Author Topic: Jesus (Read 4823 times)

The Fake Shemp · « **on:** June 22, 2009, 04:11:02 PM »

Someone must stop Tim Burton.

Ganhyun · « **Reply #1 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:13:31 PM »

wtf?!?!

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #2 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:13:33 PM »

yep. yeah. this is exactly what i would expect a tim burton movie to look like.

drew · « **Reply #3 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:14:19 PM »

Quote from: Green Man on June 22, 2009, 04:12:57 PM

Tim Burton is the worst person ever. Fuck Johnny Deep too. I hope all his films TANK!

his new movie about dillinger looks good

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #4 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:14:48 PM »

Also, I've never been so repulsed and oddly attracted until this picture:

Arbys Roast Beef Sandwich · « **Reply #5 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:15:03 PM »

Can he not make films that look EXACTLY the same as his previous ones? Hack total

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #6 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:16:59 PM »

Its funny, because he's not a very good director - on a technical level. Its like he's always wanted to do set design and just became a director.

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #7 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:17:19 PM »

good to see elijah wood is still getting work

Ganhyun · « **Reply #8 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:17:27 PM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 04:14:48 PM

Also, I've never been so repulsed and oddly attracted until this picture:

(Image removed from quote.)

That pic makes me think of a blonde Anne Hathaway.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #9 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:17:30 PM »

I usually like Burton's stuff but wow dude...nearly every fucking picture I saw today was like a horrible photoshop.

Alice in Wonderland is trippy enough as itself. Adding a little dark/goth/whateverthefucktheycallit/etc makes sense sure. But this is beyond over board. This is like visionary...water board

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #10 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:19:20 PM »

I want to see TIM BURTON's remake of TORA TORA TORA!

duckman2000 · « **Reply #11 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:27:10 PM »

The Alice game was a hell of a lot more fucked up. Also, quite awesome. The Cheshire Cat is the most awesome thing ever.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #12 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:27:41 PM »

I don't see the problem. Alice in Wonderland was always a very, very fucked up book if you actually read it after childhood. Maybe this one is aimed mostly at an older audience?

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #13 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:30:44 PM »

The book wasn't "fucked up" - it was a dark fairy tale. This is Tim Burton doing Tim Burton shit.

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #14 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:32:09 PM »

Tim Burton's American McGee's Alice

brawndolicious · « **Reply #15 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:32:41 PM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 04:30:44 PM

The book wasn't "fucked up" - it was a dark fairy tale. This is Tim Burton doing Tim Burton shit.

No, it was written by a pedophile and it had content that I would never feel comfortable explaining to a child.

Let Tim Burton go wild with it. I don't mind Depp but I got really bored with the other Burton/Depp movies and this one looks like it might actually keep my interest..

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #16 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:38:47 PM »

Quote from: am nintenho on June 22, 2009, 04:32:41 PM

No, it was written by a pedophile...

Uh, there's really no evidence of this.

Quote

... and it had content that I would never feel comfortable explaining to a child.

Such as? A lot of the stuff is interpretative, and Carroll himself wrote that much of it was nonsense.

You're a closet case, dude.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #17 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:43:20 PM »

He took pictures of a 7 year old girl, naked, without her parents in the room (as was the norm back then). There is no CSI DNA evidence left in her rectum but it's pretty obvious what was going on.

Things like the mercury poisoning and the historical references are way too much for a kid to think about. Obviously, these shots are not the same style you'd see in a Nickolodean show so maybe it's not even aimed at kids?

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #18 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:45:25 PM »

Actually, from all accounts, including that girl - Carroll died celibate. He was definitely an eccentric guy, but nude pictures of a girl in Victorian era England isn't the big deal it is nowadays. He was an eccentric child author and loved kids. None of the girls that he kept in contact with spoke an ill word about him.

MAYBE IF SHE WORE A BURQA IT'D BE OKAY.

Powerslave · « **Reply #19 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:49:50 PM »

Quote from: Green Man on June 22, 2009, 04:12:57 PM

Tim Burton is the worst person ever. Fuck Johnny Deep too. I hope all his films TANK!

Yeah agreed Johnny Crap is annoying.

Himu · « **Reply #20 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:55:36 PM »

I look forward to this. I didn't think the Tim Burton Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was bad at all; really good in fact, just not as good as Willy Wonka 70's version. Then again, I'm a fan of the book.

I just didn't think it was as bad as others said it was.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #21 on:** June 22, 2009, 04:56:05 PM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 04:45:25 PM

Actually, from all accounts, including that girl - Carroll died celibate. He was definitely an eccentric guy, but nude pictures of a girl in Victorian era England isn't the big deal it is nowadays. He was an eccentric child author and loved kids. None of the girls that he kept in contact with spoke an ill word about him.

MAYBE IF SHE WORE A BURQA IT'D BE OKAY.

Well at the least, he was screwed up sexually. Maybe he was molested as a kid?

Ellrick · « **Reply #22 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:18:41 PM »

This thread warms my cockles. Ive been screaming about what a shit director Tim Burton is forever. Guy cant tell a story to save his life.

