusting. :bow2
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on November 08, 2010, 09:23:52 AM
My only complaint was the black guy getting the ever-loving shit beat out of him and then only having like a bloody nose. Oh well.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on November 08, 2010, 12:55:53 PM
short round is the best character

"Where's Glenn?"

:lol

I didn't get that until I just watched it. 

 :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 08, 2010, 02:42:30 PM
Yes, she is. I hate that bitch.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 08, 2010, 03:39:12 PM
Lori is ugly, way too skinny and Andre looks old and ugly, Amy is hot though the show still needs a milf where's Carol?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: TakingBackSunday on November 08, 2010, 04:07:09 PM
scored a 4.7 :bow2
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Nintendosbooger on November 08, 2010, 08:29:46 PM
Second show was good.

At some point, however, they're going to have to introduce a new, more challenging breed of zombies, because these common "walkers" have illustrated to be nothing more than a mere nuisance to any well-prepared individual or group. When those two trekked through the sewers and encountered those nasty rats, my mind began to wander at the possibility of infected non-humans and the challenges they'd pose.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 08, 2010, 08:47:22 PM
If you want infected non-humans, watch the Resident Evil movies. There are crows and dobermans and probably zombie plants.

Personally, I hate non-human zombies, because it blows the metaphor apart. Zombies as "the other," as the force which is largely like us but clearly not us, this fails when it's a zombie dog or a zombie chicken trying to peck us to death. Zombies have to retain their anthropic form to provide the specific threat of zombies: unreasoning mindlessness, overwhelming numbers, implacable pace.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 09, 2010, 07:19:17 AM
Just finished watching ep. 2. Really enjoyed it overall. Anyone who still thinks it's boring, they should probably check out now.

So far, Lori's actually not seeming as bitchy as she is in the comic. An adulterer, sure, but she's also probably assuming that Rick is dead, and Shane is clearly the de facto leader of the group even if he's not exactly a respected pillar of the little community. It's said that in the face of death, humans get a tremendous sexual drive increase, maybe an evolutionary boost to try and increase the number of births to offset the deaths. Or maybe she's trading sex for safety or placating Shane's temper.

But since Rick is being shown as the "let's do anything to get all of us out of this" leader, and Shane is the "Too bad! They knew the risks! They're as good as GONE!" abandon-your-family guy, I expect the situation on the ground will change quickly once Rick inevitably joins them next episode.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 09, 2010, 08:06:30 AM
Rick is going to knock the fuck out of both Shane his bimbo wife, take his kid and ride into the sunset. Also, I knew that horse would die early on. I mean, how long can a horse survive without water, especially during a zombie apocalypse? They ate that fucking horse up.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on November 09, 2010, 09:10:14 AM
(http://furiousfanboys.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/zombiekilloftheweek_01.jpg)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 09, 2010, 10:19:37 AM
Rick is going to knock the fuck out of both Shane his bimbo wife, take his kid and ride into the sunset. Also, I knew that horse would die early on. I mean, how long can a horse survive without water, especially during a zombie apocalypse? They ate that fucking horse up.

Yeah, I think that is there to show that Rick is a man of good intentions, but those good intentions as a plan won't survive contact with the enemy.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 09, 2010, 10:28:14 AM
I'm up to "Life Among Them" in the trade paperbacks now (vol. 12). I am seriously jonesing to get the next bit of story out of the singles, but will wait. "Life Among Them" ends with Rick making, I think, a serious error in judgment (though it is difficult to blame him after Woodbury).
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Douglas, the ex-senator is clearly suffering from a bloated sense of entitlement, and also seem stuck in The Old Ways, wanting to assign people a duty so that each person has their spot. The reality of the new world is a critical need for malleability, adaptability, the willingness to do whatever it takes to survive... not just filling one's role in society.
[close]

Carl is remarkably realistic about the viability of maintaining their good luck; it was nice watching the reality wash over Rick, and his support of his boy as well.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 09, 2010, 10:39:03 AM
I need to start reading them again, I stopped at like issue 70 but couldn't find a place online to pirate them, anyone know?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 09, 2010, 10:41:50 PM
I need to start reading them again, I stopped at like issue 70 but couldn't find a place online to pirate them, anyone know?

Warez-bb and Myxss.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 14, 2010, 08:49:03 PM
Episode 2 was AWESOME.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Zombie gut rub-downs? Disgusting. :bow2
[close]


"one more thing.....he's an organ donor."  :rofl
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 14, 2010, 10:06:07 PM
surprise surprise. AMC HD's not coming in tonight. sooo no TWD until tomorrow for me

but the bright side is that i just discovered Time Warner added a bunch of new HD channels including BBC America HD and they're playing all 6 episodes of Luther!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: GilloD on November 14, 2010, 10:34:45 PM
surprise surprise. AMC HD's not coming in tonight. sooo no TWD until tomorrow for me

but the bright side is that i just discovered Time Warner added a bunch of new HD channels including BBC America HD and they're playing all 6 episodes of Luther!

Luther gets so silly by episode 4.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 14, 2010, 10:44:08 PM
i think its mostly due to the fact that its only 6 episodes. there wasnt enough time to build up all the characters so when one of the characters turn it ends up feeling way too abrupt. but i liked where the story went and if there had been more time to build the characters then it wouldnt have been an issue
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 14, 2010, 11:04:51 PM
I can't tell if this show is any good or not. I've read the comics so it's all kinda "meh" because the little things bug me like andrea, carla's and now Tyraels actor in the next episode it looks like

how are reviewers reviewing it
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 14, 2010, 11:32:44 PM

how are reviewers reviewing it

why do you care?  Can't you watch it and form an opinion for yourself as to its quality?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on November 14, 2010, 11:41:58 PM
yes, I was just wondering how the public are perceiving it, because I don't want it cancelled.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 14, 2010, 11:45:45 PM
yes, I was just wondering how the public are perceiving it, because I don't want it cancelled.

Umm, after episode two, a second season was already greenlit, according to wikipedia.  Research, dude.

I would have thought the whole "OMG, HIGHEST RATINGS EVAR FOR A CABLE DRAMA" might have clued you in after the pilot, tho.

http://www.thefutoncritic.com/news/2010/11/08/amc-resurrects-the-walking-dead-for-a-second-season-639014/20101108amc01/

Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 15, 2010, 12:03:21 AM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 15, 2010, 12:16:29 AM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


spoiler (click to show/hide)
The wife crying over her beat-up dead-beat husband was a big time eye-roller, though.  :lol
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 15, 2010, 12:29:49 AM
totally

it should have been
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane standing over the body as the all the women cheer him on.  Or at least the wife picks up his cigarette and puts it out in the husband's eye.

emotions are so passé
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 15, 2010, 12:33:49 AM
That would be awesome, yeah. :patel
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: TakingBackSunday on November 15, 2010, 01:33:39 AM
short round is by far the best character
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 15, 2010, 03:58:53 AM
I knew Merle was going to do that at the end.  The way Lori and Shane can't just tell Rick pisses me off though.

It's pretty disappointing how they've already finished half of the first season.  They're starting production of the second season in February so hopefully they can air it before Fall 2011?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 15, 2010, 04:00:09 AM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


:bow :bow
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 15, 2010, 04:01:41 AM
i was hoping that when rick and his gal bone, and she says,"don't worry he won't wake up" they show the two of the kissing for one moment, transition, show the kid wide awake with his eyes open wondering what the fuck that noise is.

wasted opportunity.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on November 15, 2010, 07:34:56 AM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


spoiler (click to show/hide)
The wife crying over her beat-up dead-beat husband was a big time eye-roller, though.  :lol
[close]

lol you know nothing of abusive relationships.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 15, 2010, 09:17:31 AM
i was hoping that when rick and his gal bone, and she says,"don't worry he won't wake up" they show the two of the kissing for one moment, transition, show the kid wide awake with his eyes open wondering what the fuck that noise is.

wasted opportunity.

he should have been woken up to the sound of moaning, only to run out of the tent yelling about a zombie eating his mom. 
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Then Shane walks in and starts crying.  Then he goes and wakes up the wife beater guy and takes his anger out on him.
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 15, 2010, 09:20:39 AM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


spoiler (click to show/hide)
The wife crying over her beat-up dead-beat husband was a big time eye-roller, though.  :lol
[close]

lol you know nothing of abusive relationships.

