Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 6832498 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26760 on: December 01, 2018, 09:24:23 PM »
Putin looks like he has fetal alcohol syndrome and has gay mannerisms.

Hey got that small head, small close together eyes low on his face, and a thin upper loop.

He just has a bridge on his nose, otherwise he’d be a dead ringer for a fas baby.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26761 on: December 01, 2018, 09:43:47 PM »
Putin looks like he has fetal alcohol syndrome and has gay mannerisms.

In Russia the joke is that he's a nebbish.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26762 on: December 01, 2018, 10:06:35 PM »
Sometimes I entertained thoughts of Medvedev not agreeing to just swap back with Putin in 2012. Force an election or assassination at minimum. I got the impression he was somewhat more concerned about Russia's system and how it engaged with the West. And I remember reading a number of Russian experts American intelligence sources about how Putin's camp was mildly afraid he wouldn't just step down when he was briefly more popular than Putin. Also I liked how Medvedev wouldn't use all the joints on his body ever, like he was conserving massive amounts of energy for some secret purpose.

Maybe I'm doing a Russian President equivalent of "Bush wasn't as bad" though.

But yet:

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26763 on: December 02, 2018, 12:02:05 AM »
Quote
Congressional negotiators and White House officials are discussing a one-week budget bill that would delay a partial government shutdown while Washington prepares for the state funeral of former president George H.W. Bush, according to several people briefed on the talks.

On Saturday, President Trump weighed in, too, saying he’d possibly sign a two-week funding extension while the Bush memorials took place, according to an Associated Press report.

A final decision has not been made but could come as soon as Sunday, when Trump returns to Washington.

Funding for parts of the federal government is set to expire at midnight Dec. 7, but Congress is deadlocked over Trump’s demand for $5 billion in funding for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
:american

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26764 on: December 02, 2018, 01:32:25 AM »
Government shutdowns are always massively unpopular and there’s no way trump will get exactly what he wants without really big concessions.

I could see Democrats trading the $5 billion for DACA and some changes to the tax bill to pay for it

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26765 on: December 02, 2018, 01:43:46 AM »
They were willing to trade some wall funding for a big pile of concessions on actual immigration policy. That was roughly the deal they were working on last year until Stephen Miller got in Trump's ear.

I think it's harder for them to do something like that now. Good chance their base flips out on anyone compromising on the wall and half the Dems in the Senate are running for president.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26766 on: December 02, 2018, 04:53:47 AM »
I’m being realistic that Schumer will fold like a wet suit, not saying what I think they SHOULD do.

I think they should tell Trump to eat shit, and dare him to shut down the government two weeks before Christmas.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26767 on: December 02, 2018, 07:10:17 AM »
They are with their backs against the wall.

If Trump gets his $5 billion it signals to him that he can demand money for his pet projects.
They would have to assume that if Trump gets his wall, he won't ask for anything else which is unlikely.
Won't be long before congress is deadlocked over funding a space cruiser or whatever he latches on to next when the wall is no longer an issue.

If they don't give him the wall he will shutdown the government. Guiliani is sure to remind him that without government funding Mueller can't continue his work.
In fact, his most important advisors such as Sean Hannity, Lou Dobbs and the Mar-a-lago members will say he can just privatize everything like the miliitary(Erik Prince) and education(the Marvel/Disney execs) to save a lot of money.
Sure the Democrats can take back power but the Trump administration can ruin departments to a point that they have no choice but to privatize. Something that Tillerson was well on his way to do.

The best way to handle this, is to drag this out. Negotiate with Trump and cut a 'deal' for $2 billion or whatever. Trump can keep screaming the Democrats block him but can still do photo ops at sections of his new wall. So he's happy.
The Government keeps running for at least another year and $2 billion to pay off Trump is cheap compared to the other options.

He didn't used to look like that. Lends credence to nintex's theory that he was replaced by an imposter in 2006
Putin is part of the same botox club as Gerard Schroeder, Berlusconi and a bunch of other high level figures.
Everyone who tried to investigate that is probably dead.

Bro-hugging MBS in front of Trump, boasting that he's blocking the Ukrainian navy and showing his dissapointment in Trump..... Putin is doing all his fuckery out in the open now.
The Kremlin is basically demanding a meeting between Trump/Putin and blocking any US attempts to send John Bolton or Pompeo instead.

This popped up yesterday, an interesting interview with Mattis about North Korea/Afghanistan/Iran/Russia and everything else. Mattis seems very confident until his own job security comes up.


It seems that overall Mattis is doing a great job. Taking over the job of the state department that Trump and Tillerson gutted and aware of the importance of his work.
Trump is expected to fire more members of his cabinet and especially the competent ones and while he does it there may be a government shutdown. Next to that he's dragging his feet with new appointments such as the ambassador to the UN.
Thinking about sending John James there who has no diplomatic or foreign policy experience except for flying attack helicopters in Iraq.

