Author Topic: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible  (Read 3800117 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5280 on: March 24, 2019, 05:01:47 PM »
at least they'll learn their lesson about deifying and trusting a lifelong cop

#Kamala2020

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5281 on: March 24, 2019, 05:02:03 PM »
the reeeeee fell for this the same way their parents fell for trickle down economics  :mueller :mueller :mueller
*****

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5282 on: March 24, 2019, 05:04:42 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces
imagine how Kirblar feels, he still has six days

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5283 on: March 24, 2019, 05:06:00 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces
imagine how Kirblar feels

Don’t ever wish that on me again you motherfucker

The pent up sexual aggression.... :/

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5284 on: March 24, 2019, 05:08:43 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces
imagine how Kirblar feels, he still has six days

Dude is probably pounding away the the screen anyway.

Something something korean war justified this report
:O


Lonewulfeus

  • Former Unofficial Ambassador to ResetEra
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5286 on: March 24, 2019, 05:15:09 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces

We all wish you weren’t banned from RE  :fbm

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5287 on: March 24, 2019, 05:17:32 PM »
*****

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5288 on: March 24, 2019, 05:19:49 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces

We all wish you weren’t banned from RE  :fbm

I guess triggering you is a good enough second place.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5289 on: March 24, 2019, 05:23:03 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces

We all wish you weren’t banned from RE  :fbm

I guess triggering you is a good enough second place.

Meme Marrec.

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5290 on: March 24, 2019, 05:23:07 PM »
Guys stay safe out there

Quote
Also heads up that ResetEra is currently being inundated with bad actors and it’s pretty obvious.

Its worse than you could think

Quote
It's weird when it's a user I recognize

Wow they had sleeper accounts playing the long game.


From the same poster:

Quote
Reading Twitter. My bad, sure. But there are three main credible theories happening:

1. This is so bad that NatSec stuff is happening behind the scenes and Barr/Rosentein put a good face on it to buy time while it unfolds. There’s a lot more to see here.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/us-poliera-2019-ot3-its-finally-happening.101959/page-279
:O

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5291 on: March 24, 2019, 05:25:36 PM »
Don't tell me that there actually is no pee pee tape

Lonewulfeus

  • Former Unofficial Ambassador to ResetEra
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5292 on: March 24, 2019, 05:26:16 PM »
God I wish I wasn’t banned so I could told you so all over their faces

We all wish you weren’t banned from RE  :fbm

I guess triggering you is a good enough second place.

 ::) :shaking

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5293 on: March 24, 2019, 05:34:46 PM »
Quote
Have fun living in a hellworld ruled by fascists because you're too afraid to fight.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5294 on: March 24, 2019, 05:36:00 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/us-poliera-2019-ot3-its-finally-happening.101959/page-268#post-19170111

Cheebo why u lyin' ?
Cheebs was throwing a fit over Bernard hiring someone who didn't vote for Hillary in New York City, but he's already decided he's not going to support a number of hypothetical Democratic nominees in a key swing state huh

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5295 on: March 24, 2019, 05:36:12 PM »
Quote
Most people never cared about the Russia investigation to begin with.

 :marimo

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5296 on: March 24, 2019, 05:36:32 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.
ὕβρις

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5297 on: March 24, 2019, 05:40:13 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

The Trump admin would never lie to you, citizen!
:O

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5298 on: March 24, 2019, 05:40:31 PM »
The house still needs to act on __________________.

zepblackstar

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5299 on: March 24, 2019, 05:41:57 PM »

THE SLEEPER HAD AWAKEN!!!!! THE SPICE WILL FLOW
Quote
It's weird when it's a user I recognize

Wow they had sleeper accounts playing the long game.


 


thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5300 on: March 24, 2019, 05:51:17 PM »
So, Trump isn't being taken out in handcuffs, huh?

