Author Topic: star trek  (Read 330772 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2940 on: May 15, 2020, 01:52:54 PM »
I like New Trek so I'm fine with this until I stop liking the shows. When that happens I will mention it personally. Everybody is of course entitled to their own opinion and preferences (once properly vetted by an RLM video of course)

My secret wish for a trek show was the rumoured original pitch for Discovery and that it was going to be an anthology show where you focused on a different cast and experience each season. I loved that idea. But I also understand why from a business perspective it was shot down.
keeping on with this RLM shtick when everyone in this thread pretty much gives their opinions 5 mins after the show aired is distinguished mentally-challenged fellow fuel, but hey I guess it worked on me  :shaking :engel

yep. Gonna keep doing it too because it continues to make me laugh. Get use to it.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2941 on: May 15, 2020, 01:55:06 PM »
Hey like I said, you got me. Denying the agency of my own thoughs is a cheap laugh but it sadly works on me  :engel :mike :notlikethis

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2942 on: May 15, 2020, 02:19:37 PM »


This is better than Picard.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2943 on: May 15, 2020, 02:20:32 PM »
Nice Power Ranger costumes.
IYKYK

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2944 on: May 15, 2020, 02:22:09 PM »
No he's not right, the people in this thread, ostensibly the readers of this thread have all shared their opinions well before RLM has given their opinions, that we laugh along with RLM later does in no way seed those opinions unless you've secretly discovered time travel.

Expecting Discovery fans to fucks with logic :nope

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2945 on: May 15, 2020, 02:23:39 PM »
everytime the klingons showed up on discovery

 :snore


Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2946 on: May 15, 2020, 02:25:36 PM »
Ok, back to not clicking this thread.
IYKYK

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2947 on: May 15, 2020, 02:47:34 PM »
love it. Triggering those RLM fanboys

 :phil

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2948 on: May 15, 2020, 03:19:59 PM »
love it. Triggering those RLM fanboys

 :phil

I see if you like RLM you are a fanboy

if you like Drek, you hate RLM and pretend that they aren't 100% on point with their criticism of this wack ass show. So delusional basically.
What

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2949 on: May 15, 2020, 03:23:42 PM »
Keep feeding me boys. I'm hungry


 :D

GreatSageEqualOfHeaven

  • Dumbass Monkey
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2950 on: May 15, 2020, 03:24:07 PM »
I thought the klingon stuff in discovery was pretty universally disliked even by people that otherwise enjoyed the show.
I mean... I don't think its coincidence they seemed to shitcan the whole thing and wrap it up ASAP as soon as they changed showrunner :idont

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2951 on: May 15, 2020, 03:44:32 PM »
New klingons are gross

they have no honor
What

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2952 on: May 15, 2020, 03:52:25 PM »
love it. Triggering those RLM fanboys

 :phil
I'm not triggered, just hoping we can find jovial mutual disgust in each other's viewing habits without attributing it to third party puppet masters. I for one would rather be called a dumbass than a dumbass by proxy because I have standards dammit  :quark

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2953 on: May 15, 2020, 03:55:33 PM »
love it. Triggering those RLM fanboys

 :phil
I'm not triggered, just hoping we can find jovial mutual disgust in each other's viewing habits without attributing it to third party puppet masters. I for one would rather be called a dumbass than a dumbass by proxy because I have standards dammit  :quark

Not gonna happen. But luckily I post in this thread about once every three months or so. So at least you won't have to see it that much. So small comforts and all that.


Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2954 on: May 15, 2020, 03:57:24 PM »
Nah, I want you to post more, I actually most look forward to reading posts I disagree with, especially when chrono posts cause he tends to be verbose and specific.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2955 on: May 15, 2020, 04:00:07 PM »
nah. I contribute as much as I can tolerate as I really don't care for the thread. No offense and not specifically aimed at you. But I generally post a review of each season of each show as I watch them. So there's that. Still need to watch season 2 of orville so I'm sure I'll do a post for that and eventually season 3 of discovery. God Bless chrono. I don't have his level of patience.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2956 on: May 15, 2020, 04:05:41 PM »
Orville gets so much better season 2. I feel like the show was pitched as a light comedy and Seth is slowly making it more like what he actually wanted. It's highly derivative but not in a negative way, most episodes entertain me and leaves me in a better mood than it found me. I like that the show doesn't feel like it needs to be edgy, high concept or whatever else is going on in new trek but just decided it's goal was to give you a solid 42 minutes of entertainment

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2957 on: May 15, 2020, 04:09:06 PM »
I liked the first season of Orville. Probably not as much as some but I did like it. Personally I'm happier with sci-fi ship shows than I've been in quite a while or at least in recent years.

