You're not doing anyone any good by talking about the stuff you're supposed to not be watching.
0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: nachobro on November 27, 2019, 01:07:45 PMneoxon is also the dude who made the thread complaining about street fighter not having many racial minorities and also said that asians don't count because reasons.
neoxon is also the dude who made the thread complaining about street fighter not having many racial minorities and also said that asians don't count because reasons.
I was originally gonna make this a percentage thread like I did for the female fighters thread, but it'd be a bit depressing with regards to how many we have in each game. That plus counting those of East Asian descent would get a bit dicey in terms of how people would feel about the final percentage, especially with regards to fighting games from Japan.
Good writeup, but please use women instead of females.
QuoteGood writeup, but please use women instead of females.I get why you say that, obviously, but it is also a bit odd to say women, when we honestly do not know how all characters self-identify.
e: some of the replies in this old thread lmaoQuoteQuoteGood writeup, but please use women instead of females.I get why you say that, obviously, but it is also a bit odd to say women, when we honestly do not know how all characters self-identify.https://www.resetera.com/threads/analyzing-the-percentage-of-female-fighters-in-the-rosters-of-the-current-batch-of-fighting-games-update-sfv-ce-percentage-updated.10398/post-1935877
On NeoGAF.com they were talking about when the forum started going downhill and I made a carepost saying it really started going downhill fast after like 2014 (back before climate change) and was a flood of ResetERA.com's traits by 2016-2017 and Evilore-senpai liked it. Maybe I can get filler unbanned after all.
do people actually like characters more for their appearance than gameplay reasons he pretended to ask
Is it okay for a developer to decide how a fictional character identifies???
Ashe's character, like many others, was created after the fact of her design. She exists as a foil to McCree because, upon settling on a design, they simply made her that way. We don't know how she would've been characterized as a black woman because Blizzard didn't give her the chance to be a black woman.
Not just which games, but how do you order them?Do you order your list based on which games you had the most fun playing this year? Or do you take a more analytical approach and try to pick the games that were the most ambitious/best from a game design perspective? Do you pick the most technologically ambitious games? Or maybe the most original and unique games, even if they're smaller in scope? Do you prioritize games that had the best gameplay but perhaps middling stories? Or maybe the other way around? Do you put the games you've spent the most time with at the top of your list? Or does playtime not factor into it for you?
https://twitter.com/WarThunder/status/1199696536936034304
https://www.resetera.com/threads/its-about-to-be-2020-how-has-camping-in-fps-not-been-addressed.155463/FPS Staff needs to have a meeting with the Camping community ASAP.There will of course be a foreword by SweetNicole.
Quote from: Hermit on November 27, 2019, 01:26:28 PMIs it okay for a developer to decide how a fictional character identifies??? No:Quote from: Nepenthe, https://www.resetera.com/threads/fans-are-disappointed-that-overwatch-still-doesnt-have-a-black-woman-hero.80148/post-14820973Ashe's character, like many others, was created after the fact of her design. She exists as a foil to McCree because, upon settling on a design, they simply made her that way. We don't know how she would've been characterized as a black woman because Blizzard didn't give her the chance to be a black woman.
If POSITIVE sexual relations are the end goal, i am sure there can be some acknowledgements we can agree on.Enthusiastic consent by all parties.
This reminds me of RE arguing that videogame characters didn't "consent" to the camera or outfits.QuoteIf POSITIVE sexual relations are the end goal, i am sure there can be some acknowledgements we can agree on.Enthusiastic consent by all parties.https://www.resetera.com/threads/positive-sexual-representation-in-games-is-it-possible.141825/post-24650064Wont somebody please think about Bayonetta not even consenting to star in a videogame?
Quote from: TVC 15 on November 27, 2019, 02:04:27 PMhttps://twitter.com/lloydkaufman/status/1199738951306747904?That looks more like Twitter to me, chief.Anyways, famous scene from Tromeo and Juliet. Guess it's the anniversary today.
https://twitter.com/lloydkaufman/status/1199738951306747904?
Quote from: TVC 15 on November 27, 2019, 02:25:37 PMIs it the anniversary or is he just name-dropping it since he’s doing a follow-up now?Hmph, guess it came out in February.
Is it the anniversary or is he just name-dropping it since he’s doing a follow-up now?
Quote from: benjipwns on November 27, 2019, 01:39:06 PMQuote from: Hermit on November 27, 2019, 01:26:28 PMIs it okay for a developer to decide how a fictional character identifies??? No:Quote from: Nepenthe, https://www.resetera.com/threads/fans-are-disappointed-that-overwatch-still-doesnt-have-a-black-woman-hero.80148/post-14820973Ashe's character, like many others, was created after the fact of her design. She exists as a foil to McCree because, upon settling on a design, they simply made her that way. We don't know how she would've been characterized as a black woman because Blizzard didn't give her the chance to be a black woman.This reminds me of RE arguing that videogame characters didn't "consent" to the camera or outfits.QuoteIf POSITIVE sexual relations are the end goal, i am sure there can be some acknowledgements we can agree on.Enthusiastic consent by all parties.https://www.resetera.com/threads/positive-sexual-representation-in-games-is-it-possible.141825/post-24650064Wont somebody please think about Bayonetta not even consenting to star in a videogame?
