Author Topic: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible  (Read 5036358 times)

0 Members and 43 Guests are viewing this topic.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45420 on: September 25, 2019, 11:35:08 AM »
Quote
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-do-people-associate-the-a-from-lgbtqia-with-ally-rather-than-asexual.143100/


Funny how the most prolific "Why women criticise...." poster also happens to be asexual. Not that there's anything wrong with that but doesn't seem like that's a topic where they can give a lot of input

FunSlower

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45421 on: September 25, 2019, 11:35:46 AM »
I'm surprised mods haven't locked the Kotankus topic. Wondering if they'll send Jason Shirtbag a PM telling him to quit or else his site will be blacklisted among other blacklisted outlets like Colby Moriatorium.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45422 on: September 25, 2019, 11:36:58 AM »
The Last of Us murders a child in the opening sequence... I really don't know what anyone expected other than more manipulative storytelling.

Yes but you fail to see the important details, such as being white and not kissing another girl.

 :wag

ND never even gave her the chance to be a gay black woman.  :tocry
©@©™

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45423 on: September 25, 2019, 11:42:35 AM »
Quote
That story admits that some of the stuff in the transcript is yikes too. Is careful to frame it as legal... But as yikes.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/pelosi-announces-formal-impeachment-inquiry-into-president-trump.142962/post-24840527

Didn't read the article because yikes but like there's probably some good point hidden somewhere behind all this child porn - like, focus on consenting adults with chemistry instead of... the very stuff in the article. But don't actually show the child porn like yikes what the fuck.
:hmm



Yikes!  But really, yikes!
sigh

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45424 on: September 25, 2019, 11:50:04 AM »
They just can't win...

Quote
What it boils down to is that either:

a) ND pulled a fakeout with the trailer, leading us gays to *think* we were going to have to witness one of the most harmful and upsetting tropes about us in fiction (and it would probably be held up as incredible storytelling by the cishets, lbr), then going "haha! fooled you! can't believe you gays were so dumb as to believe we were gonna fridge Ellie's girlfriend!" which is shitty. I've seen people equate it to someone raising their hand like they're going to slap you then laughing at you for flinching. That's legitimately how it feels.

or

b) they are actually going to kill Dina, in which case, fuck Neil Druckmann

Really?

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45425 on: September 25, 2019, 11:51:25 AM »
Quote
Quote
I do find the fact Jason still works at Kotaku as strange. He's one of the most respected games journalists about surely other publications would be happy to have him
Depends on whether other publications are willing to pay for long form journalism. From everything I’ve seen, signs point to no.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/did-kotaku-just-post-an-article-with-animated-child-porn-nsfw.142926/post-24851823

He's the most respected games journalist of all time!  Why doesn't he get the obvious respect and millions that title deserves?
sigh

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45426 on: September 25, 2019, 11:53:59 AM »
the best games livejournalist is that dude tim whatever that writes 15 pages about getting a soda at 7-11 before finally talking about how a game made him feel.

who is ted danson?

  • ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀✋💎✋🤬
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45427 on: September 25, 2019, 12:18:44 PM »
Kotaku posting cp

a match made in heaven for reeeee :neogaf
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

porkbun

  • #1 Pit-Fighter fan
  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45428 on: September 25, 2019, 12:28:11 PM »
Quote
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-do-people-associate-the-a-from-lgbtqia-with-ally-rather-than-asexual.143100/


Funny how the most prolific "Why women criticise...." poster also happens to be asexual. Not that there's anything wrong with that but doesn't seem like that's a topic where they can give a lot of input

Gee, people (specifically MEN) that don't like or care about sex (who are probably "asexual" because no one's ever wanted to touch them) getting triggered about cleavage.  Great thread.

 :ahnuld2

Akala

  • Easy Victor
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45429 on: September 25, 2019, 12:31:30 PM »
I wish there was a thread on the Busch lite kid.

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45430 on: September 25, 2019, 12:36:30 PM »
Geoff Keighley is more of a journalist than that grotesque tool.  Hell, so is Patrick Klepek.  Jason is, at best, a commentator for the enthusiast press.


Ghoul

  • Cremation will be my last chance to have a smoking hot body. We have already made the arrangements.
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45432 on: September 25, 2019, 12:52:44 PM »
Geoff Keighley is more of a journalist than that grotesque tool.  Hell, so is Patrick Klepek.  Jason is, at best, a commentator for the enthusiast press.

