Guess what, sometimes something good happens to you and you want to celebrate with a family dinner at Olive Garden.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: TripleA on November 28, 2010, 12:08:40 PMQuote from: am nintenho on November 28, 2010, 07:03:50 AMSomebody on gaf posted some decent comparison shots.photomode models:http://i.imgur.com/1mDyt.jpggameplay models:http://i.imgur.com/uGxnJ.jpgBoth games use higher poly meshes for the photomode/menu models while the poly count for the meshes that are used during gameplay and replays are a fraction of that. I think both games basically look identical.Then you have not played both games. Either that or you're playing in standard definition, because the premium models in GT5 look an entire generation ahead of anything on both Ps3 and 360.In fact, it is only the shadow resolution (on the cars) and effect pixelation that remind you that you're playing on limited hardware. But to be fair to GT, there are still PC games that struggle like fuck with effects cranked up - so yeah.If it looked an entire generation ahead then it wouldn't look the same in a side-by-side comparison shot. Hell, the only difference I can see in any of the shots is the better tire texture on the evo in FM3.
Quote from: am nintenho on November 28, 2010, 07:03:50 AMSomebody on gaf posted some decent comparison shots.photomode models:http://i.imgur.com/1mDyt.jpggameplay models:http://i.imgur.com/uGxnJ.jpgBoth games use higher poly meshes for the photomode/menu models while the poly count for the meshes that are used during gameplay and replays are a fraction of that. I think both games basically look identical.Then you have not played both games. Either that or you're playing in standard definition, because the premium models in GT5 look an entire generation ahead of anything on both Ps3 and 360.In fact, it is only the shadow resolution (on the cars) and effect pixelation that remind you that you're playing on limited hardware. But to be fair to GT, there are still PC games that struggle like fuck with effects cranked up - so yeah.
Somebody on gaf posted some decent comparison shots.photomode models:http://i.imgur.com/1mDyt.jpggameplay models:http://i.imgur.com/uGxnJ.jpgBoth games use higher poly meshes for the photomode/menu models while the poly count for the meshes that are used during gameplay and replays are a fraction of that. I think both games basically look identical.
Have you actually played both games? Because I have, and I can tell you right now: Nothing on either console can match the graphical fidelity of the premium models in GT5.GT5 looks like driving games do on my PC (running @1080p with everything on high). And it's running on 6 year old hardware.Makes you wonder what PC devs have been doing all this time.
Then you have not played both games. Either that or you're playing in standard definition, because the premium models in GT5 look an entire generation ahead of anything on both Ps3 and 360.
Quote from: TripleA on November 28, 2010, 03:04:16 PMThen you have not played both games. Either that or you're playing in standard definition, because the premium models in GT5 look an entire generation ahead of anything on both Ps3 and 360.During gameplay, the games are basically indistinguishable except for different lighting and Forza's more stable framerate.If anything it makes me wonder why it took Polyphony Digital so long to put this out....and in this state.
Quote from: TripleA on November 28, 2010, 03:04:16 PMHave you actually played both games? Because I have, and I can tell you right now: Nothing on either console can match the graphical fidelity of the premium models in GT5.GT5 looks like driving games do on my PC (running @1080p with everything on high). And it's running on 6 year old hardware.Makes you wonder what PC devs have been doing all this time.First off the PS3 is 4 years old and second, maybe the lighting on the cars is more convincing. When looking at extreme close up shots of gameplay/photomode models of both games, it's clear that there aint shit other than that that's different about the cars.
STOP WITH THE GODDAMN PHOTOMODE SCREENS
So basically, Ps3 distinguished mentally-challenged fellows buy this game to take pictures of 3D modeled cars that they will never drive in real life.Fucking amazing game!!!!"$!"$
Quote from: ManaByte on November 28, 2010, 03:09:05 PMSTOP WITH THE GODDAMN PHOTOMODE SCREENSSo we can post heavily edited troll screens but god forbid we post direct photomode screens?Tsk tsk tsk.
Quote from: TripleA on November 28, 2010, 03:58:08 PMQuote from: ManaByte on November 28, 2010, 03:09:05 PMSTOP WITH THE GODDAMN PHOTOMODE SCREENSSo we can post heavily edited troll screens but god forbid we post direct photomode screens?Tsk tsk tsk.You can't be that stupid...oh wait you can...lolheavily edited troll screens
To put it blunt: there is no equal.(Image removed from quote.)
have you unlocked it yet
Btw Antony, what level are you?
Wait so GT5 does use different models for gameplay and photo?
What an ownage then 53% tearing in-racehttp://blog.livedoor.jp/ps360/archives/51644734.htmlSpecial stage route 7Race: Avg: 55.288fps Min-Max :35.5-60 .0 fps Tear: 53.302% Replay: Avg: 29.914fps Min-Max :26.0-30 .0 fps Tear: 2.389%Snow Race: Avg: 57.419fps Min-Max :43.5-60 .0 fps Tear: 31.658% Replay: Avg: 29.753fps Min-Max :18.5-30 .0 fps Tear: 2.437%London Race: Avg: 57.110fps Min-Max :48.5-60 .0 fps Tear: 53.002% Replay: Avg: 29.485fps Min-Max :25.0-30 .0 fps Tear: 10.478%GT5 Prologue London Race: Avg: 60.000fps Min-Max :60.0-60 .0 fps Tear: 0.198% Replay: Avg: 29.984fps Min-Max :29.0-30 .0 fps Tear: 1.786%
(Image removed from quote.)
Quote from: Sho Nuff on November 26, 2010, 10:55:40 PMShit that was fast. If this had been an MS game itd be stuck in cert for weeks. Has MS released a game at retail that was this fucking broken and unfinished?
Shit that was fast. If this had been an MS game itd be stuck in cert for weeks.
TripleA needs to quit spamming and threadshitting. It's getting irritating.
QuoteBtw Antony, what level are you?<serioushat> I've not started career mode yet, i've had a few hours just arsing around with Arcade as the times i could play the noise from the force feedback wheel would have woken the boy (i'm only getting to game very late at night and didn't want to hit career on the pad). Likely the next time i'll get to play the first patch will be out, so that all works out fine </serioushat>I'm level on the floor laughing at this turd.
[youtube=560,345]-1KVKSIVdK8[/youtube]If people still care, that is a nice fair video that shows almost identical races for both games. I only played Forza 3, but it looks too bright in that video than how I remembered it looking. Gran Turismo 5 looks a bit dark and I have no idea if that's normal.
Fighting about which drab-sim is better. Seriously.
Quote from: The Experiment on November 28, 2010, 06:36:05 PMTripleA needs to quit spamming and threadshitting. It's getting irritating.Yeah. Ease back on the HUGE pictures, TripleA.
And with that, I say farewell.
Quote from: TripleA on November 28, 2010, 09:15:46 PMAnd with that, I say farewell.Good riddance, Snigger scum.just kidding ok
Quote from: TripleA on November 28, 2010, 09:15:46 PMAnd with that, I say farewell.Don't let the door hit you in the ass.
Quote from: Linkzg on November 28, 2010, 07:51:30 PM[youtube=560,345]-1KVKSIVdK8[/youtube]If people still care, that is a nice fair video that shows almost identical races for both games. I only played Forza 3, but it looks too bright in that video than how I remembered it looking. Gran Turismo 5 looks a bit dark and I have no idea if that's normal.1) Agreed, Gran Turismo 5 looks waaaay too dark in that comparison.2) You can see the shadow resolution issue (in GT5) that I posted in my previous post.3) Forza's lighting is abysmal. It looks like a cartoon in comparison to actual simulators.
