I know AIA is our resident conservative, but he seriously also a BENGHAZI!-er as well?
You getting paid to astroturf for this criminal bitch or what?
Let me know when she actually is honest about either of the following: Benghazi or Whitewater.
"Criminal" isn't an accurate term, since she has yet to face any jailtime. "Bitch" is more accurate but it also highlights the pervasive sexist attitudes Hillary Clinton has had to deal with her entire career.
Eight separate Benghazi committees, including a Republican-led committee which grilled Hillary for eight hours straight, all failed to produce anything substantial against her. The entire circus was a pointless waste of time and money, championed by the GOP in yet another desperate bid to tear a Clinton down. And it completely failed.
As for Whitewater, it's comical to bring that up against Hillary two decades later, since the Clinton's did nothing wrong and weren't convicted. That "scandal" is literally as old as I am.
Bring up her emails next, I'm waiting. (Image removed from quote.)
Let's start here
1. Clinton originated the false narrative about a YouTube video protest — Using Clinton's emails and calls as proof, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, accused her of lying to the American people, telling them that the incident in Benghazi was a protest that got out of hand, instead of what it really was: a terrorist attack.
"So if there's no evidence for a video-inspired protest, then where did the false narrative start? It started with you, Madam Secretary," said Jordan, Real Clear Politics reported. "Here's what you said at 11 o'clock that night, approximately one hour after you told the American people it was a video, you say to your family, 'Two officers were killed today in Benghazi by an al-Qaida- like group.' You tell — you tell the American people one thing, you tell your family an entirely different story. Also on the night of the attack, you had a call with the president of Libya. Here's what you said to him: 'Ansar al-Sharia is claiming responsibility.' It's interesting; Mr. Khattala, one of the guys arrested in charge actually belonged to that group. And finally, most significantly, the next day, within 24 hours, you had a conversation with the Egyptian prime minister. You told him this: 'We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest.'"
Caught lying. Defend that and we'll move along.
That stupid quote from Jordan doesn't prove a damn thing. Here's what seems to have happened:
1. That dumbass youtube video was released by that right-wing douchebag filmmaker, and that led to protests all over the Middle East, in places like Cairo and Tunisia.
2. After the assault on BENGHAZI!, some Al Qaeda affiliated group took credit for it. This is why Hillary sent that e-mail to her daughter saying that it was a terrorist attack, because that's what the fucking terrorists said it was!
3. Sometime in the next few days after the attack, that Al Qaeda group retracted the statement taking credit for it.
4. Because that stupid youtube video caused the protests (again) ALL OVER THE MIDDLE EAST, presumably people figured that it would be reasonable to assume that the same thing happened in BENGHAZI! as well, what with also being in a Middle East country.
If you're truly serious about believing in the BENGHAZI! conspiracy, then maybe you can answer some questions for me that have been bugging me since this inane farce started.
- How does blaming Amb. Stevens death from protests and riots due to a youtube video make things easier for Obama to be re-elected?
- If Obama/Hillary were trying to "coverup" the terrorist attack by blaming it on the video, why did Obama say in a press conference THE VERY NEXT FUCKING DAY that it was a terrorist attack? (this one seems to have gotten lost in the memory hole for some reason, which is odd considering the huge deal it was during the second debate with Romney).
- We've had eight fucking investigations so far. EIGHT! And in one of them, the House Intelligence committee released a thorough report admitting that Hillary did NOTHING negligent, or misleading. Are the House Republicans on the Obama/Hillary payroll too?
- If Obama/Hillary were in fact trying to "coverup" BENGHAZI! by blaming it on a youtube video, that plan fell apart within days as everyone in the administration admitted it was due to terrorists. Was that due to brilliant DEE-tective work by Republicans?
- Are you seriously arguing that we should have sent dozens and dozens more of our HEROIC TROOPS to risk their lives to save an Obama lackey? I mean, I guess it's nice to know that conservatives (at least in this instance) value a Democrat appointee's life more than the lives of several of our brave soldiers.
- Seriously, how the fuck does letting your own Ambassador die make for GOOD politics?
edit: and this mofo actually used the "Bush kept us safe after 9/11 but we've had terrorist attacks under Obama!" card, which makes me think he's gotta be trolling.
...right?
