Author Topic: Weed: Not so harmless?  (Read 5977 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Weed: Not so harmless?
« on: August 17, 2007, 01:31:04 PM »
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20052489/

Quote
London - Smoking one cannabis joint is as harmful to a person’s lungs as having up to five cigarettes, according to research published on Tuesday.

Those who smoked cannabis damaged both the lungs’ small fine airways, used for transporting oxygen, and the large airways, which blocked air flow, the researchers said.

It meant cannabis smokers complained of wheezing, coughing, and chest tightness, the study by experts at the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand found.

I think this has more to do with people who smoke it beyond a 'recreational' capacity. Still, even 1 or 2 = as many as 10 freakin cigarettes yikes.
o_0

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2007, 01:32:37 PM »
We're all going to die sooner or later, I'd rather enjoy my time a bit zooted
dap

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #2 on: August 17, 2007, 01:34:25 PM »
Hey I can't criticize, I drink so much alcohol haha.
o_0

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2007, 01:36:06 PM »
This has been known for some time; I remember my bio teacher once telling me about experimenting with this in class during the 70s lol.

If people want to harm their bodies that's perfectly fine with me - just don't tell me it's harmless. I'm not that stupid.
010

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #4 on: August 17, 2007, 01:42:51 PM »
If people want to harm their bodies that's perfectly fine with me - just don't tell me it's harmless. I'm not that stupid.


Then you're not so stupid to fall prey to all the hysteria surrounding recreational marijuana usage, right?
dap

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2007, 01:45:35 PM »
PD: well again, id like to stress that this most likely does not matter to recreational users who do it like once or twice a month.
o_0

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2007, 01:47:52 PM »
I'm pretty healthy for someone who smokes once or twice a day, all things considered.
dap

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2007, 01:49:44 PM »
there's exceptions to every rule, no doubt. I drink more than most of my friends an dont suffer mind bending hang overs for some reason.
o_0

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2007, 01:50:21 PM »
What do you define as "recreational" usage? According to the study one joint is equal to around 5 cigarettes, so while I don't fall prey to any hysteria how does one deny the harmful effects of this stuff? 5 cigs a month isn't going to kill anyone, but that builds up.

Same with drinking. There's nothing wrong with drinking in moderation. But when you start abusing it, drinking multiple beers each day - you're going to damage your liver. Plain and simple. There's nothing "square" about saying that.
010

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2007, 01:52:12 PM »
Well you could be a teetotaler and still get hit by a bus, PD.

dap

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #10 on: August 17, 2007, 01:52:42 PM »
Id GUESS recreational is a few times a week. I dont smoke so im not sure what they consider recreational. I will say my drinking certainly isnt recreaional. I love booze. I drink scotch, brandy, bourbon, and vodka until I fall asleep some nights. Its awesome. I make up for it by not drinking soda muhaha.

I used to be like you PD, all naive about how to deal with being an adult, but now I know that NOTHING compares to the dimension booze can send you to.
o_0

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #11 on: August 17, 2007, 01:56:53 PM »
Id GUESS recreational is a few times a week. I dont smoke so im not sure what they consider recreational. I will say my drinking certainly isnt recreaional. I love booze. I drink scotch, brandy, bourbon, and vodka until I fall asleep some nights. Its awesome. I make up for it by not drinking soda muhaha.

I used to be like you PD, all naive about how to deal with being an adult, but now I know that NOTHING compares to the dimension booze can send you to.

Would it be fair to say you drink enough to suffer from liver damage problems in the future? If so, does the momentary pleasure justify the long term consequence?

Like I said I'm not saying drinking alcohol is bad PERIOD. But is there anyone who'd argue that over doing it has poor consequences for the body's health?


Would you guys agree that smoking cigarettes is a "bad" thing for the body?
010

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #12 on: August 17, 2007, 01:59:59 PM »
IT DEPENDS ON THE BRAND, PD

STOP BEING ARGUMENTATIVE FOR THE SAKE OF BEING ARGUMENTATIVE
dap

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #13 on: August 17, 2007, 02:00:44 PM »
Breathing the air every morning is bad for you.
o_0

Candyflip

  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #14 on: August 17, 2007, 02:02:10 PM »
Quote
but cannabis use stopped the lungs working properly.
Quote
“The danger cannabis poses to respiratory health is consistently being overlooked,”

So basically they're saying smoking weed makes you wheeze? Small price to pay. I'd rather be doing that then dying of lung cancer and emphysema.
ffs

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #15 on: August 17, 2007, 02:11:48 PM »
IT DEPENDS ON THE BRAND, PD

STOP BEING ARGUMENTATIVE FOR THE SAKE OF BEING ARGUMENTATIVE

I'm not being argumentative, I'm just discussing this issue. But it's not going anywhere so I'll let it be
010

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #16 on: August 17, 2007, 02:13:27 PM »
You would have to smoke 4 joints a day to equal a single pack of cigarettes, which nobody does.


dap

Candyflip

  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #17 on: August 17, 2007, 02:15:48 PM »
You would have to smoke 4 joints a day to equal a single pack of cigarettes, which nobody does.


