THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:13:41 PM

Title: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:13:41 PM
Like isnt the best actor supposed to get the part

Isnt that what equality is about

Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 04:14:49 PM
Like isnt the best actor supposed to get the part

Also a good reason not to cast her.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: I'm a Puppy! on July 31, 2018, 04:17:52 PM
we see you. you nazi!
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:26:23 PM
Didnt Hillary Swank get a Oscar nomination for playing a trans?

Like isnt the best actor supposed to get the part

Also a good reason not to cast her.

Fight me
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 31, 2018, 04:29:08 PM
Didn't James Baskett get an Academy Award for playing Uncle Remus in Song of the South?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 04:30:42 PM
What is with lager and trans people?

Tbh I don’t give a fuck about the role. It doesn’t impact my life in any way. I don’t find being trans like race. It isn’t an inherent physical characteristic. This is like a straight man playing a gay man to me. I’d much rather have trans actors and actresses to play non trans roles. But I realize this isn’t an ideal world. That said I find it funny how ScarJo has had two roles in recent years of her playing characters that either whitewash or does something else to piss off a minority community. I’m just here to laugh at ScarJo memes tbqh
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 04:32:01 PM
Google Assistant or Alexa should have been cast in Her. #JusticeForAIs
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 04:33:59 PM
Didnt Hillary Swank get a Oscar nomination for playing a trans?

Like isnt the best actor supposed to get the part

Also a good reason not to cast her.

Fight me

Yes, but at the same time that time was different (less Transexual Actors/Actresses). There's nothing inherently wrong with women taking a mans (or vice-versa as that's older with theater) role. The problem was 1) there's plenty of transexual actor/esses that could fit that role now and 2) ScarJo already had whitewashing controversy with Ghost in the Shell. So...
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Huff on July 31, 2018, 04:41:03 PM
Quote
there's plenty of transexual actor/esses that could fit that role now

i don't follow Hollywood enough to know. is this actually true?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:43:21 PM
Think Cindi is right here, this isnt like a white person playing a black person

It just reeks of sjw drama
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:44:26 PM
Quote
there's plenty of transexual actor/esses that could fit that role now

i don't follow Hollywood enough to know. is this actually true?

No

I cant even name one
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 04:46:06 PM
Quote
there's plenty of transexual actor/esses that could fit that role now

i don't follow Hollywood enough to know. is this actually true?

Lavern Cox in Orange is the New Black is an instant one off the top of my head.

"Hollywood" may be too broad, since that's "AAA" (ugh) acting/movies in general. But smaller parts? There's enough there (especially in theater I think. I'd have to look deeper to actually know) that they could cast these folks for these roles.

I mean conversely: Racial roles have been a problem in Hollywood/movies for a LONG LONG LONG while, so why is Lager targeting this hoopla when he didn't make a "ScarJo and that GitS role" thread when that was blowing up? There's plenty of Asian actors/actresses out there. Just like there's plenty of black actors/actresses for certain roles. But Hollywood won't cast a lot of them (Will Smith and Denzel Washington being the two off the top of my head that get a lot of roles but no new actors/actresses "breaking" in like white straight [or gay] men/women).

I guess to put it another way: Yes, BUT they aren't introduced because the guild (or whatever) doesn't want to hire them for these roles. So they can't "break into the scene." It's a chicken and egg situation.

I mean there's that one deaf girl that was in "A Quiet Place" (and another major film) for disabled actors/actresses, but outside of that? Could you honestly tell me a deaf/blind (whichever) or another disabled actor/actress that IS NOT the one woman from "Switched at Birth" (the TV show on ABC family, not sure if that's still running)?

That's the problem. Casting folks that have lived the experience or are that role/gender/whatever isn't done. They rather hire able-boded/cisgender/white people for these roles because that's "what sells."
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 04:46:29 PM
The weird thing about the GitS thing is it would have been fine (who was freaking out that Light was white in Death Note Netflix?) but they pulled some Psylocke shit and said she was originally Asian. Because... reasons?

Even then I don't see it as a big deal personally. Translating properties from other cultures means localizing it for the new market.

Now, white-washing or whatever when adapting American properties into an American movie is much more of a fine line IMO. The Ancient One in Doctor Strange, for instance. I was still OK with that because who's to say there can't be multiple Ancient Ones, and Tilda Swinton is fantastic, but that easily could have turned out much worse.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 04:48:40 PM
Quote
there's plenty of transexual actor/esses that could fit that role now

i don't follow Hollywood enough to know. is this actually true?

There is.

Think Cindi is right here, this isnt like a white person playing a black person

It just reeks of sjw drama

I wouldn’t entirely say that I’m right because they raise a good point about representation. I’m just not down with being mad about shit every hour/day/week so I’m just kind of over it and just coasting even if I admit that I understand both viewpoints.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:50:25 PM
Quote
That's the problem. Casting folks that have lived the experience or are that role/gender/whatever isn't done. They rather hire able-boded/cisgender/white people for these roles because that's "what sells."

Wow are you somehow implying capitalism obstructs art?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 04:51:49 PM
Quote
That's the problem. Casting folks that have lived the experience or are that role/gender/whatever isn't done. They rather hire able-boded/cisgender/white people for these roles because that's "what sells."

Wow are you somehow implying capitalism obstructs art?

Not at all. But Hollywood is so risk-averse now (why do you think there's Marvel film #2903490284023840239840923849023804983209483209840923 over Indie Film #90238049832094823098423098420398409238420?), that they'd rather NOT try to cast for roles with newer actors/actresses than do so.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:53:07 PM
Thank god we have Star Wars to cast unkowns still :heart
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on July 31, 2018, 04:54:28 PM
Thank you all for your replies now I can sleep knowing that even Cindisnt outraged so it really is a complete non issue
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 04:54:38 PM
Laverne Cox is the best part of OitNB.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 04:54:53 PM
In any case, this is a dumb debate and I don't know why I'm even bothering with you Lager since you're in Poland.

1) Women/men being casted for the other genders roles has been done since the 1700's (or even earlier) so this isn't the problem.
2) The problem has been: Casting for roles that fit a certain "profile" that have actor(s) that have that experience but don't get casted because of fear of a box-office failure/worrying about the bottom line.
3) There was nothing wrong with ScarJo being casted in GitS (beyond the whitewashing them trying to justify it in the film) or here, the problem was: There's actor(s) out there that could fit the Asian (GitS) or transexual (here) role that are those things, but Hollywood was too lazy to bother looking for those folks before casting.