:trumps ALL I DO IS WIN :trumps </pol>

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5301 on: March 24, 2019, 05:51:22 PM »
lol "sleeper account" they are in full pants-on-head mode now.

Jansen

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5302 on: March 24, 2019, 05:59:42 PM »

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5303 on: March 24, 2019, 06:11:00 PM »
There's also a subplot with a DOJ plane used for extraordinary rendition that was in London and Assange apparently freaking out because of a supposed increase of plainclothes under the Embassy's windows. The plane has left London and headed back to the US. It's all very exciting but I don't really see how exactly Assange could have been arrested short of his own volition or some massive diplomatic violations, him being in an embassy and everything.

Quote
I'm pretty confident that the US has Assange or someone from wikileaks and will announce it tomorrow at a news conference. No tweets from them since the plane left London.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/us-poliera-2019-ot3-its-finally-happening.101959/page-280#post-19182599
ὕβρις

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5304 on: March 24, 2019, 06:12:31 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

benita

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5305 on: March 24, 2019, 06:17:21 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/rob-gronkowski-announces-retirement.107385/#post-19182731

Quote
I really hope he gets into gay porn but I doubt it will happen


Tsk tsk. If this were a female athlete this dude would have been "inappropriate commentary"d to the shadow realm by now.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5306 on: March 24, 2019, 06:18:29 PM »
There's also a subplot with a DOJ plane used for extraordinary rendition that was in London and Assange apparently freaking out because of a supposed increase of plainclothes under the Embassy's windows. The plane has left London and headed back to the US. It's all very exciting but I don't really see how exactly Assange could have been arrested short of his own volition or some massive diplomatic violations, him being in an embassy and everything.

Quote
I'm pretty confident that the US has Assange or someone from wikileaks and will announce it tomorrow at a news conference. No tweets from them since the plane left London.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/us-poliera-2019-ot3-its-finally-happening.101959/page-280#post-19182599
they seem to think Assange is the only person who tweets from the Wikileaks account?

and that like the entire organization wouldn't be screaming its head off about this, all their contacts (like alt-right leader Glenn Greenwald) were doing that when it was rumored there had been a deal made with Ecuador to kick him out

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5307 on: March 24, 2019, 06:20:56 PM »
Well, at least is a relief that Trump is possibly just grossly incompetent to the point of making itself look like he was part of a massive conspiracy than just being part of it.

pgtl_10

  • Junior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5308 on: March 24, 2019, 06:21:50 PM »
Quote
Also, Glenn Greenwald was right about collusion even if you hate him.

Yep all that hate on Resetera against Glenn who is vindicated here.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5309 on: March 24, 2019, 06:22:04 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

Sure. Dems are pushing for the report as the DOJ summary implies there could be some evidence for obstruction there. But unless they're mangling the content something fierce (which I wouldn't put past them...) "the Special Counsel hasn't found that any member of the campaign colluded with the Russian government" is pretty plain, cut and dry.

We'll see, I guess.
ὕβρις

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5310 on: March 24, 2019, 06:24:23 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

Sure. Dems are pushing for the report as the DOJ summary implies there could be some evidence for obstruction there. But unless they're mangling the content something fierce (which I wouldn't put past them...) "the Special Counsel hasn't found that any member of the campaign colluded with the Russian government" is pretty plain, cut and dry.

We'll see, I guess.

The new theory is that collusion was with totally independent Russian nationals
:O

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5311 on: March 24, 2019, 06:24:55 PM »
You can't find evidence to disprove that something super vauge happened.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5312 on: March 24, 2019, 06:27:26 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

Sure. Dems are pushing for the report as the DOJ summary implies there could be some evidence for obstruction there. But unless they're mangling the content something fierce (which I wouldn't put past them...) "the Special Counsel hasn't found that any member of the campaign colluded with the Russian government" is pretty plain, cut and dry.

We'll see, I guess.