I didn't roll my eyes because I thought it was unrealistic.  :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 15, 2010, 08:39:27 PM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


spoiler (click to show/hide)
The wife crying over her beat-up dead-beat husband was a big time eye-roller, though.  :lol
[close]

An eye-roller?  Maybe.

Realistic, though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 15, 2010, 08:40:59 PM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


spoiler (click to show/hide)
The wife crying over her beat-up dead-beat husband was a big time eye-roller, though.  :lol
[close]

An eye-roller?  Maybe.

Realistic, though.

Quote
I didn't roll my eyes because I thought it was unrealistic.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 15, 2010, 08:45:14 PM
episode 3
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane :bow2

taking out his anger on a wife beater
[close]


spoiler (click to show/hide)
The wife crying over her beat-up dead-beat husband was a big time eye-roller, though.  :lol
[close]

An eye-roller?  Maybe.

Realistic, though.

Quote
I didn't roll my eyes because I thought it was unrealistic.

Yes, I posted before reading.  Sue me.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 15, 2010, 09:14:47 PM
Finally watched it, another good ep.

Ratings actually went up from Ep2  :o
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 15, 2010, 09:47:40 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Not quite sure why redneck dude hacksawed his hand off, rather than the handcuffs....
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Tauntaun on November 15, 2010, 09:51:27 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Not quite sure why redneck dude hacksawed his hand off, rather than the handcuffs....
[close]

Cause he's a stupid redneck?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 15, 2010, 09:54:16 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Not quite sure why redneck dude hacksawed his hand off, rather than the handcuffs....
[close]

.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 16, 2010, 01:47:43 AM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Not quite sure why redneck dude hacksawed his hand off, rather than the handcuffs....
[close]

Cause he's a stupid redneck?
I just posted the same damned response over in the TV thread. :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 16, 2010, 02:17:48 AM
I've picked up the first comic collection thing (first eight volumes) last week-ish and have been going through it.  I'm about halfway into it and I'm really excited to see how they handle a lot of this stuff on the show.  Already I think the show is doing a lot of things better.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on November 16, 2010, 09:23:57 AM
(http://furiousfanboys.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/zombiekilloftheweek_02.jpg)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 16, 2010, 03:44:05 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Not quite sure why redneck dude hacksawed his hand off, rather than the handcuffs....
[close]

Cause he's a stupid redneck?
I just posted the same damned response over in the TV thread. :lol
It seems unlikely that you could cut through an inch or two of steel with a steel saw.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 16, 2010, 05:22:58 PM
Okay, how about the heads of the bolts/screws where it's attached?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 16, 2010, 05:28:47 PM
Okay, how about the heads of the bolts/screws where it's attached?

He was completely out of his mind at that point and the zombies were banging on the door to the roof. Not exactly a situation where he's going to sit down and rationally think about the best way to get himself loose.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 16, 2010, 05:50:33 PM
Hence: "stupid redneck."
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 16, 2010, 05:55:47 PM
Okay, how about the heads of the bolts/screws where it's attached?

He was completely out of his mind at that point and the zombies were banging on the door to the roof. Not exactly a situation where he's going to sit down and rationally think about the best way to get himself loose.

Oh please, it was stupid writing with the sole purpose of creating more melodrama all this excuses are pretty ridiculous.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 16, 2010, 06:52:30 PM
yeah, i didn't buy that for a second, it was pure set up for that last shot

someone was a little too in love with their own writing there
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on November 16, 2010, 06:55:52 PM
You knew he was going to do that in the last episode when the hacksaw fell out of the bag. If you didn't you're a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow and need to be hit on the head with a tack hammer.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 16, 2010, 07:01:13 PM
and that totally makes it not bad writing

also, tone down that fucking violent rhetoric you use all the time, you sound like a goddamned psychopath
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 16, 2010, 07:14:47 PM
You knew he was going to do that in the last episode when the hacksaw fell out of the bag. If you didn't you're a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow and need to be hit on the head with a tack hammer.

It was obvious that the hacksaw would come into play.  It wasn't obvious that he'd cut off his damn hand, rather than the cuffs or the pipe.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on November 16, 2010, 07:34:44 PM
and that totally makes it not bad writing

also, tone down that fucking violent rhetoric you use all the time, you sound like a goddamned psychopath

Someone never saw Tommy Boy.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 16, 2010, 07:46:45 PM
A lot of people never saw Tommy Boy.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 16, 2010, 11:37:02 PM
i was kind of hoping this show was going to end the season with the major plot point from the comics
spoiler for anyone who hasnt read the books:

spoiler (click to show/hide)
for me, ending the season on Carl killing Shane just makes sense. it's such a huge moment and is a perfect cliffhanger. but... i dont see them getting us there in 2 more episodes. they would have to quickly transition into Shane/Rick tension next episode and play it hard going into the 6th then have the moment where Shane, Rick and Carl go hunting. i just dont see it happening tho.
[close]

tbh i'm worried they might not even go that route at all. which would be disappointing. while i do want this show to find it's own story, that particular plot point really needs to stay IMO.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 17, 2010, 12:07:11 AM
Okay, how about the heads of the bolts/screws where it's attached?
That's an awful precise cut to be making one-handed.  Regardless, that would be an even thicker cut than cutting right through the steel rod since the nuts went around the threaded ends of the rod.  You can find examples of steel saws cutting paper thin pieces of steel at a time but even then, they use tons of cooling fluid.  It would be nice if they put this guessing to rest in the beginning of the next episode by showing a tiny notch on the rod where he tried initially to cut the steel.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 17, 2010, 04:07:40 AM
hey, don't get me wrong, I was pretty sure he'd saw SOMETHING of his off to get out of there. I personally would probably have tied off my hand, and cut inward from between my pinky and ring finger, so I'D STILL HAVE A HAND.

We can discuss this all day, but at the end of it all: Yes, he was panicked by a group of zombies pounding on the door. Yes, he had a saw and it was obvious that it would be put to use in his escape.

But are any of us actually arguing that he wasn't a stupid redneck?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on November 17, 2010, 03:15:57 PM
He obviously cut off the hand he used to eat the chocolate covered pretzels.
[youtube=560,345]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfVVjpVZP8I[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 17, 2010, 10:57:19 PM
Lori really tears into Shane there at the end. I thought, "wow, Lori's even more of a bitch than she is in the comic!" But it looks like they're setting it up differently than the book.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane told her that Rick had died; she or Shane told Carl. In the comic, it's much more of a "the world is ending" moment of weakness and doubt.
[close]

Carl is badass. He's really going to be great as things ramp up. I got chills when he was talking to his mom in the tent.