Who knows what the fuck will happen when Kelly and Mattis are fired.  :doge
🤴

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26768 on: December 02, 2018, 12:23:06 PM »
Trump doesn't have the resolve or balls to maintain a government shutdown. We've seen this movie before guys: the media will shit on republicans, Trump will distance himself from them and swoop in to "fix" things by creating a deal/cave everyone can agree on.

I think this is a case of bad journalism creating a narrative that can't die. The money is going to be for "border security," not the wall, yet the journalist who first tweeted about it mentioned the wall and everyone got upset. Now democrats are scrambling.
010

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26769 on: December 02, 2018, 02:42:48 PM »
We need hungry noob back because some of this shit is classic:

https://twitter.com/kasons4/status/1068871564974800896

You know the q types think that guy that looks like a Hobonis JFK Jr in disguise :sabu :ohhh

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26770 on: December 02, 2018, 04:10:34 PM »
The latest in Q world is ... something.

They already speculated that D-Day was fast approaching. Or as they called it "D5" (December 5th).
Because, Comey, Lynch are due to testify next week (December 3 - 4). And some guy named John Huber will release a report on the Clinton Foundation.
So first they got angry that H.W. Bush died. Saying that he was killed in order to 'distract' from the arrests of Clinton et all.
 
But because H.W. Bush passed away Trump has ordered a closing of government agencies and departments on December 5th to honor him.
He has also deployed a new group of military personel to Guantanamo.

The Q's are now even more convinced that on D5 (the day of the funeral of H.W. Bush) the arrests will begin.

So we might finally see a conclusion to this episode. As I don't think their movement can withstand yet another nothingburger.
🤴

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26771 on: December 02, 2018, 04:27:27 PM »
I think you will be surprised and delighted at their resiliency.

What did it look like right after the elections? I can barely even read Q drops. They’re impossibly vague.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26772 on: December 02, 2018, 04:54:13 PM »
The Democrats did it because of when he wheeled his hand into that woman’s ass.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26773 on: December 02, 2018, 04:59:27 PM »
So we might finally see a conclusion to this episode. As I don't think their movement can withstand yet another nothingburger.

Of course it can.
ὕβρις

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26774 on: December 02, 2018, 05:20:01 PM »
It's a feature, not a bug.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26775 on: December 02, 2018, 07:24:50 PM »
So we might finally see a conclusion to this episode. As I don't think their movement can withstand yet another nothingburger.

I don't think that will deter them. They're so confident they have a special insight into American politics so badly that literally over a year of failed predictions hasn't slowed them down or made them reconsider.

You may know someone like this.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26776 on: December 02, 2018, 09:43:06 PM »
Q isn't going anywhere because it's based on belief, not facts. Someone will just invent a reason why the thing they thought was going to happen didn't happen when they thought it was going to happen, and the true believers will just go along with it.
dog

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26777 on: December 02, 2018, 10:19:41 PM »
I do feel like the Q stuff has fallen off somewhat.

You don’t really hear about it anymore after their reddit died.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26778 on: December 03, 2018, 02:54:34 AM »
There's still some twitter dumbshits going on about it but that's twitter for ye. :doge
Hi

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member


Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
©ZH


Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26783 on: December 03, 2018, 01:34:17 PM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1069584730880974849

"military is depleted"
"military needs more funding"
"we need more military"

"woah, why are we spending so much on the military guys" :trumps
🤴

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26784 on: December 03, 2018, 01:58:02 PM »
Critical support for the 3 stooges trying to end militarism or whatever.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26785 on: December 03, 2018, 01:59:45 PM »
A big get together about arms is probably the cover up Trump needs to meet with Putin again for new directions.  :doge

He ain't slick
🤴

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26786 on: December 03, 2018, 02:29:45 PM »
I guess the new proposed Space Force is going to raise money through bake sales and boxed wine.




benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26787 on: December 03, 2018, 04:48:25 PM »
An insurgent underdog no more, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is laying the groundwork to launch a bigger presidential campaign than his first, as advisers predict he would open the 2020 Democratic presidential primary season as a political powerhouse.

A final decision has not been made, but those closest to the 77-year-old self-described democratic socialist suggest that neither age nor interest from a glut of progressive presidential prospects would dissuade him from undertaking a second shot at the presidency. And as Sanders’ brain trust gathered for a retreat in Vermont over the weekend, some spoke openly about a 2020 White House bid as if it was almost a foregone conclusion.
Michael Avenatti’s cable TV bookings have dwindled. He was uninvited from one prominent Democratic event and skipped out on another. He has even publicly clashed with his highest profile client.

In just a matter of weeks, Avenatti’s fortunes have taken a nosedive, rapidly downshifting him from 2020 presidential prospect to political pariah.

After a recent domestic violence arrest in Los Angeles and a public rift with client Stormy Daniels over fees and legal strategy, even some of his most loyal supporters are questioning whetherhe could survive the latest round of challenges and be a viable candidate.

“As a friend, I’m concerned about him. When I call him to say ‘Hey, how you doing?’ It’s pretty obvious he’s going through a pretty rough time now,” said David Betras, a Democratic county chairman in Youngstown, Ohio, and one of Avenatti’s earliest political backers. “I’m more worried about these pending charges. Domestic abuse? That’s pretty bad for a run for president.”

