I still don't get what she did.
On June 6, 2020, Rowling retweeted an op-ed piece that discussed “people who menstruate,” apparently taking issue with the fact that the story did not use the word women. “‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” she wrote.
Is it this? Is this what this violent reaction for over 2 years has been about?
her stance is basically what terf stands for -- trans exclusionary
support groups for women are based around every aspect of the female experience, being raised with an air of extra caution in who you're allowed to be around, the pink toys bought for you, mom having "the talk" about never going anywhere alone because men will overpower you and prey on you, dad having "the talk" about how boys all want to sleep with them, going through puberty, learning to live with period and hormonal changes etc. etc.
she asks trans people to read the room and understand that by suddenly becoming female later in life, they really lack the shared experiences and traumas that most other women have had to grow up with, and how that shapes you as a person, and whether that really enables you to contribute in women's spaces on the same level
not all female groups or events require an innate understanding of what it means to grow up as a woman, but some do
she's also made a number of comments about how much she empathizes with trans people too, because there's at least some level of kinship with being treated as lesser by society, even if they're not exactly the same on every level