User Banned (Permanent) - Unneeded Hostility & Generalizations of a whole community before edit.[Mod Edit: Reverted post and added spoiler tag to highly offensive user post]spoiler (click to show/hide)Fuck you all stupid fucks with your dumbass suggestions. I'm sick of dumb idiots with no intelligence to pick a bandwagon character and fucking defend it to death. Fuck stupid ass Ninja Gaiden and Resident Evil. Go die in a hole and ban me if you want SJW fucking cunts. You got stupid ass Banjo and Hero so fuck off. Entitled ass choosing beggars wishing for more stupid shit in a goddamn kid game. Fucking manchildren[close]
Oh I get it its funny cuz those black men are going to gang rape that small young white woman. Because women getting raped by black men is funny.
She appears to be offering enthusiastic consent.
QuoteOh I get it its funny cuz those black men are going to gang rape that small young white woman. Because women getting raped by black men is funny.https://www.resetera.com/threads/ready-to-get-blacked.155636/post-26872033
I see racism is alive and well, even in this thread.
Comments like that are the reason why fillers are leaving the forum in droves.
Thread locked due to inappropriate content
The fantasy being referenced is a rape fantasy though? Gangbangs in porn are more often than not. There's nothing wrong with any kind of consensual interracial orgy but it is not coded as such, its coded as a group of large older black males hovering behind an "unsuspecting" young and small white girl. From what I can tell, they're specifically referencing a power dynamic (and often white male-serving giant dadoldry fetish) fantasy that stems from racist depictions of black men as rapists and women as sexual prey. Oh, and the fact the comparison being made in the video is with competitive war maneuvers. But hey i'd love to be convinced otherwise.
Regardless of context, the "just a joke, bro" excuse is flimsy. Would you really trust a bunch of dudebro game developers to do racial humor in good faith?
Mainstream porn is...still pretty shitty, eh?
That was my primary point to raise as I agree. It's something that people have to endure an amount of because it relies on being a pattern of subtle prods than an obvious transphobic comment. If it takes 5 posts to make a clear case, it's 4 people have had to put up with. Moderators only see one post from a report, and the others that we know are there somewhere because we've been the ones affected by them, might be buried in among 500 posts across 150 threads. So tackling it isn't simple, but I think some steps proposed could definitely help, alongside the increase in severity of bans around the topic.One was in having links to threads like the Transgender 101 thread to direct people with good-faith questions to, so they don't congest the current thread while also allowing us to educate. Having to be diverted to troll in an old widely-used thread isn't as fun as the current active one, reducing the kick people get from it. If they continue they walk a thinner line as it's been made clear that general questions around identity etc. should be forwarded to the 101 (or other).In addition a couple of staff members said they would be fine being a point of contact moving forward for reporting ones we did see. If I were to spot someone posting in bad-faith and knew they were only there to troll based on past history, I could put the posts in question into a PM to them, detailing some of the context and the pattern and these would be reviewed in addition to any reports. Hopefully over time this will help mods identify some of the behaviours we're affected by more keenly, while meaning we don't have to put up with them for as long.Staff post I imagine will lay out the scope of the changes and implementations, but wanted to give some context because it's very much something that has been rife in the past and is extremely aggravating. Hopefully through the above and other changes we can both reduce the amount interested, and sooner identify those that still are.
good faith humor
Sounds lime good steps are being made.
This morning my cousin asked her kids if they wanted to see the latest SW movie tomorrow after we eat. There was a resounding NOOOOO!
Release date: December 20, 2019
QuoteIndiana University is a public university and it’s employees are all working for the state government.If the Constitution of the US applies in this current context, then that is weird and unexpected for me, as that's not how this works in Canada.
Indiana University is a public university and it’s employees are all working for the state government.
So many things wrong with this OP.It is a public university, not a private institution, as you claim.The vice president and provost is a woman, not a "he".The vice president is a lawyer and legal scholar. She was dean of the law school before being named provost.The statement is both well-worded, and accurate. It's also a scathing takedown (in legal speak) of the shithead professor AND a legal roadmap for students to get him fired.Maybe spend an hour or two reading up on basic Constitutional law before making sweeping statements that have no basis in fact and calling a law professor "a dumb fuck" because you don't like the law?
Okay. Nice to know that you did not mean to be rude.I did not deny that there are religious Biologists.Despite trying, I have not found anyone on this list (shared by another member) who is clearly stated as downright toally disagreeing with Evolution. I am quite sure that there will be a few.Anyways I have no time for Internet message boards. Goodbye.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/its-amazing-how-there-are-still-educated-people-people-in-prestigious-positions-who-do-not-understand-how-the-fuck-a-constitution-works.154730/Quote from: The OPQuoteIndiana University is a public university and it’s employees are all working for the state government.If the Constitution of the US applies in this current context, then that is weird and unexpected for me, as that's not how this works in Canada.lol
Yeah wasn’t in the classroom. I have to read it again I’m a lawyer but not that kind a lawyer
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Still unbanned an no reply? That dude sure shut her trap.
Today at 1:35 PM
Today at 1:55 PM
Today at 1:08 PM
Yesterday at 2:44 PM
Yesterday at 3:11 PM
Quote from: BisMarckie on November 27, 2019, 04:23:46 PMQuoteYeah wasn’t in the classroom. I have to read it again I’m a lawyer but not that kind a lawyerZattMurdock alt? i fergert that guy
QuoteYeah wasn’t in the classroom. I have to read it again I’m a lawyer but not that kind a lawyerZattMurdock alt?
The girl intentionally looking teenaged and people not minding that is much more telling.Fucking pervy ass men with not even thinly veiled child predator vibes.
