I obviously agree with certain aspects of this speech PD posted but I always hate how the solution is social conservatism, tougher "law and order" and immediate cut-offs.
Never talk about other reasons they don't have fathers or whatever with the drug war and basically forced recidivism. Never propose fixing welfare systems so they taper off instead of the sudden cut offs where taking on jobs actually makes people worse off. Complaining about "black anger" but dismissing any grievances as illegitimate, even if they are imaginary you still need to address them, not dismiss them. (Same with Middle East views and so on.)
Jesse Distinguished Black Fellow Peterson spends a lot of the speech bashing communities and their institutions (churches, etc.) for not doing better, yet he doesn't tie his anti-government views to areas where the government is holding them back. He doesn't ask why blacks turn to the only people who show interest in their complaints or interests even if their "solutions" are actually harmful.
To tie this into the Buchanan book I was reading, he basically makes the same argument they were using in the 1960's, that the left (especially Robert Kennedy) are promoting violence by minorities by treating their complaints as legitimate. If the power structure denies avenues of redress of grievances or even attention towards them of course any group will get frustrated. Even if riots like in the 1960's were a slightly counter-productive solution.
There's something amusing about how he comes towards the conclusion that Obama and other blacks want to take power away from whites and how this has to be opposed, it's a tacit admission of racial power structures he dismisses as existing otherwise.
I like how he rants about all the kids out of wedlock, and then shifts to how abortion is at fault.
spoiler (click to show/hide)
I don't have an Afro, I have an Amerifro.
