US Politics Thread |OT| SAD TRUMP

[Skullfuckers Anonymous]

"A deeper relationship" bruh, you're just skipping work with another head of state.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/986711015630036992

You clearly have no clue how Japanese culture works. Trump is incredibly close to maxing out his social link with Abe.

[Joe Molotov]

I wonder how bad Trump cheats when he's golfing with Abe.

[Nintex]

I wonder how bad Trump cheats when he's golfing with Abe.

"I'm so Sorry Mr. Trump but you can't move the ball with your hands. That is against the rules of Golf"

"THIS IS MY GOLF COURSE SHINZO, I CAN DO THE FUCK I WANT TO BEAT YOUR ASS"

https://twitter.com/OfficeOfMike/status/987025964080291841
Rescind court order
Execute order 69
Commence Swamp Drain
Trump knows
Q
 

[hungrynoob]

hungryboob unironically posting a video from a channel called "anti school" is pitch perfect

I dont care about anything other than the event itself.

[TakingBackSunday]

hungryboob unironically posting a video from a channel called "anti school" is pitch perfect

I dont care about anything other than the event itself.

that much is clear

[Nintex]

https://twitter.com/business/status/987052287515348993

 

Yesss let the fuckery continue 

[agrajag]

Rosenstein trying to A)save his job, B)keep Mueller and his investigation alive. They never announced that Trump was the target of the investigation, only that he may become one in the future. I don't really see the fuckery in this news.

[Nintex]

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/987063833230495744

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/987060278851522566

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/987064876727226369

The Comey interviews make little sense.

[agrajag]

Not really.

The first point was known since he got fired (that he tried to "trigger" the special investigation), he said that in an interview months ago.

As for the second tweet, he may believe that Trump won legitimately, but also believe that Trump obstructed justice by firing him, and wants that investigated, and also may want to see the Russia investigation to its end.

Edit: not sure what's going on with the third tweet, I am missing context.

[Skullfuckers Anonymous]

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/19/rudy-giuliani-is-joining-president-trumps-personal-legal-team-for-the-mueller-probe.html

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani is joining President Donald Trump's personal legal team to help represent Trump in the special counsel's investigation.

Another Trump attorney on the probe, Jay Sekulow, confirmed the move to NBC News.

"I'm doing it because I hope we can negotiate an end to this for the good of the country and because I have high regard for the president and for Bob Mueller," Giuliani told The Washington Post.

Giuliani is a close ally of the president's and was a top Trump supporter on the campaign trail.

 

Now Trump can say "9/11" instead of having to plead the 5th!

[agrajag]

Now THIS is grade A fuckery!

 

[kingv]

https://twitter.com/business/status/987052287515348993

 

Yesss let the fuckery continue 

Its the same target vs subject discussion that has previously been discussed over the last few weeks.

[Nintex]

The Trump expanded universe is fucking incredible.

All the bois are back to the yard. 

The movie should be titled:

"Mar-a-lago"

Giuliani said he formalized his decision in recent days, including over dinner last week at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

[agrajag]

The movie should be titled:

"Mar-a-lago"

This but instead of a movie it should be a Curb Your Enthusiasm styled sitcom.

[Nintex]

http://twitter.com/DanaBashCNN/status/987088249364639745

Rudy thinks he can wrap the whole thing up in a couple of weeks. 

[agrajag]

Gee, where have I heard that before?

[agrajag]

patience, grasshopper

[hungrynoob]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?444272-1/democrats-back-farm-bill-leader-pelosi

13 minute mark

When??

[Mandark]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?444272-1/democrats-back-farm-bill-leader-pelosi

13 minute mark

When??

Presumably in the 90's or during GWB's first term? There have been a few congressional delegations to visit North Korea.

[hungrynoob]

https://www.c-span.org/video/?444272-1/democrats-back-farm-bill-leader-pelosi

13 minute mark

When??

Presumably in the 90's or during GWB's first term? There have been a few congressional delegations to visit North Korea.

Well if thats true and it had been hidden from public knowledge, then there will be sufficient evidence surrounding said visit and it's purpose.

[Mandark]

Well if thats true and it had been hidden from public knowledge, then there will be sufficient evidence surrounding said visit and it's purpose.

