You really think the Arab/Israeli conflict is a regional issue? Really?
Ah, I get to respond to this while pimping one of the authors I mentioned on the previous page:
http://www.gwynnedyer.com/articles/Gwynne%20Dyer%20article_%20%20The%20Importance%20of%20the%20Middle%20East.txtBasically, the Arab/Israeli conflict has had little in the way of truly global impact. And even less so in the past 20 years since the end of the Cold War. At least before that point, it was seen as one of the proxy war-areas between the US and the Soviets, but even then, there was only a couple moments where things had truly global implications. I would say the Suez Crisis applies, as it was a major diplomatic fuckup for the West, forcing the US to go against its own allies at a time when it would have preferred to put pressure on the Soviets for the Hungary situation.
And apart from that, probably the 1973 Yom Kippur War, as there was a bit of great power clash in that one, until the US was able to make the Soviets blink.
Unless you're tying the Arab/Israeli conflict in with "The War on Terror", in which case, I think that's a stretch. Al-Qaeda et al referring to Palestine strikes me simply as a propaganda talking point, and not a true motivator for terrorism. And Islamic terrorism in general is overblown in importance anyway. It's not an existential threat to the West.
http://www.gwynnedyer.com/articles/Gwynne%20Dyer%20article_%20%20The%20Great%20Islamic%20Threat.txtThe worst-case scenario for the Arab-Israeli conflict, in 2011, is......the Palestinian people continuing to suffer. There isn't even the likelihood of a
regional war, as there is no state willing or able to challenge Israel's military dominance, let alone something that has effects that spill over into other regions.
But go ahead, make your case for why The Arab/Israel conflict has global implications, other than the American media/political establishment seeming to think it does. And other than "Domino Theory" for the 21st century.