Consequentially, there's a Youtube video or whatever that had Lavern Cox and like 1-2 other transexual actors/actresses talking about this whole thing. Maybe look into that if you actually want to learn.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Nintex on July 31, 2018, 04:56:09 PM
I'm glad they made Tropic Thunder when they did. They couldn't have made it today.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: CatsCatsCats on July 31, 2018, 04:57:48 PM
Should we make Sean Penn give his Oscar back for Milk, too?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 04:59:38 PM
The weird thing about the GitS thing is it would have been fine (who was freaking out that Light was white in Death Note Netflix?) but they pulled some Psylocke shit and said she was originally Asian. Because... reasons?

Even then I don't see it as a big deal personally. Translating properties from other cultures means localizing it for the new market.

Now, white-washing or whatever when adapting American properties into an American movie is much more of a fine line IMO. The Ancient One in Doctor Strange, for instance. I was still OK with that because who's to say there can't be multiple Ancient Ones, and Tilda Swinton is fantastic, but that easily could have turned out much worse.

I can agree with this.

At the same time I and others see the major as Asian so I’d personally have a problem with it as a fan.

On the flip side we have a popular trend of making famous characters black or whatever. Nah. Michael B Jordan playing Johnny Storm? :heh Nah. I grew up on Johnny Storm being a white blonde. To me it’s like taking Peter Parker and making him black. Peter Parker is white to me. A black Peter Parker isn’t a thing unless it’s for cosplay. Just make a new character. They nailed it with Miles Morales and Kamala Khan. Have the old hero retire or die or move on to a different hero and let someone else take the mantle but be their own character. Changing the race is lacking in mental fortitude.

It’s different for a character like Bond imo. Bond is hinted as being a code name so him being black is fine to me. At the same time. I’d rather have a legit black director just make a film that’s 007 like in its aspirations starring a black character that is a direct competitor to 007. That way you get your own franchise in the end. Because Bond will go back to being white eventually.

Basically, if you’re going to change a characters race you might as well make a new character. Which is a far better use of representation than forcing us to try to beleive a character we’ve known our entire life has melanin.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 05:08:55 PM
Buffy reboot starring a black lead :nope

Buffyverse sequel starring an all-new Slayer who happens to be black :ohyeah
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 05:11:04 PM
Nobody cares about Johnny Storm.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 05:16:05 PM
Buffy reboot starring a black lead :nope

Buffyverse sequel starring an all-new Slayer who happens to be black :ohyeah

Exactly. Black Buffy? Kiss my ass.

Now a new slayer series with a black slayer?

:rejoice

Representation should matter. Because in my mind? Buffy will always be white.

People would rather placate minorities and turn a cherished character another color rather than invest and create a minority character that has a legacy as strong as that character they want to black wash. Small minds. I don’t got time for that small time mess. :trash
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 05:18:19 PM
Serious question: does black Nick Fury bother you?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 31, 2018, 05:23:20 PM
hey guys what about black james bond
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 05:29:01 PM
Nope. Didn’t know who nick fury even was because I was all about dat manga, boy. I didn’t read American comics much growing up. And it doesn’t change that I find it unnecessary.

Diggle wasn’t a character in Green Arrow until the show came up with him on Arrow. Now he became so integral to the show they introduced him in the comic. Now he’s part of the story like any other Green Arrow character without changing anyone’s race.

Creatively, just changing a characters race for “representation” might be among the most lazy creative decision you could make. Making a new character that’s a minority that’s so iconic they’re now part of the formula tho? Takes more risk, creativity, and vision.

Fuck artistic laziness.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 05:31:09 PM
Why not, they did it to Othello
black james bond in the middle of Moscow.... i wonder who the spy is   :P
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 05:41:25 PM
What about hot Aunt May?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 05:43:10 PM
Another thing about black washing: if it bombs they can always turn back the clock, pretend it never happened, and make Batman white again. There goes your representation. It just reset and now you’ve got one less black character.

Compared to: making a black Batman like character at the outset and have them star in their own comic. Even if it bombs, they can put the character in another comic and he or she will still be the same character. You still have representation.

DC got it right with Batgirl and Batwoman. Thor has been female before but we all know female Thor will revert to old male Thor eventually. Not the case for Batwoman. She will never be replaced. She is her own character.

If I worked on a project and they wanted me to make a known white character black I would outright refuse.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 05:44:27 PM
Another thing about black washing: if it bombs they can always turn back the clock, pretend it never happened, and make Batman white again. There goes your representation. It just reset and now you’ve got one less black character.

Compared to: making a black Batman like character at the outset and have them star in their own comic. Even if it bombs, they can put the character in another comic and he or she will still be the same character. You still have representation.

DC got it right with Batgirl and Batwoman. Thor has been female before but we all know female Thor will revert to old male Thor eventually. Not the case for Batwoman. She will never be replaced. She is her own character.

If I worked on a project and they wanted me to make a known white character black I would outright refuse.
This SJW agenda has pretty much destroyed comics.

You fucks will destroy everything you touch, but as long as it sticks to pop culture garbage i'm ok with it. Destroy it all i say.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 05:45:00 PM
If I worked on a project and they wanted me to make a known white character black I would outright refuse.

:gurl
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 05:50:34 PM
If I worked on a project and they wanted me to make a known white character black I would outright refuse.

:gurl

Forgot to say

* - as long as I still have a job :rejoice
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 05:53:07 PM
Another thing about black washing: if it bombs they can always turn back the clock, pretend it never happened, and make Batman white again. There goes your representation. It just reset and now you’ve got one less black character.

Compared to: making a black Batman like character at the outset and have them star in their own comic. Even if it bombs, they can put the character in another comic and he or she will still be the same character. You still have representation.

DC got it right with Batgirl and Batwoman. Thor has been female before but we all know female Thor will revert to old male Thor eventually. Not the case for Batwoman. She will never be replaced. She is her own character.

If I worked on a project and they wanted me to make a known white character black I would outright refuse.
This SJW agenda has pretty much destroyed comics.

You fucks will destroy everything you touch, but as long as it sticks to pop culture garbage i'm ok with it. Destroy it all i say.

I disagree. Kamala Khan is one of the best and most refreshing comic characters in generations.

My problem is short term solutions that are band-aids.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 05:58:35 PM
Among other things, I think you're not considering the differences in movie/TV/comic production.

Take the last F4 movie. It's all well and good to say it would be better to gradually develop a new black character rather than recast Johnny Storm, but Fox didn't have that option. Marvel wasn't about to sell them the rights to any more characters, and certainly wasn't going to invest in creating and promoting new ones on their behalf. So if you want Michael B. Jordan in your movie you can either cast him in a character who's been drawn as white, or try to sell the studio execs on "The Fantastic Four and Their Good Friend Brandon."
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: kingv on July 31, 2018, 06:09:50 PM
Re: ghost in the shell. In the actual anime/manga the Android body is white, right? Just the spirit or mind or whatever is Japanese, I think?

