Author Topic: The Other Forums Thread for 90's Kids ONLY  (Read 2864931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10380 on: January 17, 2018, 08:09:49 PM »
The point in that interview where the light goes on in Cathy Newman's head is great. 

Atramental

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10381 on: January 17, 2018, 08:12:31 PM »


Clean your room.

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10382 on: January 17, 2018, 08:12:59 PM »
That why are you not in a relationship thread is cringey beyond belief.

Dennis

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10383 on: January 17, 2018, 08:16:57 PM »
That cardboard babby Nintendo

 :dead :dead :dead

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10384 on: January 17, 2018, 08:19:34 PM »
Peterson thread already closed. :lol


Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10385 on: January 17, 2018, 08:20:49 PM »
Is Peterson off limits on Reset?

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10386 on: January 17, 2018, 08:21:26 PM »
Peterson thread already closed. :lol

Predictable. I knew the shit would hit the fan.

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10387 on: January 17, 2018, 08:22:18 PM »
What so special about Peterson? They have threads on Trump daily and he's hated there. 

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10388 on: January 17, 2018, 08:28:13 PM »
What so special about Peterson? They have threads on Trump daily and he's hated there.

Nothing other than he opposes the trans legislation in Canada. That's the reason they hate him.

Raist

  • Winner of the Baited Award 2018
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10389 on: January 17, 2018, 08:28:43 PM »
What so special about Peterson? They have threads on Trump daily and he's hated there.

He's a white alt-right racist sexist nazi straight cishet scumlord. Or something.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10390 on: January 17, 2018, 08:29:57 PM »
Well, that interview had a host who asked every slanderous thing she could and kept misrepresenting Peterson over and over, and he calmly and jovially corrected her repeatedly until about the 24 min mark where she realized her entire career was proof of his point.

So that vid is open discussion in action which leads to the ignorant person learning something when the ignorant person sounds a lot like Reset members. To reset, something like that should be marked as radioactive.

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10391 on: January 17, 2018, 08:31:18 PM »
Well, that interview had a host who asked every slanderous thing she could and kept misrepresenting Peterson over and over, and he calmly and jovially corrected her repeatedly until about the 24 min mark where she realized her entire career was proof of his point.

So that vid is open discussion in action which leads to the ignorant person learning something when the ignorant person sounds a lot like Reset members. To reset, something like that should be marked as radioactive.

The reactions were just bizarre.  Dude is really hated.  Wouldn't think Reset would be so easy to poke. 

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10392 on: January 17, 2018, 08:35:11 PM »
Well, that interview had a host who asked every slanderous thing she could and kept misrepresenting Peterson over and over, and he calmly and jovially corrected her repeatedly until about the 24 min mark where she realized her entire career was proof of his point.

So that vid is open discussion in action which leads to the ignorant person learning something when the ignorant person sounds a lot like Reset members. To reset, something like that should be marked as radioactive.

lol

The whole interview was basically a huge 'got you' attempt. I've never watched an interview where the journalist asking the questions is so hoplessly desperate to make the interviewee trip up somewhere. She was throwing everything at him including the kitchen sink.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10393 on: January 17, 2018, 08:56:41 PM »
Is Peterson off limits on Reset?

Going by the mod post it's more that those threads turn to shit rather than that Peterson is a person non-grata, but I suppose that doesn't matter all that much as the outcome is the same

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10394 on: January 17, 2018, 09:22:45 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic. 

I thought he was going to be another Alex Jones type based on the responses on Reset.

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10395 on: January 17, 2018, 09:24:49 PM »
How is that guy a christian?
*****

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10396 on: January 17, 2018, 09:33:18 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.


Odrion

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10397 on: January 17, 2018, 09:35:30 PM »
it's like that webcomic meme of the reasonable author and the unreasonable strawman except it's real and i want to die
._.

Assimilate

  • Now bringing you *Zen*
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10398 on: January 17, 2018, 09:36:13 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Clean your room.

 :dead


This alone will trigger the entirety of retardreset

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10399 on: January 17, 2018, 09:38:57 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.


Yeah, he corrected the interviewer on that.  I guess I don't see why he's so represented.  And he seems to have tons of video on YT so it should be easy to get a gotcha.  He seems more of a non-insane Canadian Conservative.

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10400 on: January 17, 2018, 09:43:36 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.


Yeah, he corrected the interviewer on that.  I guess I don't see why he's so represented.  And he seems to have tons of video on YT so it should be easy to get a gotcha.  He seems more of a non-insane Canadian Conservative.

