that's dumb
Yup. Supreme Court seats, nuclear launch codes, and decades of progress for minorities, LGBT people, immigrants and women are too important to throw down the drain because you got pouty your candidate didn't win.
If I have to vote between Clinton or Trump: I'm voting third party/Sanders write in. I trust neither of those motherfuckers with the country
The Guardian: "This may shock you: Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest"Also, equivocating Clinton and Trump as if they're both equally dishonest couldn't be further from reality.
Bernie, for comparison:
Bernie and Hillary are actually pretty damn close. In fact, while Hillary has slightly more "pants on fire," her absolutely true + mostly true statements are higher than Bernie's.
"but Clinton supports most of Sanders policies" is bullshit.
You can say it's "bullshit", but it's provably the truth.
They voted the same 93% of the time when they were both in the Senate.Yeah, because she'll cut tuition and not screw over my generation. She'll just tell Universities to "cut it out!" just like she told Wall Street. How did that work out? 
Hillary is for free (as in tuition, books, and fees) public colleges under New College Compact (both community colleges and four-year.) She also supports college debt refinancing using current rates, sharply lowering interest rates, and repayment programs that max out at 10% of the graduate's salary.
If she finally says something that is worth listening to and actually will follow through with it (which to be honest: I doubt she ever will, especially if the Congress is mixed)
This is a really defeatist way of thinking and it's strange hearing it from a Bernie supporter. If you think Hillary can't do shit with how Congress currently is, then I'm not sure how Bernie would do literally anything he's been talking about.
I should also reiterate
Hillary has been doing a lot of work for downticket candidates so that Democrats regain seats in congress, which is the
real fight. Bernie on the other hand hasn't been doing shit in comparison, but that's not a surprise since he's an "outsider" (and that's been spun as a good thing.)
I'd consider it despite my dislike of her and her history. But there's no way that's ever happening.
Dealing in absolutes is not useful when politics are involved.
I've tried to lean off the snark for this post because my personal message throughout this primary is that Democratic voters have to come together this election, regardless of their preferred candidate. There is just way too much on the line as I said at the top of this post. And yes, I'd be arguing the same points if Hillary was down and Bernie was up.
I've said my peace, vote for how you want, but don't expect to be lauded it.
