Author Topic: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)  (Read 477198 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2340 on: December 23, 2006, 06:00:05 PM »
Some of my favorite people arent icons!
like me  :(

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2341 on: December 23, 2006, 06:00:29 PM »
Some of my favorite people arent icons!

Its funny how some of the best posters on this board aren't icons. Mupepe, anyone? :-*
BKO

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2342 on: December 23, 2006, 06:05:50 PM »
you said it lol
o_0

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2343 on: December 23, 2006, 06:06:07 PM »
Mupepe's better than all of us
o_0

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2344 on: December 23, 2006, 06:11:59 PM »
:heartbeat

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2345 on: December 23, 2006, 06:12:04 PM »
Mupepe's better than all of us

Mupepe should be made King of Evilbore.
BKO

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2346 on: December 23, 2006, 06:17:45 PM »
Mupepe's better than all of us

Mupepe should be made King of Evilbore.
Death to all tyrants!

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2347 on: December 23, 2006, 06:30:02 PM »
With all this spoiler tag nonsense I really appreciate evilbore more. GAF really is turning into a big steaming turd right before our eyes.

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2348 on: December 23, 2006, 06:57:39 PM »
what's the "spoiler tag" nonsense
duc

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2349 on: December 23, 2006, 07:01:51 PM »
Some crybaby mod pissed in his diaper because people were using the spoiler tags for jokes and instead of dealing with the problem (in my opinion there was no problem) he just disabled it all together.

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2350 on: December 23, 2006, 07:07:10 PM »
Some crybaby mod pissed in his diaper because people were using the spoiler tags for jokes and instead of dealing with the problem (in my opinion there was no problem) he just disabled it all together.

*cough* Hitokage *cough*
yar

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2351 on: December 23, 2006, 07:20:32 PM »
you MUST be kidding.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:shh Hito humps goats
[close]
duc

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2352 on: December 23, 2006, 07:46:52 PM »
How the fuck can Hito turn off spoiler tags? Fucking distinguished mentally-challenged when you've got half of your website devoted to games and people don't want to have shit ruined for them.

GAF: Steaming Shitpile - confirmed.
8=D

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2353 on: December 23, 2006, 07:50:11 PM »
This is only re-confirmation #2034, Ecro... :lol
BKO

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2354 on: December 23, 2006, 07:57:22 PM »
This is only re-confirmation #2034, Ecro... :lol

It's true.

It's just getting more and more fucking distinguished mentally-challenged, though. Tons of ads? Check. Censors? Check. No more mention of women in anything less than their best mormon attire? Check. Shithead Elf admins? Check. Removal of spoiler text because it annoys an admin? Check.

That forum has gone to hell.
8=D

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2355 on: December 23, 2006, 07:59:04 PM »
The best is the "I DONT LIKE RAPE TIME, NOW EVERYONE WILL BE BANNED IF ITS USED" act. :lol

What's even better is, the mods decided to give in to this shitstick poster and banned the use of the word for the rest of the posters on GAF.
BKO

PhoenixWright

  • Saved the GAF-Hate Thread
  • Junior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2356 on: December 23, 2006, 08:01:17 PM »
What ad network is it for the small text ads at the bottom? We should pool our money together and put evilbore.com ads on there.  :D

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2357 on: December 23, 2006, 08:01:51 PM »
That would be awesome. :lol
BKO

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2358 on: December 23, 2006, 08:02:17 PM »
Why is evilbore an elf? Is there a story as to why an elf was chosen?

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2359 on: December 23, 2006, 08:03:04 PM »
Why is evilbore an elf? Is there a story as to why an elf was chosen?
The story goes a little like this:
 
spoiler (click to show/hide)
:nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh :nuhuh
[close]
« Last Edit: December 23, 2006, 08:04:37 PM by Ecrofirt »
8=D

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2360 on: December 23, 2006, 08:03:15 PM »
Why is evilbore an elf? Is there a story as to why an elf was chosen?

Evilore is an elf because he has huge elf-like ears. :duh
BKO

FlameOfCallandor

  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2361 on: December 23, 2006, 08:05:29 PM »
He looks like a cigarillo. Hes the guy in charge of GAF?

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2362 on: December 23, 2006, 08:06:49 PM »
He looks like a cigarillo. Hes the guy in charge of GAF?

