Author Topic: US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP  (Read 6942846 times)

0 Members and 37 Guests are viewing this topic.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4320 on: March 16, 2017, 08:06:25 PM »
SENATE CATFIGHT


chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4321 on: March 16, 2017, 08:19:43 PM »
This seems like the entire conservative wing throwing up their hands and admitting no, they don't have any ideas on how to address healthcare.
There just isn't a solution that stays true to conservative-libertarian beliefs while also making sure people can get health care without being bankrupted.

Even so, it's impressive how badly this has been handled. Specifically, how does the GOP, as reliant on older voters as it is, create something that is so unfavorable to 50-64 year olds and gets the AARP lined up against them? It might still get passed out of desperation to avoid an L, but feels pretty amateurish so far.

I think they only practiced being an obstacle for the past 8 years, and have forgotten how to actually create effective legislature, only block it.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4322 on: March 16, 2017, 08:32:41 PM »
010


I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4324 on: March 16, 2017, 09:50:59 PM »
The healthcare problem is the system. Not who pays.
que

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4325 on: March 16, 2017, 10:11:43 PM »
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article138743333.html
Quote
It was a secret meeting about an existential crisis.

Gathered behind closed doors in a Denver hotel, 30 conservative Democrats plotted a potential path forward for their party – an effort to devise a strategy that might help them avoid total annihilation in red states across America.

These political moderates had been called together by former Alaska Sen. Mark Begich, and they showed up out of fear that their party is growing more liberal by the day, and less interested in their centrist positions.

Over a packed three-day schedule with a battery of presentations, the U.S. senators, former federal prosecutors, mayors and top Cabinet officials from the Obama administration in attendance talked about faith and religious voters, heard from a radio host about a medium typically reserved for conservatives and considered research suggesting that liberal priorities – like student loan debt – are just not a big deal.
Quote
Begich and other Democrats at the forum said they didn’t want to provoke the party’s progressive wing, which has argued vehemently since last year’s election that Democrats need to adopt the type of muscular liberal agenda advocated by former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, an independent Vermont senator. In interview after interview, the party centrists who attended said they could find enough common ground with the party’s left wing to avoid conflict.
Quote
The presentations helped the group arrive at four core values that would unite Democrats of all kinds, according to Begich: security, opportunity, compassion and results.

“If you’re an independent Democrat in Alaska, you care about those four issues,” Begich said.

“If you’re a liberal in California, do you care about those four issues? The answer is yes.”
Quote
Begich said research he’d seen showed that younger voters didn’t care nearly as much about student debt as some liberals believed. It’s led the party to advocate solutions for problems that people simply don’t care as much about, he said.

“It was shocking to me, honestly shocking,” Begich said. “Because I’m thinking OK, the liberal wing talks about these things, which on the surface are fantastic. But we as Democrats are talking about things where we think people should be, and where the population is is actually a little different.”

recursivelyenumerable

  • you might think that; I couldn't possibly comment
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4326 on: March 16, 2017, 10:14:53 PM »
This all happened because I finished paying off my student loans in 2015
QED

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4327 on: March 16, 2017, 11:34:14 PM »
my recommendations :stahp

*clicks video out of curosity* "Alright YouTube ... John McLame" :dead :dead :dead

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4328 on: March 16, 2017, 11:36:48 PM »
Quote
Styxhexenhammer666

For years I have created videos on a range of topics; politics, religion (and antireligion), gardening, current events, and philosophy. As an early arrival to Youtube, I have always disliked the concept of ad revenue, but being compensated for the rather massive amount of material I create is now a necessity. These extra funds will provide for better equipment, perhaps a better setup for content creation, and in the future, I hope, additional avenues for content creation altogether- perhaps live shows, and so forth. It will also ensure access to caffeine, which is very important for content creation.

My videos and written works are unrepentant and eclectic- I do not censor my views and never will. In today's somewhat numb world, I believe my video content is of value to everyone.

...