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26788 on: December 03, 2018, 04:53:34 PM »
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-no-labels-went-from-preaching-unity-to-practicing-the-dark-arts
Quote
Most of those targeted for financial support didn’t end up donating to No Labels super PACs. But some notable names did, including former Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig, who was encouraged to donate by former Democrat-turned-independent Senator Joe Lieberman, according to internal records.

The attempt to recruit these financiers was, according to sources, part of a concerted effort by No Labels to steer emphasis away from its nonprofit arm and toward campaign operations designed to boost preferred political candidates and target those deemed too extreme or impediments to its policy agenda.

By the end of the 2018 cycle, six No Labels-affiliated super PACs—No Labels Action, Forward Not Back, United Together, Govern or Go Home, Citizens for a Strong America, and United for Progress—had collectively raised more than $11 million from 53 individual donors. The average contribution to the groups was about $124,000, illustrating their reliance on high-dollar donors rather than grassroots financial support.

To court those deep-pocketed donors, No Labels leaned on individuals with ties to other prominent potential givers. The group appears to have sought support from Mitt Romney, the former Republican presidential candidate who was just elected to the U.S. Senate, though it’s unclear whether it hoped that support would be financial, political, or both. In internal company notes, No Labels proposed having Lieberman contact Brad Bloom—the leader of the private-equity firm Berkshire Partners and a high-dollar donor to a pro-Romney super PAC in 2012—“to discuss Mitt” and arrange a meeting with other potential supporters in Boston. Internal documents also note that another super PAC donor prospect, financier David Nierenberg, is a “close friend of Mitt Romney.”
Quote
In December 2010, Jacobson launched No Labels. The defining purpose was to “advocate & educate for greater bipartisan cooperation throughout all levels of government.” Though the launch event featured citizens from all 50 states, the concept was also catnip for the wealthy, who tend to see two solutions to every thorny problem: stoic leadership and gobs of money.

To get those wealthy individuals to open their wallets, No Labels proposed consensus-building concepts and bipartisan ideas; and they did it all with a touch of glitz. For its launch, it debuted a “No Labels Anthem” recorded by Akon.

Quote
While Lieberman and Bayh’s association with the group, and the impression that it’s backed by some of the biggest names in finance, has given No Labels a stately reputation, behind the scenes, numerous ex-officials say the organization more closely resembles a disorganized campaign apparatus.

Ex-aides said there is incredibly high turnover. And according to one former staffer, No Labels executives would ask employees to write positive reviews on the job-posting and workplace review site Glassdoor to counteract the more numerous bad ones. Asked if that was the case, Jacobson simply shrugged and casually said, “yeah.”

There have also been internal disagreements over the organizational mission. In one March 2018 email, Ryan Clancy, the group’s top strategist, expressed fears to Jacobson that Pelosi would advise her caucus to shut out No Labels if they went after her. She could, Clancy wrote, “go all Harry Reid on us.”

The reference was to an episode that remains part of internal No Labels lore. During the 2014 cycle, the group endorsed Rep. Cory Gardner (R-CO) in his challenge to Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO), after the congressman embraced their “Problem Solver” label and Udall declined to do so. Then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) was furious and, according to his former communications director Adam Jentleson, leaned on his members to dissociate themselves from the group. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) subsequently did, noting in part that Udall’s record was strong on bipartisanship.

“It seemed like they wanted to flex, to say if you’re not willing to be a ‘problem solver’ they might throw you under the bus,” said a source who previously worked for a member of the No Labels’ Problem Solver caucus. “The message was that all the bipartisanship didn’t count if you didn’t accept their branding."
Quote
“If a man were running No Labels, would you be making the same suggestion—based on little to no evidence—that his spouse is serving as the puppet master behind the scenes?” Jacobson asked. “Eight years ago, I came up with the idea for No Labels and have led it, as a full-time volunteer, ever since. I have put my life into this work with the singular goal of helping to heal our bitterly divided country and to support leaders who want to work together to solve America’s problems. I set the direction for No Labels, not my husband.”

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26789 on: December 03, 2018, 05:08:39 PM »
more like No Constituency ayyyyyyyyyy

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26790 on: December 03, 2018, 05:10:27 PM »
An insurgent underdog no more, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is laying the groundwork to launch a bigger presidential campaign than his first, as advisers predict he would open the 2020 Democratic presidential primary season as a political powerhouse.

A final decision has not been made, but those closest to the 77-year-old self-described democratic socialist suggest that neither age nor interest from a glut of progressive presidential prospects would dissuade him from undertaking a second shot at the presidency. And as Sanders’ brain trust gathered for a retreat in Vermont over the weekend, some spoke openly about a 2020 White House bid as if it was almost a foregone conclusion.

Welcome to the 2020 Presidential Debates! With the opinion polls in dead heat and more parties running than ever we're thrilled to present to you tonights candidates.