I have plenty of trek. The orville exists. And the expanse exists which is my favorite of the lot by far currently. So I couldn't be happier at the moment.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2958 on: May 15, 2020, 04:11:42 PM »
I cry long tears between seasons of the expanse, I don't want them to rush it but I do wish there were would be more of it everytime they choose to bless us with a seasonal drop.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2959 on: May 15, 2020, 04:16:53 PM »
Yeah I adore the Expanse. By far my favorite sci-fi show on tv. Nothing else is even close. I wanted to make a post on the most recent season in the tv thread but forgot to. It was a paradox for me. I thought it was the weakest season of the 4 so far. But I still thought it was really good and I was hooked throughout the season. But I love that show and that universe. I need to read the books when I find some time.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2960 on: May 15, 2020, 04:23:19 PM »
I've been meaning to watch The Expanse.

Also Orville s2 is excellent.
IYKYK

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2961 on: May 15, 2020, 04:23:52 PM »
My only complaints about the show is that outside the crew of the rocinante a bunch of characters feel underutilized, making me want slightly longer seasons with a bit more character building for the rest. I get that if you do it too much it would feel highly unfocused but i find that the non roci chars (apart from Amos) are generally my favs

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2962 on: May 15, 2020, 04:31:32 PM »
I knew I was gonna love the Expanse from the pacing of the first season which some people label as too meandering and not focused. But that's exactly what pulled me in.  That it had this world focused on different elements like the belt, mars, earth, holden and the group, etc. I love that it spent the time to set up that kind of world. I wish more sci-fi had the patience and world building chops to set that kind of stage. But its hard to do when an audience is always overly looking for super showy moments.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2963 on: May 15, 2020, 04:35:19 PM »
Yeah in the later seasons it feels too focused for me, the roci shouldn't really be the center of everything but a small part in the whole.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2964 on: May 15, 2020, 04:42:52 PM »
I agree a bit although I've still very much enjoyed it and since I'm not familiar with the books, I'm assuming they are still following that guideline. Season 4 was very laser focused which is was part of why I considered it the weakest of the four seasons but all that being said, I'm critiquing something I still very very much like. I hope it eventually opens back up like Season 1 was but I'm down for whatever.   

shosta

  • Y = λ𝑓. (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥)) (λ𝑥. 𝑓 (𝑥 𝑥))
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2965 on: May 15, 2020, 07:28:48 PM »
"I think you've made a terrible mistake. All of you. Maybe we could have helped you. Maybe we could have helped each other. The Skreeans are farmers, Kira. You have a famine on your planet. Perhaps we could have made that peninsula bloom again. We'll never know, will we? Fifty years of Cardassian rule have made you all frightened and suspicious. I feel sorry for you. You were right. Bajor is not Kentanna."

:tocry
每天生气

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2966 on: May 16, 2020, 11:53:27 AM »
Rewatching Voyager

much more fun than dull picard where everything is dreadful
What

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2967 on: May 16, 2020, 12:30:50 PM »
watch year of hell and get back to me :ufup

 :lol

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2968 on: May 16, 2020, 12:35:01 PM »
year of hell is fantastic, the citizen kane of tv

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2969 on: May 16, 2020, 01:16:24 PM »
watch year of hell and get back to me :ufup

 :lol

Ive seen em all but forgotten this one where the hirogen are prey and the doc leaves voyager to help them

Pretty good episode I always enjoy the holo rights stuff

Year of hell yeah not a fan but eh 🤷🏼‍♂️

What

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2970 on: May 19, 2020, 07:55:27 AM »


So good
What

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2971 on: May 19, 2020, 08:18:16 AM »
Ok, since I still haven't watched Picard, I guess I'll have to do it now. Is it really really bad? On a scale of 1-10?
(No spoilers, please).
504

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2972 on: May 19, 2020, 09:25:11 AM »
look how the other autismos in here reacted to it and there's your answer

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2973 on: May 19, 2020, 09:30:10 AM »
look how the other autismos in here reacted to it and there's your answer

😂

Hating on a show thats written like shit

= autismos

😂😂😂😂

I wonder what you think of shows like The Wire or Sopranos. If you think THIS is good, you couldnt even fathom how good those shows are.

Your mind would most positively be blown.

Its funny how its the people who love this show cant seem to deal with any criticisms, and gp straight for calling others autismos.

Man what a trip. Good one nachobro. Intelligent discussion very good.
What

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2974 on: May 19, 2020, 09:30:45 AM »
see i didn't even have to drop a name and they come flocking :lol


MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2975 on: May 19, 2020, 09:32:22 AM »
see i didn't even have to drop a name and they come flocking :lol

"they"? do you have some sort of delusion?

Also can you not call other members autismos its really denigrating as fuck.
What

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2976 on: May 19, 2020, 09:32:57 AM »
post some more rlm shit disguised as your own opinion, that will surely convince me that the parts of the show i liked aren't real :lol :lol :lol

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2977 on: May 19, 2020, 09:33:41 AM »
Ok, since I still haven't watched Picard, I guess I'll have to do it now. Is it really really bad? On a scale of 1-10?
(No spoilers, please).
It's shit. If you have the ability to shut off your brain and just want to see familiar faces and be mildly entertained (about as much as when the kettle boils for tea) go ahead.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2978 on: May 19, 2020, 09:34:14 AM »
also shaddup you dutch autismo :lol :lol :lol

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2979 on: May 19, 2020, 09:34:35 AM »
post some more rlm shit disguised as your own opinion, that will surely convince me that the parts of the show i liked aren't real :lol :lol :lol

Motherfucker Ive been posting as soon as I saw the episodes you miserable fucking cunt.