He obviously cut off the hand he used to eat the chocolate covered pretzels.
[youtube=560,345]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfVVjpVZP8I[youtube]

Good christ.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on November 21, 2010, 01:47:03 PM
Just watched the pilot. Wow that was great.
Downloading the comic now. The first comic I'll ever read.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Raban on November 21, 2010, 02:17:56 PM
I tried the first two episodes, and oh lord is the acting and dialogue bad (the dialogue is so bad i think it brings down the acting) hopefully it gets better, but for now, this is is a no. :'(

:bow
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 21, 2010, 10:59:23 PM
First part of the episode was pretty boring, through the middle it was okay but not great, but the last few minutes were :omg
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 21, 2010, 11:15:30 PM
great episode



some series finale spoiler theories/comments related to the comic:

spoiler (click to show/hide)
at this point if they are going to kill Shane this season then it's likely not going to be at the hands of Carl. well... they could still go that route. but the way i see it, the plot line that leads up to that scene needs some build up that simply isn't here yet. we need Rick and crew grounded for some time and Carl starting to learn how to shoot. we need Rick and Shane to have a serious power struggle. based on what we see for the next few episodes I don't think it's going that way. that said, it doesnt necessarily mean Shane won't still eat it. they may have Merle kill Shane. I really hope that's not how they do it tho. i do like it for the show to find it's own way in terms of story but Carl killing Shane is the one thing that needs to stay i think.
[close]

Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 21, 2010, 11:42:42 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
they've already said shane's gonna last longer on the show than he did in the comic
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 21, 2010, 11:50:58 PM
booo
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 22, 2010, 12:01:39 AM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
he'll probably still get taken out by carl, but i am thinking it will be during the prison period
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Cormacaroni on November 22, 2010, 01:01:31 AM
It's not gonna wrap up in a year - he's got it planned out through #150 at least.

Where'd you see that?

It's like you don't trust me implicitly in all things! :wag
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 22, 2010, 02:17:55 AM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
they've already said shane's gonna last longer on the show than he did in the comic
[close]

Thought that would happen
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Don't think there has been enough build up yet and two episodes isn't enough time. 

My guess is that Shane makes some bad calls at Hershel's farm and that is a big part of it.  There is a lot to work with there where a character can lose his head, and you kinda see it happen to Rick in the comic.  Just have Shane willing to kill Hershel and the others to protect his group or something.

That and there is more to Shane now than there was before.
[close]

some other theories I saw thrown around are
spoiler (click to show/hide)
that Merle (however you spell it) will be The Governor.  The idea is because he lost a hand become of Rick, so when he eventually takes Rick's left hand, it can be revenge.
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Loki on November 22, 2010, 03:27:50 AM
Don't know why the third episode still isn't showing on FiOS On Demand yet.  I don't want to watch episodes out of sequence and have only seen the first two so far, which I enjoyed enough to want to continue watching.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 22, 2010, 05:29:18 AM



some other theories I saw thrown around are
spoiler (click to show/hide)
that Merle (however you spell it) will be The Governor.  The idea is because he lost a hand become of Rick, so when he eventually takes Rick's left hand, it can be revenge.
[close]


that would really good if they did this. but i don't see them keeping his character off that long. i think he'll be back and dealt with by the end episode 6.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Loki on November 22, 2010, 05:50:07 AM
Well speak of the devil - the third ep just aired on On Demand and I just watched it.  Great episode.  Is AMC replaying the one that just aired tonight (4th ep) at any point on live TV?  EDIT: just checked the listings; seems like they're airing it on Wednesday at 4:00 AM.  Not sure if I'll be up then even though I'm off this week.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 22, 2010, 07:09:58 AM
It's not gonna wrap up in a year - he's got it planned out through #150 at least.

Where'd you see that?

It's like you don't trust me implicitly in all things! :wag

Put some meat on your bones and we can talk again as men with similar values.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Here, have a donut.
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 22, 2010, 10:18:07 PM
Finally a great episode! Kirkman saving the day :bow2
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on November 24, 2010, 03:15:12 AM
Oh shit that ending was awesome.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 24, 2010, 08:02:35 AM
The ending saved the episode, this show is 80%.shit and 20% good, such a let down.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on November 24, 2010, 03:50:41 PM
Show has gone downhill after the pilot.  :-\
I'll keep on watching though.

And yeah, acting and dialogue are quite horrible.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on November 24, 2010, 08:43:01 PM
Just watched eps 3 and 4...  You know, I started out loving this.  But it felt like those episodes were a bit weak.  They're REALLY taking creative liberties.

Before, someone said the show is best watched if you think of it as it's own story, and have not read the graphic novels.  I'm inclined to agree now.  I still like it, I'm just hoping the next ep is better.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Cormacaroni on November 24, 2010, 10:34:07 PM
Some of the melodrama stuff has been truly execrable; the stuff on the fishing boat almost made me lose my lunch. There is no way I'm going to get attached to all 300 characters, sorry. Still, it's definitely good enough to hold my attention so far. They've nailed Rick, that's the key part for the long term I guess.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 24, 2010, 11:02:14 PM
Yeah, I'm liking Rick too.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on November 25, 2010, 01:07:04 AM
Without the melodramatic opening scene seeing that girl get eaten would have been far less awesome.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 25, 2010, 06:35:58 AM
Prolly should spoiler that.

It's a good episode; I think next week we're going to find out that Merle
spoiler (click to show/hide)
cut the conspicuously shown warning lines, which had noisy tin-can bells hanging from them, probably after confirming that his brother wasn't in the camp.
[close]
Jim's little freak out and recovery, with the closing line of the episode were good. I think I preferred the sullen, near-catatonic version of him from the comic though. You were never sure what he'd do. This one looks almost normal now that he's past his sunstroke.

It's really damned stupid though to keep ANYONE tied to a tree when the camp is under constant threat from zombies wandering nearby. Shane basically asking him to understand and checking to see if they're going to be copacetic while Jim is still tied up? What the hell? "Why don't you untie me so I can at least flee if a zombie comes by, and then we can work out our personal issues, m'kay?"

Also, everyone who said this episode is 80% crap is wrong. It's 90% crap. The addition of the faction INSIDE ATLANTA is dumb enough, but
spoiler (click to show/hide)
why the hell are los cholos de retirement home entirely unmolested by zombies despite being downtown? If they aren't downtown, why wouldn't they give Rick and his guys a ride back to their van? Where are they getting enough food to look after so many senior citizens? How many have they had to wrangle and cap after they pass on naturally?
[close]
NONE OF IT MAKES SENSE. All the stuff in the comics, it's like Kirkman has at least thought it out decently. Not this! This is all "hey, wouldn't it be cool if this surprising thing happened? and we all remember our humanity?"

Here's an idea: WRITE CRAP WHICH MAKES SENSE.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 25, 2010, 01:12:18 PM
I just hope that in the future Darabont keeps making his melodramatic oscar baits and leave my comic books alone :punch
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 25, 2010, 01:54:49 PM
I just hope that in the future Darabont keeps making his melodramatic oscar baits and leave my comic books alone :punch

Actually, with each passing episode Frank Darabont has taken on a smaller role [first episode: director and writer, second episode: writer, third episode: shared writing with two others, fourth episode: didn't write or direct].
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 25, 2010, 01:59:25 PM
He is the executive producer and head writer you can't get bigger roles than those.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 25, 2010, 02:05:02 PM
He is the executive producer and head writer you can't get bigger roles than those.

Doesn't change that he's taking on a smaller role on each individual episode and that each episode has gotten steadily worse.

The fourth episode was actually written by Robert Kirkman, by the way.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 25, 2010, 05:41:16 PM
Here's an idea: WRITE CRAP WHICH MAKES SENSE.
The fourth episode was actually written by Robert Kirkman, by the way.
:fbm
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Cormacaroni on November 25, 2010, 08:23:43 PM
Without the melodramatic opening scene seeing that girl get eaten would have been far less awesome.

Well, I get that, hence my comment about not getting attached to all 300 characters. When the manipulation is so obvious and so corny, it doesn't work as intended; in fact, it has the opposite effect.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 25, 2010, 09:04:50 PM
this series is only gonna get worse once they hit the prison, then it's almost all bad dialogue and melodrama
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 25, 2010, 09:10:11 PM
He is the executive producer and head writer you can't get bigger roles than those.

Doesn't change that he's taking on a smaller role on each individual episode and that each episode has gotten steadily worse.

The fourth episode was actually written by Robert Kirkman, by the way.

