Author Topic: Battlefield 1  (Read 33693 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Battlefield 1
« on: May 06, 2016, 11:21:46 AM »
« Last Edit: May 06, 2016, 04:19:44 PM by fistfulofmetal »
nat

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2016, 11:27:40 AM »
lol no

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2016, 11:45:48 AM »
Yep that kills my interest completely. I wanted a real Battlefield 5. Guess thats a few more years of BF 3/4.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2016, 11:51:34 AM »
If it's some kind of alternate era WWI with extra tech but also lots of zeppelins that'd be hott.

Kinda like Crimson Skies.

The key thing being zeppelins.

ZEPPELINS.

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2016, 11:52:49 AM »
Yep that kills my interest completely. I wanted a real Battlefield 5. Guess thats a few more years of BF 3/4.

Honestly after the several modern military Battlefield games I'm completely on board with something different. WWI with a twist sounds interesting.
nat

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2016, 11:53:48 AM »
Apparently it's going to be called Battlefield 1
nat

brob

  • 8 diagram pole rider
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2016, 12:12:32 PM »
next gen graphics depicting the dawn of chemical warfare :lawd the clash of proper 20th century killing power and outdated military orthodoxy resulting in unprecedented carnage :whoo poetry and PTSD rampant in the trenches  :aah

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2016, 12:55:57 PM »
like the narrative will matter at all.

Battlefield is the only major series that comes to mind that does its story stuff even worse then Call of Duty does.

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2016, 01:24:12 PM »
its a cool and original setting though

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2016, 02:02:06 PM »
Sounds cool to me so far

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2016, 02:12:00 PM »
Its going to be sorta goofy if the main perspective for single player is that of an American soldier. While we were involved with production and sending troops to Europe, WW1 seemed like the juiciest conflict between Germans/Austrians versus the Russians, English, and French.

No matter, nothing will top All Quiet on the Western Front when it comes to WW1 media  :brazilcry
OH!

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2016, 02:23:22 PM »
like the narrative will matter at all.

Battlefield is the only major series that comes to mind that does its story stuff even worse then Call of Duty does.

Call of Doodie is fash propaganda filtered through Michael Bay lenses, at least Battlefield has a Kelly's Heroes derivative (Bad Company).

brob

  • 8 diagram pole rider
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2016, 03:59:30 PM »
just let me equip my horse with a historically accurate gasmask and level up my soldier so I can unlock the ability to choose between german and english trench clubs (or a gauntlet dagger??) for my R3 melee attack, that's all the "narrative" I need

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2016, 04:10:04 PM »
some guy just yelled out "COMMUNITY WOOOOOOO!!!!!" from the crowd when the swedish dude said the word

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2016, 04:13:24 PM »
"making games is exciting, but it's also hard" - Executive VP of EA Games

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2016, 04:16:32 PM »
ZEPPLIN

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: WWI Battlefield nonsense
« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2016, 04:18:16 PM »

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2016, 04:20:16 PM »
Added to the OP.
nat

Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2016, 04:30:14 PM »
:rejoice

bolt action rifles, flamethrowers, horsemen, maces, boats, and biplanes.

now show me some gameplay ffs

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #19 on: May 06, 2016, 04:33:48 PM »
six months from release and no actual gameplay footage*, what could go wrong for a Battlefield game?

*"frostbite game engine footage representative of xbox one"

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #20 on: May 06, 2016, 04:34:52 PM »
Sweet sweet destruction and carrier pigeons

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #21 on: May 06, 2016, 04:35:19 PM »
you play as several different characters from different perspectives in the single player

:rejoice

bolt action rifles, flamethrowers, horsemen, maces, boats, and biplanes.

now show me some gameplay ffs
ZEPPLINS

Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #22 on: May 06, 2016, 04:37:09 PM »
zeppelins are aight too i guess

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #24 on: May 06, 2016, 04:38:11 PM »
Finally, a return to a interesting setting and atmosphere  :leon




To all of you future warfare, "WW1/WW2 is boring" hounds that decry multiplayer returning to older settings,  :miyamoto
OH!

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #25 on: May 06, 2016, 04:43:10 PM »
I hope they let us fight on top of and inside Zeppelins, like in the ending of The Rocketeer.

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #26 on: May 06, 2016, 04:45:24 PM »
I hope they let us fight on top of and inside Zeppelins, like in the ending of The Rocketeer.

I'm sorry to break it to you, but no you can not do this. Think of the Zeppelins as AT-AT's in Battlefront and you'll understand there limits.

Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #27 on: May 06, 2016, 04:45:50 PM »
October 18th? oh my.

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #28 on: May 06, 2016, 04:46:04 PM »
Y'all talk all this talk but come release all you niccas gonna be checking out when its filled with modern era BF game bullshit.