Yeah, there is and you can go find it.

edit: When you find/are shown evidence of the visit, and are shown that it was on the public record at the time, is that going to make you reassess your paranoia at all? Like even a tiny bit?

[hungrynoob]

Well if thats true and it had been hidden from public knowledge, then there will be sufficient evidence surrounding said visit and it's purpose.

Yeah, there is and you can go find it.

edit: When you find/are shown evidence of the visit, and are shown that it was on the public record at the time, is that going to make you reassess your paranoia at all? Like even a tiny bit?

Been looking.

Started this post to say i found nothing only evidence ive seen anywhere is from nancy herself. https://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/71317-8/ tacked onto a haphazard wiki article that said she first admitted it in 2019. (Edited now someone is editing the article as we speak).

Apart from last year before that no mention of it anywhere, unless you can show me what else, until then i think my post still stands.

Buying/selling intel. Lets see. 

[Mandark]

So when I find this for you and show you that it was publicly documented at the time, you going to reconsider this Dale Gribble shit?

[hungrynoob]

Im going to stop you there for the sake of honesty, youre working on the presupposition that you understand the intention of my posts. Im merely highlighting something relevant. You are asking me to drop the paranoia act in the face of evidence, without the CONTEXT surrounding the intention of my posts.

[Great Rumbler]

Im merely highlighting something relevant.

Relevant to what?

[Mandark]

Im going to stop you there for the sake of honesty, youre working on the presupposition that you understand the intention of my posts. Im merely highlighting something relevant. You are asking me to drop the paranoia act in the face of evidence, without the CONTEXT surrounding the intention of my posts.

Okay, you want to just bet cash instead?

[hungrynoob]

Im merely highlighting something relevant.

Relevant to what?

Well the leaker asks if Pompeii more senior official to visit SINCE pelosi, so already acknowledge that her admittance is true. So why would I be highlighting that?

[Great Rumbler]

Your original post on this subject presents us with NOTHING. Other than that Pelosi said she's been to Pyongyang before and that somehow this is concerning to you or something. What in the hell are we supposed to glean from this?

[Mandark]

So the question is, given evidence that this trip was public knowledge when it happened (which contradicts q saying it was an "error" to admit having gone), does that change the way you view anything?

Cause if not, what's the point?

[hungrynoob]

Okay so if the trip was public knowledge what significance is there that her wiki page was updated after this span interview to say she first admitted it in April 2019 ( must have been rushed ) WHILST citing the link I provided to then be amended later? If it was public knowledge and she admitted it in 2017, why is this important that it wasn't there before?

[Boredfrom]

Because Wikipedia doesn’t know shit?

[agrajag]

                                                                                             

[Mandark]

hungry, if I show you evidence that this trip was public information at the time, how are you going to respond?

This is a very simple question.

[Great Rumbler]

Okay so if the trip was public knowledge what significance is there that her wiki page was updated after this span interview to say she first admitted it in April 2019 ( must have been rushed ) WHILST citing the link I provided to then be amended later? If it was public knowledge and she admitted it in 2017, why is this important that it wasn't there before?

Because a dude who goes around updating Wiki pages for fun saw some commotion about it and decided to add it to the page?

[Phoenix Dark]

i know I shouldn't do this but can someone give me a TLDR of what the hell is going on with this hungryhippo dude. What trip are we talking about.

[Great Rumbler]

He's just reposting Q-ANON 4Chan conspiracy nonsense.

[CatsCatsCats]

God, I love conspiracy shit, it’s really too bad none of it pans out into something interesting. Show receipts, bois

[agrajag]

Guys holy shit guys check Wikipedia RIGHT NOW it says Donald Trump is going to prison

[Mandark]

i know I shouldn't do this but can someone give me a TLDR of what the hell is going on with this hungryhippo dude. What trip are we talking about.

q-anon/the storm

Dude posting cryptic nonsense on 4chan, which his followers interpret as Trump waging a secret war against the Deep State, and it's all going to be revealed, with Hillary/Obama/Comey/etc. all being thrown in prison Any Day Now.

The latest thing is Pelosi mentioned a visit she made to Pyongyang in the context of how severe the poverty is there. They're all "aha! she fucked up and admitted she's been to North Korea!" cause apparently she's selling them intel or nuclear secrets or whatever?