Quote
467
patrons

$2,686
per month
:goty2

El Babua

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4329 on: March 16, 2017, 11:38:37 PM »
Benji, did you realize your shitposts have value in the current market and you're not exploiting it?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4330 on: March 16, 2017, 11:42:32 PM »
he writes pamphlets too...*sets chair under fan...measures out rope*

http://tarlwarwickbooks.blogspot.com/

Quote
Against Corporate Media: Now Available!

CLICK TO PURCHASE

The third March manuscript I have constructed; a short tract detailing the evolution of, slow degeneration of, and various vices of, corporate media firms and their chosen platforms- their difficulty with the internet, their corruption and their fiscal and political backers' excuses for their constant propaganda.

Exposing truth is the best way to see that it is perpetuated; I am not satisfied with merely pointing to these things on the internet and decided the best way to further promulgate my ideological case against the MSM was through the use of a physical manifesto of sorts. The case I make here for resisting online censorship, decentralizing information dissemination, and ignoring corporate media is to the best of my ability succinct and complete.

38 pages.
Quote
Against Communism: Now Available!

CLICK TO PURCHASE

This short work is a pogrom against communism, as well as its various offshoots and "allies"- anarchism, socialism, and so forth. I could have written a 900 page manifesto against the ideology itself with ease but figured that wasn't prudent.

Communism is best attacked not with vague moral arguments but with an eye to evolution and biology; paired with an observation of its brief and violent history over the last century, communism is just another pile of trash in the garbage heap of non-working systems.

36 pages.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Quote
The Magic of the Middle Ages: Now Available!



CLICK TO PURCHASE

This work is Rydberg's finest- an academic compilation of subjects ranging from a treatment of the burning times, and of religious philosophy (dualism, specifically) to short passages on some cryptids of note, to various meanderings through the high ritual magick and alchemy of the era spoken of. Clearly hostile to Catholic lore, Rydberg manages to choke back his disdain of that church long enough to give it a fair shake at explaining its constant pogroms through especially the era of King James.

Its third section is a strange sort of quasi-fictional tale involving a group of men time traveling to the dark ages and confronting a sorcerer who is under the belief that he himself conjured them, written partly in the first person.

114 pages.
[close]

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4331 on: March 16, 2017, 11:52:46 PM »
i was clicking through his archive, he makes like five videos a day but more importantly he sometimes doesn't wear a shirt but keeps the leather jacket



i felt you all needed to know this

bluemax

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4332 on: March 17, 2017, 12:07:49 AM »
This guy makes $30k a year doing what most Poligaf posters do for free.
NO

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4333 on: March 17, 2017, 12:45:58 AM »
This seems like the entire conservative wing throwing up their hands and admitting no, they don't have any ideas on how to address healthcare.
There just isn't a solution that stays true to conservative-libertarian beliefs while also making sure people can get health care without being bankrupted.

Even so, it's impressive how badly this has been handled. Specifically, how does the GOP, as reliant on older voters as it is, create something that is so unfavorable to 50-64 year olds and gets the AARP lined up against them? It might still get passed out of desperation to avoid an L, but feels pretty amateurish so far.

I think they only practiced being an obstacle for the past 8 years, and have forgotten how to actually create effective legislature, only block it.

I'm not sure that is a new problem with the Republican party TBH.

This is the same party that under George W. Bush didn't realize that privatizing Social Security isn't magic.

They ran on scare tactics for years that Social Security was on the verge of collapse. Then when they decided to make good on the promise, all of the sudden shit isn't playing out like they convinced themselves it would.

Turns out if you want to divert money from the younger population currently paying into social security that props up incoming retirees, and shift it to your wall-street friends, you might need to find a viable way to make sure older people going into the system are still taken care of. Unless you want the people that tend to vote for you to end up pissed off and willing to throw you out in mid-terms.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4334 on: March 17, 2017, 12:47:38 AM »
Quote
Over a packed three-day schedule with a battery of presentations, the U.S. senators, former federal prosecutors, mayors and top Cabinet officials from the Obama administration in attendance talked about faith and religious voters, heard from a radio host about a medium typically reserved for conservatives and considered research suggesting that liberal priorities – like student loan debt – are just not a big deal.


Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4335 on: March 17, 2017, 01:04:30 AM »
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article138743333.html


I read the whole article twice and I still don't understand what these conservative Democrats stand for?

