Author Topic: Game (Read 1581 times)

Kestastrophe · « **Reply #1 on:** June 16, 2008, 02:53:23 PM »

It looks like COD3, with flamethrowers.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #2 on:** June 16, 2008, 02:53:57 PM »

Looks about on par with COD4

Rman · « **Reply #3 on:** June 16, 2008, 02:58:26 PM »

That soldier looks like Niko from GTAIV.

IW>>>>>>>>>>>>>Treyarch

hyp · « **Reply #4 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:04:01 PM »

damn this is on some last gen shit.

BLOOM LIGHTING

Crushed · « **Reply #5 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:04:22 PM »

ahhhhhhhh scary japs i'm so scared by this scary game

brawndolicious · « **Reply #6 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:12:06 PM »

it's basically the COD4 engine with a lot better physics and better lighting: buildings are destroyable and burnable, skin melts off bodies, etc. it'll probably look really sexy in, you know, motion. I'd imagine that they're designing it so that after you attack an area, it's unrecognizable from when you first saw it (forests/villages burned down and bunkers reduced to rubble and whatnot). the only not-so-good thing I see is the texturing but COD4 was pretty weak with that too.

Tucah · « **Reply #7 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:20:20 PM »

Lulz bloom.

But really, looks about on par with COD3. Not that that's a very good thing, mind you.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #8 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:21:56 PM »

Quote from: Tucah on June 16, 2008, 03:20:20 PM

Lulz bloom.

But really, looks about on par with COD3. Not that that's a very good thing, mind you.

So what exactly is it about it that makes it look worse than COD4?

Grecco · « **Reply #9 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:32:54 PM »

Call of Duty World in Bloom

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #10 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:38:31 PM »

Quote from: duckman2000 on June 16, 2008, 03:21:56 PM

Quote from: Tucah on June 16, 2008, 03:20:20 PM
Lulz bloom.

But really, looks about on par with COD3. Not that that's a very good thing, mind you.

So what exactly is it about it that makes it look worse than COD4?

gaf-level treyarch hate and rose-colored iw ass-tonguing, duckman

they're the same bunch who tend to forget it took four solid months of denial from activision and iw before finally patching the hopelessly broken cod2 multiplayer

good money on half the people who bitch about cod3 having never even played it, they're just bandwagon douchewallops

4-player online co-op, 2-player offline already makes it better than cod4

treyarch > iw

WrikaWrek · « **Reply #11 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:46:00 PM »

Looks old.

Get it?

tk you tk you

cool breeze · « **Reply #12 on:** June 16, 2008, 03:46:46 PM »

This has potential to be the best pacific based WW2 game! That said, it will be a turd.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #13 on:** June 16, 2008, 05:16:17 PM »

Vietnam? if so maybe each game purchase comes with a pound peyote to "further enhance the visuals"?

Narag · « **Reply #14 on:** June 16, 2008, 05:56:24 PM »

Quote from: Kosma on June 16, 2008, 03:48:39 PM

Really what are they thinking? after COD4 how can you do THIS?

I think Activision likes to throw the COD name in the crapper now and then. Why just dont give those guys @ Treyarch their own FPS series or something.

This was probably in dev before CoD4 came out and likely not worth scrapping. I'd just as soon they splinter the series off into CoD # and CoD: MW # series.

demi · « **Reply #15 on:** June 16, 2008, 06:08:04 PM »

COD3 sucks cause it had shitty online achievements :'(

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #16 on:** June 16, 2008, 07:10:34 PM »

Quote from: am nintenho on June 16, 2008, 03:12:06 PM

it's basically the COD4 engine with a lot better physics and better lighting: buildings are destroyable and burnable, skin melts off bodies, etc. it'll probably look really sexy in, you know, motion. I'd imagine that they're designing it so that after you attack an area, it's unrecognizable from when you first saw it (forests/villages burned down and bunkers reduced to rubble and whatnot). the only not-so-good thing I see is the texturing but COD4 was pretty weak with that too.

wtf, COD barely has blood

MyNameIsMethodis · « **Reply #17 on:** June 16, 2008, 07:19:19 PM »

I loved COD3 multiplayer. Still haven't gotten around to COD4 at all yet. Don't know why.

BobFromPikeCreek · « **Reply #18 on:** June 16, 2008, 08:24:37 PM »

Quote from: Amber Lambchops on June 16, 2008, 05:16:17 PM

Vietnam?

No.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #19 on:** June 17, 2008, 05:44:39 PM »

Quote from: Amber Lambchops on June 16, 2008, 05:16:17 PM

Vietnam? if so maybe each game purchase comes with a pound peyote to "further enhance the visuals"?

Vietnam wasn't a very popular war.

Quote from: AdmiralViscen on June 16, 2008, 07:10:34 PM

Quote from: am nintenho on June 16, 2008, 03:12:06 PM
it's basically the COD4 engine with a lot better physics and better lighting: buildings are destroyable and burnable, skin melts off bodies, etc. it'll probably look really sexy in, you know, motion. I'd imagine that they're designing it so that after you attack an area, it's unrecognizable from when you first saw it (forests/villages burned down and bunkers reduced to rubble and whatnot). the only not-so-good thing I see is the texturing but COD4 was pretty weak with that too.
wtf, COD barely has blood

That's what some magazine said. It seems like they're going for a totally different style cause maybe people don't mind if you're a little rougher with the asians than you are with the aryans lol. but it does seem like they want to give it a darker style. The only other treyarch game that I know I played was COD3 and that was fun even if the story was a little campy but I have hope that they'll pull this game off well with regards to the gore/darker setting because of double the dev time.

News:

Author Topic: Game (Read 1581 times)

Borys