Massive incremental progression wall
All the great maps are remakes and behind a $50 season pass
Guaranteed broken online mp for at least a month after launch

but at least the setting is interesting amirite? you niccas are not real and icu

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #29 on: May 06, 2016, 04:48:47 PM »
First BF I skip. I don't want this trash.

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #30 on: May 06, 2016, 04:50:19 PM »
I hope they let us fight on top of and inside Zeppelins, like in the ending of The Rocketeer.

I'm sorry to break it to you, but no you can not do this. Think of the Zeppelins as AT-AT's in Battlefront and you'll understand there limits.

I think it would be fair or neat if the commander on the team can steer or move a Zeppelin, with support guns and cannons that can be used by other players. It would make sense if Zeppelins were spawn points like carriers/cruisers were at sea in battlefield 1942.

Zeppelins being a mobile or aerial spawn point on land maps that don't have sea combat would be good to see.
OH!

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #31 on: May 06, 2016, 04:53:30 PM »
Look benji, now matter how hype you get no one is going to ask you if you want to see zeppelins because you're full of hot air. The Bore is a safe space, toku meltdown notwithstanding.

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #32 on: May 06, 2016, 04:54:49 PM »
Y'all talk all this talk but come release all you niccas gonna be checking out when its filled with modern era BF game bullshit.

Massive incremental progression wall
All the great maps are remakes and behind a $50 season pass
Guaranteed broken online mp for at least a month after launch

but at least the setting is interesting amirite? you niccas are not real and icu

My biggest beef with Battlefield 4 was how much shit was crammed in the game. With this setting there's only so much you can do for weapons and gadgets. If they dial back the ADD styled class/character creation system and amp up the spectacle, its a win win.

Like, you won't need to worry about equipping a barrel, a muzzle flash, a flashlight, what type of magazine, the sight, on 90 different weapons. If this Battlefield is pick up and play, more so than Battlefield and CoD in the past few years, I'll be happy.   

Shit, vehicles returning to simple shit in general is already a good thing. If its Bad Company 2 styled customization with a lot more options, that would be the best outcome possible.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2016, 05:02:53 PM by mormapope »
OH!

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #33 on: May 06, 2016, 05:17:29 PM »
After Bad Company 2, Battlefield 3 and 4 a change of scene is welcome. I didn't need another modern era one right after those ones.

eleuin

  • perennial loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #34 on: May 06, 2016, 05:30:15 PM »
Can't wait for the promo items :noah




mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #35 on: May 06, 2016, 05:31:56 PM »
OH!

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #36 on: May 06, 2016, 05:32:26 PM »
After Bad Company 2, Battlefield 3 and 4 a change of scene is welcome. I didn't need another modern era one right after those ones.

I do. I just want a Battlefield 2142 sequel. :'(

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #37 on: May 06, 2016, 05:35:40 PM »
Y'all talk all this talk but come release all you niccas gonna be checking out when its filled with modern era BF game bullshit.

Massive incremental progression wall
All the great maps are remakes and behind a $50 season pass
Guaranteed broken online mp for at least a month after launch

but at least the setting is interesting amirite? you niccas are not real and icu

My biggest beef with Battlefield 4 was how much shit was crammed in the game. With this setting there's only so much you can do for weapons and gadgets. If they dial back the ADD styled class/character creation system and amp up the spectacle, its a win win.

Like, you won't need to worry about equipping a barrel, a muzzle flash, a flashlight, what type of magazine, the sight, on 90 different weapons. If this Battlefield is pick up and play, more so than Battlefield and CoD in the past few years, I'll be happy.   

Shit, vehicles returning to simple shit in general is already a good thing. If its Bad Company 2 styled customization with a lot more options, that would be the best outcome possible.

DICE will find a way.
Look benji, now matter how hype you get no one is going to ask you if you want to see zeppelins because you're full of hot air. The Bore is a safe space, toku meltdown notwithstanding.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #38 on: May 06, 2016, 05:42:09 PM »
After Bad Company 2, Battlefield 3 and 4 a change of scene is welcome. I didn't need another modern era one right after those ones.

I do. I just want a Battlefield 2142 sequel. :'(

At least 2142 hasn't been reduced to DLC for other games like Vietnam.  :'(

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #39 on: May 06, 2016, 05:59:25 PM »
First BF I skip. I don't want this trash.

This will be the first BF I purchase.

I can't believe the amount of bravery it took to change the setting to this.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #40 on: May 06, 2016, 07:01:46 PM »
If they dial back the ADD styled class/character creation system

6 classes. Battlepacks are still in.

Prepare your anus, you're gonna get ADD'd.