I dont know how he gets to keep making movies, he should be designing sets in bollywood.

(Ed Wood is a masterpiece)

Akala · « **Reply #23 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:38:34 PM »

I don't know. My wife loves Tim Burton stuff, so I get to sit through them all. I think I like about half of his stuff, give or take. There is worse, anyway.

Also, this looks pretty cool!

Ellrick · « **Reply #24 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:43:51 PM »

Quit being reasonable and jump on the hatercade, its more fun.

Faces on flowers PFFFFFT

Tauntaun · « **Reply #25 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:45:09 PM »

Hathoway or however her name is spelled is a plus and so is wood if he's in it but can we stop using depp and that chick that has had kids with burton? PLZ?

Kestastrophe · « **Reply #26 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:46:58 PM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 04:16:59 PM

Its funny, because he's not a very good director - on a technical level. Its like he's always wanted to do set design and just became a director.

He's no Zach Snyder

Diunx · « **Reply #27 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:59:21 PM »

Horrible just horrible.

Eel O'Brian · « **Reply #28 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:03:38 PM »

i was just commenting on how much depp looks like elijah wood in that mad hatter pic

now you can't unsee it

Herr Mafflard · « **Reply #29 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:03:59 PM »

I nearly died of boredom when I watched Burton's Charlie & the Chocalate Factory.

This one looks to have the same, 'edgy' style he probably thinks is so cool and profound. I just think it's an eyesore.

Ellrick · « **Reply #30 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:06:30 PM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 04:11:02 PM

(Image removed from quote.)

Diunx · « **Reply #31 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:28:39 PM »

How the fuck can Burton have sex with that woman after directing her looking like that, I would divorce her and take the kids.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #32 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:29:42 PM »

Bildi · « **Reply #33 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:34:07 PM »

It'll have to be pretty weird to top that weird-ass Neco z Alenky

[youtube=560,345]TI1x1OfSwSY[/youtube]

Seems the entire movie is on youtube if anyone is interested:

TakingBackSunday · « **Reply #34 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:41:57 PM »

The set art looks interesting, but the forecasted make-up looks fucking deadful.

Cyanista · « **Reply #35 on:** June 22, 2009, 07:48:01 PM »

Uh. Just because it was ok to photograph naked little girls in Victorian england doesn't mean that you aren't a pedophile for doing it. It doesn't mean you ARE, but the fact that Carroll was inappropriately attracted to young girls is generally accepted knowledge - yeah, that's not DNA evidence or anything, but come on.

Federman, I don't like the turn in your outlook this seventeen year old cruise-goer has ignited.

Cormacaroni · « **Reply #36 on:** June 22, 2009, 08:49:45 PM »

for the record, Cormacaroni is:
pro Alice in Wonderland
anti pedophiles

Dickie Dee · « **Reply #37 on:** June 22, 2009, 09:19:01 PM »

Burton seems like he's been dancing around and making pseudo Alice in Wonderland movies since his career started. Rather than this being the pinnacle of his career it's kinda just bringing yawns from me. It seems like his final trip/death march back to the well.

Johnny Depp is awesome but Burton gives him too long a leash to play Depp Eccentric Character In A Burton Movie No. 24523235

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #38 on:** June 22, 2009, 09:24:38 PM »

Quote from: Cyanista on June 22, 2009, 07:48:01 PM

Uh. Just because it was ok to photograph naked little girls in Victorian england doesn't mean that you aren't a pedophile for doing it. It doesn't mean you ARE, but the fact that Carroll was inappropriately attracted to young girls is generally accepted knowledge - yeah, that's not DNA evidence or anything, but come on.

Consensus amongst those who have actually studied him is pretty straightforward - that he was not sexually attracted to young girls, but that he was socially awkward and had trouble forming adult relationships. Testimonies from children he photographed to their parents to his peers have pretty much exonerated him, but people have still created elaborate conspiracy theories.

This myth that he's a pedophile is ridiculous. Was Mark Twain a pedophile as well?

It's pretty much accepted that he died celibate.

... As for this so-called 17-year-old, I was told in Grand Bahamas that she was 22! So it's all good.

Ellrick · « **Reply #39 on:** June 22, 2009, 09:42:36 PM »

Quote from: Cormacaroni on June 22, 2009, 08:49:45 PM

for the record, Cormacaroni is:
pro Alice in Wonderland
anti pedophiles

I am anti talking in the third person, only pedophiles do that.

Olivia Wilde Homo · « **Reply #40 on:** June 22, 2009, 09:47:13 PM »

Sounds like another Tim Burton wank.

Might as well just pop in Edward Scissorhands instead and save myself some money.

Bildi · « **Reply #41 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:22:21 PM »

I've only seen two Burton/Depp films and I enjoyed both - Edward Scissorhands and Sleepy Hollow. I think the secret is to just see one film every decade or so.

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #42 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:23:16 PM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 09:24:38 PM

Consensus amongst those who have actually studied him is pretty straightforward - that he was not sexually attracted to young girls, but that he was socially awkward and had trouble forming adult relationships.