 :gurl :noooo

Jason does sometimes produce some good work, where Patrick has never.

Disney Twitter *shudders*

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45433 on: September 25, 2019, 12:59:53 PM »
Quote
I've been leary of The Last of Us Part II since the interview the writers did at last year's E3 which foreshadowed this.

"We’re aware of it, but we’re making the best decisions for the story." They know they are probably going to do something harmful but don't care for the sake of the sacred art.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot2-i-have-no-pants-and-i-must-scream-read-op.65064/post-24857752

This is just too weird for me

paprikastaude

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45434 on: September 25, 2019, 01:00:00 PM »
Geoff Keighley is more of a journalist than that grotesque tool.  Hell, so is Patrick Klepek.  Jason is, at best, a commentator for the enthusiast press.

 :gurl :noooo

Jason does sometimes produce some good work, where Patrick has never.

Disney Twitter *shudders*

arguing for any of those goons :nope
« Last Edit: September 25, 2019, 01:09:35 PM by Spieler1 »

Rman

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45435 on: September 25, 2019, 01:01:16 PM »

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45436 on: September 25, 2019, 01:08:02 PM »
Wouldn't normally point this out in this way, but it's a beautifully special case of sacred art in my opinion:
Quote from: SapphiCine
I've been leary of The Last of Us Part II since the interview the writers did at last year's E3 which foreshadowed this.

"We’re aware of it, but we’re making the best decisions for the story." They know they are probably going to do something harmful but don't care for the sake of the sacred art.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot2-i-have-no-pants-and-i-must-scream-read-op.65064/post-24857752

This is just too weird for me
I've been laughing at this for 2 minutes straight
video games are art, also it is unacceptable for this art to end in a way that doesn't satisfy me in particular.
Jesus Christ, nothing is ever going to be good or woke enough for these people.

Same poster:
Quote from: SapphiCine
Quote from: Persephone
What it boils down to is that either:
Amen, either way Druckman and co. will look bad.
Quote from: SapphiCine
Quote
Quote
anything other than Ellie having a positive relationship with another woman and both of them living in the end is unacceptable.
Unacceptable for real ?
Damn right I'm for real. I am sick and tired of straight people profiting off of my community suffering in fiction.

Doxxxed:
Trans woman (she/her), lesbian, feminist, video/tabletop game enthusiast, and lover of sapphic media.

paprikastaude

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45437 on: September 25, 2019, 01:08:19 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/catherine-zeta-jones-appreciation-thread.143128/

ERA sure is a barrel of laughs.

Quote
ResetEra is not a boys club. From the FAQ:

Respect a Diverse Audience

What might seem harmless or funny to you can be hurtful to others. Exclusionary behavior, casual or otherwise, is not tolerated. Be mindful at all times that your posts are not only being read by men; you should be considerate of women members and how your words might make them feel. We specifically discourage inappropriate or vulgar objectification of women.



Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45438 on: September 25, 2019, 01:15:56 PM »

Jason does sometimes produce some good work, where Patrick has never.

Disney Twitter *shudders*
The only reason I bring Patrick into the mix is that I seem to recall in the past Patrick actually contacting or attempting to contact the subjects of pieces he has written, whereas I definitely remember Schrier having a tendency to neglect that simple step(along with very basic research on the topic at hand, like with that hit piece on Dragons Crown).  To think that either is thought of as good journalists  :donot

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45439 on: September 25, 2019, 01:20:30 PM »
Schreier's click bait and daily posting is typical garbage, but he's also willing to sit and produce a long form story that's well sourced and detailed on things most "games journalists" could not care less about. But he is also kind of an idiot. This still puts him in the top tier of modern gaming journalists though.

Patrick's standards and efforts have collapsed since he got to Waypoint. It's lined up perfectly with his constant whining about his job.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45440 on: September 25, 2019, 01:25:24 PM »
Full disclosure: I’m a lover of sapphic media.
©@©™

Cauliflower Of Love

  • I found my bearings, they were in the race
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45441 on: September 25, 2019, 01:30:37 PM »

Quote
ResetEra is not a boys club. From the FAQ:

Morrigan using misogynist gendered language and dismissing moistness of lesbians.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45442 on: September 25, 2019, 01:34:06 PM »

Quote
ResetEra is not a boys club. From the FAQ:

Morrigan using misogynist gendered language and dismissing moistness of lesbians.

