Yeah, said it elsewhere , but with the Wii it all made sense - what Nintendo were trying to do was different and you could see where they were coming from. Wii Sports was the proof of concept game that made the machine easy to sell - it didn't even feel like gaming to non-gamers - it was something "different"
The Wii U is bringing nothing new to the table at all - whilst it could well still wind up being some perfectly executed, surprising, oh-look-what-exclusive-i've-got! hit with gamers - i just can't see what appeal it has outside of that crowd. I'm not sure how the Wii U will do especially if Iwata has to price the machine at close to/actual loss territory.
Given the rumblings doing the rounds regarding 3rd party support - this could be "back to Gamecube" levels. As much as i joke - i don't particularly want to see Nintendo struggle especially as they are the last of the console makers still focused entirely on gaming.
Top and bottom of it is - i don't see the point of the Wii U beyond giving Nintendo fans games in -bottom feeder- HD
But really now, how important do some people think these conferences really are? It's not worth this much cray.
seems to me that E3 is little more than a massive game of chicken. Why would you even bother risking -anything- ? You roll out your new hot product and all the top games, but then Sony/MS then roll out their new stuff and it's utterly insane. But over there MS trump Sony. So all that happens is that MS have "won" and the other two "lose" - the thing is.... why would you bother taking the chance ? Just have your own announcement on your own terms on your own dateline and then you don't have to worry about going toe-to-toe.