If true it’s even funnier she gets shit for whitewashing because it’s actually accurate to the source material.
Edit: reddit tells me it’s axually open to interpretation as to what she is supposed to look like and is never explicitly defined as looking as a certain race.


Can’t wait for an American attack on titan movie where only that one girl is cast as Asian... even though she is the only Asian in the whole show.

Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 06:20:06 PM
Where I’m sitting, I hear this at a creative meeting,”our last fantastic four didn’t do so well. What should we do?”

“Make a good movie?”

“Too hard. How about...we make one of the characters black?!”

“That’d cause so much controversy and attention, do it! If the movie doesn’t do well we can always make them white in the next movie.”

:yeshrug

Why not just make a good F4 movie?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 06:21:44 PM
They had to choose between making a good movie or casting a black guy. That's exactly how that went.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 06:23:19 PM
Also I’m specifically only talking about major characters here. Really minor characters though? Who cares?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 06:27:23 PM
It's just weird to think of Johnny Storm's pigmentation being untouchable when they straight replaced him with H.E.R.B.I.E. in the cartoon.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 06:33:00 PM
Nobody cares about Johnny Storm.

DC has an even more hilarious example: Wally West. Except black reboot Wally became so different from the old one, they had to bring white Wally back in Rebirth. So now DC has two Wally Wests running around: one white twentysomething and one black teenager. :lol That's an inventive way to hit multiple demographics with the "same" character I guess.

I didn't think of this much before but I definitely prefer what Cindi's saying: make a new character. Hell, they could have erased old Wally and introduced "Willy West" or some shit. But no, this is the new Wally guys!! ...even though Wally existed for like 30 years already and had been The Flash to an entire generation of comic readers (including everyone who watched the DCAU Justice League cartoon.)

@DC: :confused
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 06:38:56 PM
They had to choose between making a good movie or casting a black guy. That's exactly how that went.

Have you seen those movies?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 06:40:25 PM
Are you gonna tell me the movies with the white Johnny Storm were good?

Cause I would not know how to respond to that.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Kara on July 31, 2018, 06:45:34 PM
I didn't really give a shit when I watched the Ghost in the Shell movie, but I remember it touching on the Major's actual ethnicity and the destruction of it to give us Major Scar was treated as a wrong that was done to her.

In Stand Alone Complex they don't even dive into that until the Individual Eleven storyline has overstayed its welcome.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Nintex on July 31, 2018, 06:49:59 PM
Sometimes stuff looks out of place like a one token Chinese guy in some generic action movie because their profits depend on the cinema release in China.
Next to that there was the horribly miscast Ghost busters reboot and Star Wars: The Last Jedi which gave a big role to a shitty actress and let the good actress die in the first 15 minutes or so. 

Other than that I've never been bothered by race/gender casting decisions. Nick Fury is portrayed by a good actor.
Ghost in the Shell was a decent movie and Scarlett played it well. Those decisions should be made by the film makers.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 06:59:28 PM
Back on the ScarJo thing. My problems with it stems from:

1. If it’s a trans woman they’re played by a man; a trans man, played by a woman. It’s so shady. As if to say,”you’re a man so we will have a man play you.”

2. Lees roles for trans actors/actresses

Beyond that though....
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 31, 2018, 07:53:03 PM
I didn't really give a shit when I watched the Ghost in the Shell movie, but I remember it touching on the Major's actual ethnicity and the destruction of it to give us Major Scar was treated as a wrong that was done to her.

In Stand Alone Complex they don't even dive into that until the Individual Eleven storyline has overstayed its welcome.

Yeah, that part of the storyline was basically about how the evil megacorp nearly killed her and then went ahead and completely wiped out her previous life, making her into something that they could use and more easily control.

Which is also pretty much Robocop.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 08:01:39 PM
Back on the ScarJo thing. My problems with it stems from:

1. If it’s a trans woman they’re played by a man; a trans man, played by a woman. It’s so shady. As if to say,”you’re a man so we will have a man play you.”

2. Lees roles for trans actors/actresses

Beyond that though....
Better off just not making any movies about trans people. Less hassle, problem solved.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 08:10:12 PM
Back on the ScarJo thing. My problems with it stems from:

1. If it’s a trans woman they’re played by a man; a trans man, played by a woman. It’s so shady. As if to say,”you’re a man so we will have a man play you.”

2. Lees roles for trans actors/actresses

Beyond that though....
Better off just not making any movies about trans people. Less hassle, problem solved.

(https://i.imgur.com/ljk52ib.gif)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 08:12:13 PM
Back on the ScarJo thing. My problems with it stems from:

1. If it’s a trans woman they’re played by a man; a trans man, played by a woman. It’s so shady. As if to say,”you’re a man so we will have a man play you.”

2. Lees roles for trans actors/actresses

Beyond that though....
Better off just not making any movies about trans people. Less hassle, problem solved.

Well, no. 

Because:

1. A movie about trans people still allows further trans acceptance
2. Brokeback Mountain was played by two straight dudes and did the above.
3. How do we know they’re not trans? Like I said, trans doesn’t have a visual qualifier like race. It’s mental. ScarJo might be a closeted trans man. We don’t know. And we’d feel like assholes if she ever revealed that fact.

And this is why I don’t give a shit. Because I understand both sides and time is spent being concerned about other things.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on July 31, 2018, 08:27:18 PM
What about hot Aunt May?
Tony Stark hitting on current Aunt May :nope

Tony Stark hitting on old and dying from unnamed disease (it's oldness) Aunt May :ohyeah
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 08:33:11 PM

3. trans doesn’t have a visual qualifier like race. It’s mental. ScarJo might be a closeted trans man. We don’t know. And we’d feel like assholes if she ever revealed that fact.


I agree Cindi, it definitely is mental.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 08:41:03 PM
I’ve maintained that it is a mental disorder so I don’t think you know that I’m not triggered by your comment you hateful plebeian.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 08:45:59 PM
I’ve maintained that it is a mental disorder so I don’t think you know that I’m not triggered by your comment you hateful plebeian.
oh good then. we agree. kisses  :heart
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 08:46:48 PM
Try it bb. I am not an uwu.

(https://deadhomersociety.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/sewingfinger.gif)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 08:51:01 PM
This is the shittiest heel team-up since Venom and Sandman in Spider-Man 3.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 09:00:13 PM
I’ve maintained that it is a mental disorder so I don’t think you know that I’m not triggered by your comment you hateful plebeian.
oh good then. we agree. kisses  :heart

I’m not sure we do agree.

You: trans is a mental illness. You are a man.

Me: if you demedicalize being trans, insurance companies will have no reason to provide trans care because the uWu’s  will have made it not a medical problem but a social one. Thereby no longer giving insurance companies the need to help pay for life saving medicine which will make almost every trans commit mass suicide. Another short term solution to a larger problem to make sjws feel better.

Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on July 31, 2018, 09:00:14 PM
how did they know the movie was bad before they even cast one of the actors? :thinking

spoiler (click to show/hide)
and then reshot half of it with another wearing a bad wig to where it no longer even makes sense
[close]
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 31, 2018, 09:02:02 PM
This SJW agenda has pretty much destroyed comics.

The American comics industry has more interesting stuff going on in right now than it ever has, so I dunno what you're talking about here.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 09:04:36 PM
Saga owns.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 09:09:11 PM
I’ve maintained that it is a mental disorder so I don’t think you know that I’m not triggered by your comment you hateful plebeian.
oh good then. we agree. kisses  :heart

I’m not sure we do agree.

You: trans is a mental illness. You are a man.

Me: if you demedicalize being trans, insurance companies will have no reason to provide trans care because the uWu’s  will have made it not a medical problem but a social one. Thereby no longer giving insurance companies the need to help pay for life saving medicine which will make almost every trans commit mass suicide. Another short term solution to a larger problem to make sjws feel better.
don't trans people commit suicide at alarming rates even afterwards anyways?

This SJW agenda has pretty much destroyed comics.

The American comics industry has more interesting stuff going on in right now than it ever has, so I dunno what you're talking about here.
oh you're right all those articles about how the comic industry is struggling must be clickbait
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 31, 2018, 09:11:33 PM
oh you're right all those articles about how the comic industry is struggling must be clickbait

Why are you hand-wringing about sales? Go read some actual good comics, of which there are currently plenty on the market.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 09:12:55 PM
oh you're right all those articles about how the comic industry is struggling must be clickbait

Why are you hand-wringing about sales? Go read some actual good comics, of which there are currently plenty on the market.
You're right my apologies Dog. I don't care about comics, never did, never will.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on July 31, 2018, 09:22:21 PM
Also I’m specifically only talking about major characters here. Really minor characters though? Who cares?

I think they should slap a ginger wig on Kevin Hart and BAM!! new Jimmy Olsen.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on July 31, 2018, 09:34:01 PM
The DCEU is deeeaaaaaaaaadddddd!
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 31, 2018, 09:39:25 PM
oh you're right all those articles about how the comic industry is struggling must be clickbait

Why are you hand-wringing about sales? Go read some actual good comics, of which there are currently plenty on the market.
You're right my apologies Dog. I don't care about comics, never did, never will.

Okay.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 09:45:30 PM
:crazy
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on July 31, 2018, 09:47:13 PM
oh you're right all those articles about how the comic industry is struggling must be clickbait

Why are you hand-wringing about sales? Go read some actual good comics, of which there are currently plenty on the market.
You're right my apologies Dog. I don't care about comics, never did, never will.

Okay.

You really think he could finish a 22 page comic where each page has like two dozen words on it? You know you’re asking too much of wonder boy.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 09:50:45 PM
First he couldn't finish 22 pages of Jordan Peterson

Then he couldn't finish 22 pages of comic books

Next he won't be able to finish Green Eggs and Ham

It's a wonder he's able to form coherent sentences. I'm wondering if he's using a librarian to make these posts.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 09:55:11 PM
You think i don't know you guys would literally ejeculate in your pants knowing i bled through that Peterson paper?

 :foodcourt
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on July 31, 2018, 09:57:56 PM
I’m on so many medications and drugs that I can’t even get erections, let alone ejaculate.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 09:59:50 PM
I’m on so many medications and drugs that I can’t even get erections, let alone ejaculate.


 :oreilly
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on July 31, 2018, 10:04:42 PM
I’m on so many medications and drugs that I can’t even get erections, let alone ejaculate.


 :oreilly

Dude, I have to stand over the urinal/toilet like a full minute after peeing because of prescription-related muscle control/release/whatever issues. I accidentally piss like a cup of piss in my shorts like twice a week at work because I forget or get impatient.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 10:04:53 PM
You think i don't know you guys would literally ejeculate in your pants knowing i bled through that Peterson paper?

 :foodcourt

How tall is JP?

Two Ben Shapiro’s.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on July 31, 2018, 10:10:10 PM
So 5'4"?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 10:11:10 PM
Mmmmmm, 5’0” there abouts, ayup.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on July 31, 2018, 10:11:20 PM
Screw the metric system, Ben Shapiro based measurement system. :rejoice
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2018, 10:24:03 PM
Fuck Zack Snyder.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 10:28:55 PM
You think i don't know you guys would literally ejeculate in your pants knowing i bled through that Peterson paper?

 :foodcourt

Dear librarian,

You typo'd.

Love,
Me.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Urinals on July 31, 2018, 10:37:56 PM
Isn't an ideal situation for a trans person is to go from day to day without having to think about what gender they were born as, and for others to not give a shit what gender they were born as and accept them as the gender that they currently are? Isn't bringing up that somebody is trans outing them?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: nachobro on July 31, 2018, 10:43:56 PM
Like isnt the best actor supposed to get the part

Isnt that what equality is about

scarlett best actor :nope

scarlett best tiddies :ohyeah
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 10:51:57 PM
Isn't an ideal situation for a trans person is to go from day to day without having to think about what gender they were born as, and for others to not give a shit what gender they were born as and accept them as the gender that they currently are? Isn't bringing up that somebody is trans outing them?

Some trans people revel in the "identity", the social side. There's many of us who don't care about that and just want to live our lives as how we feel fit. Many are activists, but not all of us are. It's fine if someone wants to be an activist. It allows a voice for those of us who don't want to speak up. The problem occurs when they try to speak for all trans people. Ten years ago, most trans people tried to be stealth, as in, no one knowing you’re trans. That was the goal. It's different these days but stealth and all that comes with it is still very much a thing.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 11:11:03 PM
Isn't an ideal situation for a trans person is to go from day to day without having to think about what gender they were born as, and for others to not give a shit what gender they were born as and accept them as the gender that they currently are? Isn't bringing up that somebody is trans outing them?

Some trans people revel in the "identity", the social side. There's many of us who don't care about that and just want to live our lives as how we feel fit. Many are activists, but not all of us are. It's fine if someone wants to be an activist. It allows a voice for those of us who don't want to speak up. The problem occurs when they try to speak for all trans people. Ten years ago, most trans people tried to be stealth, as in, no one knowing you’re trans. That was the goal. It's different these days but stealth and all that comes with it is still very much a thing.
yeah but now because hollywood and mainstream media got on the trans bandwagon all of a sudden it's 'trendy' to talk about trends issue, relate with a trans person, or in some instances pretend you are actually trans.

it's fucking mind blowing but no difference than the booty implant craze after the kardashians did it. it will eventually go away.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on July 31, 2018, 11:14:13 PM
Lol no one is pretending to be trans irl

:lol

Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 11:15:37 PM
Lol no one is pretending to be trans irl
yeah i dunno about that
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on July 31, 2018, 11:24:11 PM
After they saw Caitlyn Jenner win all those awards, they want awards too!
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on July 31, 2018, 11:40:00 PM
i find it funny some of you can both mock the lunacy of REE and then come here and claim people aren't that stupid  and crazy.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on July 31, 2018, 11:50:02 PM
i find it funny some of you can both mock the lunacy of REE and then come here and claim people aren't that stupid  and crazy.