Perhaps that is the problem though? The conservative wing tries to constantly play it safe and low key, like they think any second they will be exposed and driven out. That they are on borrowed time. So they pull self-defeating shit like thinking red state voters will give two flying fucks that they keep a healthcare bill under a trillion dollars because thats what conservative radio is spamming, which then comes at the expense of subsidies to help people afford care. Who just vote you out then because they see their coverages drop and costs go up.

But for fucks sake, we have a president that just proved that at least several core Democratic principles, that the Democrats tried to downplay, in fact work really fucking well with lots of people in these areas. Shouldn't that be cause for celebration? That you now have tentpoles you can be passionate and honest about?
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 01:19:36 AM by Nola »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4336 on: March 17, 2017, 01:05:13 AM »
Quote
More than 4 million people tuned in on Tuesday to watch Ms. Maddow’s report on MSNBC, the biggest audience in her show’s nine years on the air. It was the third-ranked show across all of television at 9 p.m., beating the broadcast networks ABC and Fox.
Quote
excluding major events like elections, conventions and debates, her program on Tuesday was the second-highest rated show ever to air on MSNBC, the network said, narrowly missing a Keith Olbermann episode in October 2008.
:rejoice victory  :success
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 01:16:41 AM by benjipwns »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4337 on: March 17, 2017, 01:11:09 AM »
I read the whole article twice and I still don't understand what these conservative Democrats stand for?
Quote
The presentations helped the group arrive at four core values that would unite Democrats of all kinds, according to Begich: security, opportunity, compassion and results.

Nola

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4338 on: March 17, 2017, 01:18:13 AM »
I read the whole article twice and I still don't understand what these conservative Democrats stand for?
Quote
The presentations helped the group arrive at four core values that would unite Democrats of all kinds, according to Begich: security, opportunity, compassion and results.

Still got nothing.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4339 on: March 17, 2017, 01:39:50 AM »
Jeb!/McAuliffe 2020

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4340 on: March 17, 2017, 02:18:47 AM »
Imo someone needs to do a timelapse gif thing of Sean Spicer aging during his stint as Trump's press secretary

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4341 on: March 17, 2017, 02:38:18 AM »
Spicer hasn't seemed any worse than any of the other recent ones back to maybe Tony Snow who had years of polish to work from, it's a shitty job really and they all do the same thing because it's shit but the talking points and topics aren't too unusual from what I've watched which isn't too much. And I don't think it's necessarily about the person and the reporters seem to know that probably because of their off-the-record pre-game conference where they get to know the person more outside of the theatre of the live briefing. Robert Gibbs to me always looked like garbage but then as a CNN (I think) talking head he instantly became smarter just because he wasn't having to cover nine thousand butts at once. Dana Perino is kinda an adorable airhead but she looks way smarter giving her opinion, even if it's bad, on The Five than she ever did trying to cover up Bush garbage from every angle.

I do think there may be something to the media cycle burning them out faster. I thought you could see when Jay Carney was like fuck this how many more days do I have left during certain questions after he announced he was leaving. Joe Lockhardt had that look during Clinton's impeachment and then when he was working for the John Kerry campaign.

i enjoyed this though (~2:55)

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4342 on: March 17, 2017, 02:41:53 AM »
Nah brah. Spicer has a tougher job than the vast majority of prior press secretaries I think. He has to go out there and try to defend random stupid shit that Trump tweets about at 4am. And this man fights tooth and nail over it.  :lol

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4343 on: March 17, 2017, 02:56:31 AM »
I don't know, it's all theatre from my perspective. Spicer was attacking Trump for the RNC a year ago. He just has to talk in circles until the clock runs out and the day's a win.

If SNL hadn't picked up on them, would anyone who doesn't work within walking distance of the Orange Line even be paying attention to these? Even in that case it sounded like Trump was more upset than Spicer. :lol

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4344 on: March 17, 2017, 02:59:45 AM »
Quote
Spicer on Monday was traveling aboard Air Force One from Florida to Washington, D.C., and gamely shrugged off the spoof that was playing in loops on cable news throughout the day.

