Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| THE DARKEST TIMELINE  (Read 2771642 times)

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2040 on: September 04, 2013, 03:22:41 PM »
bent

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2041 on: September 04, 2013, 05:24:12 PM »
I fully expect PD to respond with "Of course it's an act of war, even Hawkish Politician X said it was.  If someone were to bomb us, we'd consider it an act of war, etc."

To which I would say, of course it's an act of war. But to continually refer to a limited strike as "the war" while making implicit and explicit comparisons to the Iraq invasion/occupation, joking about how there's going to be a draft, etc. is disingenuous.  It's taking advantage of a catch-all term, and eliding the difference between your subject and the connotation of your words.

Like calling Polanski's victim a "teenager" because she was 13, calling Trayvon Martin a "criminal" cause he had been caught with marijuana, or calling some old, expired stocks of ricin "WMD's" because it validates the Iraq invasion.  We don't refer to the Osirak strike as the Israel-Iraq War, or Clinton's strike against Al-Shifa as the Sudan War, or Reagan's bombing of Tripoli as the Libyan War.
Where have I done this outside of pointing out one similarity? This is a complete blindside hit and is condescending (edit: not condensing!). And if you link to me asking The Business if I could join his platoon I'm going to assume you're reaching for straws and move on.

Nor am I even going to respond to the war semantics. I know what I'm referring to, as do the other posters here when the word "war" is used. Yes, I am using it as a catch-all term, but I'm not taking advantage of it to push some agenda. Nor, I might add, am I the only person doing it here.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2013, 08:03:18 PM by Phoenix Dark »
010

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2042 on: September 04, 2013, 06:16:30 PM »

Howard Alan Treesong

  • キング・メタル・ドラゴン
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2043 on: September 04, 2013, 07:51:59 PM »


A compelling argument!
乱学者

Boogie

  • The Smooth Canadian
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2044 on: September 04, 2013, 08:13:47 PM »
I fully expect PD to respond with "Of course it's an act of war, even Hawkish Politician X said it was.  If someone were to bomb us, we'd consider it an act of war, etc."

To which I would say, of course it's an act of war. But to continually refer to a limited strike as "the war" while making implicit and explicit comparisons to the Iraq invasion/occupation, joking about how there's going to be a draft, etc. is disingenuous.  It's taking advantage of a catch-all term, and eliding the difference between your subject and the connotation of your words.

Like calling Polanski's victim a "teenager" because she was 13, calling Trayvon Martin a "criminal" cause he had been caught with marijuana, or calling some old, expired stocks of ricin "WMD's" because it validates the Iraq invasion.  We don't refer to the Osirak strike as the Israel-Iraq War, or Clinton's strike against Al-Shifa as the Sudan War, or Reagan's bombing of Tripoli as the Libyan War.
Where have I done this outside of pointing out one similarity? This is a complete blindside hit and is condescending (edit: not condensing!). And if you link to me asking The Business if I could join his platoon I'm going to assume you're reaching for straws and move on.

Nor am I even going to respond to the war semantics. I know what I'm referring to, as do the other posters here when the word "war" is used. Yes, I am using it as a catch-all term, but I'm not taking advantage of it to push some agenda. Nor, I might add, am I the only person doing it here.

'Twas a "preemptive strike", if you will, 'cause, c'mon PD, we all know you were prepping to run with that trolling angle.  :P

Hell, I'm betting you're only protesting it so much because you're bummed he called you on it before you had the chance to get going. ;)
« Last Edit: September 04, 2013, 08:17:54 PM by Boogie »
MMA

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2045 on: September 04, 2013, 08:17:36 PM »
I didnt know Dr. Hibbert had a daughter.
bent

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2046 on: September 04, 2013, 08:17:51 PM »
I don't troll here. That's what GAF is for. Although even there, I've been pretty consistent on this issue. I think it's a really, really bad idea.
010