After Bad Company 2, Battlefield 3 and 4 a change of scene is welcome. I didn't need another modern era one right after those ones.

I do. I just want a Battlefield 2142 sequel. :'(

At least 2142 hasn't been reduced to DLC for other games like Vietnam.  :'(

Actually, Final Stand had easter eggs as a "prequel" to 2142. So you could say technically it's been done.

And Bad Company 2: Vietnam's maps weren't totally awful or bad. Just really bad balance in regards to guns and mortar strikes and the like. But that was an issue in Bad Company 2 proper as well.

fizzel

  • Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #41 on: May 06, 2016, 08:09:07 PM »
A new Codename Eagle is cool. Will probably never buy though due to inevitable season pass.

Am_I_Anonymous

  • And I'm pretty sure fuck you (italics implied)
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #42 on: May 06, 2016, 10:07:09 PM »
Day 1 -10 (ea access)
YMMV

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #43 on: May 06, 2016, 11:12:04 PM »
shake up the setting by changing it to the most overplayed setting/era in all of fps. great fucking job
pcp

Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #44 on: May 06, 2016, 11:33:09 PM »


 :ohhh
😈

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #45 on: May 06, 2016, 11:56:30 PM »
That video is very accurate, that I can confirm. Once more info comes out more publicly I'll have more to say.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #46 on: May 07, 2016, 12:16:13 AM »
That video is very accurate, that I can confirm. Once more info comes out more publicly I'll have more to say.

You work for DICE? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

shake up the setting by changing it to the most overplayed setting/era in all of fps. great fucking job

Exactly how I feel. I got nothing against the World Wars, but everyone going "SO BRAVE! :doge" and being happy about it is just :confused

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #47 on: May 07, 2016, 12:20:49 AM »
No I have no affiliation to them.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #48 on: May 07, 2016, 01:03:26 AM »

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #49 on: May 07, 2016, 02:41:16 AM »
shake up the setting by changing it to the most overplayed setting/era in all of fps. great fucking job

You stan for Dragon Quest.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #50 on: May 07, 2016, 03:26:23 AM »
For a whole lot of reasons, WWI has been put in its own special sphere and it has resulted in the overriding belief that it is not a gaming design friendly setting whatever the genre (the field is equally dry in strategy/wargames among a crowd of history enthusiasts)... but seeing the trailer convinced me it can work great in a Battlefield setting if only because close quarters dogfighting or planes being somewhat vulnerable to infantry fire actually make a lick of sense at that time.
ὕβρις

Positive Touch

  • Woo Papa
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #51 on: May 07, 2016, 03:26:59 AM »
if there's one series that's known for continually rehashing the same historical events as setpieces for action, it's dragon Quest
pcp

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #52 on: May 07, 2016, 05:07:52 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

One possible angle: People who don't work for a company have to sign NDAs to work on a thing for that company.

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #53 on: May 07, 2016, 07:07:28 AM »
Isn't G in QA or focus testing or something? He's talked about this before.

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #54 on: May 07, 2016, 11:09:09 AM »
Yea I do a little here and there. I've had my hands on a lot of games which haven't come out or even been announced. I could ruin the experience of a lot of games, but thats not what I'm about. I also respect the relationships I have with the developer's I've worked with. I just don't want to be someone who damages a good thing, thats what youtube videos are for.  ;)

Back on topic what does everyone think about the cover art featuring someone of color in a prominent  role? I think it's great.

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #55 on: May 07, 2016, 11:15:08 AM »
Apparently there is a gameplay trailer EA has that it will show at a later date. Probably E3. They did the same approach with Battlefront.




Some diversity in major games is always a good thing.

eleuin

  • perennial loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #56 on: May 07, 2016, 12:20:15 PM »
The best use of WW1 before this game was a downloadable side scroller from Ubisoft

How is this setting overplayed

mormapope

  • WHADDYA HEAR, WHADDYA SAY
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #57 on: May 07, 2016, 12:38:17 PM »
Also, the Battlefield 1942/Vietnam/Battlefield 2 servers were axed since they were hosted by Gamespy, which went away. So now there are only a few private servers running and you have to put extra effort into joining some laggy ass server that's hosted in a country far from your own. You can't play old Battlefield easily anymore.

There have been way more modern Battlefields than anything else in the series, CoD has been on a 4 year bender of future shit.
OH!

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #58 on: May 07, 2016, 01:24:26 PM »
Not only that but there are rumours that DICE LA are working on Battlefield 5 now which is almost certainly a modern game.


Perhaps DICE will tackle a future game (2142) after this one.

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 1
« Reply #59 on: May 07, 2016, 01:35:27 PM »
DICE LA is working on more than one game and it's not all Battlefield over there.