And now with an extremely problematic opinion

Quote
Can... can we at least wait to see what actually happens in the game before jumping to conclusions about the story or characters?
https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-ot2-i-have-no-pants-and-i-must-scream-read-op.65064/post-24858960

Tuckers Law

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45443 on: September 25, 2019, 01:36:04 PM »
Schreier's click bait and daily posting is typical garbage, but he's also willing to sit and produce a long form story that's well sourced and detailed on things most "games journalists" could not care less about. But he is also kind of an idiot. This still puts him in the top tier of modern gaming journalists though.

Patrick's standards and efforts have collapsed since he got to Waypoint. It's lined up perfectly with his constant whining about his job.

That’s fair, admittedly I haven’t read his long form stuff.

daemon

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45444 on: September 25, 2019, 01:38:11 PM »
Lol at the FAQ planted by morrigan, and the ban. Precisely because there's a diverse userbase they can engage with whatever threads they want, and not limit the hard-ons on Chris with a sailor uniform.

ShutUp

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45445 on: September 25, 2019, 01:38:22 PM »
So they really just want Ellie to be a happy robot who endures no hardships, has no flaws and lives happily ever after. That sure would be fun to play through. I get being upset her girlfriend might die but being upset is the point. You want to see her get revenge on those who killed Dina like people cheered on Joel doing the same for his daughter. Getting revenge for the death of a loved one is one of the most common stories in any type of show/movie.

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45446 on: September 25, 2019, 01:44:44 PM »
If I want to play a game where the protagonist is upset about unfair treatment I will just play Untitled Goose Game

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45447 on: September 25, 2019, 01:45:01 PM »
Ellie should also cure the outbreak, and be elected President and then become the first lesbian to get married on Mars.

She should be treated like the icon that she is for all the LGBTQIA+ children that are fans of the Last of Us series, exclusive on the Sony Playstation 4.

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45448 on: September 25, 2019, 01:47:15 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Pretty shopable image there.
The woman is contemplating all the producer dicks she sucked to get that high profile anchor job at CNN - Colorized
🤴

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45449 on: September 25, 2019, 01:48:22 PM »
If I want to play a game where the protagonist is upset about unfair treatment I will just play Untitled Goose Game

Hoping for a LRG release of that game.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45450 on: September 25, 2019, 01:48:43 PM »
Also at the end of the game she should turn to the screen and go "well, I guess that Orange Cheeto President Shirtface really was the last of them."

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45451 on: September 25, 2019, 01:48:45 PM »
Ellie should also cure the outbreak, and be elected President and then become the first lesbian to get married on Mars.

She should be treated like the icon that she is for all the LGBTQIA+ children that are fans of the Last of Us series, exclusive on the Sony Playstation 4.

Let all be honest with each other, this would be a much more interesting game than the sci-cry grim-dark slog that Naughty Dog is going to release.

If I want to play a game where the protagonist is upset about unfair treatment I will just play Untitled Goose Game

Hoping for a LRG release of that game.

If it comes with Goose stickers I'm buying 10

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45452 on: September 25, 2019, 01:49:55 PM »
be elected President



Even in a apocalyptic wasteland we can't rid ourselves of the state. Truly a bad ending. :tocry

EchoRin

  • Hey, it's that dog.
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45453 on: September 25, 2019, 01:51:10 PM »
Jason even published like 2 (or maybe working on the second?) videogame related books by now. Sure the Dragon's Crown stuff is throwaway (not defending it), but these game sites and hell most newspapers have to live off of  fluff just for the chance to get those long form pieces funded at all. Haven't followed Patrick in a long time (I moved away from Giantbomb by the time he joined up), but I would bump into some interviews of his in the last few years so eh, he's had that. He used to dig deep though at least at some point. Sure, now whenever I see something from him it's more commenting on the subject of games or doing streaming, podcasting. Not that there is anything shameful in making a living that way. Whether one enjoys his brand is another thing. Easily accessed, easily avoided. It's whatever.
Though  :exxy was goofy as hell in that stream he did.