Yeah. It is simply to do with him having the audacity to oppose the legislation full stop. That is it. In their minds only a disgusting neo-nazi alt-right racist transphobe would do such a thing. They then make a bunch of spurious claims to try and prove their assumptions.

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10401 on: January 17, 2018, 09:49:33 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.

Pretty much.  The stupid thing is that he's apparently misrepresenting the law that he complains about.  He's created a dystopian idea that he is leading the charge against which doesn't seem to be in the pipe line at all. 
sigh

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10402 on: January 17, 2018, 09:56:37 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.

Pretty much.  The stupid thing is that he's apparently misrepresenting the law that he complains about.  He's created a dystopian idea that he is leading the charge against which doesn't seem to be in the pipe line at all.

I've heard that too. Although, I've also heard that Peterson didn't outright claim it is meant to be used that way, only that the language is vague enough it could be interpreted that way. This is something that happenss all the time I think. The NSA's secret interpretations spring to mind. In that regard, the Lindsay Shepherd affair was said by a number of people to kind of prove his point on that.

That said, in terms of the state actually using it in that way, that may be more unlikely. Of course whether he is right or wrong, it is kind of irrelevant.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10403 on: January 17, 2018, 10:02:37 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.

Pretty much.  The stupid thing is that he's apparently misrepresenting the law that he complains about.  He's created a dystopian idea that he is leading the charge against which doesn't seem to be in the pipe line at all. 

Some lawyers claim he misrepresents the bill, but he was advised by a lawyer on the bill who backed his reading of the code. Though it's a shell game with the truth here. The bill itself cannot do all that he claims, but the bill feeds into the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal which then can issue fines and set standards. So it's not the bill by itself, but the other law departments it connects to that create the compelled speech issue.

The Lindsey Shepherd thing is an example of how once put into code, and with the threat of the human rights tribunal, organizations looking to legally cover their ass will view it just as Peterson claims.

You can also look at the Dear College letter in regards to Title IX. The letter is not law and never states to directly take away fair hearings, but the threat of the letter and how it gives activists power lead to colleges violating student rights during investigations.

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10404 on: January 17, 2018, 10:04:21 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-we-talk-about-the-god-of-war-direction.17186/

Quote
I justcouldn't get enough of Krato's brutality and brashness. I can identify with the character on so many levels, but that's neither here nor there. Fast forward to the initial reveal of the new God of War...I'm lost!

admit that you identify with Psychopaths :kobeyuck

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10405 on: January 17, 2018, 10:06:05 PM »
So I listened to the interview.  30 minutes.  Nothing he said seemed unreasonable.  Seems like he's misrepresented, unless there is more that is missing. Also, he seems to have billions of YT videos. No time for that, but I couldn't find anything remotely transphobic.

No there isn't anythign transphobic about his viewpoint. He does not believe that compelled speech should be written into law. In other words, he does not believe anyone has to right to compel someone else to use whatever pronoun they wish to be identified by. It has nothing to do with whether or not you actually do refer to someone by their preferred pronoun, it's the written into law bit he objects to. As he said, he is quite happy to call someone 'she' if they want to be called 'she'.

A lot of it is to do with 'gender-neutral pronouns' anyway. Most trans people conform to the gender-binary. They are quite happy to be called 'he' or 'she'.

Pretty much.  The stupid thing is that he's apparently misrepresenting the law that he complains about.  He's created a dystopian idea that he is leading the charge against which doesn't seem to be in the pipe line at all. 

Some lawyers claim he misrepresents the bill, but he was advised by a lawyer on the bill who backed his reading of the code. Though it's a shell game with the truth here. The bill itself cannot do all that he claims, but the bill feeds into the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal which then can issue fines and set standards. So it's not the bill by itself, but the other law departments it connects to that create the compelled speech issue.

The Lindsey Shepherd thing is an example of how once put into code, and with the threat of the human rights tribunal, organizations looking to legally cover their ass will view it just as Peterson claims.

You can also look at the Dear College letter in regards to Title IX. The letter is not law and never states to directly take away fair hearings, but the threat of the letter and how it gives activists power lead to colleges violating student rights during investigations.

The Title IX thing is actually a really good example. The Dear colleague letter actually changed the way Colleges interpreted Title IX.

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10406 on: January 17, 2018, 10:09:26 PM »
Quote
Tomorrow we will begin running ads on ResetEra! Check out The Big Funding Update for all the details.

welp lets see if they can manage to not be as bad as neogafs use to be

Shuri

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10407 on: January 17, 2018, 10:10:13 PM »
3.99$ a month for an adless version of REsetera  :busta

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10408 on: January 17, 2018, 10:13:54 PM »
Is kind of gross how excelsiorlef tries to pretend she was not a unreasonable shithead in a lynch mob just a day ago about the Grace debacle.

