Isn't that just hating him because he's white though?
Edit: rich and white, I mean
That article, yes. But folks/blacks in South Bend hate him because he did jack-shit for them. I don't have actual articles (hence, check Twitter/etc.) [Edit:
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/22/south-bend-poor-say-democrat-pete-buttigieg-left-them-behind.html <---Here's one for you] to link you with his policies and pushing there, but South Bend was
ran ultra poorly for blacks to where the "grapevine" of the black community has a strong (and reasonable given his history/etc.) distrust for Pete.
It's less "they hate him because he's gay!" (Just like Warren defenders do the "oh you just hate her because she's a woman/has a vagina!!!" defense [Hi PoliBore!]) and more "he's a fuck awful candidate that is only still in the race because he has one 'quality' that diversifies him in the race: That he's
"
Thing is: Even non-rich white gays (hi, me!)
hate Pete because he's a faux candidate.
I know I've linked it a lot in the past, but
Transmetropolitan is still relevant all these years later for election cycles. I swear it should be required reading in high-schools (mostly joking): Pete is the democrats Smiler this election, just in this case he's (thankfully) no chance in hell (*knock on wood*) of winning.