"Live via a Skype feed sponsored by Microsoft from a hospital in New York, recovering from a stroke treated by Phizer... Hillary Rodham Clinton! With vice presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg by her side. Mike and Hill can you hear us on Microsoft Skype? They're representing the Liberal Democratic Party sponsored by Yum! Brands"

"Next, pushed on stage in a wheelchair by his loving wife... Bernie Sanders! Bernie is the candidate choosen by the Justice Democratic Party."

"And... hold on folks. Joe Biden will be with us in just a minute to represent the Democratic Party so we're heading to the other side..."

"The corpse of Ronald Reagan. Extremely well preserved and exhumed. Along with an AI and hologram developed by Palmer Lucky and Peter Thiel which has been trained to say exactly what Reagan would've said. The GOP could've not put forward a better candidate for tonights debate!"

"This year the polls are close so we have yet another candidate on stage. The Libertarian Party has proudly put forward John McAfee. Who has just returned from a raid on drug runners in Mexico. Mr. McAfee famously started his campaign by sending gun squads to a Bank of America branch and demand all their fiat money be replaced by crypto at gunpoint. He has also insisted to bring 4 Thai hookers and an alligator on stage with him. The other candidates respected those wishes as long as the Alligator remains in his cage."

"And last but certainly not least. The current sitting President. Who's just recovering from a heart attack at McDonalds last week and general paralysis of his face since 2019.... Donald J. Trump. His loving daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner claim they can decypher his grunts and hand signs to answer all your questions. The White House staff has stated that despite his inconviences Donald J. Trump is the healthiest President in history. As you know Mr. Trump is running with his own MAGA party after leaving the GOP with his loving wife Melania Trump running as Vice President after Mike Pence mysteriously went missing on an unscheduled flight to Moscow."

"Now before we begin... oh we regret to inform you that Joe Biden has just passed away while taking a bathroom break... after a minute of silence for our fallen hero we will start the 2020 Presidential Debate."
🤴

recursivelyenumerable

  • you might think that; I couldn't possibly comment
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26791 on: December 03, 2018, 06:38:25 PM »
Maybe if McAfee promises to eat his dick in the Oval Office
QED

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26792 on: December 03, 2018, 06:48:07 PM »
https://twitter.com/Isikoff/status/1069729807976538113
 :whoo

https://twitter.com/Newsweek/status/1069722976843644936
 :nope

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1069716921250009088
 :ohyeah

Trust the plan. #Qanon #D5 #makethearrests


The Manafort memo will be public. We can all see what greatness the trailblazer has achieved.
🤴

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26793 on: December 03, 2018, 08:48:08 PM »


Quote
Ticket prices for the Clintons’ world tour have bottomed out, with prices as low as $11 at some locations.
Quote
I’m looking around Scotiabank Arena, the home of the Toronto Maple Leafs, and it’s a depressing sight. It’s two-for-the-price-of-one in half the arena. The hockey rink is half curtained off, but even with that, organizers are scrambling at the last minute to cordon off more sections behind thick black curtains, they say due to a lack of sales. I paid $177 weeks in advance. (I passed on the pricey meet-and-greet option.) On the day of the event, some unsold tickets are slashed to single digits.

I get reassigned to another section as the Clintons’ audience space shrinks. But even with all the herding, I’m still looking at large swaths of empty seats — and I cringe at the thought that the Clintons will look out and see that, too.
:usacry :usacry :usacry :usacry

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26794 on: December 03, 2018, 09:22:36 PM »
To believe that most Q followers will realize they've been had is to believe most Q followers are rational. Sure there are those who fell for the scam, realized it after the midterms turned out to be entirely different than predicted, and then quit. But just a few days ago Pence was seen greeting a crowd that included someone with Q apparel. At this point this is more than a conspiracy, it's a way of life...and an ideology. The idea that the country is dominated by elite (child molesting) figures who are purposely making the common white man's life worse...and the only person who can stop them is the president. With assistance from JFK Jr, of course. Yeah...

The 5th will pass without anything noteworthy happening - well, unless some white dude shoots up a public square, of course. A few Q believers will jump ship, but others will maintain faith. In a sense this isn't too different from their general political views. They've been had, bamboozled, led astray, etc. Yet they can't and won't admit it because ultimately they know their lives won't get any better, truly. At the end of the day they're in this for retribution. Q promises Hillary/Obama/Bush/Comey/etc behind bars. Trump provides brown children behind bars. Ultimately this boils down to a group of people celebrating as others get punished. They know they're fucked, and they probably know Trump won't save them. But if their enemies drown first, they're ok with it.
010

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26795 on: December 03, 2018, 10:31:38 PM »
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/03/us/politics/manafort-assange-wikileaks-ecuador.html
Quote
In mid-May 2017, Paul Manafort, facing intensifying pressure to settle debts and pay mounting legal bills, flew to Ecuador to offer his services to a potentially lucrative new client — the country’s incoming president, Lenín Moreno.

Mr. Manafort made the trip mainly to see if he could broker a deal under which China would invest in Ecuador’s power system, possibly yielding a fat commission for Mr. Manafort.