Dude he is the show runner, everything needs his approval before being filmed every plot point, every character and every piece of dialog goes trough him, he probably is responsible for those caricatures they call characters and that crap about the latino only old people home, this is his show its shit so I blame him.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 25, 2010, 10:08:19 PM
He is the executive producer and head writer you can't get bigger roles than those.

Doesn't change that he's taking on a smaller role on each individual episode and that each episode has gotten steadily worse.

The fourth episode was actually written by Robert Kirkman, by the way.

Dude he is the show runner, everything needs his approval before being filmed every plot point, every character and every piece of dialog goes trough him, he probably is responsible for those caricatures they call characters and that crap about the latino only old people home, this is his show its shit so I blame him.

I imagine he's more likely responsible for setting the tone and the overall direction of the series, and then bringing in other writers/directors to handle the actual details beyond the first two episodes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 25, 2010, 10:22:07 PM
From wiki

Quote
In television an executive producer might have more power than any other credited crew member — this is the case with the show runner. Generally a show runner (still credited as an executive producer) is the creator of a series and/or an influential staff writer on the show. Their role is to guide the overall creative progress of the show's story over the course of a season — basically, the de facto creative director of the show — and all creative decisions (from casting to script approval) go through them. Usually, while there may be many credited "producers" and "executive producers" (with varying responsibilities) on a television series, there are just one or two in the position of show runner.

This is his show man he is responsible for it and its quality.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 25, 2010, 10:52:59 PM
Nothing there contradicts what I said. He's guiding the show, making the long-term decisions, and deciding who gets killed off. He's NOT in the writer's room everyday writing every single detail of the show and constantly standing behind the camera setting up shots and giving motivation to the actors. Which is unfortunate, because the episodes with every single detail handled by him have been the best so far.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: GilloD on November 25, 2010, 11:09:54 PM
You guys are hilarious babies.

BUBBUB UBBUBUBUBUBU MAH ZOMBIE SHOW IS SO DIFFERENT FROM MAH ZOMBIE COMIC AND THE SHOW IS NOTHING LIKE MY REAL LIFE

Dude. It's a TV show. It has zombies, it's pretty good, has some action and a little feeling. It's not the fucking Wire, get over it. If you can't enjoy this show, you're a hopeless nerdlinger.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 25, 2010, 11:16:31 PM
What GilloD said.

Nothing there contradicts what I said. He's guiding the show, making the long-term decisions, and deciding who gets killed off. He's NOT in the writer's room everyday writing every single detail of the show and constantly standing behind the camera setting up shots and giving motivation to the actors. Which is unfortunate, because the episodes with every single detail handled by him have been the best so far.

and you know all of this for sure...HOW?

How do you know he's not being a JMS or Aaron Sorkin type?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 25, 2010, 11:25:12 PM
Seems a safe assumption given that he's no longer listed as the director or writer beyond episodes 1 and 2.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 25, 2010, 11:43:37 PM
Nothing there contradicts what I said. He's guiding the show, making the long-term decisions, and deciding who gets killed off. He's NOT in the writer's room everyday writing every single detail of the show and constantly standing behind the camera setting up shots and giving motivation to the actors. Which is unfortunate, because the episodes with every single detail handled by him have been the best so far.

He is the show runner so he IS in the writers room everyday and he approves every horrible piece of dialog this show has, and Guillo the reason this show is so shitty has nothing to do with the comic.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Boogie on November 25, 2010, 11:44:39 PM
Seems a safe assumption given that he's no longer listed as the director or writer beyond episodes 1 and 2.

assumption

...

assumption

...

assumption


...
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 25, 2010, 11:47:45 PM
They wouldn't have taken his name off the writing credit if his role wasn't diminished, or changed or however you want to say it, in some way.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 25, 2010, 11:52:50 PM
Dude he is the SHOWRUNNER do you really think that his role consist on directing/writing a couple of episodes and then go on a vacation or something he is in charge of the show, writers report to him, for example in the last season of Doctor Who Steven Moffat was the showrunner and he had input in every script going as far as to decide which villain to use and yet the credits only list him as a writer in the ones that he wrote.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 26, 2010, 12:01:27 AM
Dude he is the SHOWRUNNER do you really think that his role consist on directing/writing a couple of episodes and then go on a vacation or something he is in charge of the show

Go find the post where I suggested that.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 26, 2010, 12:19:44 AM
Personally I don't have any problem with the show's dialog or writing but then I loved the fly episode of Breaking Bad so maybe there's no point trying to change anybody's opinion.

he probably is responsible for those caricatures they call characters and that crap about the latino only old people home, this is his show its shit so I blame him.
What's wrong with a latino-centric nursing home?  I think that would make sense with the language barrier and everything.  They did make it clear that a lot of the people left to run the place are the relatives of the seniors and that they only put on a thug image to look tough.  I don't remember them saying the nursing home was meant for latins though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 26, 2010, 12:23:49 AM
The non-latino ones were turned into carnitas and menudo when local supplies began to run low.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
:drool
[close]

Gotta admit, I'm damned happy that Kirkman is getting paid for his accomplishment, and that I've got a weekly zombie TV show to watch because of it.

Invincible next, please.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on November 27, 2010, 03:06:41 AM
Just watched the pilot. sheeeeeeiiiiiiiitttt amazing. Rest of the episodes good, or does it fall off significantly?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 27, 2010, 03:15:36 AM
Just watched the pilot. sheeeeeeiiiiiiiitttt amazing. Rest of the episodes good, or does it fall off significantly?

First one's the best, fourth episode was pretty meh except for the last few minutes. There's been a noticeable drop in quality, but I think it'll pick up a bit in the next two episodes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 27, 2010, 09:06:04 AM
Just watched the pilot. sheeeeeeiiiiiiiitttt amazing. Rest of the episodes good, or does it fall off significantly?

Show is crap.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 27, 2010, 05:58:21 PM
Yep, never in a million years I would have imagine that I was gonna enjoy Terriers more than twd this fall.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 27, 2010, 07:19:14 PM
Just watched the pilot. sheeeeeeiiiiiiiitttt amazing. Rest of the episodes good, or does it fall off significantly?
Look at the comments, people either love the show or hate it.  If you liked the pilot, you'll probably like the rest of the season.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on November 28, 2010, 03:28:05 AM
ep3 was awesome too :bow

Some of the acting is a bit too overdone (lots of yelling) but I wouldn't expect anything more from a zombie show. I HATE all zombie shit but I like this show
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 28, 2010, 11:14:50 PM
Tonight sucked.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Seriously, 20 minutes of crying over a corpse for half a day, melodramatic acting, stupid "morals" such as burying vs burning when they're infected anyways, stupid moralizing the treatment of a dude who is infected and an endangerment to the whole camp,  5 minutes of them saying goodbye to Jim - and even then why the fuck did he choose to just turn into a zombie instead of just asking them to blow his brains out? - stupid forced character development (Shane goes from asshole with a head on his shoulders to psychopath who is willing to kill his best friend in the sum of two minutes for no reason just because of a petty disagreement), stupid scientist who ruins everything because of one accident (touching acid...really?), stupid cliche' "evil" government facility;etc
[close]

It contained every single living thing I hate about the horror genre (especially zombie ones) in the time span of one hour.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on November 29, 2010, 12:34:00 AM
watched the fourth ep; hopefully the new one will  be uploaded before I have to head to bed. This show is pretty awesome. Never read the comic, and I hate zombie stuff. Kinda confused by Cohen's post: so far the only bad BAD case of acting/writing/dialogue has been the opening scene of ep4, with the sisters talking. Everything else has been pretty standard - nothing amazing, but nothing overly offensive. I didn't expect Breaking Bad quality writing/acting though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on November 29, 2010, 12:50:58 AM
I think some people are disappointed that the show's not as brutal and direct as the comic.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on November 29, 2010, 02:46:40 AM
Another good episode. I'm getting Lost vibes though, especially at the end  :lol


Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 29, 2010, 02:50:07 AM
Don't remind me :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on November 29, 2010, 02:57:09 AM
If that guy calls Rick "brotha" I'm gonna lose it
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 29, 2010, 03:04:49 AM
The ending of the show will be an elaborate battle between Shane, Rick, and their different ideologies.

