Author Topic: Fuck it, it's getting it's own thread: Trailer for Atlas Shrugged (here be lolz) (Read 2369 times)

Dickie Dee · « **on:** February 11, 2011, 05:47:26 PM »

[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

I love the modern day setting and rail infrastructure not being TEH SOCIALISM

EmCeeGrammar · « **Reply #1 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:01:15 PM »

I'm sure the modern audience will sympathize with the oppressed aristocrats of the industrial era.

Har.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #2 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:02:49 PM »

Looks...unimaginably bad.

Dickie Dee · « **Reply #3 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:09:55 PM »

LOL, just noticed it's opening tax day

HyperZoneWasAwesome · « **Reply #4 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:14:56 PM »

I can't tell who isn't the villain.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #5 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:16:01 PM »

Quote from: HyperZoneWasAwesome on February 11, 2011, 06:14:56 PM

I can't tell who isn't the villain.

I was thinking the same thing.

ManaByte · « **Reply #6 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:42:15 PM »

Quote from: mojovonio on February 11, 2011, 06:38:10 PM

Part 1?

UGH

Part 1 of THREE

Howard Alan Treesong · « **Reply #7 on:** February 11, 2011, 06:55:18 PM »

Quote from: HyperZoneWasAwesome on February 11, 2011, 06:14:56 PM

I can't tell who isn't the villain.

this, it's like a TNT cable movie about a Bond Villain convention

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #8 on:** February 11, 2011, 07:00:12 PM »

Should have made Bioshock instead.

HyperZoneWasAwesome · « **Reply #9 on:** February 11, 2011, 07:03:58 PM »

You know, I really do have to give props for at least making this film. It appears to be independently made and distributed. That can be a tough business to raise money for, and for this film it must have been particularily brutal.

Quote from: Movie Guy

Can I has monies to make Rand-ian spectacule? Mr. Objectivist, please?

Quote from: Rich Dude

Why, I admire greatly the works of Ayn Rand. Here, let me write you a check.

Quote from: Movie Guy

Um, sir. The check is addressed to "Your Mama" and is for the amount of "Fuck Off!"

Quote from: Rich Dude

And?

fistfulofmetal · « **Reply #10 on:** February 11, 2011, 07:05:23 PM »

so the book is about trains?

Boogie · « **Reply #11 on:** February 11, 2011, 07:15:26 PM »

Quote from: HyperZoneWasAwesome on February 11, 2011, 06:14:56 PM

I can't tell who isn't the villain.

me too!

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #12 on:** February 11, 2011, 07:24:44 PM »

It looks like James Bond + There Will Be Blood.

I give it 4 1/2 Gold Bars out of 5. [/foc]

Smooth Groove · « **Reply #13 on:** February 11, 2011, 07:34:19 PM »

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #14 on:** February 11, 2011, 08:18:27 PM »

Talk about a horrific trailer, regardless of the story's content

Boogie · « **Reply #15 on:** February 11, 2011, 08:51:45 PM »

Quote from: AdmiralViscen on February 11, 2011, 08:18:27 PM

Talk about a horrific trailer, regardless of the story's content

Indeed. You have no idea what the fuck the movie's about, or why you should go see it, based on the trailer.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #16 on:** February 11, 2011, 08:59:29 PM »

you liberals would be lapping this up if it was directed by Michael Moore or some Hollywood bleeding heart

Diunx · « **Reply #17 on:** February 11, 2011, 09:00:41 PM »

Why does this exist?

I don't know about the ocean but I'm pretty sure we know how high the sky is.

Boogie · « **Reply #18 on:** February 11, 2011, 09:03:16 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 11, 2011, 08:59:29 PM

you liberals would be lapping this up if it was directed by Michael Moore or some Hollywood bleeding heart

Someone's trying too hard.

In any case: Fuck Michael Moore.

Except for Canadian Bacon. That's a classic.

[youtube=560,345]J0R5DTHcmGU[/youtube]

ManaByte · « **Reply #19 on:** February 11, 2011, 09:09:26 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on February 11, 2011, 08:59:29 PM

you liberals would be lapping this up if it was directed by Michael Moore or some Hollywood bleeding heart

Coming to theaters in 2012: Rob Reiner's The Communist Manifesto

E-DuB · « **Reply #20 on:** February 12, 2011, 12:34:29 AM »

Quote from: Smooth Groove on February 11, 2011, 07:00:12 PM

Should have made Bioshock instead.

Real Talk
Edit: Just watched the trailer. I am at a loss for words. I would love to have been in the meeting where they thought this would be a good idea $:-\$

chronovore · « **Reply #21 on:** February 13, 2011, 10:35:44 AM »

Quote from: Howard Alan Treesong on February 11, 2011, 06:55:18 PM

Quote from: HyperZoneWasAwesome on February 11, 2011, 06:14:56 PM
I can't tell who isn't the villain.

this, it's like a TNT cable movie about a Bond Villain convention

:golfclap

Human Snorenado · « **Reply #22 on:** February 13, 2011, 11:49:20 PM »

After the movie inevitably fails at the box office more spectacularly than Maurice trying to get a woman to touch his junk, causing the other two installments to NOT get made, you have to wonder... will this mean that THE MARKET HAS SPOKEN re: objectivism???