But the talks turned to a diplomatic sticking point between the United States and Ecuador: the fate of the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

In at least two meetings with Mr. Manafort, Mr. Moreno and his aides discussed their desire to rid themselves of Mr. Assange, who has been holed up in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since 2012, in exchange for concessions like debt relief from the United States, according to three people familiar with the talks, the details of which have not been previously reported.

They said Mr. Manafort suggested he could help negotiate a deal for the handover of Mr. Assange to the United States, which has long investigated Mr. Assange for the disclosure of secret documents and which later filed charges against him that have not yet been made public.

Within a couple of days of Mr. Manafort’s final meeting in Quito, Robert S. Mueller III was appointed as the special counsel to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters, and it quickly became clear that Mr. Manafort was a primary target. His talks with Ecuador ended without any deals.
TRYING TO CLEAN UP THE EVIDENCE :doge

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26796 on: December 03, 2018, 11:11:51 PM »
https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/12/sully-hw-bush-service-dog-george-hw-bush-funeral.html
Quote
But it’s a bit demented to project soul-wrenching grief onto a dog’s decision to lay down in front of a casket. Is Sully “heroic” for learning to obey the human beings who taught him to perform certain tasks? Does the photo say anything special about this dog’s particular loyalty or judgment, or is he just … there? Also, if dogs are subject to praise for obeying their masters, what do we do about the pets who eat their owners’ dead (or even just passed-out) bodies?

The photograph, in other words, is not proof that Sully is a particularly “good boy” or that “we don’t deserve dogs,” as countless swooning tweets put it on Monday. On its own, it says almost nothing other than the fact that Sully was, at one point in the same room as the casket of his former boss. This is simply a photograph of a dog doing something dogs love to do: Lie down.
finally, someone is willing to expose the media lies about dogs

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26797 on: December 03, 2018, 11:20:02 PM »
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/broward-sheriffs-office-demotes-qanon-cop-matt-patten-10940330
Quote
This past Friday, Broward Sheriff's Office SWAT member Matt Patten wore a QAnon conspiracy-theory patch while greeting Vice President Mike Pence at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Today Patten was reprimanded and demoted from the SWAT team and BSO’s Office of Homeland Security.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/disgruntled-ex-employee-of-conspiracy-theorist-admits-shooting-him/2018/12/03/e5df4478-f719-11e8-8c9a-860ce2a8148f_story.html
Quote
A man who worked as an investigator for conspiracy theorist Jack Burkman will serve nine years in prison for shooting and wounding his ex-boss in a complicated plot involving a fake FBI exposé.

Kevin Doherty, 46, said little as Judge William T. Newman Jr. sentenced him Monday for malicious wounding and use of a firearm in commission of a felony, but he acknowledged the veracity of a set of facts read by Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Evie Eastman detailing his “serious falling out” with Burkman and the “grand ruse” he concocted in revenge.

Eastman said Doherty lured Burkman to a hotel parking garage in March with the false promise of turning over details of FBI misconduct.

“It was all pretend,” Eastman said.

During the hearing in Arlington Circuit Court, Newman imposed a 23-year prison term with 14 years suspended. In addition, Doherty, who pleaded guilty to both charges, must pay back with interest the $15,000 Burkman gave him for the nonexistent FBI documents.

Burkman told The Washington Post in March that he hired Doherty, a onetime Marine, to investigate the death of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich. Burkman, a Republican lobbyist, has enmeshed himself in a conspiracy theory that Rich was killed for handing Democratic emails over to WikiLeaks. Law enforcement has deemed the homicide a botched street robbery, and Rich’s family has repeatedly sued right-wing news outlets for falsely reporting otherwise.

Doherty was supposed to build a psychological profile of Rich’s possible killer, but Burkman said in March that he and Doherty quickly came to loggerheads over control of the project. Burkman fired Doherty in July 2017.

In court, Eastman described the plot Doherty executed months later and how police tracked him down. Doherty sent Burkman emails pretending to have information “detrimental to the FBI.” Burkman paid Doherty $15,000 and arranged to pick up the documentation from under a traffic cone at the Key Bridge Marriott in Arlington on March 13.

When Burkman leaned over to get the documents, Eastman said, Doherty shot him twice in the buttocks with a rifle. Burkman fled up a parking ramp, carrying the traffic cone and his dog, Jack Jr. Doherty admitted he then ran down his former employer from behind the wheel of a black SUV.

