Ok question time will connery be in it or not. That is the billion dollar questions. No connery no ticket sale. Harrison ford cant sell a film on his own anymore. Just look at his last two monumental failures. We all love Indy, but we love Indy's dad even more. I need to hear some more cocky funny from connery before the old mother fucker dies.Connery said if any film would bring him out of his acting retirement it would be Indy a few weeks ago.
Fuck i cant sleep
I wonder if they'll fight terrrists in this one and if they did it'd be awesome if Connery stuck a fork up ones ass.It will be the commies most likely seeing how it takes place in the 50's
There was a rumor that Ford was going to quit if he can't use the whip.I doubt Paramount would have finalized a date if they thought Harrison would quit.
I don't really have an idea if it will be bad or not. But I'm just saying I will be there no matter what.I know, but there are many who are.
I think it's just the blind (but well-targeted) hate for Lucas right now.But as I said, Lucas while a weak writer and director has been pretty solid at coming up with stories and letting others craft them into scripts and direct them as shown with ESB and the Indiana Jones trilogy.
But the people with the blind hate don't see that! They just see Lucas' ugly face with that scruffy beard and that SW runing agenda and my God! THE HATE MAN!I think it's just the blind (but well-targeted) hate for Lucas right now.But as I said, Lucas while a weak writer and director has been pretty solid at coming up with stories and letting others craft them into scripts and direct them as shown with ESB and the Indiana Jones trilogy.
I dont get why people are so worried about it being bad.
George Lucas did the story yes, but isn't it general consensus that Lucas is a brilliant story teller but tends to be very weak at writing the scripts for his story and directing? His best works (ESB & Raiders) are where he gave the script writing and directing to others so I don't see a problem with that.
And Steven Spielberg is directing this, it isn't like say a Die Hard 4 or something where the original director is long gone.
Indiana Jones 4 is done by the same team as Raiders, I don't see how a problem will arise.
(http://www.celebsa-z.com/images/celebrity_pics/george_lucas.jpg)
why youssa no likey?
LADY IN THE WATER WAS COOL! SCREW YOU:lol :lol :lol
He is willing still. He outlined Indiana Jones IV and wrote the story but he gave it to David Koepp.(http://www.celebsa-z.com/images/celebrity_pics/george_lucas.jpg)
why youssa no likey?
I like Lucas. I respect what he did with Star Wars, and how he shared the profits of the original movies with his crew. Also I love his storytelling; Star Wars and Indiana Jones are iconic staples of American culture.
But I can't stand what he did with Star Wars. The movies could have possibly been better if he allowed others to write the screenplay. But like M Night Shamalynan he seems unwilling to let someone else do it for him, perhaps out of arrogance. Both of them simply can't write scripts anymore
This movie is going to blow, Cheebs. Sorry to break it to you.I love the Indiana Jones trilogy with insane passion. I will be for Indy 4 what the insane star wars apologists were for the prequels so I doubt it. ;)
Just because you're an apologist, doesn't mean the movie doesn't blow. See Episode IIII am not a star wars apologist. the prequels cant compare to ANH and ESB. ROTJ vs ROTS is debatle but I would easily say:
I put TPM ahead of both. I think the prequels got progressively worse.TPM felt like a film more so than AOTC and ROTS which seemed to go over the top in cgi and I liked that.
How do you love ROTJ so much? Most of the problems that plagued the prequels were creeping in by the time of ROTJ.
Lucas has said Connery will be in it whether he wants to be or not.
Meaning? Most likely he will be.
Just for fun:
ANH - 7/10
ESB - 8.5/10
ROTJ - 6/10
TPM - 5/10
AOTC - 2/10
ROTS - 3/10
I agree with those ratings, but I think ROTS is worse than AOTC. AOTC is painful, but it's at least coherent. ROTS is like an incoherent collection of clips of people playing a Star Wars: Battlefront.
THE FINAL INDISPUTABLE WORD ON STAR WARS
ANH - 4.0/10
ESB - 6.0/10
ROTJ - 3.0/10
TPM - 3.0/10
AotC - 0.5/10
RotS - 1.5/10
I feel TPM is aging the best of the prequels so far which is quite suprising. I think it will be the most well looked upon of the three 25+ years from now.:lol
TPM is easily the best of three, Phoenix Dark. It comes at no surprise that its ranked that way by the REAL objective people in this thread.
ESB 6/10?
Yeah, now I know you have no taste. ::)
WTF that scene is awful. Let's cram a bunch of exposition that should've been fleshed out over the entire trilogy into one distinguished mentally-challenged CG-filled sequence and in one swoop, bring back the dreaded M-word (midichlorians are the dumbest fucking thing ever).
Whoa now. Empire Strikes Back is pretty good, but a classic? C'mon.
I think with the last two prequels, nothing with Star Wars on the cover can even be considered remotely a classic.
RotS felt like a bunch of shitty videogame cutscenes strung together and poorly-edited.
PD, ESB does have the pacing on its side, but some of those lines are pure drippy cheese ("nerf herder" et al). I suppose your preference for ESB (and the OT in general) depends entirely on the level of sophistication you demand from your cinema.
RotS was the most entertaining of the prequel films, though TPM was the best in a techincal sense (aside from puppet Yoda... :yuck ). There's no way you can tell me TPM entertained you more than RotS without having me laugh in your face. An hour of masturbatory pod-racing? No thanks.That is how I feel. TPM is the better film but ROTS is more entertaining.
what amazes me is what happened from TPM to AOTC. TPM did have tons of CGI but it had REAL sets and REAL locations and scenes with not much cgi(excluding Jar Jar). But AOTC and ROTS were like 3 humans standing on a green screen with every thing else being cgi for the entire movies.
what amazes me is what happened from TPM to AOTC. TPM did have tons of CGI but it had REAL sets and REAL locations and scenes with not much cgi(excluding Jar Jar). But AOTC and ROTS were like 3 humans standing on a green screen with every thing else being cgi for the entire movies.
