Author Topic: Movie News, Reviews, and Discussion Super-Thread  (Read 5388178 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28260 on: November 06, 2017, 10:28:33 AM »


Quote
Eric [][][]
13 hours ago
These two morons are gonna love Justice League with its generic villain and army of space bugs. Looking forward to the review of that fucking turd.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2017, 11:13:01 AM by benjipwns »

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28261 on: November 06, 2017, 11:39:58 AM »
Love Maximum Overdrive. Stephen King should have never gave up the cocaine.

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28262 on: November 06, 2017, 11:43:22 AM »
I just really can't get excited for this knowing we aren't getting snyder's original humorless apocalyptic vision of the justice league

 :-\ :'(

#fuckwhedon

I'm a Puppy!

  • Knows the muffin man.
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28263 on: November 06, 2017, 11:56:04 AM »
Watched Blade Runner 2049. It completely blew my mind with how awesome it was.
que

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28264 on: November 06, 2017, 12:56:45 PM »
Justice League looks horrendous. Really getting a mo-lester vibe from Ezra Miller.
serge

Snoopycat_

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28265 on: November 06, 2017, 01:10:00 PM »
Atomic Blonde. Lasted 40 minutes. Total shite.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28266 on: November 06, 2017, 01:13:14 PM »
Looks possibly not completely terrible, which would be a step up from Batman v Superman at least.
dog

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28268 on: November 06, 2017, 02:43:19 PM »
There is rumors that Disney is in talks to buy Fox, so she'll have even less movies to review if that goes through.


Quaker

  • Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28269 on: November 06, 2017, 02:46:26 PM »
Your loss. Should have fast forwarded to the fight scene on the staircase.  :whew

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28270 on: November 06, 2017, 02:57:14 PM »
edit: beaten like Korean animators

Also apparently 21st Century Fox is in talks with Disney about selling them all the movie/TV production wing, with Fox focusing solely on its News and Sports end of the business. Fox would also retain its U.S. broadcast network and all the affiliates (which they've been trying to slowly hand off starting with the extra channels on the feeds) because no one in their right mind wants to disentangle the regulatory barriers to that, so Disney would just be gobbling up most of the Fox owned cable networks except maybe FX/FXX along with Fox Sports and Fox News/Fox Business. On the movie side the biggest thing in terms of modern blockbuster films would be that Marvel gets back the X-Men. And even more importantly THE FANTASTIC FOUR.

Disagreement from the articles I read seems to be on just how fast Disney would gobble up everything, Disney seems to want to pick stuff up in waves so they can integrate it more and lower the overall cost, and Fox just wants to dump the whole thing and say "good luck!"

Fox has apparently been floating offers for a while as they see the new media environment as either you have to get Disney big or pair down to focus on your "best" parts. And apparently came to the conclusion that Disney is the only one who might want to take most all of it. Fox has lots of ownership share of emerging markets as Murdoch really pushed that before everyone else which is probably what Disney really wants. Along with getting all of Marvel back since they're going to be running into casting problems soon.

No word on what this would do to the much awaited Avatar sequels.

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28271 on: November 06, 2017, 03:10:42 PM »
X-Men now part of the MCU, MCU now the only movies allowed to be made.
©@©™

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28272 on: November 06, 2017, 03:27:23 PM »
MCU now the only movies allowed to be made.

yes please.  Fast and Furious MCU cross over please.

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28273 on: November 06, 2017, 03:39:50 PM »
That's going to be the next wave of hollywood. When they are done rebooting every property from the 20th century, they will just mash them all up into crossovers.


benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28274 on: November 06, 2017, 03:53:36 PM »
I'm honestly kind of baffled that Fox didn't drag Fantastic Four out of the gutter by doing an X-Men/Fantastic Four crossover film. Especially since so many of the comic storylines they're grabbing from included the FF due to Franklin Richards.

Would have been interesting to have done an in-period FF reboot film when they did First Class set back in the 1960s. Then crossed them over with Doom as the villain or some shit.

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28275 on: November 06, 2017, 04:11:52 PM »
Inhumans rekt
___

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28276 on: November 06, 2017, 04:27:29 PM »
I'm honestly kind of baffled that Fox didn't drag Fantastic Four out of the gutter by doing an X-Men/Fantastic Four crossover film. Especially since so many of the comic storylines they're grabbing from included the FF due to Franklin Richards.