Quote
I think what is really interesting is that this has exposed an absolute generational gap between older feminists and younger feminists (and no Way's behaviour is not representative of all younger feminists).

It's also the divide again between an older "No Means No" and a newer "Yes means Yes"

It's unfortunate that all these older feminists (well except Flannigan she's just an anti-feminist) opted to go fult tilt on attacking Grace rather than trying to encourage a broader discussion where Aziz's career isn't destroyed (and really he's gonna fine) and we talk about how to create a society where pressuring and pressuring for sex is seen as universally unacceptable.

All thse women are absolutely acting as gatekeepers for what is MeToo... but fuck MeToo isn't even just for women, are we forgetting about Spacey and Singer?

Jesus, you were calling him names a day ago...

BadAss2961

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10409 on: January 17, 2018, 10:17:32 PM »
3.99$ a month for an adless version of REsetera  :busta
:tauntaun

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10410 on: January 17, 2018, 10:23:07 PM »
Anyway I wanted to comment on this post:

https://www.resetera.com/posts/3433056/
Quote
Fuck Jordan Peterson. This asshole rakes in thousands of dollars every month telling alt-righters what they want to hear.

The reason I bring attention to it is because by a funny coincidence I watched a youtube video yesterday, purely because it was in the related section. It was a video by Matt Christiansen. Never watched one of his videos before and quite enjoyed it. It wasn't about Jordan Peterson, but one of is other videos was and I watched that as well. The reason i bring it up is because I think this person got their information from the same article Matt Christiansen criticises.

BadAss2961

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10411 on: January 17, 2018, 10:33:06 PM »
Looks like GAF switching over to XenForo was a mistake. The old design was outdated, but familiar. Became its identity over the years. The one thing it had left... Now it's just #metooERA.

Shit is deader than fried chicken. Evilore might be bagging groceries soon.

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10412 on: January 17, 2018, 10:33:11 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/joe-biden-tells-complaining-millennials-give-me-a-break.17197/

Joe Biden is now an alt-right Nazi, the chicken tendies have hit the fan.

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10413 on: January 17, 2018, 10:40:36 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/jordan-peterson-interview-on-channel-4-news.17170/

lol
The guy asks Reset what they think.

I wonder what they think...
Didnt really know this dude apart from that interview with the bald social studies idiot and he seems super reasonable in the face of stupid arguements, hence I can see why he makes gaf mad  :playa


TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
serge

El Babua

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10416 on: January 17, 2018, 10:51:58 PM »
Joe Biden is an old, out of touch Democrat that will probably lose to Trump if the party decides it wants to be Republican-lite for 2020.

Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10417 on: January 17, 2018, 10:57:48 PM »
Looks like GAF switching over to XenForo was a mistake. The old design was outdated, but familiar. Became its identity over the years. The one thing it had left... Now it's just #metooERA.

Shit is deader than fried chicken. Evilore might be bagging groceries soon.

I think Resetera/Xenforo looks like crap compared to the old GAF design.  The modern features are nice, I guess, but it's ugly and feels more bloated. 

Aside from the color scheme, GAF on XF is even worse than Resetera.

Maybe I'm old fashioned but I thought old GAF looked good and easy to use both on desktop and mobile.
They should switch back imo.

Not that it would save the site, obv.

Let's Cyber

  • Banned (duration pending)
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10418 on: January 17, 2018, 11:14:12 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)
lmao, GAF Gold is real.

Dennis is currently throwing money at his 8k monitor.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10419 on: January 17, 2018, 11:17:36 PM »
$40 a year? How much are their server costs that they are charging that much for adblock and zero extra services? Giant Bomb is $50 a year and I get a shirt and a ton of premium videos on top of adblocking.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10420 on: January 17, 2018, 11:19:04 PM »
That Babe.com thread is really something and about to get locked.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10421 on: January 17, 2018, 11:34:27 PM »
3.99$ a month for an adless version of REsetera  :busta

lol That was fast. But I can't blame them. Listening to the morons that stuck around.

Let's Cyber

  • Banned (duration pending)
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10422 on: January 17, 2018, 11:34:42 PM »
I love that Cerium has to address how it sounds like a fucking cult. :lol :lol :lol

"We're working on the branding at this time, but no you're not joining a cult. Trust me.  ;) Ok now everybody line up to give me their money and you'll all get your own cup of kool-aid"

I'd love to have been a fly on the wall while they tried to figured out who gets paid and how much.

