yep, it's been gimp't
http://kotaku.com/5442458/report-microsoft-drops-natal-chip
now that it's the eyewii no one's going to go through the hassle of adding the functionality to their games,interest dissolving
they should have just held off and launched it with their next system
I'd guess that it'll be part of their next system as well, probably packed in and better supported in hardware. Yes, this is half-assed, but whatevs. What kills me from the article you provided is:
According to Games Industry, the majority of the processing chip work will be done by one of the three main Xenon processors. A percentage will be lost, but most games don't use a hundred percent of processing power.

~ Which games are these? XBLA titles? It's not games like Gears or Smackdown or Bayonetta. Yeah, I know those are unlikely to benefit from a vastly revised control scheme, and nobody wants to see Sho Nuff or A Slime Appears shakin' it like Bayonetta. But it's really not clear where this blasé conscription of 15% of the processing is going to get them into developers' hearts.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
I'm guessing it's more likely there will be moneyhats for big titles who are willing to work around the reduction. And sadly those moneyhats (if they really exist, ahem) will likely be given toward big titles rather than to something smallish and indie which has a better chance of doing something really innovative.
"Patching up older games to run with the new hardware now looks rather unlikely unless they have the CPU time to spare, but hopefully this will serve to focus developers on Natal-specific concepts as opposed to revisiting old classics."
Here again, I'm wondering which fairy-magic-powered titles these are which the devs would be willing to spend money to support Natal so the Pre-Owned copies being re-re-re-sold at Gamestop would be able to use it. Or is this for all the people who bought and held onto the games because they liked them enough to do so BUT also want to try them out with an added-after-the-fact control scheme?