Please give us examples of people that are pretending to be transexual. Please.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: curly on July 31, 2018, 11:51:36 PM
i find it funny some of you can both mock the lunacy of REE and then come here and claim people aren't that stupid  and crazy.

Please give us examples of people that are pretending to be transexual. Please.

wasn't this a dave chapelle bit

assi is probably confused
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on August 01, 2018, 12:02:25 AM
Limited to the statement, I'm sure there are people playing trans on ERA/the internet. But the "in real life" part is more difficult. For one thing, it implies they exist in real life and I have not independently confirmed that yet.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on August 01, 2018, 12:03:02 AM
Ah, irl. Yeah, true enough.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: bluemax on August 01, 2018, 12:40:09 AM
Remember back in the day when Michael Jackson and then later Marlon Wayans were up for the role of Robin in Batman movies and then later it went to a white guy.

Or how they re-cast Billy Dee Williams with a white guy to play Two Face?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: I'm a Puppy! on August 01, 2018, 12:41:24 AM
not to defend assimilate, but I sorta get the whole "people pretending to trans IRL" cause I saw it when my daughter ran her highschool's LGBT club.

There were two kids in there that were definitely trans. They took it seriously and it wasn't "man in a dress" trans, I mean if you knew them you knew that they were damned serious about it. Then there were a bunch of other kids that decided they were "gender fluid" and treated it like a fad. Changing their gender as they wanted, naming themselves after their favorite anime characters and such one week they'd get all pissed if you called them a guy, the next you'd be crucified for calling them a girl. Of course, they're teens and we all did stupid stuff in our teens but I can see where the criticism comes from. I don't think it's common place, and it's a stupid thing, but I can't say I don't understand when people say "some people pretend to be trans" because I've certainly seen it.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: I'm a Puppy! on August 01, 2018, 12:45:05 AM
I feel like confused kids trying to figure shit out is very different from people pretending to be trans.
I agree. But I can see how an idiot like Assi would be like "haha! SEE?! People DO pretend to be trans!!"

I mean, it's not a large jump.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on August 01, 2018, 12:46:39 AM
What if they speak for trans people while being confused?

Trans trender is a phrase in the trans community. A lot of trans people think there’s people trying to be trans because they think it’s the it thing now. Like trans is counter culture and the new punk or emo. So not even people like assimilate are the only ones to hold those views.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 01, 2018, 12:48:38 AM
I think we lost track of the real topic here

(https://i.imgur.com/Ztc0sVx.jpg)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 01, 2018, 12:57:58 AM
I feel like confused kids trying to figure shit out is very different from people pretending to be trans.
I agree. But I can see how an idiot like Assi would be like "haha! SEE?! People DO pretend to be trans!!"

I mean, it's not a large jump.
i'm the idiot here? i'd pull my fucking kid out of that school.

go ahead and foster that type of fucking behavior lol

"hey im a girl today.... nope i'm a boy today fuck you"

this is what passes for "teens being teens" now?

amazing. this social experiment should turn out alright  :clap
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on August 01, 2018, 01:00:29 AM
i'm the idiot here?

yeah
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: team filler on August 01, 2018, 01:00:59 AM
i find it funny some of you can both mock the lunacy of REE and then come here and claim people aren't that stupid  and crazy.

Please give us examples of people that are pretending to be transexual. Please.
lime  :rejoice :rejoice :rejoice
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: I'm a Puppy! on August 01, 2018, 01:04:39 AM
i'm the idiot here?
umm...how is that even a question, in this or any thread?
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Himu on August 01, 2018, 01:06:19 AM
Worst part of the people Puppy talked about is that they help create animosity between trans people and non binary people. People like that are what many trans people think of when they hear non binary and it’s like they’re pissing in the pool. So now many trans people flat out assume all non binary people are like that.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on August 01, 2018, 01:12:49 AM
I think we lost track of the real topic here

(https://i.imgur.com/Ztc0sVx.jpg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQXtxSBQGmA

spoiler (click to show/hide)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=42_fVUFsN8M
[close]
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 01, 2018, 01:21:46 AM
I feel like confused kids trying to figure shit out is very different from people pretending to be trans.

When I was young being a teen meant doing a bit of drugs, drinking booze, throwing bricks through windows of abandoned buildings, chasing tail and listening to limp bizkit

spoiler (click to show/hide)
and final fantasy
[close]
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Trent Dole on August 01, 2018, 01:31:14 AM
Well, like, playing the Major in GitS requires one to be soulless and unemotional and get their tits out lots, ScarJo is perfect for that role ethnicity aside. :lol Also that movie was really bad and so she did everyone else involved with the project a favor by being the fall guy person in that particular situation. :doge Doing the trans role basically immediately afterwards is just amusing cause she's pissing everyone off again. I'd feel sorry for her but it's probably just her agent shoving her at whatever will be the biggest paycheck. :yeshrug
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Nola on August 01, 2018, 02:09:09 AM
not to defend assimilate, but I sorta get the whole "people pretending to trans IRL" cause I saw it when my daughter ran her highschool's LGBT club.

There were two kids in there that were definitely trans. They took it seriously and it wasn't "man in a dress" trans, I mean if you knew them you knew that they were damned serious about it. Then there were a bunch of other kids that decided they were "gender fluid" and treated it like a fad. Changing their gender as they wanted, naming themselves after their favorite anime characters and such one week they'd get all pissed if you called them a guy, the next you'd be crucified for calling them a girl. Of course, they're teens and we all did stupid stuff in our teens but I can see where the criticism comes from. I don't think it's common place, and it's a stupid thing, but I can't say I don't understand when people say "some people pretend to be trans" because I've certainly seen it.
The difference here is you seem to be coming at it from the perspective of concern for what such behavior may do to harm a vulnerable and often targeted sect of today's society. Assimilate is just a POS that seems to always be using his  ::) try-hard alpha online persona to make up for his real-life misery and hatefulness, so he tends to gravitate exclusively toward any argument that reinforces those ignorances and prejudices.