TPM had a dumb charm that kept me moderately engaged despite my endless eye-rolling and wincing. It didn't even seem like a Star Wars movie.
RotS, on the other hand, wasn't even remotely entertaining -- it was an endless pastiche of dry, dreadful, and unpleasantly ridiculous scenes of the sort untalented comic book and videogaming nerds might visualize if they were given access to an SGI render farm. OMG FOUR LIGHTSABERS! I'VE GOT THE HIGH GROUND! FORCE BATTLE! PALPATINE GRANDSTANDING! ORDER 88! YODA FLIPPIN' OUT DOIN' HOP AND BOP LIKE MARIO! BOSS FIGHTS GALORE! LIZARD RIDIN' MINI-GAME! INCOHERENT SPACE BATTLE! NATALIE PORTMAN SO PRETTY AND INNOCENT LIKE AERIS! TRANSFORMERS! OMG OMG OMG!
RotS is ManaByte the Movie.
So both Drinky and Willco prove their poor taste when it comes to Star Wars films, excellent.
You act like as if people hated it, Shake. There's a difference between nobody seeing it and people hating it. The overwhelming concensus from people who saw it was that it was a great deal of fun. And it was.
Again, speaks volumes about your tastes!
(http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/0/0e/180px-Arrested_Development_-_Star_Wars_Kid.jpg)
Jedi on a Plane would have been awesomer!
I know. The dude also hates Fight Club and thinks Godfather is "meh".
Let me put this in perspective. The movie was called Snakes on a Plane. It delivered its promise of snakes on said plane.
Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith did not deliver Star Wars, nor avenge the Sith (how could it - why were they revegenful of?). It just sucked.
So now a film like Brazil has to deliver only "Brasil" for it to be good?
Step your game up, Willco. This is a pathetic excuse. :rofl
Once again, since when does the title of a film have to indicate "THIS IS ALL THE FILM IS ABOUT, DON'T EXPECT ANYTHING BETTER"? That's just a crappy excuse to defend your poor taste.
Yes, there were snakes on planes. That can't hold a movie for 90 minutes, though, and it did not.
I know. The dude also hates Fight Club and thinks Godfather is "meh".
There is no helping those that don't love The Godfather. But, to be fair, Fight Club is a fucking pretentious turd of a movie. Se7en r.ocks my shit, but Fight Club is an embarassing tribute to the mentality of young adult males circa 1999.
Did somebody just compare The Motherfucking Godfather to Mission Impossible?!:lol :lol :lol
:duh
Again, you prove your retardedness. I never said the two are equal quality-wise, but we're comparing how spoofing/quoting ruins the original movie for us.
So, please, continue hitting yourself.
What the fuck are you talking about, Shake. Make sense. Nobody is hating on Mission: Impossible, The Godfather or Evil Dead. Quit being stupid.
Are you implying that The Evil Dead has been spoofed/quoted as much as The Godfather and Mission: Impossible?
:lol :lol :lol
I've heard more "mainstream" folks quote Evil Dead than Mission Impossible or The Godfather combined.
ironically, a videogame -- Knights of the Old Republic -- is the best written and acted Star Wars experience.
ironically, a videogame -- Knights of the Old Republic -- is the best written and acted Star Wars experience.
they're fifteen years too late with this project.Too late. It's in pre-production and will begin filming in a few months.
someone blow this fetal flick back to god[/img]
KOTOR was fantastic but its story was corny fanfic nonsense for the most part IMO. Way too similar to that fanfic star wars shit by timothy zahn and stuff. Only Lucas would be insane enough to charge people for fanfic nonsense.
ESB and ANH were MOVING. I mean come on KOTOR a better plot than fucking A New Hope? That is absurd.
ESB and ANH were MOVING. I mean come on KOTOR a better plot than fucking A New Hope? That is absurd.
It's laughable, and to tell the truth I don't think Drinky believes that for a second either.
KOTOR merely takes themes from the movies and adds some tid bit to it. That's what videogames do: they copy film, yet they never surpass film.
interactivity doesn't make a plot better. Most cases it makes it WORSE since the artist can't always dictate the order of things or how they will happen.ESB and ANH were MOVING. I mean come on KOTOR a better plot than fucking A New Hope? That is absurd.
It's laughable, and to tell the truth I don't think Drinky believes that for a second either.
KOTOR merely takes themes from the movies and adds some tid bit to it. That's what videogames do: they copy film, yet they never surpass film.
Games have one advantage and that is the interactivity, which for alot of people makes a game more immersive.
I can't believe this thread turned into another star wars bitchfest.Well KOTOR should never be mentioned in the same breathe as Empire Strikes Back!
yeah lolI can't believe this thread turned into another star wars bitchfest.Well KOTOR should never be mentioned in the same breathe as Empire Strikes Back!
I bet you'd find the story in OOT better than Kingdom of Heaven. :'(yeah lolI can't believe this thread turned into another star wars bitchfest.Well KOTOR should never be mentioned in the same breathe as Empire Strikes Back!
What a way to ruin your credibility in movie discussion :lol
Coming from ME that's harsh
This user is currently ignored.
It would be worse than KOTOR if I tried probably, thats why I don't write movies.
It would be worse than KOTOR if I tried probably, thats why I don't write movies.:lol