Still, it would be interesting given that report briefing says “doesn’t exonerate him”, that sounds oddly specific.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5313 on: March 24, 2019, 06:29:10 PM »
You can't find evidence to disprove that something super vauge happened.

That is the thing, why even mentioning it?

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5314 on: March 24, 2019, 06:30:20 PM »
You can't find evidence to disprove that something super vauge happened.

This isn’t proving a negative that’s different because I know in my heart what the truth is!!

halfanhourglass

  • Junior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5315 on: March 24, 2019, 06:30:35 PM »
You can't find evidence to disprove that something super vauge happened.

Not with that attitude.

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5316 on: March 24, 2019, 06:32:07 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

Sure. Dems are pushing for the report as the DOJ summary implies there could be some evidence for obstruction there. But unless they're mangling the content something fierce (which I wouldn't put past them...) "the Special Counsel hasn't found that any member of the campaign colluded with the Russian government" is pretty plain, cut and dry.

We'll see, I guess.

Still, it would be interesting given that report briefing says “doesn’t exonerate him”, that sounds oddly specific.

I mean, it says that because it’s true, the scope of the investigation wasn’t to prove the Trump Campaign guilty or to exonerate them.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5317 on: March 24, 2019, 06:32:18 PM »
You can't find evidence to disprove that something super vauge happened.

This isn’t proving a negative that’s different because I know in my heart what the truth is!!

That Trump is an incompetent scumbag that just wasted everyone time because he cannot stop acting like a mob boss?

zepblackstar

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5318 on: March 24, 2019, 06:34:47 PM »
Trump became a billionaire in the late 70's  thru 80's in NYC which was as corrupt as it came  in the world between the police, mob, wall street and somehow made it out without jail time. He knows how to do shady shit but put enough space between him and it for deniability

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5319 on: March 24, 2019, 06:35:00 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

Sure. Dems are pushing for the report as the DOJ summary implies there could be some evidence for obstruction there. But unless they're mangling the content something fierce (which I wouldn't put past them...) "the Special Counsel hasn't found that any member of the campaign colluded with the Russian government" is pretty plain, cut and dry.

We'll see, I guess.

Still, it would be interesting given that report briefing says “doesn’t exonerate him”, that sounds oddly specific.

I mean, it says that because it’s true, the scope of the investigation wasn’t to prove the Trump Campaign guilty or to exonerate them.

Then why is everyone freaking out?  :donot

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5320 on: March 24, 2019, 06:35:34 PM »
It's because the second mandate of the Special Counsel was so broad to include literally anything, which is why he charged Manafort for crimes that had absolutely nothing to do with the Trump campaign or Russia simply because Manafort lied to him and he had the power to fold any investigation into his own:
Quote
The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confinned by then-FBI
Director James 8. Corney in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence on March 20, 2017, including:
(i) any links and/or coordination bet ween the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and
(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5321 on: March 24, 2019, 06:36:31 PM »
You can't find evidence to disprove that something super vauge happened.

This isn’t proving a negative that’s different because I know in my heart what the truth is!!

That Trump is an incompetent scumbag that just wasted everyone time because he cannot stop acting like a mob boss?

We didn’t need a years long investigation into that my dude we all already know this truth.

Depending on how hard you stan for white people you will react to these facts differently.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5322 on: March 24, 2019, 06:41:36 PM »
Oh god there's still some "Wait for the full report guys, those Twitter insiders have sources !". I can certainly buy that the DoJ is putting a spin on it but unless Barr and Rosenstein are straight up lying about the conclusions, there's no trump card here.

It seems that the report still doesn’t paint a “perfectly legal picture” as Nintex is sperging. It seems they just didn’t found enough evidence to say either way.

Sure. Dems are pushing for the report as the DOJ summary implies there could be some evidence for obstruction there. But unless they're mangling the content something fierce (which I wouldn't put past them...) "the Special Counsel hasn't found that any member of the campaign colluded with the Russian government" is pretty plain, cut and dry.