Like I would suspect he also gets disproportionately worked up over the relatively small upticks in false positives stemming from strengthening norms and laws governing sexual harassment and rape aimed to address the much larger issue of a systemic imbalance for the actual victims of these things. Whereas a normal person worries about that issue like you would a serious but low probability side effect from a life saving drug, something that needs to be addressed and treated but not something to justify sticking to the backasswards practice of bloodletting instead of moving forward.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: brawndolicious on August 01, 2018, 02:31:54 AM
What I got out of this thread is that representation is bad because then there's a greater chance everyone will be able to read the mind of low-motivation descendants of imperialists.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: VomKriege on August 01, 2018, 02:47:47 AM
Re: ghost in the shell. In the actual anime/manga the Android body is white, right? Just the spirit or mind or whatever is Japanese, I think?

If true it’s even funnier she gets shit for whitewashing because it’s actually accurate to the source material.
Edit: reddit tells me it’s axually open to interpretation as to what she is supposed to look like and is never explicitly defined as looking as a certain race.

Never took the Major for a "white body" in any of the manga or anime.
:yeshrug

But it doesn't matter a ton in a world where ghosts can switch bodies on a whim (one rogue agent do that from a male company executive to a female blonde) or become outright robots (like the CEO / porn doll maker) anyway. The manga doesn't cover identity in that way really and is even pretty light on the whole nationality thing (it's made explicit that it's Japan and there's a couple of story threads around that but Newport could have been made a cosmopolitan city state like Olympus without much fuss. Stand Alone Complex is way more into fitting it in a recognizable geopolitic landscape).

As for the trans role I dunno... I'm not here to tell people how they feel about that but in the grand scheme of things I think the film would have been a net positive for the image of trans people (provided the writing was up to par) and removing herself from the project may have doomed it's financing or the prospect of a wider release.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: HardcoreRetro on August 01, 2018, 07:13:39 AM
If I worked on a project and they wanted me to make a known white character black I would outright refuse.

I'd put shoe polish on a white actor.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on August 01, 2018, 07:24:27 AM
I'd put shoe polish on a white actor.
Look, look, we gotta agree on this: the whole idea is getting the right color shoe polish.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on August 01, 2018, 07:27:01 AM
And you gotta make the lips funny!
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 01, 2018, 09:23:52 AM
Polish on a white actor is white on white  ???
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 01, 2018, 10:28:42 AM
Doing the trans role basically immediately afterwards is just amusing cause she's pissing everyone off again. I'd feel sorry for her but it's probably just her agent shoving her at whatever will be the biggest paycheck. :yeshrug


Or maybe she was going for that almighty Oscar nom? You know like a ton of actors have gotten simply by playing a gay/trans/ whatever the fuck role that the perv infested Hollywood loves so much.

Just think of it from her view: you see all your peers get nominated for such roles so why wouldn't you take one? especially for a hot button topic such as this trans shit is now in libby moronic circles?

No, of course not, everyone must slam her for 'poor' taste or being an idiot because she 'pissed everyone off' in the tumblr gay sphere. But don't take my hatefulness the wrong way,  i would like nothing more than Hollywood in its current form to implode. 
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: HardcoreRetro on August 01, 2018, 10:43:00 AM
Polish on a white actor is white on white  ???

"Early white performers in blackface used burnt cork and later greasepaint or shoe polish to blacken their skin and exaggerate their lips"

I know my racism.

Edit: In fact, the character in my avatar uses shoe polish to paint his beak black. His actual beak is yellow cause his mom ain't a crow, but a blackbird.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: CatsCatsCats on August 01, 2018, 10:44:46 AM
Lager is reading as Polish for comedic effect
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on August 01, 2018, 10:45:12 AM
Or maybe she was going for that almighty Oscar nom? You know like a ton of actors have gotten simply by playing a gay/trans/ whatever the fuck role that the perv infested Hollywood loves so much.

Just think of it from her view: you see all your peers get nominated for such roles so why wouldn't you take one? especially for a hot button topic such as this trans shit is now in libby moronic circles?
:lol this dude and his award butthurt
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 01, 2018, 12:20:41 PM
Or maybe she was going for that almighty Oscar nom? You know like a ton of actors have gotten simply by playing a gay/trans/ whatever the fuck role that the perv infested Hollywood loves so much.

Just think of it from her view: you see all your peers get nominated for such roles so why wouldn't you take one? especially for a hot button topic such as this trans shit is now in libby moronic circles?
:lol this dude and his award butthurt
who the fuck is butthurt? i don't care about what parts this bitch takes on or not. The people asshurt is the ridiculous LGBTQ community that has a problem with everything.

Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 01, 2018, 03:03:46 PM
Woa woa who are u calling a bitch
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: naff on August 01, 2018, 06:25:36 PM
(https://s.blogcdn.com/www.mydaily.co.uk/media/2013/10/scarlett-johansson.jpg)

v cute pic. i find her look cute, but fairly pedestrian. she's also very short. ymmv.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: team filler on August 01, 2018, 06:58:46 PM
no BBC, no interest  8)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 01, 2018, 07:21:10 PM
(https://s.blogcdn.com/www.mydaily.co.uk/media/2013/10/scarlett-johansson.jpg)

v cute pic. i find her look cute, but fairly pedestrian. she's also very short. ymmv.
she's 5'2

damn she is tiny, like really fucking tiny. i can't even visualize that in my head, her standing in front of me being that small.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 01, 2018, 07:28:11 PM
not to defend assimilate, but I sorta get the whole "people pretending to trans IRL" cause I saw it when my daughter ran her highschool's LGBT club.

There were two kids in there that were definitely trans. They took it seriously and it wasn't "man in a dress" trans, I mean if you knew them you knew that they were damned serious about it. Then there were a bunch of other kids that decided they were "gender fluid" and treated it like a fad. Changing their gender as they wanted, naming themselves after their favorite anime characters and such one week they'd get all pissed if you called them a guy, the next you'd be crucified for calling them a girl. Of course, they're teens and we all did stupid stuff in our teens but I can see where the criticism comes from. I don't think it's common place, and it's a stupid thing, but I can't say I don't understand when people say "some people pretend to be trans" because I've certainly seen it.

I didn’t do stupid stuff in my teens.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Nintex on August 01, 2018, 07:49:15 PM
(https://em.wattpad.com/0c268ee778f661877043242dd1acccddc3b2f8ce/68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f63313430574c6f4d6578647671413d3d2d3538303039313233342e3135333237636566663561336363626238313035353930383136352e676966?s=fit&w=720&h=720)
In the Disney stuff Scarlett looks absolutely stunning in nearly all her scenes but sometimes the CG and stunt doubles are not very well done and it's easy to see it's not actually her in certain scenes.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 01, 2018, 07:52:53 PM
(https://s.blogcdn.com/www.mydaily.co.uk/media/2013/10/scarlett-johansson.jpg)

v cute pic. i find her look cute, but fairly pedestrian. she's also very short. ymmv.
she's 5'2

damn she is tiny, like really fucking tiny. i can't even visualize that in my head, her standing in front of me being that small.

