Author Topic: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread  (Read 5996759 times)

0 Members and 29 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35640 on: January 04, 2013, 04:59:12 PM »
You work in tech, right? Have you brought up this idea of no NDAs to your coworkers or boss?
野球

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35641 on: January 04, 2013, 04:59:19 PM »
©@©™

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35642 on: January 04, 2013, 04:59:40 PM »
:facepalm

You simply don't get it. 
vin

Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35643 on: January 04, 2013, 05:00:19 PM »
Companies do get feedback. They probably don't want feedback from random people on the internet.

:facepalm

You simply don't get it.

I'm sure he gets it, he just doesn't care and wants the information.
野球

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35644 on: January 04, 2013, 05:00:38 PM »
You work in tech, right? Have you brought up this idea of no NDAs to your coworkers or boss?
Yes, ask your boss to let you off the NDA because you want to be more transparent with the media.
vin

Tasty

  • Senior Member
-
« Reply #35645 on: January 04, 2013, 05:01:24 PM »
:facepalm

You simply don't get it.

Maybe, but your examples aren't exactly illuminations to the soul.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35646 on: January 04, 2013, 05:01:28 PM »
:facepalm

You simply don't get it.

I'm sure he gets it, he just doesn't care and wants the information.
This seems about right.  Though I'm not sure.  Ask DCharlie about the SEC and what happens if he starts running his lip.
vin

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35647 on: January 04, 2013, 05:02:03 PM »
You work in tech, right? Have you brought up this idea of no NDAs to your coworkers or boss?
Yes, ask your boss to let you off the NDA because you want to be more transparent with the media.

Working within the system doesn't mean you have to approve of it.

"If you don't like the Patriot Act, move to Canada you commie!"

Verdigris Murder

  • #metoo
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35648 on: January 04, 2013, 05:02:36 PM »
There are specific legal reasons for A3DS, Andrex.  Publicly traded companies have to be very careful about when and how they announce, things .  Having NDAs and legal recourse when these are broken is a good way to do this.
Laws.
:{]

Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35649 on: January 04, 2013, 05:02:53 PM »
You work in tech, right? Have you brought up this idea of no NDAs to your coworkers or boss?
Yes, ask your boss to let you off the NDA because you want to be more transparent with the media.

Working within the system doesn't mean you have to approve of it.

"If you don't like the Patriot Act, move to Canada you commie!"

Then you should totally talk to them about it. Make some waves and bring about change.
野球

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: -
« Reply #35650 on: January 04, 2013, 05:03:08 PM »
:facepalm

You simply don't get it.

Maybe, but your examples aren't exactly illuminations to the soul.
Well that's because you don't really have any context besides what you want to see.  Lawsuits, criminal cases all come out of employees running their mouths when hey shouldn't be.  NDAs are meant to be a stop to that.
vin

Verdigris Murder

  • #metoo
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35651 on: January 04, 2013, 05:03:30 PM »
The A is always in front.
:{]

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35652 on: January 04, 2013, 05:04:08 PM »
Companies do get feedback. They probably don't want feedback from random people on the internet.

At that point, it would be for them to decide. And it wouldn't be random people, it would mostly be their fans.

AKA the people most likely to buy their product. But I guess Sony doesn't need to pay attention to those people.

Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35653 on: January 04, 2013, 05:04:31 PM »
:facepalm

You simply don't get it.

I'm sure he gets it, he just doesn't care and wants the information.
This seems about right.  Though I'm not sure.  Ask DCharlie about the SEC and what happens if he starts running his lip.

I can't talk about the cases or students I work with. Big time lawsuits ahoy.
野球

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35654 on: January 04, 2013, 05:05:27 PM »
Shut up, Andy.
bent

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35655 on: January 04, 2013, 05:05:35 PM »

Then you should totally talk to them about it. Make some waves and bring about change.

Maybe I will. Maybe I won't. It's barely tangential to the conversation and nothing more than a distraction since you know, on some level, that I'm right.

Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35656 on: January 04, 2013, 05:05:45 PM »
It isn't crucial information in the conventional sense. As I said, we've gotten along fine so far. But I don't think we've gone far enough. I would love to see Sony blog about the different GPUs it was thinking of going with. Then maybe they'd get some feedback to steer them away from something as distinguished mentally-challenged as RSX.

Or, they'd just be the contestant on The Price is Right trying to guess how much this refrigerator costs as jackasses in the audience yell at them prices ranging from "$1!!!" to "$20,000!!!"

"But then MS will just copy them, or do something better!" I would like to think Sony and Microsoft are knowledgeable enough to know all the possible options in any case. Why would a competitor going with X GPU change anything? It wouldn't. The only instance I could see is one of them choosing not to go with a similar GPU to make ports to competitors more difficult, but there would be pushback there from third parties.

I don't think the implication is necessarily just that their ideas will invariably be copied and improved upon in as much as the idea would just be that they prefer the competition being in the dark about what they're doing. Maybe it is that their million dollar idea may be stolen. Or maybe they just don't want the competition to have time to react to the key design choices made. Why is it beneficial to them for the competition to know what they're planning every step of the way. For that matter, why is it beneficial to us outside of a desire to know things?
« Last Edit: January 04, 2013, 05:07:44 PM by Steve Youngblood »

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35657 on: January 04, 2013, 05:06:59 PM »
Laws.

LAW, MAN

Like, I know there's LAWS and PRECEDENTS out there that totally make NDAs crucial to every single company out there to survive. I just won't say what they are. :teehee

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35658 on: January 04, 2013, 05:07:04 PM »
One more thing, in most cases most people under NDA aren't even aware of the status of a project.  I've been on plenty of cancelled projects that were months in negotiations to be cancelled and we didn't know until....


(Wait for it)

Everyone else did.
vin

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35659 on: January 04, 2013, 05:09:41 PM »
I don't think the implication is necessarily just that their ideas will invariably be copied and improved upon in as much as the idea would just be that they prefer the competition being in the dark about what they're doing. Maybe it is that their million dollar idea may be stolen. Or maybe they just don't want the competition to have time to react to the key design choices made.

So you agree it makes no logical sense.

Why is it beneficial to them for the competition to know what they're planning every step of the way.

It isn't, but that's my point. Why should we care? More knowledge creates more fervored competition. If Microsoft was going to release 360.5 but Sony announced they were leapfrogging them significantly, and Microsoft beefed their next system up, you don't think that's a net win for consumers even if it's a loss of competitive edge for Sony?

For that matter, why is it beneficial to us outside of a desire to know things?

I've explained it several times, keep up. I know it might be a little difficult for you.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35660 on: January 04, 2013, 05:09:49 PM »
Laws.

LAW, MAN

Like, I know there's LAWS and PRECEDENTS out there that totally make NDAs crucial to every single company out there to survive. I just won't say what they are. :teehee
It's called an 8-k.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_8-K#When_Form_8-K_is_required

So please shut up now.
vin

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35661 on: January 04, 2013, 05:10:15 PM »
One more thing, in most cases most people under NDA aren't even aware of the status of a project.  I've been on plenty of cancelled projects that were months in negotiations to be cancelled and we didn't know until....


(Wait for it)

Everyone else did.

Good, that's the model that should be applied top to bottom.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35662 on: January 04, 2013, 05:11:04 PM »
Laws.

LAW, MAN

Like, I know there's LAWS and PRECEDENTS out there that totally make NDAs crucial to every single company out there to survive. I just won't say what they are. :teehee
It's called an 8-k.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_8-K#When_Form_8-K_is_required

So please shut up now.

No, because just posting that doesn't say anything.

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35663 on: January 04, 2013, 05:11:52 PM »
Andrex. Every new project you do I hope you blog about it extensively so others can steal your ideas.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35664 on: January 04, 2013, 05:13:20 PM »
ITT Andrex wants Steve Contra and Mr. Gundam to summarize corporate law and the associated economic theories in a single post. 