(Image removed from quote.)
Yeah =\ sometimes.
ffs

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #18 on: August 17, 2007, 02:19:10 PM »
Like Cheech & Chong sized spliffs man.
dap

Cyanista

  • IGNORE ME
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2007, 02:28:52 PM »
Who smokes a joint alone, though?  Unlike cigarettes, a joint is often shared between 2-4 people. 

I don't think it's harmless - I have a really hard time getting over respiratory infections and my hair smells like pot sometimes :(.  Still, I could outrun any of my cigarette smoking friends any day of the week, and many of them haven't been smoking as long as I have.  No one's adding poison to the marijuana cigarettes. 
omg

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2007, 02:33:55 PM »
While I personally would rather smoke a bong than a joint, my roommates are quite content with rolling a jay or a blunt and smoking it by themselves. Professional stoners!

I won't argue that smoking ganja is harmless, but I'm not going to try to quantify "oh smoking this much pot = smoking this many cigarettes" because that's a hysterical argument to be used when the DARE commercials are losing their effectiveness.
dap

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2007, 03:40:46 PM »
I wish they'd focus their attention on whether cannibis causes it's long-time users to be paranoid when sober or if paranoid people are more apt to smoke cannibis to self-medicate.

Because the causal link is definitely there in my experiences.




Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #22 on: August 17, 2007, 03:45:35 PM »
I wish they would do some real studies.  I thought everyone already knew this and accepted it?  I mean, the point is, a recreational marijuana user doesn't damage their lungs nearly as much as an average cigarette smoker because quite simply, they don't smoke as much. 

You could smoke a bowl a day and if that equals 5 cigarettes, you're still smoking way less than the average cigarette smoker.

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #23 on: August 17, 2007, 03:52:01 PM »
I dont smoke I vaproize.

Smoking is like inhaling a forest fire...

vaporizing is like inhaling a small little bit of steam....

its like fried chicken vs baked chicken.

Sadly some people dont appreciate vaproizing because it doesnt have that horrible lung burn like smoking does. because that feeling isnt there, they feel they arent getting as high - when they really are.

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2007, 03:53:02 PM »
hair smells like pot sometimes :(


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2007, 03:55:54 PM »
I dont smoke I vaproize.

Smoking is like inhaling a forest fire...

vaporizing is like inhaling a small little bit of steam....

its like fried chicken vs baked chicken.

Sadly some people dont appreciate vaproizing because it doesnt have that horrible lung burn like smoking does. because that feeling isnt there, they feel they arent getting as high - when they really are.

vaporizing fucking rocks. 

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #26 on: August 17, 2007, 03:56:14 PM »
hair smells like pot sometimes :(


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.


...
010

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #27 on: August 17, 2007, 03:58:07 PM »
hair smells like pot sometimes :(


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

like her bush?

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #28 on: August 17, 2007, 04:00:00 PM »
hair smells like pot sometimes :(


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

like her bush?

LOL - no - youv never liked to touch/play with a girls good smelling hair?

I prefer that other bit trimmed up anyway for the record - there shouldnt be enough hair there to hold a smoke smell.

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #29 on: August 17, 2007, 04:03:41 PM »
...

:wag
dap

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #30 on: August 17, 2007, 04:04:27 PM »
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\
010

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #31 on: August 17, 2007, 04:04:58 PM »
hair smells like pot sometimes :(


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

like her bush?

LOL - no - youv never liked to touch/play with a girls good smelling hair?

I prefer that other bit trimmed up anyway for the record - there shouldnt be enough hair there to hold a smoke smell.

not really.  I'll smell it while we're making out or something.  

and i like a girls bush to be trimmed like a well-kept lawn.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #32 on: August 17, 2007, 04:05:45 PM »
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\
we're not even talking about whats-her-nuts anymore, mr. i-got-a-hug-from-a-brazilian-chick-and-her-hair-smelled-great-lolz.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #33 on: August 17, 2007, 04:10:59 PM »
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\
we're not even talking about whats-her-nuts anymore, mr. i-got-a-hug-from-a-brazilian-chick-and-her-hair-smelled-great-lolz.
010

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #34 on: August 17, 2007, 04:13:19 PM »
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol   

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #35 on: August 17, 2007, 04:13:43 PM »
Notice the white hand holding the book.
dap

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #36 on: August 17, 2007, 04:21:50 PM »
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\

no.

BlackMage

  • The Panty-Peeler
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #37 on: August 17, 2007, 04:25:57 PM »
WE LANDED ON THE MOON, PEOPLE.

wtf, maf?
UNF

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #38 on: August 17, 2007, 04:39:06 PM »
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???
dap

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #39 on: August 17, 2007, 04:44:35 PM »
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???

Maybe he is one of those - "im too professional to partake" mates...

I love those guys - they try to look down on me because I partake - and they try so hard to fly the straight and narrow - you know because only losers "partake"

Then they jump back in their Toyota Corolla and ride off to their 40 hr a week 50-60K /year shyt job.....

People who try to hard and look down on people who partake in the THC blo - and they usually make 8x less $$ even tho they insist their way is the right way.