G The Resurrected · « **Reply #23 on:** February 14, 2011, 06:07:29 AM »

the Ferengi' 9th rule of acquisition tells us that "Opportunity plus instinct equals profit" I somehow doubt that the Grand Nagus would think this film to be profitable.

Boogie · « **Reply #24 on:** February 14, 2011, 03:30:16 PM »

Quote from: G The Resurrected on February 14, 2011, 06:07:29 AM

the Ferengi' 9th rule of acquisition tells us that "Opportunity plus instinct equals profit" I somehow doubt that the Grand Nagus would think this film to be profitable.

But if Quark is willing to be a part of the film, surely he sees opportunity for profit in it.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #25 on:** February 14, 2011, 03:43:48 PM »

The monologue should feature lots of exposition shots and a tense Hans Zimmer score

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #26 on:** February 14, 2011, 04:31:10 PM »

Quote from: Billy Rygar on February 14, 2011, 02:05:54 PM

Part 3 will necessarily have to be 2 hours of radio speech.

At least until the 3 hour Unrated Director's Cut comes out, with monologue too steamy for the original release!

Dickie Dee · « **Reply #27 on:** February 14, 2011, 06:36:56 PM »

Quote from: Billy Rygar on February 14, 2011, 02:05:54 PM

Part 3 will necessarily have to be 2 hours of radio speech.

The actual speech clocks in at ~3 hours

AdmiralViscen · « **Reply #28 on:** February 14, 2011, 09:42:22 PM »

I picked up one of these books off the shelf of the library and flipped through it for a few minutes. What a piece of shit

ferrarimanf355 · « **Reply #29 on:** February 16, 2011, 09:49:48 AM »

I can tell that Galt's speech will take up part 3 all by itself AND require a part 4. $:-\$

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #30 on:** February 16, 2011, 11:38:24 PM »

It would be cool if they, like, came up with some awesome trippy visuals to illustrate Galt's speech.

Dickie Dee · « **Reply #31 on:** March 06, 2011, 10:33:59 AM »

Quote from: recursivelyenumerable on February 16, 2011, 11:38:24 PM

It would be cool if they, like, came up with some awesome trippy visuals to illustrate Galt's speech.

LOL, glad this was the last reply

Quote

Have you decided how you’ll tackle John Galt’s epic speech in part three?

Well, I’m looking at a number of different things. Having John Galt give that speech, it might be in a casino environment. It might be that he is at a mountain retreat, rather than being where he is captured, not…that violent scene at the end. But we’re going to take a look. It doesn’t have to copy just that.

No, it absolutely will be a concentrate of entertaining words with a total, philosophic…But, you know, part three could be a musical…like a Les Miserables kind of a musical. That’s part of the impact and I guess I haven’t said this publicly yet, but I’m looking at it completely different if part three is a musical with quality music that’s done in a certain way that people will like. I mean, if you saw the play Les Miserable without the music, and then with the music, you may go in there saying, ‘oh hell, I would never want to see that great book in a musical.’ That’s going to shock a lot of people to see part three be a musical, and part two may be very different from part three and very different from part one. It has to be new, you know…We get a freshness, a vitality about it, and yet it has the same, rock-solid principles and philosophies that we all know and love.

Day 1

recursivelyenumerable · « **Reply #32 on:** March 06, 2011, 06:45:37 PM »

Definitive cultural touchstone of the early '10s? Seems so

Also, I'm stealing "Quality music done in a certain way people will like" for my new band's tagline.

HyperZoneWasAwesome · « **Reply #33 on:** March 07, 2011, 04:14:05 PM »

promo clip, which is getting the Rand crowd excited.

[youtube=560,345]5PK5Sq3bIHY[/youtube]

is it just me, or is everyone in this film/book a huge piece of shit?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #34 on:** March 07, 2011, 04:15:49 PM »

looks better than Mad Men

Rand

Galt

hollywood

HyperZoneWasAwesome · « **Reply #35 on:** March 07, 2011, 04:18:42 PM »

I'd say the film, at least this scene is actually competently directed, there's decent cinematography, tasteful music. It looks like a real film, even the acting is sorta okay, the weird part is the dialog, which is just, how to say? I don't know how to put it more succinctly rather then "ripped from a 1940's studio melodrama picture", which given the all the modern trappings on display just seems damn peculiar.

News:

Author Topic: Fuck it, it's getting it's own thread: Trailer for Atlas Shrugged (here be lolz) (Read 2369 times)