Speaking about MJ, what's your stance on the matter? I feel there's too much money in play to give people who lied under oath the benefit of the doubt. Yes, they could've lied because they were groomed. Just like they can be lying now for monetary purposes. Not to mention that the documentary itself is one-sided and caught in many proven lies. But still, that could be explained by fuzzy memory from the alleged victims. It's all just too convenient.
It didn't really bother me until I read that Jim Brooks was going to remove the MJ episode from the archive.
It's almost as if they forgot...
...their own satire about overly dramatic TV crap.