Keighly? Dorito's Pope baby. Let's go!

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45454 on: September 25, 2019, 01:51:30 PM »
TLOU 2 Spoilers: They find a cure but it only works on women and enbys.
©@©™

BisMarckie

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45455 on: September 25, 2019, 01:51:53 PM »
I was not aware of LRG's relationship with child porn enablers THQ Nordic. I apologize and will no longer endorse their products.

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45456 on: September 25, 2019, 01:52:42 PM »
I was not aware of LRG's relationship with child porn enablers THQ Nordic. I apologize and will no longer endorse their products.

I'm sorry I missed it did THQ Nordic host an AMA on Kotaku?

Ghoul

  • Cremation will be my last chance to have a smoking hot body. We have already made the arrangements.
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45457 on: September 25, 2019, 01:56:28 PM »
Seems like the virus in TLOU is the reverse of aids, seems like everyone who survived it was gay.

Typical left destroying and killing each other. Or as they call it "The Great Cancel"

marrec

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45458 on: September 25, 2019, 02:02:43 PM »
THEY DID IT, THOSE BASTARDS THEY ACTUALLY DID IT

*shot pans out to show the State of Liberty has been canceled*

Ghoul

  • Cremation will be my last chance to have a smoking hot body. We have already made the arrangements.
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45459 on: September 25, 2019, 02:06:13 PM »
pans out further to who said it, it's blame space and nobody gave a single fuck.

porkbun

  • #1 Pit-Fighter fan
  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45460 on: September 25, 2019, 02:09:10 PM »
https://www.resetera.com/threads/catherine-zeta-jones-appreciation-thread.143128/

ERA sure is a barrel of laughs.

Of course ratface Morrigan shut it down.  Cunt.

 :picard

My wife does hate her though because of her bangs.

 :crybaby

Crumb

  • *cough*
  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45461 on: September 25, 2019, 02:09:52 PM »
Good thing based on the leaks all the events of tlou2 is one big dream sequence anyway.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45462 on: September 25, 2019, 02:10:16 PM »
Quote
Exclusionary behavior, casual or otherwise, is not tolerated
how could this possibly be fairly enforced?

EchoRin

  • Hey, it's that dog.
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45463 on: September 25, 2019, 02:11:50 PM »
Good thing based on the leaks all the events of tlou2 is one big dream sequence anyway.

Sony copying Nintendo again!!!

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45464 on: September 25, 2019, 02:16:41 PM »
If I want to play a game where the protagonist is upset about unfair treatment I will just play Untitled Goose Game

A goose can't even get a title for their game. So fucked up.

ShutUp

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45465 on: September 25, 2019, 02:18:37 PM »
There was a thread last week where people were openly joking about the woman who masturbated during a Broadway show. Then you had the ones who called them out and said if it was a guy the thread would be massive and calling the behavior disgusting. Follow that up with Mercury and the usual suspects poking fun at those criticizing the hypocrisy.

ERA, not a boys club. But we sure make fun of boys here!

Nintex

  • Finish the Fight
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45466 on: September 25, 2019, 02:20:34 PM »
ResetEra like its members is gender fluid when it suits them
🤴

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45467 on: September 25, 2019, 02:27:42 PM »
Quote
Exclusionary behavior, casual or otherwise, is not tolerated
how could this possibly be fairly enforced?

Fairly? ???
©@©™

Ghoul

  • Cremation will be my last chance to have a smoking hot body. We have already made the arrangements.
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45468 on: September 25, 2019, 02:30:55 PM »
remember a time when known pedos tried to buy the bones of freaks and everyone was cool about it?

Simpler times my friends.

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45469 on: September 25, 2019, 02:31:45 PM »
Post apocalyptic world full of zombies: "YAAY!"
Great representation of race/gender/sexuality: "YAAY!"
Everyone loses loved ones in the horror of their reality: "woooah, wait why are you killing LGBT characters like they're normal people??"

Either LGBT and POC characters can have the same faults and story lines as everyone else or they're tokens. End of.

Coffee Dog

  • Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45470 on: September 25, 2019, 02:36:15 PM »

Quote
ResetEra is not a boys club. From the FAQ:

Morrigan using misogynist gendered language and dismissing moistness of lesbians.