He was like a Victorian era Evilbore poster.

Cyanista · « **Reply #43 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:33:30 PM »

Yeah, what a vote of confidence.

You can be a celibate pervert. I don't have to study Carroll to realize that he had inappropriate ideas about youngsters - I just had to read his stories.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #44 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:39:38 PM »

He existed in an era before Freud. Only now might you allege that he harbored inappropriate thoughts about children, but during the Victorian era, he was just an eccentric artist - and not even one of a kind!

The guy was just weird, but our post-Freud society has deemed it fit to demonize the guy. A lot of it has to do by the kind of subculture that has reveled in his works - does anyone throw labels like "pedophile" around Mark Twain, who is largely guilty of the same behaviors as Carroll?

Nope.

Because Alice in Wonderland is hippy trash and the author is a pervert. So sayeth the puritanical American hive mind.

Cyanista · « **Reply #45 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:43:27 PM »

You're assuming a lot. I actually like all the Wonderland stories - I read them all, after all. I think he created a vibrant and engaging fantasy world, and i give him credit for not actually FUCKING little girls.

But come on. He so wanted to.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #46 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:46:21 PM »

I really think his works are interpretative and people that come away thinking that he was a pedophile (that wanted to bed little girls) says more about their own mental health than Carroll's.

MAYBE DADDY ISSUES?

spoiler (click to show/hide)

Just kidding. Don't hit me, please.

[close]

Ellrick · « **Reply #47 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:48:25 PM »

If Carroll were alive today he would be posting on GAF under the handle "alex".

Powerslave · « **Reply #48 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:54:27 PM »

brawndolicious · « **Reply #49 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:37:27 AM »

Quote from: Willco on June 22, 2009, 10:39:38 PM

but during the Victorian era, he was just an eccentric artist - and not even one of a kind!

From one of his biographies:

Quote

We cannot know to what extent sexual urges lay behind Charles's preference for drawing and photographing children in the nude. He contended the preference was entirely aesthetic. But given his emotional attachment to children as well as his aesthetic appreciation of their forms, his assertion that his interest was strictly artistic is naive. He probably felt more than he dared acknowledge, even to himself.[

It's commonly accepted that he was a repressed pedophile. When I say that it was a "fucked up" book, I don't mean that it was bad. But that maybe it's meant for a more mature audience. We all grew up thinking of it as just another Disney movie your parents pop in to shut you up. It obviously has a bit more to it than that so lets wait and see the final product which might actually be good. Obviously, Burton is going for a "disturbing" visual style like just about every movie he's ever directed but that style obviously would be perfect for Alice in Wonderland.

chronovore · « **Reply #50 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:44:55 AM »

Quote from: Cormacaroni on June 22, 2009, 08:49:45 PM

for the record, Cormacaroni is:
pro Alice in Wonderland
anti blended whiskies

fixed.

duckman2000 · « **Reply #51 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:49:09 AM »

I'm pretty damned sensitive to pedophilia, but the reasoning in that "biographical" bit is less than brilliant. It's absolutely possible to enjoy something from artistic and emotional perspectives without it ever having anything to do with a sexual interest. Arguing that this is an alien concept says plenty more about cultural standards and perception than it does about the dude in question.

Basically, you people are a bunch of damaged sickos.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #52 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:54:06 AM »

Uh, there's no consensus that he was a repressed pedophile, nor did that biography really bring anything to the table. You should just stay out of this conversation while you're ahead, am nintenho.

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #53 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:58:14 AM »

nudity in itself is not sexual, but enjoying the nude form for nonsexual aesthetic reasons seems pretty foreign to many of us.

cool breeze · « **Reply #54 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:58:22 AM »

someone stop letting Tim Burton make movies

he makes Johnny Depp seem like an asshole by association

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #55 on:** June 23, 2009, 02:01:05 AM »

Quote from: swaggaz on June 23, 2009, 01:58:22 AM

someone stop letting Tim Burton make movies

he makes Johnny Depp seem like an asshole by association

Fresh Prince · « **Reply #56 on:** June 23, 2009, 02:01:17 AM »

Malek owns repressed pedo-supporters.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #57 on:** June 23, 2009, 03:19:06 AM »

I remember reading that one author from back then actually couldn't lose his virginity on his wedding night because he was disgusted by his wife's pubes. They annulled their marriage 7 years later.

Obviously, there is a whole spectrum to the "taking pictures of naked girls" hobby but if you can't be attracted to an adult woman, then there is a huge problem.

chronovore · « **Reply #58 on:** June 23, 2009, 03:45:47 AM »

Maybe it was a huge bush, like a rhododendron.

brawndolicious · « **Reply #59 on:** June 23, 2009, 04:00:33 AM »

I think I actually saw a picture of it once. It looked pretty normal.

Fun fact: Honey made from a rhodendron flower is extremely toxic and causes vomiting and intense heart palpitations for about 24 hours.

News:

Author Topic: Jesus (Read 4823 times)