He's the guy in Sony's pocket, yes. He's also the guy that bought himself an HDTV with his ad revenue, while letting his forum consistently run slow as shit.
8=D

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2363 on: December 23, 2006, 08:07:43 PM »
Basic recap of entire thread: GAF is crap, and is getting crappier by the hour. :tophat
BKO

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2364 on: December 23, 2006, 08:09:20 PM »
Basic recap of entire thread: GAF is crap, and is getting crappier by the hour. :tophat

I approve of your top hat and monocle, sir.
8=D

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2365 on: December 23, 2006, 08:11:28 PM »
 :-*
BKO

PhoenixWright

  • Saved the GAF-Hate Thread
  • Junior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2366 on: December 23, 2006, 08:14:27 PM »
Basic recap of entire thread: GAF is crap, and is getting crappier by the hour. :tophat

I approve of your top hat and monocle, sir.

I DONT, U MUST BAN EVERYONE THAT USES IT, D00D!  :D

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2367 on: December 23, 2006, 08:42:14 PM »
Look at the OT right now.  3 of the first 10 or so topics have been locked down- 2 babe threads (hottest black chick and Scarlett) and the spoiler tag bitching thread. 

Seriously, that place is a festering shit hole now.  They should just close down the OT and turn the place into "The Bitching about Video Game Sales and Review Scores" forum, because apparently that's all they want anymore.  Shit forum total CONFIRMED.
yar

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2368 on: December 23, 2006, 08:47:47 PM »
Look at the OT right now.  3 of the first 10 or so topics have been locked down- 2 babe threads (hottest black chick and Scarlett) and the spoiler tag bitching thread. 

Seriously, that place is a festering shit hole now.  They should just close down the OT and turn the place into "The Bitching about Video Game Sales and Review Scores" forum, because apparently that's all they want anymore.  Shit forum total CONFIRMED.

8.8/10


The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2369 on: December 23, 2006, 08:54:43 PM »
Fucking Christ, it was Spinnington who asked for spoilers to be banned... :(
BKO

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2370 on: December 23, 2006, 08:57:45 PM »
Look at the OT right now.  3 of the first 10 or so topics have been locked down- 2 babe threads (hottest black chick and Scarlett) and the spoiler tag bitching thread. 

Seriously, that place is a festering shit hole now.  They should just close down the OT and turn the place into "The Bitching about Video Game Sales and Review Scores" forum, because apparently that's all they want anymore.  Shit forum total CONFIRMED.

Except they can't bitch about anything having to do with the NPD, or sonycowboy the traitorous fuck gets to lock everything down again!
8=D

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2371 on: December 23, 2006, 11:22:09 PM »
gaf banned spoiler tags?

...what..
IYKYK

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2372 on: December 24, 2006, 12:27:15 AM »
Nothing wrong with babe threads long as they dont violate the TOS and are clearly marked as babe threads. MY issues lie with Babes invading threads people may be browsing at work ;)
o_0

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2374 on: December 24, 2006, 01:44:51 AM »
He's definitely not going to jail, but that's fucking embarassing.

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2375 on: December 24, 2006, 01:46:58 AM »
 :lol
BKO

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2376 on: December 24, 2006, 01:48:12 AM »
He's definitely not going to jail, but that's fucking embarassing.

Joke post.

:shh


brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2377 on: December 24, 2006, 01:52:45 AM »
something tells me it's either going to be a very unfunny thread eventually, or it'll get locked.

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2378 on: December 24, 2006, 12:23:15 PM »
That stupid fuck Amir0x derails more threads than anyone. Why is he a mod?

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=5177945&posted=1#post5177945

Every thread that happens to mention one of his hot-button issues instantly becomes The Amir0x Show. There are a dozen things worth posting about in that NYT article, but instead we get 2 and a half pages of him making the same fucking statements about ONE part of the article.

I don't see why Drinky has to reign himself in if he wants to come back while Amir0x can run around like a cockass 24/7 with a red username.

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2379 on: December 24, 2006, 12:38:44 PM »
well, he has a point -- Wii Sports is crap -- but he's so fuckin' humorless about it.
duc

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2380 on: December 24, 2006, 12:43:36 PM »
Yea, exactly. I could give a shit less if he doesn't like the game (I only like Bowling), but hes such a fucking drip about it. And he's got to make himself the star of the show. Look at the last 2.5 pages of that topic, they're all him.

Then you correct him on something, and his first resort is to tear you down and try to ruin your credibility. He's all the worst things about GAF rolled into one user.