Burkman suffered a broken arm, and two bullets remain lodged in his buttocks, Eastman said. His dachshund was not harmed.
Nintex, fan fiction, STAT.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26798 on: December 03, 2018, 11:36:01 PM »
Wikileaks is a well known Russian intelligence agency.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26799 on: December 04, 2018, 01:01:39 AM »
Read that Manafort-Ecuador story and it's not clear what his plan was regarding Assange? As in, it doesn't say whether the plan was to bring him over and prosecute him or bring him over and protect him. Unless I missed something.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26800 on: December 04, 2018, 01:11:53 AM »
The Trump Administration plans on prosecuting him according to their other filings in court, so I imagine that was the case. I apologize if my non-Mandark level joke played any part in your confusion.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26801 on: December 04, 2018, 01:20:07 AM »
This is what I tried saying like 10 times on the other place but it didn't stick lol.
were you linked to multiple articles on random Dimm sites that all sourced each other and none of which supported the opposing claim anyway?

that's what I got the last time I engaged in any Russian skepticism discussion with Dimms that wasn't here, where while I disagree with their conclusions and many premises I think Nola and kingv at the very very least grasp the claim they're making and what evidence could support it

i was mostly upset about their lack of adherence to their own conspiracy theories more than whatever the specifics were...it was like when people briefly seemed to distrust Q

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26802 on: December 04, 2018, 01:33:52 AM »
I mean I've seen a lot of people talk about that article with the assumption that the deal would be brokered so Assange could be prosecuted, but the article itself never states or even really implies that was Manafort's plan.

Also Manafort somehow still has a spokesman despite being massively in debt and having his assets seized and being in prison, which feels like a metaphor for something.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26803 on: December 04, 2018, 01:43:58 AM »
I think Manafort's plan was simply to be the middleman on yet another deal between countries and skim off the top. Moreno's been pretty clear about not wanting to harbor Assange seemingly forever unlike the prior administration, but he still wants to leverage it in deals with the United States. Manafort probably didn't care either way about what happened to Assange or the debt relief, and if a third party stepped in interested in Assange offering more to Manafort and seeing that time was up on Assange's protection, he may have helped make that deal go though while still trying to work a different Ecuador-U.S. deal.

It's like the tweets you posted, you sometimes just have to admire Manafort's commitment to his character.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26804 on: December 04, 2018, 01:50:19 AM »
In the Ukraine stuff he was doing, I don't remember the exact details of it, but I do remember noticing that Manafort had pretty much setup conditions to where he could switch off to a new set of parties if one of them went down. But Russia screwed him over when they started the Crimea stuff as he had to lock in with Yanukovych to protect his money or it'd flee to Russia too.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26805 on: December 04, 2018, 01:52:16 AM »
if the trump campaign was trying to get the hacked emails from wikileaks through secret channels doesn't that mean that they didn't have any real communications with russian intelligence agencies, which is kind of what the snappleopoulos thing showed before, too

For like, anybody that is not a sitting President this is irrelevant to whether or not there is a criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Russians.

Not everybody in the conspiracy needs to talk together or conspire together 1:1 for there to be a criminal conspiracy provable in court for prosecution. The statutes are broad to allow people to not skirt conspiracy with middle men.

Edit: I think the most obvious thing to charge trump with during the campaign is a conspiracy to defraud the United States. This is basically impeding government function in a general sense.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2018, 02:28:41 AM by kingv »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26806 on: December 04, 2018, 02:25:25 AM »
I think you're mistaken on some of the facts there. Seth Rich was killed by the Clintons for damaging the ticket sales to their theatre tour.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26807 on: December 04, 2018, 02:39:42 AM »
What's the conspiracy? Trump agrees to make concessions on Ukrainian policy, then Russia hacks the DNC, hands the emails to WikiLeaks, and then tells the Trump campaign they can send Roger Stone to pick up "Hillary's Emails" (which they weren't) from Julian Assange? That Wikileaks released publicly anyway? Or was it just that Trump would make the concessions, and Wikileaks would release it... but then why send this turdball?

It seems like the Trump campaign tried multiple times to be in cahoots with a Russian intelligence operation that was operating successfully on its own and then failed to make any connection at all until all the crimes had been committed. Including killing Seth Rich.

That’s the thing with conspiracy cases. They don’t actually have to be coordinating like via email or phone or whatever. The fact that they are coordinating, even if independently, to the same illegal goals, even if they didn’t actually accomplish said goal, is enough to establish a criminal conspiracy.

So like, theoretically, a situation where Russia is hacking Hillary’s emails to harm her in the election, and then providing them to Wikileaks independently, and then Trump is obfuscating on the source of those emails, while otherwise acknowledging that they were obtained criminally, is actually a criminal conspiracy, even if Trumo has never talked to a Russian. Never mind that he was doing this while also trying to obtain said emails.

Now I have no illusions that this will be enough for Republican step convict in impeachment. But theoretically there really would not be that much needed to indict,


kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26808 on: December 04, 2018, 02:44:47 AM »
I also think that we might see a conspiracy to obstruct justice come out, as Michael Cohen has already alleged that  there was an effort to get everybody to “get their story straight” before testifying before Congress and the grand jury.

Presuming that they are collaborating to lie, that is another criminal conspiracy.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26809 on: December 04, 2018, 02:57:38 AM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldDrumpf/status/1069584730880974849

"military is depleted"
"military needs more funding"
"we need more military"

"woah, why are we spending so much on the military guys" :trumps
Hi

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26810 on: December 04, 2018, 03:02:14 AM »
The statutes are broad to allow people to not skirt conspiracy with middle men.

I guess that's one way to look at it.