Era always dismisses lesbians because 95% of posters have penises and are incapable of empathy. I've never seen anyone bring up the lesbian perspective without getting accused of disingenuous posting.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45471 on: September 25, 2019, 02:41:01 PM »
Post apocalyptic world full of zombies: "YAAY!"
Great representation of race/gender/sexuality: "YAAY!"
Everyone loses loved ones in the horror of their reality: "woooah, wait why are you killing LGBT characters like they're normal people??"

Either LGBT and POC characters can have the same faults and story lines as everyone else or they're tokens. End of.

Reminds me of when they got mad about the one TLOU2 trailer showing a woman being tortured. Suddenly this was gross and disgusting and how dare they not include any context to this violence. Now the new trailer features a shot of dude sitting naked on a chair, clearly being tortured with no context what so ever and no one cares.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45472 on: September 25, 2019, 02:45:36 PM »
Era always dismisses lesbians because 95% of posters have penises and are incapable of empathy. I've never seen anyone bring up the lesbian perspective without getting accused of disingenuous posting.
95% of resetti's lesbians have a penis too :wag

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45473 on: September 25, 2019, 02:51:15 PM »
I was not aware of LRG's relationship with child porn enablers THQ Nordic. I apologize and will no longer endorse their products.

I'm sorry I missed it did THQ Nordic host an AMA on Kotaku?
No, THQ Nordic does not actually post child porn, merely strongly and highly endorse the viewing of Ms.Galaxy's totally real video that's constantly shared online.


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45475 on: September 25, 2019, 02:54:10 PM »
Quote
Exclusionary behavior, casual or otherwise, is not tolerated
how could this possibly be fairly enforced?
The Team

Our international staff is made up of dedicated individuals spread across five continents, with wildly diverse backgrounds and interests. Women, people of color, LGBTQ, and religious minorities are all well represented on our team. That team consists entirely of volunteers drawn from the community they seek to serve. A comprehensive Active Staff Roster is available to the public and updated regularly.

The team processes hundreds of reports daily, and every one of those reports is handled by multiple moderators. We also receive dozens of emails and private messages, and manually approve dozens of new registrations each day. This work is endless, stressful, and often thankless. Many staff members put in countless hours each week towards maintaining the forum; this is a responsibility they take on because they care deeply about the community and want it to be the best that it can be.

It is important to note that we take a team approach to moderation, and no single moderator will ever be solely responsible for a given decision. All moderator actions are automatically logged and visible to the rest of the team; it is therefore impossible for an individual member of staff to go rogue. Every action is discussed as a team and signed off on by multiple staff before it is carried out. The diversity of our team is a strength -- we always seek insight on any given issue from the staff members who know the most about it.

Like all members, individual staff have strong opinions on any number of topics and are free to express those opinions as posters. Those opinions and posts are their own and do not represent official policy. Moderator actions are always driven by consensus from multiple staff and by our written guidelines and policies. Official staff communications will be marked as such.

Moderators

These are the volunteers charged with enforcing our mission statement and our policies. They are on the front lines when it comes to keeping the peace on the forums. Moderators process the bulk of the reports, provide guidance through written warnings, and try to make contributions as posters along the way. Many were pillars in the community even before they became staff. Without their efforts, there would not be a community to inhabit the site.

Administrators

The administration is responsible for keeping the site healthy and operational in all areas. This means coordinating with tech staff on maintenance and new features, verifying industry members, screening new registrations, and responding to emails. Administrators also lead internal policy discussions and are often called upon to provide guidance to the moderation team.

Certain administrators (designated as "Mod Captains" on the roster) are specifically in charge of managing the moderation team. These Mod Captains are required to approve any ban over 2 weeks in duration. They also process appeals and are available to answer any questions you might have about moderation.

Moderation Approach

We aim to articulate our policies and expectations as clearly as possible, in this document and in all our official communications. Whenever a user is warned or banned for a post, the reason is provided in a public banner attached to that post. In addition to ensuring transparency and accountability, these banners are helpful for other members to understand where the lines are and what our rationale is. Every staff member is expected to follow the same rules as the rest of the forum.

Due to our heavy workload, a large moderation team is required to ensure timely coverage around the clock. The size of the team can make it very challenging to ensure consistent moderation. To address this, we have Mod Captains and internal moderation guidelines based on precedent and publicly available policy. Some flexibility is required to account for new or unexpected circumstances.