We'll see, I guess.

Still, it would be interesting given that report briefing says “doesn’t exonerate him”, that sounds oddly specific.

That's specifically with regards to the obstruction charge, isn't it ? Or did I misunderstand that ?
ὕβρις

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5323 on: March 24, 2019, 06:41:45 PM »
Clinton's impeachment stemmed from Ken Starr doing the same thing. Starr was appointed to investigate Whitewater and "anything" related to the investigation. Starr used this power to fold not only investigations regarding the White House Travel office, the White House (possibly in Hillary's office) accessing personal FBI files of people and civil cases against Bill Clinton for sexual harassment into his investigation and then Clinton lied to Starr about not having sex with Lewinsky. In the end nobody even cared about Whitewater, the Travel Office, FBI files or anything else, not even Starr because he had got an easy "win" by catching Clinton in a crime against his investigation. But Starr also couldn't exonerate anyone for the previous things because it's not his job to prove they didn't do it.

Mueller's easy "wins" were against people like Flynn and Manafort lying to his investigation. Also the Russians who never left Russia and didn't even bother to cover up their actions because they probably never plan on leaving Russia. (I mention this because Russia makes a point of not extraditing its citizens under almost any circumstance possible. No one charges them with crimes actually expecting to prosecute them normally.)
« Last Edit: March 24, 2019, 06:51:24 PM by benjipwns »

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5324 on: March 24, 2019, 06:46:38 PM »
Mueller left no stone unturned (literally). If he had found something on Don Jr., Kushner or Ivanka he would've questioned them.
In fact, given the Kushner and Trump family history it is astounding that he found nothing to pressure them with like he did with Manafort, Cohen and Flynn.

But the writing was already on the wall that this went nowhere when Manafort was caught for crimes he did prior to the Trump campaign and Hicks and others close to the family walked away after just a few rounds of questioning.
🤴

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5325 on: March 24, 2019, 06:53:12 PM »
You can pretty much stonewall any investigation that doesn't know what crimes it's investigating if you don't talk to it.

Nuitangg

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5326 on: March 24, 2019, 06:59:32 PM »
Quote
I dont believe it for a second. Release the whole report to the public. This summary is a lie.

:hans1

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5327 on: March 24, 2019, 07:03:26 PM »
The whole Mueller investigation was the center of the cover up from the start. :rollsafe

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5328 on: March 24, 2019, 07:18:07 PM »
stop editing  :stahp
*****

PogiJones

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5329 on: March 24, 2019, 07:22:05 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-exactly-is-the-deal-with-this-%E2%80%9Canti-sjw%E2%80%9D-bullshit-in-the-gaming-community.107390/post-19184063

I'll answer your question here, OP.

Yes, many are racists or misogynists that only want white men represented. I don't, however, believe that most are that way. I think most just want to be colorblind again. Let me explain.

When I was growing up, Samus was one of my favorite characters. She wasn't a woman to me, she was just Samus. Same with every other character. Same goes for movies.  Ripley wasn't a woman, she was Ripley. All I cared about was the character.

Even as recently as my undergrad years, I had a buddy I met in college I didn't even notice was of Asian descent until someone mentioned it months later. Perhaps that was because his name was Lawrence, but regardless. Race, gender, etc., were pretty insignificant to me.

Then I started browsing forums like GAF. Everything became about color, everything became about gender. And now I find myself noticing the race and gender of most characters. And I don't like noticing, because those surface-level characteristics are the most shallow elements of a character.

Now, I get that some of you may say, "It's good that you're noticing, because now we can fix the inequality." I get that, and I get the sentiment. But the bottom line is I don't like seeing race and gender first. I've been pushed into it by this huge focus on race and gender.