Occam

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26811 on: December 04, 2018, 07:49:18 AM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldDrumpf/status/1069584730880974849

"military is depleted"
"military needs more funding"
"we need more military"

"woah, why are we spending so much on the military guys" :trumps


Fun fact: This is a politically correct response, because Trump obviously is suffering from mental distinguished mentally-challenged.
504

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26812 on: December 04, 2018, 12:10:57 PM »
The statutes are broad to allow people to not skirt conspiracy with middle men.

I guess that's one way to look at it.

I think there’s room to criticize the prosecution of inchoate crimes, but these laws are needed in some fashion for society to function.

Otherwise it opens up complete lawlessness to anybody who’s basically a clear wordsmith or acts through intermediaries in an indirect way. Imagine the mob boss that just says “please take care of that thing in Chicago”. It’s the inchoate crime laws that then allow him to be prosecuted  for ordering a murder without saying “go murder Steve in Chicago”.

It’s also what allows the police to arrest people before they commit like a mass shooting or bombing. Without them, the police would not have far less power to stop terrorist attacks or mass shootings before they occur, even if they identify the perpetrators because oftentimes they’re not really doing anything illegal other than plotting a crime up until the moment they actually go out and start shooting people.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26813 on: December 04, 2018, 01:24:32 PM »
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/broward-sheriffs-office-demotes-qanon-cop-matt-patten-10940330
Quote
This past Friday, Broward Sheriff's Office SWAT member Matt Patten wore a QAnon conspiracy-theory patch while greeting Vice President Mike Pence at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. Today Patten was reprimanded and demoted from the SWAT team and BSO’s Office of Homeland Security.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/disgruntled-ex-employee-of-conspiracy-theorist-admits-shooting-him/2018/12/03/e5df4478-f719-11e8-8c9a-860ce2a8148f_story.html
Quote
A man who worked as an investigator for conspiracy theorist Jack Burkman will serve nine years in prison for shooting and wounding his ex-boss in a complicated plot involving a fake FBI exposé.

Kevin Doherty, 46, said little as Judge William T. Newman Jr. sentenced him Monday for malicious wounding and use of a firearm in commission of a felony, but he acknowledged the veracity of a set of facts read by Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Evie Eastman detailing his “serious falling out” with Burkman and the “grand ruse” he concocted in revenge.

Eastman said Doherty lured Burkman to a hotel parking garage in March with the false promise of turning over details of FBI misconduct.

“It was all pretend,” Eastman said.

During the hearing in Arlington Circuit Court, Newman imposed a 23-year prison term with 14 years suspended. In addition, Doherty, who pleaded guilty to both charges, must pay back with interest the $15,000 Burkman gave him for the nonexistent FBI documents.

Burkman told The Washington Post in March that he hired Doherty, a onetime Marine, to investigate the death of Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich. Burkman, a Republican lobbyist, has enmeshed himself in a conspiracy theory that Rich was killed for handing Democratic emails over to WikiLeaks. Law enforcement has deemed the homicide a botched street robbery, and Rich’s family has repeatedly sued right-wing news outlets for falsely reporting otherwise.

Doherty was supposed to build a psychological profile of Rich’s possible killer, but Burkman said in March that he and Doherty quickly came to loggerheads over control of the project. Burkman fired Doherty in July 2017.

In court, Eastman described the plot Doherty executed months later and how police tracked him down. Doherty sent Burkman emails pretending to have information “detrimental to the FBI.” Burkman paid Doherty $15,000 and arranged to pick up the documentation from under a traffic cone at the Key Bridge Marriott in Arlington on March 13.

When Burkman leaned over to get the documents, Eastman said, Doherty shot him twice in the buttocks with a rifle. Burkman fled up a parking ramp, carrying the traffic cone and his dog, Jack Jr. Doherty admitted he then ran down his former employer from behind the wheel of a black SUV.

Burkman suffered a broken arm, and two bullets remain lodged in his buttocks, Eastman said. His dachshund was not harmed.
Nintex, fan fiction, STAT.
"Do you have the files"
"Yes but if you go through with this there's no way back. You can't unsee what has been seen. You can't undo what has been done"
"Well it falls to me now to right this wrong, hand me the files"

"This...."
"Yes that's what I thought too"

"Ruki vverkh, dayte nam fayl!"
"DROP THE FILES AMERICAN, YOU SHALL NOT RUIN A NEAR PERFECT OPERATION"

"But why... why did Jared kill Seth Rich!"
*BANG*
"Aahh you shot me in the ass you maniac"

"Consider yourself lucky that you are still alive. If you ever try to look into this case again the bullets wil go straight into your head dovarich"

*later*

"Roger, it is done we have the files..."
"Good good, make sure it is the only copy"
🤴

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26814 on: December 04, 2018, 01:26:32 PM »
Stop
püp

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
« Last Edit: December 04, 2018, 02:33:23 PM by Madrun Badrun »

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26816 on: December 04, 2018, 02:47:28 PM »
I wonder who told Trump he couldn't nuke canada and mexico and he had to settle for signing a deal.
🤴

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
🤴

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26818 on: December 04, 2018, 04:15:19 PM »
What's the conspiracy? Trump agrees to make concessions on Ukrainian policy, then Russia hacks the DNC, hands the emails to WikiLeaks, and then tells the Trump campaign they can send Roger Stone to pick up "Hillary's Emails" (which they weren't) from Julian Assange? That Wikileaks released publicly anyway? Or was it just that Trump would make the concessions, and Wikileaks would release it... but then why send this turdball?