Rick will defeat Shane with one final punch...

and as he does, God descends from heaven and tells them that they are allowed to enter his kingdom with all of the other survivors of the zombie apocalypse.

Four trumpets sound, the zombies warp to heaven, nestled in God's arms, anon to be devout soldiers of the kingdom once more.

The Earth descends into darkness and then...

wipe.

BOOM

"THE WALKING DEAD"
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on November 29, 2010, 03:08:40 AM
spoilerz
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Dead Amy was way hotter than Alive Amy  :-[
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 29, 2010, 03:14:33 AM
Dead Boone is hotter than Alive Boone.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on November 29, 2010, 07:15:02 AM
Yuckkkkkkkkkk. Awful episode. So much fucking ham-fisted melodrama and corny dialog.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 29, 2010, 09:35:05 AM
Yuckkkkkkkkkk. Awful episode. So much fucking ham-fisted melodrama and corny dialog.

.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 29, 2010, 04:01:56 PM
This episode was so fucking back, 45 minutes of terrible acted melodrama, when the chinaguy was like "we don't burn our people!!!!!!" I was rofl and zombie amy was the most pathetic zombie I have ever seen and I loved how rick was going to give a fucking gun to a guy that had like two minutes left to live :lol this is Heroes season 2 level of bad :yuck
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 29, 2010, 04:07:33 PM
Maybe try lowering your standards and just enjoy it for what it is, no one will think less of you.

Ugh I hate this shit, why should I lower my standards to enjoy something? there are a lot of other shows that don't require me to do so to be enjoyable, maybe the team behind this should aim for good instead of just good enough if you lower your standard.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 29, 2010, 04:37:29 PM
This episode was so fucking back, 45 minutes of terrible acted melodrama, when the chinaguy was like "we don't burn our people!!!!!!" I was rofl and zombie amy was the most pathetic zombie I have ever seen and I loved how rick was going to give a fucking gun to a guy that had like two minutes left to live :lol this is Heroes season 2 level of bad :yuck

The WE DON'T BURN OUR PEOPLE THING got me too. Seriously?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on November 29, 2010, 05:39:34 PM
Hopefully this was their RAW EMOTIONS and TOUGH DECISIONS episode so they can focus on more interesting things in the next few.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 29, 2010, 06:33:14 PM
Maybe try lowering your standards and just enjoy it for what it is, no one will think less of you.

Ugh I hate this shit, why should I lower my standards to enjoy something? there are a lot of other shows that don't require me to do so to be enjoyable, maybe the team behind this should aim for good instead of just good enough if you lower your standard.

Because your expectations are way too high? Its a serialized drama and its the first one in this setting. I've seen so so many zombie movies and believe me, this one is pretty original in terms of how they treat the characters and the overall conflict. Its really not without its faults at all, nothing is, but I hardly see how it can be seen as "terrible" or be compared to Heroes.

My expectations weren't too high, this show is based on a great book series is being develop by an oscar nominee writer/director and this was hyped(not only by the fans but by the channel itself) as the next zomg best show ever!!!11!! on AMC so I was kinda expecting a high quality tv show not this c-movie crap, my expectations were on par with the talent behind the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Tauntaun on November 29, 2010, 10:28:56 PM
Show is awesome.

Haters annihilated.

:bow 

Hey good lookin!  :-*
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Dickie Dee on November 29, 2010, 10:54:36 PM
This episode was so fucking back, 45 minutes of terrible acted melodrama, when the chinaguy was like "we don't burn our people!!!!!!" I was rofl and zombie amy was the most pathetic zombie I have ever seen and I loved how rick was going to give a fucking gun to a guy that had like two minutes left to live :lol this is Heroes season 2 level of bad :yuck

The WE DON'T BURN OUR PEOPLE THING got me too. Seriously?

WTF was the problem with that, they were just keeping a bit of mental space between the people they were just talking and relating to a few moments ago and the walking carcases they just smushed the heads in of...What the hell do you want from this show??? Jeezus
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on November 29, 2010, 11:13:00 PM
yeah I think you guys are expecting them to be much more war-hardened or some shit.  maybe they are in the comic but the characterizations in the series feels fine to me.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 29, 2010, 11:13:45 PM
This episode was so fucking back, 45 minutes of terrible acted melodrama, when the chinaguy was like "we don't burn our people!!!!!!" I was rofl and zombie amy was the most pathetic zombie I have ever seen and I loved how rick was going to give a fucking gun to a guy that had like two minutes left to live :lol this is Heroes season 2 level of bad :yuck

The WE DON'T BURN OUR PEOPLE THING got me too. Seriously?

WTF was the problem with that, they were just keeping a bit of mental space between the people they were just talking and relating to a few moments ago and the walking carcases they just smushed the heads in of...What the hell do you want from this show??? Jeezus

I guess I've never understood the human fascination with burial. Personally, in a zombie apocalypse, burn me if I die.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 30, 2010, 12:02:41 AM
I was referring to the horrible acting from glen :lol and I actually thing that burning human bodies a couple of blocks from the city of the dead is a pretty stupid idea.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 30, 2010, 09:46:53 PM
dont like the direction the show is going. no so i don't like it.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on November 30, 2010, 11:34:48 PM
So apparently Darabont fired the whole writing staff :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Eel O'Brian on November 30, 2010, 11:43:45 PM
It's not like he's any better.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on November 30, 2010, 11:49:26 PM
to be fair, whoever wrote the 'no crying in the boat' scene was probably trying to sabotage the production.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on November 30, 2010, 11:50:45 PM
So apparently Darabont fired the whole writing staff :lol

what is going on :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on December 01, 2010, 12:25:58 AM
I love that gaf thread, now all of the suddenly the writing sucks and Darabont is gonna fix it and rise the show to god tier.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 01, 2010, 12:34:15 AM
How is gaf taking the latest ep?

The SA thread is mixed. Some are defending the episode, most think it was boring.

My troll in the SA thread made it to the thread's title :lol

"death scenes should last 5 seconds to a minute at most"

:lol PROVE ME WRONG
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on December 01, 2010, 01:16:20 AM
Most people loved it and thought the death scenes were touching and develop the characters and all that crap, luckily there are a few sane people called it like it is, of course after the news about the writers now everyone agrees that the writing of the show is crap :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 01, 2010, 02:19:04 AM
The problem isn't the writing so much.

The problem is mostly editing. The premise of the sister's plight is interesting, conceptually. but the process takes too long.

In my head, I can do that scene in at least 3 different ways that would be far more emotional and last 3-4 minutes tops.

This is without mentioning the poorly edited sophomore-ish editing throughout the rest of the episode, like Jim seeing VISIONS OF ZOMBIES during his fever.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: GilloD on December 01, 2010, 03:03:22 AM
http://tv.ign.com/articles/113/1137550p1.html

WELL I HOPE YOURE ALL HAPPY (okay the writing kind of stunk but I still thought the show was pretty good!)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on December 01, 2010, 04:36:59 AM
Season finale this weekend? WTF? Season 1 only consists out of 5 episodes?  ???

The comic is pretty good so far btw. Up tp page 490 already. Can't wait to see the new characters on the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on December 01, 2010, 05:27:32 AM
Season finale this weekend? WTF? Season 1 only consists out of 5 episodes?  ???


6 episodes. and it's been widely known since way before the show even premiered.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on December 01, 2010, 05:28:53 AM
to be fair, whoever wrote the 'no crying in the boat' scene was probably trying to sabotage the production.

you mean Kirkman

the writer of the comic  :teehee
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on December 01, 2010, 05:55:18 AM
Season finale this weekend? WTF? Season 1 only consists out of 5 episodes?  ???


