In a human rights respect I think trans rights are pretty much equal to gay rights atm, except in some holdouts in society (the deeply religious, the deeply bigoted, the deeply stupid). And that is a bad part of a venn-diagram to be in the center of. That's one of those bad-grams
trans right now face the same exclusion that, let's say, any other person that conducts a perceptible body modification that deviates from what's socially acceptable. They modify their traits in a way that is perceptible and that causes a natural rejection. Surely a portion of that rejection is based on hate, but most of it is just being wary, curious, etc.
"Oh, i'm sure this dude with a tattooed skull on his neck and shaved head is a nice guy"- no one, 2019.
PS: I can see how my message could be misconstrued here. There's a range of transgender people. There's people who pull it off in a way they're undetectable, but then you also have what seemed to be a potato skin middle-aged guy with blue long hair. That's perceptually gross no matter how many excuses people make to pretend they're not grossed out on a visual basis.
I've seen very few trans people. One of them in a footwear store. I was so analyzing that i probably stared way longer than we'd determine as acceptable. I didn't do it out of spite, I was just checking a very believable transitioned person. But i'm sure if she realized that I was looking, she'd believe I was being judgmental. But it's like... a natural thing that happens. It's like when you see someone that has something odd in their face, like a prosthetic part of the face, or a deformity. You're mostly curious about it.
violence/physical assault is of course illegal, trans panic should not be defensible, however words are not violence
words on a 1 on 1 basis are not violence per se. The problem would be if the person saying those words could cause others to take action against that person. Say, a community leader of sorts. Then it'd be more than just words.