StealthFan

  • Swings Both Ways
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35665 on: January 04, 2013, 05:13:52 PM »
The Black Stallion lmfao. Goddamn GAF used to be great.

Stallion's attempt at being another Maddox wasn't so funny though. His entry about the Sniper series made me chuckle a bit, even if he was trying too hard.
reckt

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35666 on: January 04, 2013, 05:14:08 PM »
Laws.

LAW, MAN

Like, I know there's LAWS and PRECEDENTS out there that totally make NDAs crucial to every single company out there to survive. I just won't say what they are. :teehee
It's called an 8-k.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_8-K#When_Form_8-K_is_required

So please shut up now.

No, because just posting that doesn't say anything.
You asked for laws.  Be a public corporation and just start letting employees announce whatever they want whenever they want and see how the SEC treats you.
vin

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35667 on: January 04, 2013, 05:14:21 PM »
Andrex. Every new project you do I hope you blog about it extensively so others can steal your ideas.

I would love for this to happen because so many of my projects go unfinished. Like with Candlepin which I posted a while back, I would love for there to be a site that used those same ideas since I've cooled off on it.

As it is, I usually announce most of my projects by simultaneously posting a GitHub link. Sharing is caring.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35668 on: January 04, 2013, 05:14:50 PM »
Information just wants to be free, man.
dog

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35669 on: January 04, 2013, 05:15:40 PM »
You asked for laws.  Be a public corporation and just start letting employees announce whatever they want whenever they want and see how the SEC treats you.

Are you saying investors should find things out a long time after employees? Because I'm having difficulty understanding how you're connecting this with your 8K link.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35670 on: January 04, 2013, 05:16:36 PM »
Andrex, you are on the verge of being banned here. Demi didn't want to tell you, but I'm breaking NDA.
©@©™

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35671 on: January 04, 2013, 05:17:00 PM »
Information just wants to be free, man.

You said it.

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35672 on: January 04, 2013, 05:17:13 PM »
Andrex. Every new project you do I hope you blog about it extensively so others can steal your ideas.

I would love for this to happen because so many of my projects go unfinished. Like with Candlepin which I posted a while back, I would love for there to be a site that used those same ideas since I've cooled off on it.

As it is, I usually announce most of my projects by simultaneously posting a GitHub link. Sharing is caring.

You're specifically referencing stuff you didn't finish because ::hindsight::. If it was something great that others aren't doing and you mention it, the race is on to beat you to it even if the quality is lesser. That's the point, securing ideas.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35673 on: January 04, 2013, 05:17:26 PM »
Andrex, you are on the verge of being banned here. Demi didn't want to tell you, but I'm breaking NDA.

Cool. Not like I was getting much out of the discourse anyways.

Verdigris Murder

  • #metoo
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35674 on: January 04, 2013, 05:17:26 PM »
ITT Andrex wants Steve Contra and Mr. Gundam to summarize corporate law and the associated economic theories in a single post.
:lol

But still. The law is fine, but the lawyers are mostly pretty fucking awful. It's a bit like the Koran and suicide bombers I guess.
:{]

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35675 on: January 04, 2013, 05:17:50 PM »
Andrex. Every new project you do I hope you blog about it extensively so others can steal your ideas.

I would love for this to happen because so many of my projects go unfinished. Like with Candlepin which I posted a while back, I would love for there to be a site that used those same ideas since I've cooled off on it.

As it is, I usually announce most of my projects by simultaneously posting a GitHub link. Sharing is caring.

You're specifically referencing stuff you didn't finish because ::hindsight::. If it was something great that others aren't doing and you mention it, the race is on to beat you to it even if the quality is lesser. That's the point, securing ideas.

Ideas are worthless next to execution.

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35676 on: January 04, 2013, 05:18:39 PM »
Ideas are worthless next to execution.

Oh dear lord. I've seen some fabulous designs that were shallow as all fuck.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35677 on: January 04, 2013, 05:19:11 PM »
You asked for laws.  Be a public corporation and just start letting employees announce whatever they want whenever they want and see how the SEC treats you.