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2381 on: December 24, 2006, 12:52:10 PM »
hehe, i've got this drug story of his on my PC he sent me
fat

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2382 on: December 24, 2006, 12:53:22 PM »
You know what to do, demi.

EVILBORE EXCLUSIVO
duc

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2383 on: December 24, 2006, 12:54:27 PM »
POST DAT SHYT

also what do you play on XBL

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2384 on: December 24, 2006, 12:56:38 PM »
Me? R6 Vegas, Assault Heroes, and Test Drive Unlimited
duc

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2385 on: December 24, 2006, 12:57:39 PM »
Well, demi, but you work too.

I own none of those games :(

Christopher

  • Justin Timberlake's #1 Fan
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2386 on: December 24, 2006, 01:30:06 PM »


haha that avaitar is awesome.

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2387 on: December 24, 2006, 02:33:16 PM »
I don't really play XBL much, I'm into co-op gaming, not deathmatch. R6 will be hot, probably rent that. I have Gears that I try and play co-op with Robby, but he's like BUSY WITH LIFE and stuff yknow (mostly school, blah).
fat

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2388 on: December 24, 2006, 02:33:51 PM »
LISTEN BRO

I'll co op with you. I'm 1337

GilloD

  • TAKE THE LIFE OF FRED ASTAIRE. MAKE HIM PAY. TRANSFER HIS FAME TO YOU.
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2389 on: December 25, 2006, 01:14:23 AM »
Seriously. Someone play something with me. I have all these games. I'm l33t! I'm down!
wha

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2390 on: December 25, 2006, 03:23:13 PM »
Why does GAF allow you to openly discuss emulation of PSP games, but has an even stricter policy than gamefaqs when it comes to any other form of emulation?

Ecrofirt

  • Heavy Metal Jesus
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2391 on: December 25, 2006, 06:36:56 PM »
Why does GAF allow you to openly discuss emulation of PSP games, but has an even stricter policy than gamefaqs when it comes to any other form of emulation?

They have no problems with discussion of emulators or anything. I've started multiple threads about emulation. The talk usually degrades to piracy shit quickly where people ask where to get ROMs and shit, though. You've got to walk that fine line where you discuss things like which emulator is best for a particular console, etc.
8=D

MrAngryFace

  • I have the most sensible car on The Bore
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2392 on: December 25, 2006, 06:38:19 PM »
I assume they have the same stance we do. Talk of emulation is fine, but linking to roms is prohibited. Emulation was never the crime.
o_0

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2393 on: December 25, 2006, 07:26:32 PM »
I know, but I've seen people banned without asking for or posting ROMs. PSP, on the other hand...

The Miles Trahan Burger Experiment

  • Can he only eat just one?
  • The Walking Dead
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2394 on: December 25, 2006, 11:20:37 PM »
Some dude was just banned for posting this. THIS.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5182070&postcount=25

 ::) ::) ::)
BKO

Mondain

  • no bias
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2395 on: December 25, 2006, 11:52:16 PM »
I assume they have the same stance we do. Talk of emulation is fine, but linking to roms is prohibited. Emulation was never the crime.

but here admittance to piracy or impressions based off of pirated games/software seem to be condoned...

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2396 on: December 26, 2006, 12:09:26 AM »
I assume they have the same stance we do. Talk of emulation is fine, but linking to roms is prohibited. Emulation was never the crime.

but here admittance to piracy or impressions based off of pirated games/software seem to be condoned...

Just a reason why this place is a middle grounds between OA and GA
fat

Cheebs

  • How's my posting? Call 1-866-MAF-BANS to report flame bait.
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2397 on: December 26, 2006, 06:44:18 PM »
Someone explain to me why is there a thread at GAF where everyone is hyped about Fantastic Four 2? FANTASTIC FOUR???!? wtf

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2398 on: December 26, 2006, 06:48:11 PM »
It was a trap by the mods to attract all of posters at GAF with the worst movie taste and wipe them out all at once... i hope.

GilloD

  • TAKE THE LIFE OF FRED ASTAIRE. MAKE HIM PAY. TRANSFER HIS FAME TO YOU.
  • Senior Member
Re: GAF DISCUSSIONS GO IN HERE - PART DEUX (Keep it Civil, Fuckers!)
« Reply #2399 on: December 26, 2006, 10:50:50 PM »
GAF-bans are so incredibly ridiculous nowadays. What a fraud.
wha