McCarthy “needs to slow down on the gum chewing; way too many pieces in there,” he joked in an interview with Extra.
Quote
More than being lampooned as a press secretary who makes up facts, it was Spicer’s portrayal by a woman that was most problematic in the president’s eyes, according to sources close to him.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4345 on: March 17, 2017, 03:04:54 AM »
I dunno, talking in circles for an hour, and aggressively so has to wear on a person eventually. Sometimes I listen to these press conferences and  I'm all like :mindblown

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4346 on: March 17, 2017, 03:05:58 AM »
Sometimes I listen to these press conferences
:trumps

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4347 on: March 17, 2017, 03:07:38 AM »
I have a very long commute to work

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4348 on: March 17, 2017, 04:08:12 AM »
Nah brah. Spicer has a tougher job than the vast majority of prior press secretaries I think. He has to go out there and try to defend random stupid shit that Trump tweets about at 4am. And this man fights tooth and nail over it.  :lol

If I lived in an area with gambling, I'd be betting on Spicey's inevitable heart attack.

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4349 on: March 17, 2017, 01:33:38 PM »
Quote
Business Income Tax Changes

Taxes income derived from pass-through businesses at a maximum rate of 25 percent.

Allows the cost of capital investment to be fully and immediately deductible.

Allows net operating losses to be carried forward indefinitely, and increased by a factor reflecting inflation and the real return to capital.

Does not allow net operating losses to be carried back.

Restricts the deduction for net operating losses to 90 percent of net taxable income.

Creates a fully territorial tax system, exempting 100 percent of dividends from foreign subsidiaries from U.S. tax.

Enacts a deemed repatriation of currently deferred foreign profits, at a tax rate of 8.75 percent for cash and cash-equivalent profits and 3.5 percent on other profits.

lol

On a tangential note, I'm shocked (just shocked) the goofy consumption tax that's part of this was previously advocated for in a Center for American Progress paper.

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4350 on: March 17, 2017, 02:43:11 PM »
Quote
Business Income Tax Changes

Taxes income derived from pass-through businesses at a maximum rate of 25 percent.

Allows the cost of capital investment to be fully and immediately deductible.

Allows net operating losses to be carried forward indefinitely, and increased by a factor reflecting inflation and the real return to capital.

Does not allow net operating losses to be carried back.

Restricts the deduction for net operating losses to 90 percent of net taxable income.

Creates a fully territorial tax system, exempting 100 percent of dividends from foreign subsidiaries from U.S. tax.

Enacts a deemed repatriation of currently deferred foreign profits, at a tax rate of 8.75 percent for cash and cash-equivalent profits and 3.5 percent on other profits.

lol

On a tangential note, I'm shocked (just shocked) the goofy consumption tax that's part of this was previously advocated for in a Center for American Progress paper.


jjjjjeeeeeeesssssssssssssuuuusssss
rub

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4351 on: March 17, 2017, 06:52:52 PM »
I don't know, it's all theatre from my perspective. Spicer was attacking Trump for the RNC a year ago. He just has to talk in circles until the clock runs out and the day's a win.

If SNL hadn't picked up on them, would anyone who doesn't work within walking distance of the Orange Line even be paying attention to these? Even in that case it sounded like Trump was more upset than Spicer. :lol

Trump often reviews and critiques his Press Conferences in spicer face, and has been vocal in how Spicer was not his firs choice for the job. Is clear he  feels the pressure of getting yelled by Trump. 

I mean, I don't envy  his position but I don't feel bad for him as he still gets a big fat paycheck to be the Bitch Mouth's of Trump
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 07:03:47 PM by Boredfrom »

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4352 on: March 17, 2017, 07:08:51 PM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/842724011234791424

Impotent twitter rage of an United States President will never not be funny / terrifying.
ὕβρις

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4353 on: March 17, 2017, 07:48:51 PM »
North Korea is a shithole that tries to troll US and gets some pass from China. News at 11.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4354 on: March 18, 2017, 01:28:40 AM »
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/842724011234791424

Impotent twitter rage of an United States President will never not be funny / terrifying.