Are you saying investors should find things out a long time after employees? Because I'm having difficulty understanding how you're connecting this with your 8K link.
He's saying the potential for abuse by individual employees is too high.  "Company X is working on a new miracle drug" when in reality "Company X is starting research into a potential new miracle drug" + the confusion this would cause in markets.  The whole point of the SEC is to keep the markets stable.

In other words, take some economics classes and put 2 and 2 together.  You sound a lot like a libertarian (or a troll) with your naivety
« Last Edit: January 04, 2013, 05:20:52 PM by Mupepe »

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35678 on: January 04, 2013, 05:19:50 PM »
He's saying the potential for abuse by individual employees is too high.  "Company X is working on a new miracle drug" when in reality "Company X is starting research into a potential new miracle drug" + the confusion this would cause in markets.  The whole point of the SEC is to keep the markets stable.

Fuck that we need more rumors in the market.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35679 on: January 04, 2013, 05:20:24 PM »
You asked for laws.  Be a public corporation and just start letting employees announce whatever they want whenever they want and see how the SEC treats you.

Are you saying investors should find things out a long time after employees? Because I'm having difficulty understanding how you're connecting this with your 8K link.
He's saying the potential for abuse by individual employees is too high.  "Company X is working on a new miracle drug" when in reality "Company X is starting research into a potential new miracle drug" + the confusion this would cause in markets.  The whole point of the SEC is to keep the markets stable.

That's basically handicapping information for the sake of the dumb, which I can accept on a pragmatic level but not an idealistic one.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35680 on: January 04, 2013, 05:20:55 PM »
Ideas are worthless next to execution.

Oh dear lord. I've seen some fabulous designs that were shallow as all fuck.

Then the execution wasn't very good.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35681 on: January 04, 2013, 05:22:09 PM »
You asked for laws.  Be a public corporation and just start letting employees announce whatever they want whenever they want and see how the SEC treats you.

Are you saying investors should find things out a long time after employees? Because I'm having difficulty understanding how you're connecting this with your 8K link.
Yes, because employees are not allowed to trade on info that isn't public, hence filing an 8-k and alerting investors all at once, not through some fansite.
vin

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35682 on: January 04, 2013, 05:22:10 PM »
What does the information sharing actually do for people Andrex?


Ideas are worthless next to execution.

Oh dear lord. I've seen some fabulous designs that were shallow as all fuck.

Then the execution wasn't very good.

Haha you can have a pretty awesome looking design without staying power or a strong concept. You're deciding "execution" is the entire design process.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35683 on: January 04, 2013, 05:23:03 PM »
You asked for laws.  Be a public corporation and just start letting employees announce whatever they want whenever they want and see how the SEC treats you.

Are you saying investors should find things out a long time after employees? Because I'm having difficulty understanding how you're connecting this with your 8K link.
He's saying the potential for abuse by individual employees is too high.  "Company X is working on a new miracle drug" when in reality "Company X is starting research into a potential new miracle drug" + the confusion this would cause in markets.  The whole point of the SEC is to keep the markets stable.

That's basically handicapping information for the sake of the dumb, which I can accept on a pragmatic level but not an idealistic one.
[In other words, take some economics classes and put 2 and 2 together.  You sound a lot like a libertarian (or a troll) with your naivety

Damn I called it.  The world doesn't function ideally.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35684 on: January 04, 2013, 05:23:18 PM »
It lets Andrex know about Nintendo in development 2 months early.
vin

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35685 on: January 04, 2013, 05:25:46 PM »
It lets Andrex know about Nintendo in development 2 months early.

That's what he wants despite how much instability in investing it would cause and how it wouldn't change much for him?



Ideas are worthless next to execution.
Eh, this sentiment has been the thrust of game development this whole generation and the overall product has been uninspiring. I'd rather play something daring and interesting but flawed in a few respects than some boring shit that's been polished to a marble. How Nintendo of you.