6 episodes. and it's been widely known since way before the show even premiered.

gay
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on December 01, 2010, 09:13:21 AM
http://tv.ign.com/articles/113/1137550p1.html

WELL I HOPE YOURE ALL HAPPY (okay the writing kind of stunk but I still thought the show was pretty good!)

I'm ok with this.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on December 01, 2010, 01:14:14 PM
God, this last episode was so worthless. I'm might be going comic exclusive.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on December 01, 2010, 03:57:24 PM
What I pulled from this article:

Quote
They also note that Darabont would be using the same model employed by Torchwood, which has several writers working on episodes for the upcoming re-launch on Starz

WHAT.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mr. Gundam on December 01, 2010, 03:58:43 PM
What I pulled from this article:

Quote
They also note that Darabont would be using the same model employed by Torchwood, which has several writers working on episodes for the upcoming re-launch on Starz

WHAT.

I heard something about an American version of Torchwood a while back.

Quote from: Wiki
In its closing scenes, with Gwen heavily pregnant and Jack leaving Earth, Torchwood effectively no longer existed. Series four, Torchwood: The New World, will see Torchwood having been reduced to the status of legend following Children of Earth. The narrative will follow two CIA agents who encounter Torchwood's supernatural world, and later Gwen and Jack.[49] Gardner has stated, however, that as with series three, Cardiff will remain a part of the show's setting, with Gwen being Welsh and her young family based in Wales.

The Wiki page is vague, but mentions that American financing (along with the BBC) allowed for a fourth season to be made, and that it will be feature UK, American and worldwide locations. This sounds similar to how CBC helped finance the first season of Torchwood.

I wonder if they'll up the T&A content now that it's airing on Starz in the US?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on December 01, 2010, 04:09:20 PM
I wonder if they'll up the T&A content now that it's airing on Starz in the US?

I hope so.

 :heartbeat Gwen

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:tauntaun
(http://blogs.poz.com/mark/upload/Captain_Jack_Harkness.jpg)
:tauntaun
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on December 01, 2010, 04:13:25 PM
http://tv.ign.com/articles/113/1137550p1.html

WELL I HOPE YOURE ALL HAPPY (okay the writing kind of stunk but I still thought the show was pretty good!)

Hey, I told you guys that everything started to tank when Frank Darabont let the staff take over writing/directing!
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mr. Gundam on December 01, 2010, 04:23:34 PM
I wonder if they'll up the T&A content now that it's airing on Starz in the US?

I hope so.

 :heartbeat Gwen

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:tauntaun
(http://blogs.poz.com/mark/upload/Captain_Jack_Harkness.jpg)
:tauntaun
[close]

Will new bow-tie Dr. Who have any run-ins with Jack and Torchwood? I heard they filmed a few eps of the new season here in the states. It's also awesome news that we're actually getting the Christmas special on Christmas day.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on December 04, 2010, 05:16:41 PM
Just finished reading the comic. That was amazing. Shits all over the show.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on December 05, 2010, 03:51:36 AM
What does the comic do better or what is different than the show?

I thought the quality of the writing was decent but of course it's bs to start from a clean slate by firing all the writers when the first season was already finished months ago.  The show is getting good ratings and reviews so I don't know who AMC is trying to bullshit with this though.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on December 05, 2010, 04:36:44 AM
The comic's pace is a bit more relentless, if you want to consider a deaths- or horrible-shit-per-issue ratio. One episode of the TV show... well, hell, didn't we go 5 episodes with one death? One? In the comic, you're never sure who's going to be safe. Likely no-one, except Rick. Rick is the point of the series: how does a man change when faced with cataclysm?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: tehjaybo on December 05, 2010, 04:02:09 PM
I wonder if they'll up the T&A content now that it's airing on Starz in the US?

I hope so.

 :heartbeat Gwen

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:tauntaun
(http://blogs.poz.com/mark/upload/Captain_Jack_Harkness.jpg)
:tauntaun
[close]

Will new bow-tie Dr. Who have any run-ins with Jack and Torchwood? I heard they filmed a few eps of the new season here in the states. It's also awesome news that we're actually getting the Christmas special on Christmas day.

I'm not sure but I totally HOPE SO.  Jack is one of my favorite characters from the entire Who-verse.  Also Christmas Special :hyper
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: drew on December 05, 2010, 04:05:53 PM
i would REALLY like to know which episodes Darabont wrote
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on December 05, 2010, 06:03:17 PM
i would REALLY like to know which episodes Darabont wrote

Did the first by himself, worked with one other person to write the second, the rest have varying degrees of support from him of the staff writers.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on December 05, 2010, 07:03:42 PM
Apparently he "secretly" re-wrote every episode in the series.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on December 05, 2010, 10:31:05 PM
HELLO CONVENIENTLY PLACED PLOT DEVICE
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 05, 2010, 11:06:26 PM
AWESOME finale
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on December 05, 2010, 11:12:56 PM
i did not like the direction the show was going into the finale.

however i really enjoyed the finale.

Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Great Rumbler on December 05, 2010, 11:13:10 PM
Missed the finale because I was watching Swamp Thing. :rock
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on December 05, 2010, 11:15:37 PM
yeah, finale was good except for
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane stuff.

oh, so he wasn't lying about Rick dying! he's a good guy!
oh, he just tried to rape Lori...hmm, maybe he isn't good?
oh, everyone is cool at the breakfast table!
oh, he's going crazy with a shotgun...whatever fuck it
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on December 05, 2010, 11:18:52 PM
yeah, finale was good except for
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane stuff.

oh, so he wasn't lying about Rick dying! he's a good guy!
oh, he just tried to rape Lori...hmm, maybe he isn't good?
oh, everyone is cool at the breakfast table!
oh, he's going crazy with a shotgun...whatever fuck it
[close]


comic spoilers
spoiler (click to show/hide)
it's clearly setup for killing him off next season. glad they've started early. and it was pretty obvious everyone wasn't "cool" at the breakfast table. the only two that knew about the rape situation (lori and shane) are clearly very tense and trying to hide it. shane going crazy shooting stuff is just showing his downward spiral.
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 05, 2010, 11:19:22 PM
The shane stuff was the best stuff in this episode. I thought it made him an actually complex, confused character whose pathos are worth paying attention to rather than just being some excuse to extend the plot like in the last few eps.

he's a legitimately good guy with very often bad and very abrupt intentions, most of which could be wholly blamed for the apocalypse. I was all with Shane when he gave that rant to Lory until he tried to finger her.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on December 05, 2010, 11:43:01 PM
yeah, finale was good except for
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shane stuff.

oh, so he wasn't lying about Rick dying! he's a good guy!
oh, he just tried to rape Lori...hmm, maybe he isn't good?
oh, everyone is cool at the breakfast table!
oh, he's going crazy with a shotgun...whatever fuck it
[close]


comic spoilers
spoiler (click to show/hide)
it's clearly setup for killing him off next season. glad they've started early. and it was pretty obvious everyone wasn't "cool" at the breakfast table. the only two that knew about the rape situation (lori and shane) are clearly very tense and trying to hide it. shane going crazy shooting stuff is just showing his downward spiral.
[close]

comic spoilers again
spoiler (click to show/hide)
I was exaggerating a bit, but it was still clumsy.  Last episode had him aiming at Rick thinking about pulling the trigger.  A lot of the time it feels unwarranted and it's just there to make him seem like more conflicted; it's like someone said "shit, we're making him look good with him really thinking Rick was dead...have him rape Lori or start throwing out racial slurs or something."  The time when he should have lost his shit was when the scientist dude told everyone about what Rick said, and while he did, it wasn't directed at Rick.