Would have been interesting to have done an in-period FF reboot film when they did First Class set back in the 1960s. Then crossed them over with Doom as the villain or some shit.

That was the plan actually, but then Fan4stic flopped.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/markhughes/2015/04/22/why-fantastic-four-reboot-is-set-in-the-x-men-universe/amp/&ved=0ahUKEwiK39bt8arXAhXCblAKHV18CvoQFggpMAA&usg=AOvVaw1ruXzbrGp5Zomg2b1RDWxQ&ampcf=1

seagrams hotsauce

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28277 on: November 06, 2017, 05:54:38 PM »
I hope Disney buys every company on the planet. WWE. Netflix. Activision. I wanna see the bitches from Orange Is The New Black getting an F5 from Cena while Genji from Overwatch has a sword fight with Daredevil outside the ring. And I hope they buy non entertainment too. Gimme Flo from Progressive beheading the guy Verizon traitor with a lightsaber. I want it all

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member

Snoopycat_

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28279 on: November 06, 2017, 08:46:59 PM »
I watched up to the terrible lesbo scene and that was enough

Bebpo

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28280 on: November 06, 2017, 10:25:46 PM »
Love Maximum Overdrive. Stephen King should have never gave up the cocaine.

I want to be with you on this and the crazy machines killing people in the first 30 mins is great. Like strolling down the neighborhood in the post robo-apocalypse.

But the rest of the movie is boring and nothing happens ;_;

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28281 on: November 06, 2017, 10:34:17 PM »
dog

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28282 on: November 06, 2017, 11:33:17 PM »
Love Maximum Overdrive. Stephen King should have never gave up the cocaine.

I want to be with you on this and the crazy machines killing people in the first 30 mins is great. Like strolling down the neighborhood in the post robo-apocalypse.

But the rest of the movie is boring and nothing happens ;_;

I guess it helps that like mupepe i first discovered it some strange mid sunday afternoon when I was a kid. It's a silly movie but when you're young that goblin truck stays with you.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28283 on: November 07, 2017, 01:04:39 AM »
Saw Valerian and the City of planets orwhaeverthetitleis

Great visuals. Everything else: Maximum Meh

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28284 on: November 07, 2017, 08:19:44 AM »
The premise of Valerian would've made for a great Netflix series. Endless amount of stories to tell.

For the movie, if they would've nailed the casting on the male character and they ignored the "romance" angle between the two agents, it might've been enough to make it a good movie.


team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28285 on: November 07, 2017, 06:13:26 PM »
RAIDAHS!
« Last Edit: November 07, 2017, 06:18:53 PM by filler »
*****

team filler

  • filler
  • filler
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28286 on: November 07, 2017, 06:14:19 PM »
Anybody see Jeeper Creeper 3? How was it?
*****

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28287 on: November 08, 2017, 11:17:36 PM »
so the new Ridley Scott joint All the Money in the World had a big part for Kevin Spacey, but HOLY CARP they'rerecast/reshooting all his scenes with Christopher Plummer and are still looking to keep their Dec 22 release date.

I mean, we all knew Spacey was done forever in Hollywood (he's got a complete film about Gore Vidal that may never get released), but even so this is friggin drastic.

so imagine this same trailer, but with less shitty old-age makeup.



still coming soon... apparently.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28288 on: November 09, 2017, 01:27:15 AM »
Plummer will eat that role alive.

…It's the weirdest form of Hollywood hubris to take actors and get them made-up to look like old people. Why not just get an older actor?
spoiler (click to show/hide)
j/k the worst form of Hollywood hubris is taking other countries' movies and recasting them with caucasian leads speaking English
[close]

Quaker

  • Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28289 on: November 09, 2017, 01:31:30 AM »
I read on Twitter that it might just be them pasting Plummer's head on existing footage, like Fincher does.

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28290 on: November 09, 2017, 01:48:39 AM »
if that's the case they would still have to give Spacey some sort of minor performance credit 'body double - Disgraced Double Oscar Winner Kevin Spacey'

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28291 on: November 09, 2017, 01:58:25 PM »
Spacey is pretty much toast at this point. Maybe he reemerges 5-10 years down the road after therapy/jail time, but for now nobody's gonna touch him.
dog

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28292 on: November 09, 2017, 05:43:29 PM »
I read on Twitter that it might just be them pasting Plummer's head on existing footage, like Fincher does.
I would absolutely watch the shit out of a cut of a multi-million dollar film where they badly green screen in a replacement actor for one of the leads.