Our team moderates to the spirit of the rules and our mission statement. Multiple factors are taken into account before coming to a decision. We weigh past infractions, post history, and the severity of the post(s) when determining penalties. We also consider whether a member doubled down on their behavior.

Staff members are required to avoid any involvement in moderating disputes that they have personally taken part in. This means that a moderator will never moderate a user for an argument between the two. Instead, any relevant reports are handled independently by other moderators on the team. We do our utmost to ensure that moderation is impartial, objective, and not driven by emotion. On the other hand, when it comes to community threads that might each have a unique culture, we always seek to consult staff members who are familiar with that community in order to avoid potential misunderstandings.

Please bear in mind that due to the highly active and fast paced nature of discussion on ResetEra, it is impossible for our staff to be everywhere. Even if you notice staff presence within a thread, there is no guarantee that they have read every single post before or after their own. Do not assume that moderators are ignoring rule violations. If you see an issue, report it.
Quote
Infractions and Penalties

The majority of our members will never break a rule or face moderation action. However, when such action is required, there are a range of punitive measures that might be used.

Warnings are applied when a user needs guidance and/or has committed a minor infraction -- these are situations where a ban is deemed unnecessary. All infractions, including warnings, are logged for future reference by the moderation team. For transparency, a public banner will be added to the offending post explaining the warning. Some warnings will contain a more detailed message for the offending member, to ensure that they understand why they are being warned and how they can avoid problems in the future. You must manually acknowledge a warning before you are able to post again.

Bans are used for more serious infractions, when a warning is ignored, or for a recurring pattern of misbehavior. As with warnings, bans are logged and public banners are applied to the offending post. The length of the ban depends on the severity of the infraction as well as the member's record. The more infractions a member has, the longer their next ban is likely to be. Serious infractions, such as those related to bigotry, are monitored and tracked separately from other bans. In cases where we determine that a member is either unable or unwilling to correct their behavior, a permanent ban will be issued. When a long ban is requested, or when the team is initially unsure how long a ban should be, it will be marked as 'Duration Pending' on the public banner. These bans are reviewed by the Mod Captains, who determine the final length.

Thread creation privileges may be revoked or suspended if a member creates low quality threads. Low quality threads include threads that are poorly sourced, have obvious clickbait titles, are created to troll members or staff, or otherwise fail to provide an OP that encourages good discussion. Thread creation privileges are either revoked permanently or for a 6 month period, after which you can request them back by contacting the staff. This is sometimes informally referred to as a 'junioring'.

Appealing a Ban

You can appeal a ban by clicking the Contact Us link at the bottom of the site (accessible while banned). We recommend that you use the form while logged in so that we can verify that it is you. If you'd prefer to be contacted at a different email than the one you registered with, please mention that in your message. Include all relevant context and information, and be polite and constructive while making your case. Taking an aggressive tone or sending insults to staff will not be rewarded, and in fact may lead to a more severe penalty up to and including a permanent ban. We receive a large number of emails each day and do not guarantee a response to all of them. Ban appeals are reviewed independently by the Mod Captains.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45476 on: September 25, 2019, 03:04:55 PM »
posting the actual things on the General Guide to ResetERA.com is my best ongoing bit and you guys don't appreciate enough :pacspit

OnlyRegret

  • <<SALVATION!>>
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45477 on: September 25, 2019, 03:05:54 PM »
honestly, just seems less a hassle to make all your characters straight white men

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45478 on: September 25, 2019, 03:07:56 PM »
honestly, just seems less a hassle to make all your characters straight white men

The big fear is that if you don’t make it that way you are going to face backlash (from bigots and woke idiots).

I actually like diversity, but these past years has been a shitshow for the most part in discussing this stuff.

HaughtyFrank

  • Haughty and a little naughty
  • Senior Member
Re: River Of Slime |OT| Mission: Impossible
« Reply #45479 on: September 25, 2019, 03:13:40 PM »
honestly, just seems less a hassle to make all your characters straight white men

Pretty much. If Ellie had a boyfriend who was about to be killed no one would give a shit. That this standard narrative is "harmful" because she happens to be gay is dumb as hell and like the opposite of inclusive