The comic, despite having less information about the character, was able to have a smoother decent.  Here it feels like random bursts of anger, which isn't much different than Daryl, except since it's Shane it has 'meaning'.

Plus, Lori was a much bigger bitch in the comics.
[close]

edit:  someone brought up a really good point about the whisper in the gaf thread
*comic spoilers*
spoiler (click to show/hide)
the doctor probably whispered that Lori was pregnant
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: fistfulofmetal on December 05, 2010, 11:52:30 PM


comic spoilers again
spoiler (click to show/hide)
I was exaggerating a bit, but it was still clumsy.  Last episode had him aiming at Rick thinking about pulling the trigger.  A lot of the time it feels unwarranted and it's just there to make him seem like more conflicted; it's like someone said "shit, we're making him look good with him really thinking Rick was dead...have him rape Lori or start throwing out racial slurs or something."  The time when he should have lost his shit was when the scientist dude told everyone about what Rick said, and while he did, it wasn't directed at Rick.

The comic, despite having less information about the character, was able to have a smoother decent.  Here it feels like random bursts of anger, which isn't much different than Daryl, except since it's Shane it has 'meaning'.

Plus, Lori was a much bigger bitch in the comics.
[close]

edit:  someone brought up a really good point about the whisper in the gaf thread
*comic spoilers*
spoiler (click to show/hide)
the doctor probably whispered that Lori was pregnant
[close]


well yeah i would agree it's not a smooth decent. but then again we only have 6 episodes to play with. they have to push a lot into a short time (which is why 6 episode season is a terrible idea)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on December 06, 2010, 09:09:36 AM
SO
BAD

Tons of sobbing and people talking in circles. Yech. Awful script, awful special effects, awful acting. This show gets worse and worse with each episode.

Who else groaned when blondie didn't die?
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 06, 2010, 10:34:56 AM
I love how Dale is like COME WITH ME, BLONDE WHITE WOMAN while ignoring the black chick completely
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: CajoleJuice on December 06, 2010, 10:47:47 AM
SO
BAD

Tons of sobbing and people talking in circles. Yech. Awful script, awful special effects, awful acting. This show gets worse and worse with each episode.

Who else groaned when blondie didn't die?
Me.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 06, 2010, 10:49:29 AM
i was screaming at the tv
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 06, 2010, 11:00:54 AM

I thought the Walking Dead finale was good, but only because I've reconciled that it's not a serious drama, at least not anymore. The last few episodes of the season felt like network television and certainly not something that was worthy of being on AMC. But I enjoyed it anyways.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Mupepe on December 06, 2010, 11:12:37 AM
So, I haven't watched since the 2nd episode.  I loved the first two.  Does it hold up well?  I plan on having a boardwalk empire, The Walking Dead and Dexter marathon over Christmas break.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 06, 2010, 11:33:34 AM
So, I haven't watched since the 2nd episode.  I loved the first two.  Does it hold up well?  I plan on having a boardwalk empire, The Walking Dead and Dexter marathon over Christmas break.

It goes from awesome (episodes 1-3) to just enjoyable and extremely flawed (4-6)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: drew on December 06, 2010, 03:54:34 PM
the only thing that bothers me about the show is the old white dude's forelorn surprised face

O_O
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on December 06, 2010, 04:12:59 PM
SO
BAD

Tons of sobbing and people talking in circles. Yech. Awful script, awful special effects, awful acting. This show gets worse and worse with each episode.

Who else groaned when blondie didn't die?

I don't believe you think episode 5 and 6 are worse than episode 4.  The boat scene in episode 4 was one of the worst thing I've seen on TV in recent memory, and I used to watch Heroes.

Episode 6 had problems but it was the third best episode for me.  Episode 1 was the best and remains awesome.  Episode 2 was great but the shit that would define the series started to come out.  3 was so-so, 4 was completely terrible, 5 was so-so, and 6 was good.  Overall it wasn't too great.  At least the first two episodes got me reading the comic.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Third on December 06, 2010, 05:18:36 PM
The comic's pace is a bit more relentless, if you want to consider a deaths- or horrible-shit-per-issue ratio. One episode of the TV show... well, hell, didn't we go 5 episodes with one death? One? In the comic, you're never sure who's going to be safe. Likely no-one, except Rick. Rick is the point of the series: how does a man change when faced with cataclysm?

Yeah, a lot of characters die in the comic. The movie is pretty tame.

HUGE COMIC SPOILER

spoiler (click to show/hide)
the prison arc was so harsh. It seemed as if all main characters died piece by piece. I almost screamed when they shot and killed Lori and the baby. Tyreese's death was also brutal.
[close]

Don't think the show will ever reach that plottwist.

the only thing that bothers me about the show is the old white dude's forelorn surprised face

O_O

And Carl always has a cry face. So annoying.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on December 06, 2010, 05:57:14 PM
SO
BAD

Tons of sobbing and people talking in circles. Yech. Awful script, awful special effects, awful acting. This show gets worse and worse with each episode.

Who else groaned when blondie didn't die?

I don't believe you think episode 5 and 6 are worse than episode 4.  The boat scene in episode 4 was one of the worst thing I've seen on TV in recent memory, and I used to watch Heroes.

Episode 6 had problems but it was the third best episode for me.  Episode 1 was the best and remains awesome.  Episode 2 was great but the shit that would define the series started to come out.  3 was so-so, 4 was completely terrible, 5 was so-so, and 6 was good.  Overall it wasn't too great.  At least the first two episodes got me reading the comic.

I don't see how there was anything redeeming about this episode. Half of it was the lab guy saying "you can't leave, you can't leave" over and over again while characters walked around stomping their feet and occasionally lunged at him with weapons while everyone stopped them. Then Rick just has to say "give us a chance" and suddenly he'll open the doors? It was completely dull, tedious and tremendously stupid.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Himu on December 06, 2010, 06:03:40 PM
5 was clearly the worst episode, not 4.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: drew on December 06, 2010, 07:02:51 PM
they both were and you know it
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on December 06, 2010, 08:51:54 PM
This was so fucking horrible holly shit :lol Shane drinking in the shower and the doctor terrible acted rant had me on the floor and the doctor whispering something in Rick's ear was :rofl

There are shows with 6 and even 3 episodes per season that run circles around this shit so I don't buy that defense at all, more episodes will mean more shit.

RIP random black girl #1 :'( (serious question does anyone even know her name?)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on December 06, 2010, 09:28:22 PM
This was so fucking horrible holly shit :lol Shane drinking in the shower and the doctor terrible acted rant had me on the floor and the doctor whispering something in Rick's ear was :rofl

:rofl
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on December 06, 2010, 09:34:57 PM
I have to give probs to the writers, at least it wasn't the super smart computer that apparently runs the cdc that locked them in :lol
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: cool breeze on December 06, 2010, 11:12:44 PM
SO
BAD

Tons of sobbing and people talking in circles. Yech. Awful script, awful special effects, awful acting. This show gets worse and worse with each episode.

Who else groaned when blondie didn't die?

I don't believe you think episode 5 and 6 are worse than episode 4.  The boat scene in episode 4 was one of the worst thing I've seen on TV in recent memory, and I used to watch Heroes.

Episode 6 had problems but it was the third best episode for me.  Episode 1 was the best and remains awesome.  Episode 2 was great but the shit that would define the series started to come out.  3 was so-so, 4 was completely terrible, 5 was so-so, and 6 was good.  Overall it wasn't too great.  At least the first two episodes got me reading the comic.

I don't see how there was anything redeeming about this episode. Half of it was the lab guy saying "you can't leave, you can't leave" over and over again while characters walked around stomping their feet and occasionally lunged at him with weapons while everyone stopped them. Then Rick just has to say "give us a chance" and suddenly he'll open the doors? It was completely dull, tedious and tremendously stupid.