 :money

Cravy

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10423 on: January 17, 2018, 11:37:26 PM »
Maybe it's a reference to that Scientologist sex cult evilore bravely fought his way out of.

The thing to do is have ads, a sub and slap a PayPal button on there. Milk your audience.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10424 on: January 17, 2018, 11:42:01 PM »
"It's not a cult. Cults tend to promise you something in return. We just want you to pay us for the privilege of  providing us the content and the traffic."

Hot Slice

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10425 on: January 17, 2018, 11:46:20 PM »
I PROUDLY pay 20 USD a year for 4Chan Pass.

Asking 40-48 USD a year on an unproven forum is honestly excessive.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10426 on: January 17, 2018, 11:47:02 PM »
You just know 'Lore is SEETHING at how many people will admit to adblocking GAF but whitelisting this board AND possibly subbing. With how much "GAF Gold" was joked about, 'Lore was a moron to not jump on the chance to milk his audience like these people.

I honestly didn't expect REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*autistic screeching sub* to happen within 5 months, but here we are.

El Babua

  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10427 on: January 17, 2018, 11:50:58 PM »
A lot of things Evilore could have done, he didn't cause he was too lazy.

Idk if it'll give him any self reflection, but I can totally relate to being lazy.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10428 on: January 17, 2018, 11:53:08 PM »
also at least half the people who say they are whitelisting are lying.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10429 on: January 17, 2018, 11:53:57 PM »
I PROUDLY pay 20 USD a year for 4Chan Pass.

:girlaff Not just adblocking Hiroshim00t's ads and doing the captcha.

Hot Slice

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10430 on: January 17, 2018, 11:58:34 PM »
I PROUDLY pay 20 USD a year for 4Chan Pass.

:girlaff Not just adblocking Hiroshim00t's ads and doing the captcha.
4chan pass also gives you a pass-since command and lower cooldowns. That and I don’t want 4chan to ever die, it’s been the best community I’ve ever been a part of, with true acceptance and equality. I’ve been going there for over a decade, and I don’t plan on stopping anytime soon.

Point is, the board is proven and the pass is only 20 USD. The site has earned my loyalty and support. This is over double that, and is sill unproven. I am surprised they didn’t offer some introductory deal.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10431 on: January 18, 2018, 12:01:51 AM »
lower cooldowns.

What the hell are you shitposting that you can't wait a minute between posts? :doge

Hot Slice

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10432 on: January 18, 2018, 12:03:54 AM »
lower cooldowns.

What the hell are you shitposting that you can't wait a minute between posts? :doge
I post in multiple threads at once, and story time and post image sequences very often. You know what “The Ride” is? It’s every Sonic comic ever...

And we might actually start it again if we get enough conductors. Lower cooldowns helps immmensly for these threads
« Last Edit: January 18, 2018, 12:24:48 AM by Hot Slice »

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10433 on: January 18, 2018, 12:04:59 AM »
Someone proudly give me money please
fat

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10434 on: January 18, 2018, 12:05:16 AM »
I post in multiple threads at once,

So do I and I never have needed to remove the cooldown given the number of posts in the threads. /v/, /vg/, /b/, /tg/, /soc/, or /lgbt/.

Quote
and story time and post image sequences daily often. You know what “The Ride” is? It’s every Sonic comic ever...

And we might actually start it again if we get enough conductors.

Oh, ok. So you're autistic and easily ignored on the board. Got it. Well enjoy wasting your $20, I guess.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10435 on: January 18, 2018, 12:07:45 AM »
Someone proudly give me money please

Give us some pet butthole.
serge

Assimilate

  • Now bringing you *Zen*
  • Senior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10436 on: January 18, 2018, 12:09:23 AM »
Someone proudly give me money please

Only if you bring back Novid  :doge

Hot Slice

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10437 on: January 18, 2018, 12:18:30 AM »
Someone proudly give me money please
Do it in the style of Something Awful, where you can pay to dick around with someone’s username and such.

Sai

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10438 on: January 18, 2018, 12:23:45 AM »
lower cooldowns.

What the hell are you shitposting that you can't wait a minute between posts? :doge
I post in multiple threads at once, and story time and post image sequences daily often. You know what “The Ride” is? It’s every Sonic comic ever...

And we might actually start it again if we get enough conductors. Lower cooldowns helps immmensly for these threads
what the fuck
ilysm

Hot Slice

  • Junior Member
Re: The Other Forums Gentlemen's Thread for Refined Discussion of Uncouth Behavior
« Reply #10439 on: January 18, 2018, 12:25:52 AM »
It’s one of those things that either you get or you don’t, and that’s cool too.   8)