Go cry some more about how we all post RLM opinion as gospel you fucking simp
What

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2980 on: May 19, 2020, 09:35:19 AM »
 :nothing

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2981 on: May 19, 2020, 09:35:46 AM »
i too just repeat slang i read on the internet. what an autismo :lol :lol :lol

imagine having a full meltdown over every topic where people disagree with you. hopefully no one posts about epic today or you might completely lose it

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2982 on: May 19, 2020, 11:15:46 AM »
Lotta Gerardo fans in here.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]
ど助平

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2983 on: May 19, 2020, 11:23:28 AM »
lmao is there any situation you don't react to with distinguished mentally-challenged over moderation?
« Last Edit: May 19, 2020, 11:25:05 AM by bork »

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2984 on: May 19, 2020, 11:30:46 AM »
i guess that's a no :lol

editing posts like a true autismo distinguished mentally-challenged fellow
« Last Edit: May 19, 2020, 11:33:50 AM by bork »

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2985 on: May 19, 2020, 11:34:06 AM »
You bored, Nacho? 
ど助平

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2986 on: May 19, 2020, 11:50:23 AM »
He just kicked me out of his discord after pitching a fit.  :lol
ど助平

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2987 on: May 19, 2020, 11:52:36 AM »
i figured you needed some time to cool down. all that posting can't be good for your fat heart. just worried about your health ;)

unlike power tripping bore mods, it wasn't a ban and you are welcome to return any time.

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2988 on: May 19, 2020, 11:53:33 AM »
i figured you needed some time to cool down. all that posting can't be good for your fat heart. just worried about your health ;)

OK, one good turn deserves another!
ど助平

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2989 on: May 19, 2020, 11:53:39 AM »
i too just repeat slang i read on the internet. what an Rico Suave :lol :lol :lol

imagine having a full meltdown over every topic where people disagree with you. hopefully no one posts about epic today or you might completely lose it

It has nothing to do with people agreeing or disagreeing with me.

My point is insulting me and other posters because RLM shares our sentiments, then you pretend we are instead parroting RLM when actually most of us posted our thoughts on Picard way before RLM did.

This was also pointed out (to you?) a few pages back that its just a way for you to kill and any discussion or criticism. "HURR DURR RLM PARROTS LMAO" Is how your posts come across.

Some of us were even looking forward to Picard, but I guess all that's too much for you to handle. So instead of actually discussion something, all you post is the same "Hurr durr autists for liking RLM/parroting their opinions".

Lmao, yeah I suppose RLM is influencing our thoughts before they even put out a discussion video or review. Its not hard to pick out all the shit thats just messed up, doesnt make any sense, or is just plain stupid in Picard.

Now you can either try to discuss this, or put your fingers in your ear and scream "LALALA AUTISTS DONT LIKE IT LMAO RLM NERDS" but it just makes you seem like a fucking asshole.
What

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2990 on: May 19, 2020, 11:54:10 AM »
i figured you needed some time to cool down. all that posting can't be good for your fat heart. just worried about your health ;)

OK, one good turn deserves another!
like i said, unlike power tripping bore mods it wasn't a ban. prove me wrong.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2991 on: May 19, 2020, 11:54:11 AM »
 :nothing

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2992 on: May 19, 2020, 11:55:16 AM »
i figured you needed some time to cool down. all that posting can't be good for your fat heart. just worried about your health ;)

OK, one good turn deserves another!
like i said, unlike power tripping bore mods it wasn't a ban. prove me wrong.

You said some really fucked up shit to me.  Insulting my wife and unborn child is crossing the line.
ど助平

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2993 on: May 19, 2020, 11:59:36 AM »
why do we always have to get so upset at each other's opinions of star trek of all things  :snoop

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2994 on: May 19, 2020, 12:01:52 PM »
Shitty thread continues to be shitty for lots of various reasons. news at 11.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2995 on: May 19, 2020, 12:04:21 PM »
Also new Shit RLM video posted! Hooray!

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2996 on: May 19, 2020, 12:08:31 PM »
More word filters and bans, what a joke. Alsotoo, nacho, go smoke one, fam.
« Last Edit: May 19, 2020, 12:14:43 PM by CatsCatsCats »

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2997 on: May 19, 2020, 12:20:37 PM »
God damn it, now I have to watch Picard

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2998 on: May 19, 2020, 12:52:38 PM »
get off the vent or I'll have you bent
dog

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2999 on: May 19, 2020, 01:01:09 PM »
MFW Drekkie tears.

« Last Edit: May 19, 2020, 08:32:05 PM by D3RANG3D »