I mostly agree...but it was still better than the last two episode.  I'm grading the series on a curve, so episode 6 fell into the good range for me.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on December 06, 2010, 11:14:10 PM
The comic's pace is a bit more relentless, if you want to consider a deaths- or horrible-shit-per-issue ratio. One episode of the TV show... well, hell, didn't we go 5 episodes with one death? One? In the comic, you're never sure who's going to be safe. Likely no-one, except Rick. Rick is the point of the series: how does a man change when faced with cataclysm?

Yeah, a lot of characters die in the comic. The movie is pretty tame.

HUGE COMIC SPOILER

spoiler (click to show/hide)
the prison arc was so harsh. It seemed as if all main characters died piece by piece. I almost screamed when they shot and killed Lori and the baby. Tyreese's death was also brutal.
[close]

Don't think the show will ever reach that plottwist.

the only thing that bothers me about the show is the old white dude's forelorn surprised face

O_O

And Carl always has a cry face. So annoying.

You know, I wasn't super unhappy with #4 due to the appropriately horrifying conclusion.

Today I'm watching #5 during my commute today, and am not really enjoying it so far, at the halfway point. The opening exposition, disguised poorly as Rick looking for his friend Morgan and son was drippy-melodramatic monologue-y. I bet the actor felt GREAT about his "moment." Later, Andrea pulls a gun on Rick and he just says "OK, sorry for interrupting you while we wait for your dead sister to come back and endanger us all." And what was Shane doing? Thanks for having Rick's back while Andrea draws a gun on him. I'm just stunned things didn't escalate, though I would have paid good money to see her sister come back at that very instant, and Andrea just instinctively, BANG, blows her brains out and immediately freaks out at what she's done. (THE COMIC HANDLED THIS SCENE MOAR BETTAR.)

The "we don't burn our dead!" scene is dumb on dumb; from people who have seen their friends and family be eaten, or even doing the eating, I don't buy the willingness to just leave the intact, yet-to-reanimate bodies around for any length of time. ::)
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: TakingBackSunday on December 06, 2010, 11:15:09 PM
this episode was by far the worst of the season.  it was terrible
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Diunx on December 06, 2010, 11:23:45 PM
"Damn the axes aren't doing anything against this super thick glass"
T-dawwwwwwwg: "don't worry guys I have a CHAIR!!!!"
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on December 07, 2010, 02:10:48 AM
Finale was good :bow

Had some LOL moments, and some bad acting especially, but overall I liked it.

I like Dale  :-[
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on December 07, 2010, 10:53:12 AM
Finished ep. 5 -- clearly they're diverging from the comic a bunch at this point. Considering "it's just TV," I'm relegating myself to being happy that there's a zombie-themed TV show and it will have six more episodes.

The CDC thing... just... whatever.

Five is nearly my least favorite episode so far. The good-byes to Jim, the fondling of the sister while she turns, the battered wife getting her late swings in against her abuser, the mysteriously repaired Winnebago (um... huh?).

I still think El Hospice de la Raza was even less logical overall.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: ManaByte on December 07, 2010, 11:09:42 AM
Finished ep. 5 -- clearly they're diverging from the comic a bunch at this point. Considering "it's just TV," I'm relegating myself to being happy that there's a zombie-themed TV show and it will have six more episodes.

The CDC thing... just... whatever.

Five is nearly my least favorite episode so far. The good-byes to Jim, the fondling of the sister while she turns, the battered wife getting her late swings in against her abuser, the mysteriously repaired Winnebago (um... huh?).

I still think El Hospice de la Raza was even less logical overall.

Season two is 13 episodes.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: brawndolicious on December 07, 2010, 12:45:04 PM
I just watched the finale, it was decent but not too much happened in this episode or the whole season really.  Compare it to the first (6 episode) season of Breaking Bad for example.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on December 07, 2010, 01:05:57 PM
I just watched the finale, it was decent but not too much happened in this episode or the whole season really.  Compare it to the first (6 episode) season of Breaking Bad for example.

True. In 6 episodes Breaking Bad introduced its characters perfectly and set up the next season. I liked Walking Dead's finale, but at the same time it was rather predictable. You knew the CDC thing wouldn't last long, but having the thing explode mere hours after the group arrived was pretty contrived. Really felt like Lost/the hatch shit, but not done as well.

Does the CDC thing even happen in the comics? I know they go to Washington DC eventually
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on December 08, 2010, 01:09:15 AM
Does the CDC thing even happen in the comics? I know they go to Washington DC eventually
In the comic, they go to Washington because of that mullet-sporting scientist...
spoiler (click to show/hide)
...who turns out not to have been a scientist, just a guy who is really good at lying and self-preserving.

They continue toward Washington anyway, since they're already on their way and nothing else is presenting itself, IIRC. Which makes about as much sense as heading back to Atlanta, because you've gotta know any major city is going to be overrun, same as Atlanta. But the weird thing is Dr. Mullet just seems to disappear from the storyline from the time he's found out as a fraud, through the end of the 12th trade paperback.
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Phoenix Dark on December 08, 2010, 01:22:06 AM
Does the CDC thing even happen in the comics? I know they go to Washington DC eventually
In the comic, they go to Washington because of that mullet-sporting scientist...
spoiler (click to show/hide)
...who turns out not to have been a scientist, just a guy who is really good at lying and self-preserving.

They continue toward Washington anyway, since they're already on their way and nothing else is presenting itself, IIRC. Which makes about as much sense as heading back to Atlanta, because you've gotta know any major city is going to be overrun, same as Atlanta. But the weird thing is Dr. Mullet just seems to disappear from the storyline from the time he's found out as a fraud, through the end of the 12th trade paperback.
[close]

I read some spoilers earlier about DC

spoiler (click to show/hide)
concerning The Governor and Rick's wife dying (can't wait for that, tired of her). I wonder if Meryl will be the Governor?
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Enl on December 08, 2010, 01:40:13 AM
I had to comb my movie memory banks to figure out where I've heard the music from the cimax before. It's from Rabit Proof Fence (which has an excellent score beyond this):

[youtube=560,345]bxmfMh3uAiw?fs=1&hl=en_US[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on December 08, 2010, 10:29:07 AM
Does the CDC thing even happen in the comics? I know they go to Washington DC eventually
In the comic, they go to Washington because of that mullet-sporting scientist...
spoiler (click to show/hide)
...who turns out not to have been a scientist, just a guy who is really good at lying and self-preserving.

They continue toward Washington anyway, since they're already on their way and nothing else is presenting itself, IIRC. Which makes about as much sense as heading back to Atlanta, because you've gotta know any major city is going to be overrun, same as Atlanta. But the weird thing is Dr. Mullet just seems to disappear from the storyline from the time he's found out as a fraud, through the end of the 12th trade paperback.
[close]

Huh? That's not DC. That's much earlier.

I read some spoilers earlier about DC

spoiler (click to show/hide)
concerning The Governor and Rick's wife dying (can't wait for that, tired of her). I wonder if Meryl will be the Governor?
[close]
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: Nintendosbooger on December 11, 2010, 10:47:42 AM
Just purchased some of the comic books from Amazon.

While I've enjoyed the show, I've never been entirely pleased by screen adaptions of literature in the past, so if I like the show, I can only imagine how much I'll love the books.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: chronovore on December 12, 2010, 09:08:11 AM
Trade paperback #13 showed up in the mail today, apparently Amazon.co.jp fulfilled through NEW YORK. I'd forgotten I'd ordered it, since it was placed with #12 and #11...

Trying to savor this one since I won't be getting more for a bit, I suspect.
Title: Re: The Walking Dead
Post by: CHOW CHOW on December 12, 2010, 10:02:09 AM
Wow, didn't expect to read all this criticism about the show... I think you're all being overly critical.  It's better than most of the shows on TV.

Loved the last ep, well the last 10-15 minutes of it at least.  It was tense and exciting.