Maods help!
©@©™

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4355 on: March 18, 2017, 01:42:16 AM »
It's been years so I'm pretty fuzzy on the details, but I remember the Bush 2 administration scrapping the Agreed Framework, spouting off some tough talk, then eventually settling for a re-branded version of the same deal.

They also criticized the nuclear "freeze" so they had to find another word when they went back to that policy IIRC.

Basically I'm saying I hope this is comically empty bluster, rather than a step towards some horrific mistake.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4357 on: March 18, 2017, 05:10:59 AM »
The real answer is that he's playing it up for his base because she's "invited" all the refugees.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4358 on: March 18, 2017, 05:51:10 AM »
Twitter are super doom and glooming about NK and somebody even brought up selective service concerns. But here everyone just kind of rolls their eyes at all this dumbfuckery. :-[
Hi

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4359 on: March 18, 2017, 10:14:52 AM »
Twitter are super doom and glooming about NK and somebody even brought up selective service concerns. But here everyone just kind of rolls their eyes at all this dumbfuckery. :-[

As much as I loathe my own democrats for inaction and have a hate-on for republicans who have 180º turned around and are now backing The Donald, it is pretty clear that they would stand united against careless actions which would involve mobilizing China. Invading North Korea without REALLY pissing off China is all but impossible. China doesn't so much care about NK, but they do not want a US military presence on an adjacent border.

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4361 on: March 18, 2017, 01:25:16 PM »
North Korea is a shithole that tries to troll US and gets some pass from China. News at 11.

Using VX in the middle of an airport is taking it to a new level. 

Kara

  • It was all going to be very admirable and noble and it would show us - philosophically - what it means to be human.
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4362 on: March 18, 2017, 03:35:04 PM »
When the DPRK kicks America's ass again, will we be able to switch to Red Star OS? Windows has frankly been mailing it in since 7 and I have mild aspirations to be productive when I use a computer so Mac OS is clearly a non-starter.

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4363 on: March 18, 2017, 03:44:07 PM »
Twitter are super doom and glooming about NK and somebody even brought up selective service concerns. But here everyone just kind of rolls their eyes at all this dumbfuckery. :-[

As much as I loathe my own democrats for inaction and have a hate-on for republicans who have 180º turned around and are now backing The Donald, it is pretty clear that they would stand united against careless actions which would involve mobilizing China. Invading North Korea without REALLY pissing off China is all but impossible. China doesn't so much care about NK, but they do not want a US military presence on an adjacent border.
'What about China?' was one of my first thoughts, but this admin is so stupid that they might go in anyway. Bannon has claimed he sees war with China as inevitable in the next 5-10 years.
Hi

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4364 on: March 18, 2017, 04:35:06 PM »
I bet Bannon has no idea of what most of his supposedly professed beliefs entails or even how making them happen outside of telling Trump BS.

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4365 on: March 18, 2017, 06:04:06 PM »
When the DPRK kicks America's ass again, will we be able to switch to Red Star OS? Windows has frankly been mailing it in since 7 and I have mild aspirations to be productive when I use a computer so Mac OS is clearly a non-starter.

removed sudo

:hhh

rub

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4366 on: March 18, 2017, 09:52:00 PM »
When sudo is outlawed, only outlaws will be able to run programs using the "outlaw" account privileges.
©@©™

Trent Dole

  • the sharpest tool in the shed
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4367 on: March 19, 2017, 01:05:19 AM »
Hi


Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
010

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4370 on: March 19, 2017, 02:13:35 PM »
That bitch is the type to drink half a red cup of Milwaukee's Best at a house party and puke for hours.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4371 on: March 19, 2017, 02:30:24 PM »
Remember when Joe Biden sonned Paul Ryan and we thought his career was done? This guy just keeps oozing his way back.  :usacry
©@©™

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4372 on: March 19, 2017, 03:01:10 PM »
"fuck you, pay me!" is now officially US foreign policy

Eh, that has been their policy for countries in Latin America.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4373 on: March 19, 2017, 06:50:20 PM »
'What about China?' was one of my first thoughts, but this admin is so stupid that they might go in anyway. Bannon has claimed he sees war with China as inevitable in the next 5-10 years.
I bet Bannon has no idea of what most of his supposedly professed beliefs entails or even how making them happen outside of telling Trump BS.
The man is everyone's unwanted, opinionated, alcoholic right-wing uncle with whom people avoid conversation at Thanksgiving dinner. I had hoped that Trump would keep Bannon on a tighter leash after the fallout from being unaware that he'd signed Bannon onto the NSC.