It seems like the Trump campaign tried multiple times to be in cahoots with a Russian intelligence operation that was operating successfully on its own and then failed to make any connection at all until all the crimes had been committed. Including killing Seth Rich.

That’s the thing with conspiracy cases. They don’t actually have to be coordinating like via email or phone or whatever. The fact that they are coordinating, even if independently, to the same illegal goals, even if they didn’t actually accomplish said goal, is enough to establish a criminal conspiracy.

So like, theoretically, a situation where Russia is hacking Hillary’s emails to harm her in the election, and then providing them to Wikileaks independently, and then Trump is obfuscating on the source of those emails, while otherwise acknowledging that they were obtained criminally, is actually a criminal conspiracy, even if Trumo has never talked to a Russian. Never mind that he was doing this while also trying to obtain said emails.

Now I have no illusions that this will be enough for Republican step convict in impeachment. But theoretically there really would not be that much needed to indict,

 Conspiracy to commit what crime?

The hack had already happened, the emails are after it was already public knowledge that more were coming.

I think that you could make a pretty good case even today for any of the following:
Conspiracy to:
- defraud the United States: https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us
- violate campaign finance laws (both from accepting foreign aid in a campaign and from the Stormy Daniels illegal campaign donation). This one seems to be basically open and shut. Michael Cohen pled guilty to it already more or less and directly implicated Donald Trump under oath.
- misprision of a felony from the Trump tower meeting, possibly. I don’t think we have enough information about the meeting to know for sure.
- violating Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for offering Putin $50 million to approve Trump Tower Moscow... or planning to do so
- violating us sanctions by planning to accept finances from a sanctioned bank in that process of finding financing for Trump Tower Moscow.

All of these are basically one or two public data points from being obviously proven. IMP some of them might look pretty obvious just from repackaging news stories and reading them chronologically.

This email people kind of forgot about (it’s real despite the dumb screen name, you can find it in the attached NY times story)

https://twitter.com/th3j35t3r/status/1032124237304086528


At the time Cohen said “Felix is a blowhard and didn’t know his head from his ass and we weren’t seriously working on Trump Tower Moscow”. I think the odds are that Cohen is not singing the same tune today to Mueller and this reads somewhat differently knowing that they were actually trying to get the deal done for Trumo Tower Moscow through at least mid 2016.

The overall conspiracy, I think might look something like this, though some of it is definitely conjecture.

- Trump wants to get Trump Tower Moscow done and be President
- Putin wants to get rid of sanctions
- Trump starts buttering up Putin in the Primary both publically through speeches that say good things about Russia with a conciliatory tone and actions in the convention and privately by offering up a $50 million condo to help get the deal approved
- Russia in the middle of these negotiations starts setting things up in a way that positions Trump to benefit personally from removing sanctions by taking a few actions:
       - they begin to privately support him through illegal donations to the NRA, illegally buying ads on Facebook/twitter/etc, hacking Hillary/DNC emails and laundering them through fake identities and Wikileaks.
      - they Veselnitskaya to trump tower to talk about gathering dirt on Hillary Clinton. During this meeting they suggest it would be positive to remove sanctions on Russian entities
      - they arrange funding for Trump Tower Moscow through a sanctioned, state owned bank (VTB), giving him a clear personal financial incentive to lift sanctions
- Trump puts the word out to his inner circle that they will lift sanctions. Flynn begins working on and communicating this, leading into Logan act violations and the communications where he eventually said Russian sanctions would be “ripped up” as one of the first acts of the Trump administration, freeing him up for one of his own corrupt side deals. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/us/politics/michael-flynn-russia-sanctions-ripped-up-whistleblower.html
- As the Logan Act violations happened, Trump began to lie about them and initiate a cover up
- Comey is fired as a heavy handed attempt at the cover up
- Trump engages in a pattern of lying to obfuscate the truth as part of the cover up
- Trump and other White House staff now enter a new conspiracy to cover up both the original scheme AND the cover up by 1) coordinating their testimony so that the lies don’t contradict 2) coordinating a strategy with Devin Nunes and the House Intelligence committee to impede the Congressional investigation.
- he does some minor witness tampering and further obstruction of justice on the way until firing sessions in some sort of last ditch effort to shut it all down.

Again there is some conjecture in there, but not all that much. And the important thing to understand about conspiracy laws is that the people don’t actually have to explicitly tell each other what each of them is doing or going  to do to further the conspiracy.

kingv

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| No Vote November
« Reply #26819 on: December 04, 2018, 04:18:20 PM »
Note that the Sater email was like 6 months before the hack.