Yea, that latest R2 video was pretty embarrassing. I didn't post it here because it would be dogpiled.
Can't say I was too excited about it, but that was mostly because the gunplay in SP looked down right weird.
Still, the MP in Resistance was plenty well playing and full featured, and R2, whether you end up enjoying the campaign or not, is going to up that. And I fail to see how 8-player online co-op and 60 player multiplayer matches can be reduced to "things to put on the back of the box."
Separate campaign, really? GRAW did that, for what? 16 player co op if i remember? Pointless. Co Op is either incorporated in the main campaign or i don't care.
And 60 player matches, with no vehicles? Really? Not to mention, ok so you have this big map, and you are divided by squads, so there's lot's of small battles happening in the Map.
What's the point? cmon, when people see "60 players", they want to jump into chaos, if they want to fight 10vs10 they will just make a 20 player game.
And Resistance 1 was a twitch shooter, so when you add 60 players to the mix, it sounds like it's going to be chaotically boring, because Resistance is very arcadey.
If you liked the 1st one, and are excited for the 2nd, more power to you, but to me it doesn't surprise me that most people simply don't care that Resistance 2 is coming.