When the DPRK kicks America's ass again, will we be able to switch to Red Star OS? Windows has frankly been mailing it in since 7 and I have mild aspirations to be productive when I use a computer so Mac OS is clearly a non-starter.
SHOTS FIRED

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4374 on: March 19, 2017, 06:51:32 PM »
"fuck you, pay me!" is now officially US foreign policy
Particularly ironic that this is Trump's hill to die on, when he's notorious for shirking payment despite in-place contracts.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4375 on: March 19, 2017, 07:31:39 PM »
OK, third consecutive post (BAD FORM, sorry) but this is it before I go to work:
https://storify.com/JenHayden/former-u-s-ambassador-to-nato-forced-to-educate-do

Jesus Fucking H. Christ, Trump is the least competent President the USA has ever had. At what point do we admit that Designated Survivor is now escapist wish-fulfillment?

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4376 on: March 20, 2017, 02:15:44 AM »
OK, third consecutive post (BAD FORM, sorry)
:patel

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4377 on: March 20, 2017, 02:43:32 AM »
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-deep-state-20170319-story.html
Quote
Here's what Trump supporters mean when they talk about the 'deep state'
Quote
For starters, what does the term mean?

The Oxford dictionary defines a “deep state” like this: “A body of people, typically influential members of government agencies or the military, believed to be involved in the secret manipulation or control of government policy.”
Quote
What have Trump’s allies said about a deep state?

Quite a lot, actually.

Breitbart News, which Trump senior advisor Stephen K. Bannon once oversaw, has published several pieces in recent weeks alleging that a deep state exists in America.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Trump supporter throughout last year’s presidential campaign, told the Associated Press recently that a deep state definitely exists.

“There’s a permanent state of massive bureaucracies that do whatever they want and set up deliberate leaks to attack the president,” he said. “This is what the deep state does: They create a lie, spread a lie, fail to check the lie and then deny they were behind the lie.”

Fox News host Sean Hannity, a friend of Trump, opened a show recently by claiming there are “deep-state Obama holdovers embedded like barnacles in the federal bureaucracy … hell-bent on destroying President Trump.”
Quote
So, is there actually a deep state in America?

Probably not.

“What the current administration believes to be the American deep state seems to be little more than the time-honored practice of leaking information to journalists in Washington,” Cook said.

There may be more leaks now “because there are a lot of civil servants who apparently disagree with this administration,” he said. “There is no evidence of a cabal intent on overthrowing the administration.”

Trump’s recent setbacks are not an orchestrated attempt to overthrow him, but a natural part of government’s checks and balances, experts say.
Quote
Have past administrations talked about a deep state?

Not in the same way as the Trump administration, but some have offered hints.

In his farewell address in 1961, President Eisenhower famously warned about the “unwarranted influence” of the “military-industrial complex,” a term that he never clearly defined but that conspiracy theorists latched onto.

Deep-state conspiracies emerged about the 1963 assassination of President Kennedy, but they have been largely debunked.

And some allies to President Nixon — who resigned in August 1974 because of the Watergate scandal — alluded to the deep state as the root of his downfall. Nixon, like Trump, had a fractious relationship with the press, calling it “the enemy.”
so they mean the same thing as everyone else who has ever used the term? i feel so much more informed, thank you, kurtis lee

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4378 on: March 20, 2017, 02:53:18 AM »
OK, third consecutive post (BAD FORM, sorry)
:patel
:-*

https://twitter.com/American_Bridge/status/842773013456191490

Paul Ryan's version of exploited/college party porn is very different from ours.

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: U.S. Politics Discussion Thread |OT| Twilight in America
« Reply #4379 on: March 20, 2017, 07:53:51 AM »
He called his mom Keg?

Weird.
rub