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2047 on: September 04, 2013, 08:20:07 PM »
how in the fuck is that supposed to look like sasha obama

or barack obama for that matter
pcp

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2048 on: September 04, 2013, 08:23:30 PM »
how in the fuck is that supposed to look like sasha obama

or barack obama for that matter

A good comic.
yar

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2049 on: September 04, 2013, 08:35:10 PM »
Good to see Sasha went to the playground without Secret Service to save tax payers some money.
010

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2050 on: September 05, 2013, 12:36:56 AM »
If "people know what I'm talking about" were the only criteria for proper word choice, Paula Deen would still have a valued brand.  If you're not using it for extra rhetorical oomph, why not just use "strike"?  It's more precise, and you'll be saved the emotional trauma of a "blindside hit."

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2051 on: September 05, 2013, 12:49:24 AM »
Nah, wasn't all that. I'm good.


Looks like Weiner...has been vindicated
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/weiner-heckler-made-married-to-arab-comment-video

010

huckleberry

  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2052 on: September 05, 2013, 05:52:56 AM »
Nah, wasn't all that. I'm good.


Looks like Weiner...has been vindicated
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/weiner-heckler-made-married-to-arab-comment-video

So dude wasn't pissed at Weiner showing his weiner and was pissed that he married a hot as hell Muslim? What tha fuk.
wub

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
©ZH

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2054 on: September 06, 2013, 09:54:38 AM »
Televangelists are the absolute worst.

I mean, all TV pitchmen are pretty bad, but at least Ron Popeil is actually going to send you something tangible in exchange for your money.

Quote
But the Virginian authorities declined to prosecute Robertson, describing his misrepresentations as a "blemish". Mission Congo notes that leading state politicians were recipients of large donations from Robertson.

:pacspit
« Last Edit: September 06, 2013, 09:57:39 AM by Great Rumbler »
dog

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2055 on: September 06, 2013, 10:01:41 AM »
Quote
Robertson has consistently denied the accusation of misusing donations and claimed that the Virginia authorities' failure to prosecute effectively cleared him of wrongdoing.
You can't make this shit up. To know it is one thing, to say it out loud as a defence is another.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2056 on: September 06, 2013, 10:26:44 AM »
So he was funneling aid money into a diamond mine? Just when you think you can't have a lower opinion of a person.  :dead
©@©™

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2057 on: September 06, 2013, 10:29:17 AM »
This has been known for years.  I think I read it in one of those "50 stories that never get reported" type of thing on alt news sites.
🍆🍆

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2058 on: September 06, 2013, 12:36:58 PM »
Quote
Graham wound up his case on Syria intervention by raising the stakes considerably. He painted a frightening picture of cascading world events that would reverberate far beyond the borders of a civil war in one Middle Eastern country.
If the United States doesn't deal with Syria, Graham promised Iran would acquire a nuclear weapon by 2014, the King of Jordan would be deposed and Israel would start preparing to protect itself.

"I believe that if we get Syria wrong, within six months -- and you can quote me on this," Graham said, pausing for dramatic effect. "There will be a war between Iran and Israel over their nuclear program."

But it wouldn't even end there, Graham surmised. Undoubtedly, he said ominously, the Iranians would share its nuclear technology with U.S. enemies.

"My fear is that it won't come to America on top of a missile, it'll come in the belly of a ship in the Charleston or New York harbor," he said.

 :holeup :holeup :holeup
©@©™

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2059 on: September 06, 2013, 12:42:29 PM »
Scary future guys.  I'm building my bunker.  Who wants in?

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2060 on: September 06, 2013, 01:06:35 PM »
You can't get money from people without getting them scared about something. That's conservatism 101.
©ZH

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2061 on: September 06, 2013, 02:53:14 PM »
You can't get money from people without getting them scared about something. That's conservatism 101.