Why would Scarlett Johansson ever be standing in front of you to begin with
because i'm not a fat fuck lard like you that had to drop 60lb and now have loose ass skin.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: naff on August 02, 2018, 12:17:21 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/3nXnPcQ.png)

i got half a foot on hugh jackman. being tall with a short woman is pretty funny. i've only ever dated someone shorter than 5'8" once though, and would avoid it long term. so much nicer dating someone nearer your height. being able to talk at gigs <3 not getting looked at like some weird freaks. long legs :lawd

Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 02, 2018, 12:29:44 AM
Lmao this is sharp knees 2.0

As if you wouldnt sell your kidney to a chinese butcher for a shot with Scarlett
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: naff on August 02, 2018, 12:41:13 AM
Lost in Translation era? Yeah. Now. idk. A kidney is a lot breh.

Speaking hypothetically about dream white women ~that age I would be much more interested in Greta Gerwig.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 02, 2018, 12:43:06 AM
That age? Shes like 35  :lol

To each his own I guess.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: naff on August 02, 2018, 12:44:08 AM
ScarJo is 33, Gerwig is 34
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 02, 2018, 12:46:50 AM
Is that that age? Is it old or something?

Im 35 so just wondering, their age never crossed my mind when talking about her
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Coax on August 02, 2018, 01:27:12 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/3nXnPcQ.png)

Updated for more accurate reference

(https://i.imgur.com/ivyxBrW.jpg)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: naff on August 02, 2018, 02:30:23 AM
Is that that age? Is it old or something?

Im 35 so just wondering, their age never crossed my mind when talking about her

For me it's older, for you it's younger *shrug*, I thought we were purely objectifying, ignoring the obvious draw of dating them for wealth (and fame if that's your thing). It is pretty hard to beat youth.

Your 20s  :rejoice

Getting older  :nintendo

Would easily give a kidney to date someone that successful. Wouldnt need to be that hot  :doge
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 02, 2018, 03:48:33 AM
Idk man I never liked younger chicks as they don't have their shit together. Which I find really unattractive.

Also, I think woman look hotter when they look like woman and not girls.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 02, 2018, 01:41:15 PM
i got half a foot on hugh jackman. being tall with a short woman is pretty funny. i've only ever dated someone shorter than 5'8" once though, and would avoid it long term. so much nicer dating someone nearer your height. being able to talk at gigs <3 not getting looked at like some weird freaks. long legs :lawd
You're crazy.  I'm over a foot taller than my wife.  Short chicks are hot.  Easier for them to get thick too.  And when people think my wife is my daughter  :lawd
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on August 02, 2018, 02:48:46 PM
Messed up mayne
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: naff on August 02, 2018, 04:41:44 PM
Newsfeed.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 02, 2018, 05:21:46 PM
  :lol
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 02, 2018, 06:19:19 PM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 02, 2018, 07:36:10 PM
younger chics>shorter chics> older women with their shit together


Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on August 02, 2018, 08:13:46 PM
And when people think my wife is my daughter  :lawd

(https://i.imgur.com/V13Bo0N.png)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Assimilate on August 02, 2018, 08:17:05 PM
And when people think my wife is my daughter  :lawd

(https://i.imgur.com/V13Bo0N.png)
that's so fucking cringe
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 02, 2018, 08:29:48 PM
(https://i.redd.it/1600dutncge01.png)

If we’re allowed to post porn for Assy now, I want bork to give me the ok to start posting rubber fetish stuff again.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mandark on August 02, 2018, 09:07:18 PM
He kisses his son like it's the Lombardi trophy :lol

difference is he still has his son
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: team filler on August 03, 2018, 12:21:27 AM
i got half a foot on hugh jackman. being tall with a short woman is pretty funny. i've only ever dated someone shorter than 5'8" once though, and would avoid it long term. so much nicer dating someone nearer your height. being able to talk at gigs <3 not getting looked at like some weird freaks. long legs :lawd
You're crazy.  I'm over a foot taller than my wife.  Short chicks are hot.  Easier for them to get thick too.  And when people think my wife is my daughter  :lawd
:mynicca
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 03, 2018, 10:20:31 AM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
No.  But that's a damn good idea.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 03, 2018, 01:08:43 PM

hey guys, trying to get back to posting more, how is -
i got half a foot on hugh jackman. being tall with a short woman is pretty funny. i've only ever dated someone shorter than 5'8" once though, and would avoid it long term. so much nicer dating someone nearer your height. being able to talk at gigs <3 not getting looked at like some weird freaks. long legs :lawd
You're crazy.  I'm over a foot taller than my wife.  Short chicks are hot.  Easier for them to get thick too.  And when people think my wife is my daughter  :lawd

(https://i.imgur.com/wn4jHls.gif)
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 03, 2018, 02:00:21 PM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
No.  But that's a damn good idea.

You should also have a Girl Scout uniform for her. Maybe a few boxes of cookies to try to sell to strangers when you’re out and about.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: benjipwns on August 03, 2018, 02:05:14 PM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
No.  But that's a damn good idea.

You should also have a Girl Scout uniform for her. Maybe a few boxes of cookies to try to sell to strangers when you’re out and about.
making them earn their keep :rejoice
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 03, 2018, 02:48:40 PM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
No.  But that's a damn good idea.

You should also have a Girl Scout uniform for her. Maybe a few boxes of cookies to try to sell to strangers when you’re out and about.
PM me.  I need more of these ideas
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 03, 2018, 04:27:46 PM
mods help
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 03, 2018, 04:32:36 PM
I can't even complain actually. Mupepe sent me semi nudes of his sister like 15 years ago.
 :neogaf
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Kara on August 04, 2018, 11:03:38 AM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
No.  But that's a damn good idea.

You should also have a Girl Scout uniform for her. Maybe a few boxes of cookies to try to sell to strangers when you’re out and about.

Step off Bryci's game. :bolo
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 04, 2018, 11:50:04 AM
Do you make her wear little girl babydoll dresses? Because that shit is hot.
No.  But that's a damn good idea.

You should also have a Girl Scout uniform for her. Maybe a few boxes of cookies to try to sell to strangers when you’re out and about.
PM me.  I need more of these ideas

Mups, I dreamt of THE NEXT LEVEL last night. This scenario is so sexy that it might be illegal to write it out. Will post later going to nap and see if I can refine it.

I also dreamt that on the set of Broken Arrow, John Travolta refused to eat anything other than Totino’s Party Pizza.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 04, 2018, 01:10:37 PM
Either post it or PM it, boo boo.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 04, 2018, 05:31:51 PM
Either post it or PM it, boo boo.