So to answer your question, OP: Why are so many people "anti-SJW"? Because they wish they could go back to being colorblind/genderblind. They want to go back to how they used to feel about characters. But they probably can't. Now that we've been so focused on representation as a society, we're all bound to notice. And that's uncomfortable, because many of us were raised on the notion that making race or gender an important factor is wrong.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2019, 07:37:23 PM by PogiJones »

ResetBanBot

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5330 on: March 24, 2019, 07:22:05 PM »
It's pretty funny watching people try to aggressively bite into a nothing-burger for 2+ years.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5331 on: March 24, 2019, 07:27:51 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-exactly-is-the-deal-with-this-%E2%80%9Canti-sjw%E2%80%9D-bullshit-in-the-gaming-community.107390/post-19184063

I'll answer your question here, OP.

Yes, many are racists or misogynists that only want white men represented. I don't, however, believe that most are that way. I think most just want to be colorblind again. Let me explain.

When I was growing up, Samus was one of my favorite characters. She wasn't a woman to me, she was just Samus. Same with every other character. Same goes for movies.  Ripley wasn't a woman, she was Ripley. All I cared about was the character.

Even as recently as my undergrad years, I had a buddy I met in college I didn't even notice was of Asian decent until someone mentioned it months later. Perhaps that was because his name was Lawrence, but regardless. Race, gender, etc., were pretty insignificant to me.

Then I started browsing forums like GAF. Everything became about color, everything became about gender. And now I find myself noticing the race and gender of most characters. And I don't like noticing, because those surface-level characteristics are the most shallow elements of a character.

Now, I get that some of you may say, "It's good that you're noticing, because now we can fix the inequality." I get that, and I get the sentiment. But the bottom line is I don't like seeing race and gender first. I've been pushed into it by this huge focus on race and gender.

So to answer your question, OP: Why are so many people "anti-SJW"? Because they wish they could go back to being colorblind/genderblind. They want to go back to how they used to feel about characters. But they probably can't. Now that we've been so focused on representation as a society, we're all bound to notice. And that's uncomfortable, because many of us were raised on the notion that making race or gender an important factor is wrong.

 :delicious

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5332 on: March 24, 2019, 07:29:35 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-exactly-is-the-deal-with-this-%E2%80%9Canti-sjw%E2%80%9D-bullshit-in-the-gaming-community.107390/post-19184063

I'll answer your question here, OP.

Yes, many are racists or misogynists that only want white men represented. I don't, however, believe that most are that way. I think most just want to be colorblind again. Let me explain.

When I was growing up, Samus was one of my favorite characters. She wasn't a woman to me, she was just Samus. Same with every other character. Same goes for movies.  Ripley wasn't a woman, she was Ripley. All I cared about was the character.

Even as recently as my undergrad years, I had a buddy I met in college I didn't even notice was of Asian decent until someone mentioned it months later. Perhaps that was because his name was Lawrence, but regardless. Race, gender, etc., were pretty insignificant to me.

Then I started browsing forums like GAF. Everything became about color, everything became about gender. And now I find myself noticing the race and gender of most characters. And I don't like noticing, because those surface-level characteristics are the most shallow elements of a character.

Now, I get that some of you may say, "It's good that you're noticing, because now we can fix the inequality." I get that, and I get the sentiment. But the bottom line is I don't like seeing race and gender first. I've been pushed into it by this huge focus on race and gender.

So to answer your question, OP: Why are so many people "anti-SJW"? Because they wish they could go back to being colorblind/genderblind. They want to go back to how they used to feel about characters. But they probably can't. Now that we've been so focused on representation as a society, we're all bound to notice. And that's uncomfortable, because many of us were raised on the notion that making race or gender an important factor is wrong.
sounds like you're suffocated in a white guilt shithole everyday, you don't need it online  :smug
*****

halfanhourglass

  • Junior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5333 on: March 24, 2019, 07:40:46 PM »
This is what happens when you lionize a federal investigator for doing his job, placing bets that he will save you at the second with the Trumps being led out the White House in cuffs.

Remember all those 5D chess theories re:Mueller’s investigation?