Scared or angry. Preferably both.
dog

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2062 on: September 07, 2013, 06:33:39 AM »
uh thanks for the suggestion Amazon, but I'm good

Quote
Nationally syndicated radio talk-show host Rush Limbaugh has long wanted to make American history come to life for the children of his listeners, so he created the character of a fearless middle-school history teacher named Rush Revere, who travels back in time and experiences American history as it happens, in adventures with exceptional Americans. In this book, he is transported back to the deck of the Mayflower.

Tonya

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2063 on: September 07, 2013, 07:16:58 AM »
:lol
©@©™

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2064 on: September 07, 2013, 01:31:21 PM »
Stiglitz shivs Larry Summers to death in this, but he (Summers) is STILL probably gonna be the next Fed chair.  Sigh.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/why-janet-yellen-not-larry-summers-should-lead-the-fed/?_r=0
yar

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2065 on: September 07, 2013, 03:54:25 PM »
UK's lowest-paid employees to be classed as 'not working enough'
One million people could be pushed to earn more – or have their benefits cut, says Department for Work and Pensions
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/sep/06/uk-lowest-paid-classed-not-working-enough

You have to claim benefits to make ends meet because your shit job doesn't pay well enough? Well, why don't you just, I don't know, try working more? :leon There's totally more jobs out there, I swear! How about a second zero-hour contract? Lord Tesco needs more desperate peasants. :heh

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2066 on: September 07, 2013, 03:55:42 PM »
Stiglitz shivs Larry Summers to death in this, but he (Summers) is STILL probably gonna be the next Fed chair.  Sigh.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/why-janet-yellen-not-larry-summers-should-lead-the-fed/?_r=0

Larry Summers has photos and videos of the illuminati in compromising positions :hans1

At least that is what I tell myself because it boggles the mind how he can do so well at failing upwards.
🍆🍆

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2067 on: September 07, 2013, 05:24:07 PM »
Quote
fearless middle-school history teacher

Wha? I thought only fegs become teachers?

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2068 on: September 08, 2013, 11:38:31 AM »
how the fuck haven't I seen this before today
010

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2069 on: September 08, 2013, 01:41:12 PM »
how the fuck haven't I seen this before today

Cuz the Lamestream Media covered it up.
©@©™

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2070 on: September 08, 2013, 09:27:23 PM »
yar

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2071 on: September 08, 2013, 09:34:52 PM »
The Three Stooges
dog

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2072 on: September 08, 2013, 11:19:48 PM »

©@©™

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2073 on: September 09, 2013, 09:47:38 AM »
Quote from: Dumbass
“We want to make sure that you have the Apache helicopters, the F-16s, the equipment that you have so bravely used to capture terrorists and to take care of this menace that’s on your border,” she continued.

They don't give a shit about egypt. They are mouth pieces of the war profiteers.
©ZH

Broseidon

  • Estado Homo
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2074 on: September 09, 2013, 09:54:25 AM »
Quote from: Dumbass
“We want to make sure that you have the Apache helicopters, the F-16s, the equipment that you have so bravely used to capture terrorists and to take care of this menace that’s on your border,” she continued.

Israel? :leon
bent

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2075 on: September 09, 2013, 12:03:31 PM »
I could see why a layperson would think that all radical Muslims are pro-bin Laden, what is surprising is that she thought that Western countries were initially supporting a political party that in some way was behind the 9/11 attacks. I mean that's just nearly too fucked up for a Monday morning .

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2076 on: September 09, 2013, 12:29:59 PM »
I could see why a layperson would think that all radical Muslims are pro-bin Laden, what is surprising is that she thought that Western countries were initially supporting a political party that in some way was behind the 9/11 attacks. I mean that's just nearly too fucked up for a Monday morning .

That's fairly standard Bachmann rhetoric.
dog

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2077 on: September 09, 2013, 01:38:50 PM »
She HAS to have a handler though. I refuse to believe she is bright enough to think this stuff up on her own.