"I would love to smoke, but they do random drug screening at my job"

Tip 1: if your job is even piss testing you, you are someones buttfukk monkey boy ;)


Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #40 on: August 17, 2007, 04:46:49 PM »
I am someones buttfukk monkey boy, evidently. And not the person whose monkey boy I want to be, either  :'(
dap

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #41 on: August 17, 2007, 04:58:35 PM »
I dont smoke I vaproize.

Smoking is like inhaling a forest fire...

vaporizing is like inhaling a small little bit of steam....

its like fried chicken vs baked chicken.

Sadly some people dont appreciate vaproizing because it doesnt have that horrible lung burn like smoking does. because that feeling isnt there, they feel they arent getting as high - when they really are.

vaporizing fucking rocks. 

I use this one...



and this one when im on the go



Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #42 on: August 17, 2007, 05:00:47 PM »
Jesus those are some serious apparatuses.
dap

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #43 on: August 17, 2007, 05:03:34 PM »
I have a homemade one.  Ghetto as fuck, but it works.

Candyflip

  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #44 on: August 17, 2007, 05:05:12 PM »
Volcano vapes are pretty nice too.

ffs

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #45 on: August 17, 2007, 05:08:29 PM »
Volcano vapes are pretty nice too.

(Image removed from quote.)

So I have heard - never got a chance to use one of those.

BlackMage

  • The Panty-Peeler
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #46 on: August 17, 2007, 05:51:22 PM »
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???

Maybe he is one of those - "im too professional to partake" mates...

I love those guys - they try to look down on me because I partake - and they try so hard to fly the straight and narrow - you know because only losers "partake"

Then they jump back in their Toyota Corolla and ride off to their 40 hr a week 50-60K /year shyt job.....

People who try to hard and look down on people who partake in the THC blo - and they usually make 8x less $$ even tho they insist their way is the right way.

"I would love to smoke, but they do random drug screening at my job"

Tip 1: if your job is even piss testing you, you are someones buttfukk monkey boy ;)



huh?
UNF

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #47 on: August 17, 2007, 05:51:54 PM »
He's as confusing as you are, just more verbose.
dap

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #48 on: August 17, 2007, 05:53:28 PM »
Clear the thread, Blackmage is about to explode
010

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #49 on: August 17, 2007, 05:55:42 PM »
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???

Maybe he is one of those - "im too professional to partake" mates...

I love those guys - they try to look down on me because I partake - and they try so hard to fly the straight and narrow - you know because only losers "partake"

Then they jump back in their Toyota Corolla and ride off to their 40 hr a week 50-60K /year shyt job.....

People who try to hard and look down on people who partake in the THC blo - and they usually make 8x less $$ even tho they insist their way is the right way.

"I would love to smoke, but they do random drug screening at my job"

Tip 1: if your job is even piss testing you, you are someones buttfukk monkey boy ;)



huh?

Oh this isnt directed at you - I have no idea.

You could be one of those mates tho - I have no idea.

Your post left us hanging, so I redirected.

Did I describe you by coincidence?

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #50 on: August 17, 2007, 06:01:05 PM »
I dont mess with weed, booze is my anti drug. Im not gonna hassle people for doing it tho.
o_0

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #51 on: August 17, 2007, 06:04:30 PM »
Do you like wine?
010

Saint Cornelius

  • Always rockin' the sawed-off wisdom.
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #52 on: August 17, 2007, 06:05:17 PM »
As long as that shit is fortified, my nicca
dap

abrader

  • Bomb-A-Daeus
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #53 on: August 17, 2007, 06:05:56 PM »
back OT REAL TALK:

Yeah smoking anything will destroy you.

It reminds me of the MadTV skit where the guys job is to suck exhaust out of a pipe in a wall...his stay at home wife needs him to suck more exhaust so he mcan make more $$ and buy her more porn....

in the skit the guy has a perminant black stain all around his mouth

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #54 on: August 17, 2007, 06:28:01 PM »
[youtube=425,350]4GXb7-efd4M[/youtube]
 :lol
010

bud

  • a smudge of excrement on a tissue surging out to sea with a million tons of raw sewage
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #55 on: August 17, 2007, 06:35:29 PM »
i love chris rock the comedian, but he should never do movies again.
zzz

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #56 on: August 17, 2007, 07:33:32 PM »
I knew a stoner who smoked a pack or more a day and smoked several joints a day as well. Fun guy, too bad he was kicked out of school. Now he makes 6 figures in Alberta and I'm stoned sober and unemployed.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #57 on: August 17, 2007, 07:45:18 PM »
I knew a stoner who smoked a pack or more a day and smoked several joints a day as well. Fun guy, too bad he was kicked out of school. Now he makes 6 figures in Alberta and I'm stoned sober and unemployed.

STILL!?

 :(

You must interview really bad.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #58 on: August 17, 2007, 07:46:53 PM »
Or he must not be looking very hard.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
« Reply #59 on: August 17, 2007, 07:47:38 PM »
Or he must not be looking very hard.

I do believe he is.