Forced fake leaks w/ controlled misinfo sent out to various news sources to lull Don Jr. in a sense of security so as to arrest the dude.

Mueller denying allegations actually being made on a technicality? That it was all spiritually true, and that Mueller was just winking at us Twitter obsessed weirdos who had it all understood?

 :doge

There was some MisterXmedia level of interpretation going on.

Although for the record I do still believe there is a second and perhaps third gpu hidden inside the xbox one.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5334 on: March 24, 2019, 07:41:53 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/what-exactly-is-the-deal-with-this-%E2%80%9Canti-sjw%E2%80%9D-bullshit-in-the-gaming-community.107390/post-19184063

I'll answer your question here, OP.

Yes, many are racists or misogynists that only want white men represented. I don't, however, believe that most are that way. I think most just want to be colorblind again. Let me explain.

When I was growing up, Samus was one of my favorite characters. She wasn't a woman to me, she was just Samus. Same with every other character. Same goes for movies.  Ripley wasn't a woman, she was Ripley. All I cared about was the character.

Even as recently as my undergrad years, I had a buddy I met in college I didn't even notice was of Asian descent until someone mentioned it months later. Perhaps that was because his name was Lawrence, but regardless. Race, gender, etc., were pretty insignificant to me.

Then I started browsing forums like GAF. Everything became about color, everything became about gender. And now I find myself noticing the race and gender of most characters. And I don't like noticing, because those surface-level characteristics are the most shallow elements of a character.

Now, I get that some of you may say, "It's good that you're noticing, because now we can fix the inequality." I get that, and I get the sentiment. But the bottom line is I don't like seeing race and gender first. I've been pushed into it by this huge focus on race and gender.

So to answer your question, OP: Why are so many people "anti-SJW"? Because they wish they could go back to being colorblind/genderblind. They want to go back to how they used to feel about characters. But they probably can't. Now that we've been so focused on representation as a society, we're all bound to notice. And that's uncomfortable, because many of us were raised on the notion that making race or gender an important factor is wrong.
I'll answer your question here, OP.

shut the fuck up


james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5335 on: March 24, 2019, 07:42:02 PM »
Mueller's easy "wins" were against people like Flynn and Manafort lying to his investigation.

Hold on, hold on.

The experts at Poliera repeatedly told me that folks like Flynn and Gates were given very light sentences because sometimes you let the small fish go as you focus in on the big fish. It's all about cutting deals to make an air-tight case against individual 1.

What happened?
:O

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5336 on: March 24, 2019, 07:44:01 PM »
Hold on, hold on.

The experts at Poliera repeatedly told me that folks like Flynn and Gates were given very light sentences because sometimes you let the small fish go as you focus in on the big fish. It's all about cutting deals to make an air-tight case against individual 1.

What happened?
Mueller was the biggest milkshake fish of all.

And CNN/MSNBC/WaPo were helping him all along with their hype.

Tripon

  • Teach by day, Sleep by night
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5337 on: March 24, 2019, 07:47:17 PM »
Mueller's easy "wins" were against people like Flynn and Manafort lying to his investigation.

Hold on, hold on.

The experts at Poliera repeatedly told me that folks like Flynn and Gates were given very light sentences because sometimes you let the small fish go as you focus in on the big fish. It's all about cutting deals to make an air-tight case against individual 1.

What happened?

Uh, if we're just looking at the results, apparently the mastermind is Roger Stone.

james

  • Donate to the JAMES FUND
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5338 on: March 24, 2019, 07:47:35 PM »
All I know is that I get 100% of my news and analysis on Poliera, and nothing makes sense anymore
:O

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #5339 on: March 24, 2019, 07:48:50 PM »
All I know is that I get 100% of my news and analysis on Poliera, and nothing makes sense anymore
To be fair, Kirblar's been banned for two weeks now, so we've been relying on people who can't read faster than TV Cable News people can speak. Who knows what we've missed.