It will be so much better when she is gone.
©ZH

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2078 on: September 09, 2013, 08:08:47 PM »
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/09/08/iowa-grants-gun-permits-to-the-blind/2780303/

Quote
Wethington, the Cedar County sheriff, has a legally blind daughter who plans to obtain a permit to carry when she turns 21 in about two years. He demonstrated for the Register how he would train blind people who want to carry a gun.

"If sheriffs spent more time trying to keep guns out of criminals' hands and not people with disabilities, their time would be more productive," Wethington said as he and his daughter took turns practice shooting with a semi-automatic handgun on private property in rural Cedar County.

drew, explain.
©@©™

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2079 on: September 10, 2013, 07:57:56 PM »
The initial reviews from conservatives Tuesday are in and they’re staunchly negative. The proposed House Republican plan to force the Senate to vote on defunding Obamacare — while removing the threat of a government shutdown if Democrats reject the legislation — seems to have inflamed the very people it was designed to placate.

The plan was pushed by Republican leaders at a conference meeting Tuesday morning, and may be brought up in the House this week.

“Boehner has cooked up a bait and switch to give the Senate a hall pass to fund Obamacare while pretending not to,” Dean Clancy, the vice president of health care policy at the conservative activist group FreedomWorks, told TPM. “We oppose this kind of parliamentary trickery. … This is a grand betrayal that they’re cooking up here. They think they can baffle and confuse people, but we’re going to make sure they don’t succeed.”

Quote
“They should pass a bill funding the government without Obamacare,” said Clancy. “Then they fold their arms, smile and wait.”

:heh
dog

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2080 on: September 11, 2013, 06:18:38 AM »
this is my second mayoral election but the first one to which i've really paid attention and shit cray.

i mean all local politics are cray, but i think that the money in this city and force of personalities makes it just so over the top.

but this is just really weird to me.

http://gothamist.com/2013/09/11/voter_fraud_attempts.php

Quote
What appears to be an orchestrated pattern of voter fraud is being reported at a pivotal precinct in South Williamsburg. According to a Board of Elections poll worker and another poll watcher, groups of young Hasidic men attempted to enter the polling station at IS 71 and vote under the names of other citizens who have yet to vote. "They're signing signatures, but the ID they show doesn't match the signature on the forms. Yes, there's been some illegal stuff going on," BOE poll worker Antoinette Reaves said.

An NYPD officer standing outside IS 71 told us he had witnessed four men attempting to vote under the wrong name in the two hours he had been posted there.

While some of the attempts were made by men who looked to be of voting age, others struck poll workers as obviously fraudulent. "They're fourteen, fifteen years old, walking in here with a crowd of people. We stopped them and asked for ID—we know they're too young to go in there. They've been trying it all day," Reaves said. "The same faces are appearing."

Quote
Simon, a 24-year-old Hasid with a baby girl, expressed an even stronger bond with his community. "I don't know the meaning of democracy, I just vote what they tell me to do, because maybe they've made deals with the politicians," he told us. "If people voted more than once or voted for other people, I don't know if that happened, but it doesn't matter to me, because I know they're voting for the right people."
Tonya

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2081 on: September 11, 2013, 12:12:30 PM »
Haha, religion is just fucking AWESOME
yar

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2082 on: September 11, 2013, 12:17:03 PM »
It's more tribalism. I mean there's a lot of special interest bloc voters here in NYC (the Unions probably the most famous one) but the depths of this fraud stuff is just kind of crazy to me.