In design we call them polished turds.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35686 on: January 04, 2013, 05:26:24 PM »
NDAs are bad now? I guess it's time for doctors and psychologists to flood the internet with patient records! Someone out there probably really wants to get that information and it would wrong to not let them see it.
dog

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35687 on: January 04, 2013, 05:27:11 PM »
What does the information sharing actually do for people Andrex?

Nothing. That's why the internet is completely worthless.

Haha you can have a pretty awesome looking design without staying power or a strong concept. You're deciding "execution" is the entire design process.

Execution isn't only design.

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35688 on: January 04, 2013, 05:27:55 PM »
Haha you can have a pretty awesome looking design without staying power or a strong concept. You're deciding "execution" is the entire design process.

Execution isn't only design.

Now you're just not even making sense.

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35689 on: January 04, 2013, 05:28:16 PM »
Mario jumps in 2D, Mario jumps in 3D, Mario rides around in a kart, Mario plays golf, Mario parties, Mario forces his brother to vacuum his house. There.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35690 on: January 04, 2013, 05:28:21 PM »
NDAs are bad now? I guess it's time for doctors and psychologists to flood the internet with patient records! Someone out there probably really wants to get that information and it would wrong to not let them see it.

I never implied it was, just that it's a problem in he games industry specifically.

To use an example, patents are crucial and necessary in some fields like medicine, but completely toxic in others like software.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35691 on: January 04, 2013, 05:28:45 PM »
Andrex: The Ron Paul of The Bore.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35692 on: January 04, 2013, 05:29:54 PM »
Haha you can have a pretty awesome looking design without staying power or a strong concept. You're deciding "execution" is the entire design process.

Execution isn't only design.

Now you're just not even making sense.

You can execute on more than design, I'm not sure how to make that clearer. You can execute a daring new concept roughly, but it could still be executed better than if it wasn't executed at all. Which is what I meant by saying ideas are worthless.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35693 on: January 04, 2013, 05:30:14 PM »
Andrex: The Ron Paul of The Bore.

Who?

Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35694 on: January 04, 2013, 05:30:52 PM »
TBH it sounds like you just want ur game nooz and you want it NOW, rather than any legitimate justifying rationale backed up by data.

He basically just thinks that corporations would be better if they ran like open source software projects.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35695 on: January 04, 2013, 05:30:56 PM »
NDAs are bad now? I guess it's time for doctors and psychologists to flood the internet with patient records! Someone out there probably really wants to get that information and it would wrong to not let them see it.

I never implied it was, just that it's a problem in he games industry specifically.

To use an example, patents are crucial and necessary in some fields like medicine, but completely toxic in others like software.

Now you're just picking and choosing. You were never on the "free information" bandwagon at all! :maf
dog

Shadow Mod

  • It was Tuesday
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35696 on: January 04, 2013, 05:31:16 PM »
You can execute on more than design, I'm not sure how to make that clearer. You can execute a daring new concept roughly, but it could still be executed better than if it wasn't executed at all. Which is what I meant by saying ideas are worthless.

Saying ideas are worthless is the dumbest declarative statement I've read in a long time.

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35697 on: January 04, 2013, 05:31:44 PM »
TBH it sounds like you just want ur game nooz and you want it NOW, rather than any legitimate justifying rationale backed up by data.

I don't really care what it sounds like, it's what I believe to be true.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35698 on: January 04, 2013, 05:32:26 PM »
And it's dumb, case closed.
vin

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Official Psychoanalysis GAF Thread
« Reply #35699 on: January 04, 2013, 05:32:53 PM »
TBH it sounds like you just want ur game nooz and you want it NOW, rather than any legitimate justifying rationale backed up by data.

I don't really care what it sounds like, it's what I believe to be true.

Well, I believe that Reggie and Shiggy are gonna come to my house one day and throw me an awesome party with a million naked women and a bounce castle, but it ain't gonna happen and there are a lot of good reasons why.
dog