You’ll get what you want. I’m drinking now, it’s so sexy. This may be my next masterpiece. You’re gonna cheese without touching your cock.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 04, 2018, 07:02:17 PM
Oh mupepe, I may have to deliver this scenario in erotic fanfic format. It’s just too juicy to merely describe declaratively. I’ve worked in so many little perfect details. I’ve been perfecting it all day in my head.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 04, 2018, 07:12:40 PM
Please please please you big tease
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: thisismyusername on August 04, 2018, 07:15:29 PM
mods help

No mods here, only dogs.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 04, 2018, 07:19:40 PM
Please please please you big tease

I’m working on it now. I feel dirty writing this. It should be done tonight.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 05, 2018, 12:33:30 AM
Here you go--this may have suffered from having to finish it quickly, but I got things to do tonight.
----------

They didn’t know it yet, but their weekly role-play day would never be sexier or sleazier than the one in front of them. Mupepe and his wifey had picked the filthiest Wal-Mart in all the land to turn into their depraved playground, and they’d been planning for weeks. It was the sort of Wal-Mart that was more like daycare for its r-word-tarded and disgustingly elderly employees.

Miss Pepe was working the entrance in her special girl scout uniform. The hem on her little plaid skirt was inappropriate by several inches. As she tried to pitch her Samoas and Thin Mints, she’d bounce like a giddy child, and that pervy hemline meant all of her customers saw a lot of her lacy underthings, inappropriate for a girl her age, along with a heaping serving of mound. She’d get so excited that she’d drop money she was handed, and she’d shoo away her customers as they tried to help her, just so she could conspicuously bend over and show her candy apple ass to the world.

Mupepe watched from the bushes. He didn’t have any pants on and he was manipulating himself. Far enough away that he didn’t really need to stifle his masturbatory moans, he got a little too comfortable and was maybe a little too loud when he nutted. The noise caught Miss Pepe’s attention, and she figured it was time for Phase Two.

In the middle of a sale, Miss Pepe dropped her cookies and grabbed her crotch with both hands, with an embarrassed look on her face. Mupepe quickly wiped off his dick with some leaves, pulled up his sweat pants, and ran over to Miss Pepe. Bending down a little, she put her hand over his ear and whispered something into it. Mupepe mimed shock, lifted up his wife, and ran to the men’s room.

He burst into the room, which was filled with the sort of men you’d expect to find in a shitty Wal-Mart in fucking Texas. It’s like a truck rest stop but worse. Large hairy men, child molesters, rapists, open carriers, murders, people without shoes and socks. Nobody wore shirts. There were some American flag crop tops. Yellowed underwear peaked out of tight denim. That’s what men’s rooms in Texas are like, and they smell like beef jerky and piss, their only good point.

Anyway, Mupepe set his little girl down on the nanny state-mandated changing table that sat on the wall opposite the all-occupied urinals.

“It’s okay. Everyone has accidents once in a while. Let’s get you cleaned up so you can go out and sell more cookies,” said Mupepe.

“Okay, daddy!” said Miss Pepe.

Miss Pepe laid down on her back as Mupepe upturned her skirt and pulled her panties down, pulling them further apart to get around her thick and juicy thighs.

“Daddy, can I have a lollipop?” asked Miss Pepe.

“Oh, I gave you my last one this morning. Hmmm, does this work?”

Mupepe leaned forward and stuck his thumb in Miss Pepe’s mouth, resting that arm on the changing table so he could focus on cleaning up her precious areas with a wet wipe with his other arm. As soon as he made contact, she let him know how much she liked it by biting harder on daddy’s thumb and teasing a bit of tongue play. Mupepe took this as a sign that she needed to be cleaned more deeply, and in every available orifice. As things escalated into pure spelunking, Miss Pepe’s hands crushed the remaining sample Thin Mint that was still in her hand.

“Oooo, daddy’s got a lollipop now,” Mupepe said.

The tongue-biting and licking quickly turned to audible moaning, and the various gross Texans at the urinals started looking over their shoulder to bear witness to the perversion, thinking of all the nasty shit they had done to their daughters lately. There was a lot of rubbernecking going on as folks left the bathroom, and more than a few of those urinals were choked up with loads by the time somebody finally called security on the apparent incestuous pedo-bacchanalia going on.

Mupepe and Miss Pepe were taken to the security office. There, the head of security, a tall bull dyke that looked like a gym teacher ripped into Mupepe, telling him how sick he was and how fucked up he was for thinking he could get away with this in a public men’s restroom.

Mupepe looked shocked. “This is all a huge misunderstanding. This isn’t my daughter. This is my wife,” he said.

In response to her husband’s words, Miss Pepe took off her clothes, quick like a pro. There’d be no mistaking her for a child when her clothes were off. She was all woman.

“I don’t know how you can look at something like this and think she’s a little girl. That’s just weird,” said Mupepe.

As Mupepe was saying this, Miss Pepe had moved to beside the head of security and was pulling on her shirt, near her breast.

“Daddy, I’m hungry,” said Miss Pepe.

The head of security smiled a little bit. Mupepe’s argument, and his wife’s body, were very convincing.

“Well, she hasn’t eaten all day, Ms. Head of Security,” said Mupepe.

The head of security unbuttoned her shirt and pulled a big titty out of her bra, but this wasn’t good enough for Miss Pepe.

“All off,” she said. And the head of security complied.

It only took a few minutes before the head of security was naked on the desk, tits up, with Miss Mupepe, tits down, nursing on her. Due to the height discrepancy between the two, their assholes and vaginas lined up just right for Mupepe to have an easy buffet. First, he covered their holes in Nutella and had himself a feast (a slightly more difficult one with the significantly hairier head of security), and then he played whack-a-mole with his dick, switching between vaginas rapidly between strokes, and then finished in his wife’s asshole (note that this was all done hygienically—the asshole was fucked last and there was no switching from asshole to vagina).

In the end, that bull dyke head of security was played by Scarlett Johansson in the movie adaptation of this story, which is what this thread is all about.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: team filler on August 05, 2018, 12:35:41 AM
 :doge
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 05, 2018, 12:38:52 AM
:doge

https://youtu.be/m59UM1iFu-c
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: team filler on August 05, 2018, 12:40:27 AM
 :asuka You think I would read all that
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: TVC15 on August 05, 2018, 12:42:12 AM
:asuka You think I would read all that

Hey, I hyped up some fanfic. I had to deliver. It’s smutty.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Mupepe on August 05, 2018, 01:13:20 AM
You’re one sick fuck. I love it. And I love you.
Title: Re: Scarlett Johansson and that lgqbt role
Post by: Nintex on August 06, 2018, 07:29:02 PM
[...]

In the end, that bull dyke head of security was played by Scarlett Johansson in the movie adaptation of this story, which is what this thread is all about.
:delicious