Tonya

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2083 on: September 11, 2013, 12:53:53 PM »
I understand issue based tribalism, though- like unions totally make sense to me

Voting however you're told and not having any thoughts about the rationale behind your vote (or possible fraud) because HEY RELIGION is what freaks me the fuck out
yar

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2084 on: September 12, 2013, 05:54:55 PM »
©@©™

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2085 on: September 12, 2013, 06:04:30 PM »
No one puts it down like grumpy old people.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Except  :paul
[close]
vin

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2086 on: September 12, 2013, 06:06:51 PM »
that's my congressman :tocry
010

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2087 on: September 12, 2013, 06:09:03 PM »
that's my congressman :tocry
Yeah, but we know who your governor is :heh
vin

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2088 on: September 12, 2013, 07:33:53 PM »
PD's governor accepted Obamacare, at least, unlike my governor.  >:(
dog

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2089 on: September 12, 2013, 10:10:38 PM »
PD's governor accepted Obamacare, at least, unlike my governor.  >:(

That's cool, at least my governor is openly trying to turn our state into a libertopian hellhole of insanity. 
yar

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2090 on: September 13, 2013, 01:08:12 AM »
My governor is Tommy Carcetti.

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2091 on: September 13, 2013, 11:17:31 AM »
Poll: 78% of Americans don't know what the fuck the debt ceiling is

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/poll-44-percent-of-americans-oppose-raising-debt?ref=fpb
yar

huckleberry

  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2092 on: September 13, 2013, 04:02:43 PM »
PD's governor accepted Obamacare, at least, unlike my governor.  >:(

Our governor is fully embracing O'care - of course we have some many poor people it makes sense. Hell, he even overruled the legislature on science standards implementation when all the crispies and hillbillies cried foul. Shame he didn't put himself up to challenge McConnell (even though he would probably lose).
wub

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2093 on: September 15, 2013, 09:28:16 AM »
Conservatives' buttlust for Putin knows no bounds :lol

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/gop-rep-arm-wrestled-putin-he-put-me

Quote
"So we got down to these arm-wrestling matches and I ended up being paired off with Putin!" he continued. "And he's a little guy but boy I tell ya -- he put me down in a millisecond. He is tough! He just - muscles were just unbelievable."

no homo, obvs  :-*
©@©™

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2094 on: September 15, 2013, 09:28:55 AM »
"Daddy!" :uguu
dog

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2095 on: September 15, 2013, 04:06:45 PM »
how the fuck haven't I seen this before today


Was doing pretty good until the end, when they fucked up the guitar chords.  :shaq2

Original is way superior:



Conservatives' buttlust for Putin knows no bounds :lol

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/gop-rep-arm-wrestled-putin-he-put-me

Quote
"So we got down to these arm-wrestling matches and I ended up being paired off with Putin!" he continued. "And he's a little guy but boy I tell ya -- he put me down in a millisecond. He is tough! He just - muscles were just unbelievable."

no homo, obvs  :-*

I can't find it, but a few years ago, Erick Erickson plastered several pics of a shirtless Putin on his site and talked about how "manly" he was.  :mouf


Btw, my governor seems to be the best right now. He's about to sign a bill that increases our minimum wage to 10$/hr.  :bow

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
yar

Oblivion

  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2097 on: September 15, 2013, 06:20:57 PM »
Only to be replaced by Rob Rubin or Geithner.  :patel

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2098 on: September 15, 2013, 06:21:08 PM »
Sounds like liberals blew up the nomination, republicans didn't have much of a say. Good.
010

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: BENGHAZI! TAXGHAZI! TELEPHONEGHAZI! Thread of American Politics
« Reply #2099 on: September 16, 2013, 03:01:58 AM »
Quote
Boehner also has assured Wall Street and K Street that he will not allow the U.S. government to default on its debt — effectively removing some of his leverage in the battle.

There, I saved everyone a Politico click.

They'll hold out as long as possible in anticipation of an Obama cave, but if it doesn't come they'll fold (again). I don't think Obama will negotiate on either the CR or the debt ceiling.

2013, completely wasted. Seems like Obama's presidency is pretty much over, outside of debt ceiling battles every 10 months. Couple more years of high unemployment and he might be Bush status in many people's eyes, which IMO is what republicans have been trying to do. No sympathy, tbh.
010