[hungrynoob]

hungry, if I show you evidence that this trip was public information at the time, how are you going to respond?

This is a very simple question.

When you search Nancy pelosi  north Korea visit on google, how easily accessible is this information, and why are the top results the media emphasising only the cspan mention if it's so insignificant?

[Mandark]

hungry, answer my question.

[Great Rumbler]

I just watched a press conference from last year where she says pretty much exactly the same thing she did today. What a slip up!

[agrajag]

I just watched a press conference from last year where she says pretty much exactly the same thing she did today. What a slip up!

How shameful, the deep state prevented Wikipedia from alerting the public last year. This is an attack on our country!

[hungrynoob]

hungry, answer my question.

I did. I would respond with the same question. The significance isn't necessarily the evidence itself but why it's important the media is making a deal about her admittance earlier.

Edit



Hmm
https://ibb.co/gPnUz7

[Mandark]

I'm not talking about her mentioning it last year (which you keep referring to as 2019 instead of 2017). I'm talking about showing it was public knowledge at the time it happened.

When I show you that, how are you going to react? Quit dodging the question.

[agrajag]

we have a time traveler among us

[hungrynoob]

I'm not talking about her mentioning it last year (which you keep referring to as 2019 instead of 2017). I'm talking about showing it was public knowledge at the time it happened.

When I show you that, how are you going to react? Quit dodging the question.

I'm not disputing you have the evidence at all, if you have the evidence then in regards to the context - it works in favour of the insinuation of q drops so please keep a hold of it and think about what I'm referring to.

[Mandark]

No, q is insinuating that this trip to North Korea was somehow a secret because Pelosi was doing something untoward. The trip being publicly known and talked about at the time contradicts that.

Don't be dumber than normal, man.

[Mandark]

Get the fuck off 4chan.

peterson stans, man. amirite?

[thehunter116]

Can we have Cindi back yet this new guy isn't funny nor original.

[Mandark]

I will say "how come this very minor event decades in the past isn't at the top of the results for my Google search using rudimentary terms?" as evidence for an active cover-up is a good example not just of hungryboob being dumb, but of our general expectations of the accessibility of information in 2018.

Quod qui non in Google est, non est.

[hungrynoob]

No, q is insinuating that this trip to North Korea was somehow a secret because Pelosi was doing something untoward. The trip being publicly known and talked about at the time contradicts that.

Don't be dumber than normal, man.

If you think so, I'm going to ask again why is the media making a deal about this if it's nothing and been public knowledge prior? Why is it hard to find on google? What is possibly being hidden by the European data protection act pertaining to search keywords "Nancy Pelosi North Korea visits"

Edit: lol

[agrajag]

 

[Mandark]

If you think so, I'm going to ask again why is the media making a deal about this if it's nothing and been public knowledge prior?

Elaborate.

[TakingBackSunday]

No, q is insinuating that this trip to North Korea was somehow a secret because Pelosi was doing something untoward. The trip being publicly known and talked about at the time contradicts that.

Don't be dumber than normal, man.

If you think so, I'm going to ask again why is the media making a deal about this if it's nothing and been public knowledge prior? Why is it hard to find on google? What is possibly being hidden by the European data protection act pertaining to search keywords "Nancy Pelosi North Korea visits"

Edit: lol

Bro do you even know what GDPR is and what it entails?  There are many numerous reasons as to why so something would be hidden via those words.  Many sites are in violation of it.

[Phoenix Dark]

whew lads. I'm out

[Boredfrom]

No, q is insinuating that this trip to North Korea was somehow a secret because Pelosi was doing something untoward. The trip being publicly known and talked about at the time contradicts that.

Don't be dumber than normal, man.

If you think so, I'm going to ask again why is the media making a deal about this if it's nothing and been public knowledge prior? Why is it hard to find on google? What is possibly being hidden by the European data protection act pertaining to search keywords "Nancy Pelosi North Korea visits"

Edit: lol

Holy Fuck, you are an idiot...

[agrajag]

You gotta love how persistently stupid this guy is

[hungrynoob]

That's just my experience and I'll concede that data protection act hidden is nothing more than coincidence, but the former half of that question still stands.

[Mandark]

What do you mean "the media is making a big deal" of it? Citation needed.