Either that or one of these Star Wars/Marvel/etc. everything is green screen movies where they use cuts where the actors aren't looking in the right place or something.

Like when Lucas first put Jabba over top of that fat dude and Harrison Ford was never lined up properly with him because he was looking at the actor and the technology wasn't quite ready yet. I saw the scene again years later when my roommate bought that crazy box set and it and all sorts of other stuff had been fixed and it was terrible, Lucas has no whimsy.

Nabbis

  • oops
  • Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28293 on: November 10, 2017, 11:37:28 AM »
Saw the new Thor and i felt like i watched Guardians of the galaxy. Nothing particularly wrong with that but i would hate it if all the Marvel movies became like that.

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28295 on: November 10, 2017, 05:46:49 PM »
Agatha Christie has got to be the most adapted author of the last century, so how novel can any new movie based on any of her stubbornly anachronistic (even for their time) works be? The newest (for now) version of Murder on the Orient Express thankfully doesn't even try to be 'not your Daddy's whodunit'. Its old fashioned, just like pretty much every movie that Kenneth Branagh have ever directed. The alterations to the source material are minor (acknowledges racism of the 1930's, kinda well too. And Poirot is lovelorn!? Ah man)compared to the classical structure and production design on display. I don't know how much they spent on this reboot of the 70's/80's era Finney/Ustinov All-Star Poirot vehicles, but you see every penny onscreen. But like its antecedents, of which its a comfortable comparison to, its a fine enough picture for adults. Practically the ideal film to take your middle-aged parents to, depending on your folks of course.

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28296 on: November 10, 2017, 05:58:51 PM »
Why would you take your parents to the movies? That’s a terrible idea.
serge

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28297 on: November 10, 2017, 07:02:12 PM »
Anyone catch Killing of a Sacred Deer? Worth it? May end up catching it tomorrow
:9

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28298 on: November 10, 2017, 08:27:44 PM »
Sonic the Hedgehog -1991
Memoirs of an Invisible Man(his worst movie) - 1992

COINCIDENCE?

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28299 on: November 10, 2017, 08:58:44 PM »
Sonic the Hedgehog -1991
Memoirs of an Invisible Man(his worst movie) - 1992

COINCIDENCE?

I pointed this out in The Most Important Thread of the Forum, where this was discussed hours ago. Stop stealing my material, you plagiarist bitch.
serge

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28300 on: November 10, 2017, 08:59:27 PM »
Take those likes away from him. They are stolen as far as I am concerned. Contacting lawyer.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2017, 09:03:57 PM by TVC 15 »
serge

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28301 on: November 10, 2017, 09:16:59 PM »
Take those likes away from him. They are stolen as far as I am concerned. Contacting lawyer.

Just liked it because of this.

You little bitch. I shouldn’t be surprised that a filthy pirate like you would also like stolen jokes. How could you do this to me? And just days after I offered you the chance to masturbate for me over webcam.
serge

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28302 on: November 10, 2017, 09:51:31 PM »
©@©™

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28303 on: November 11, 2017, 03:08:05 AM »
Sonic the Hedgehog -1991
Memoirs of an Invisible Man(his worst movie) - 1992

COINCIDENCE?

I pointed this out in The Most Important Thread of the Forum, where this was discussed hours ago. Stop stealing my material, you plagiarist bitch.
I swear I didn't see that, and golly, I don't know how anybody else could have come to the conclusion that 90's Carpenter was vastly inferior to 80's and 70's Carpenter.

I'll make it up to you by performing some rite of self-ablating nihilism. Cool?

TVC15

  • Laugh when you can, it’s cheap medicine -LB
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28304 on: November 11, 2017, 03:11:50 AM »
Sonic the Hedgehog -1991
Memoirs of an Invisible Man(his worst movie) - 1992

COINCIDENCE?

I pointed this out in The Most Important Thread of the Forum, where this was discussed hours ago. Stop stealing my material, you plagiarist bitch.
I swear I didn't see that, and golly, I don't know how anybody else could have come to the conclusion that 90's Carpenter was vastly inferior to 80's and 70's Carpenter.

I'll make it up to you by performing some rite of self-ablating nihilism. Cool?

Replace “nihilism” with something daddy finds sexier.
serge

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member

Tasty

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28306 on: November 11, 2017, 11:23:31 AM »

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28307 on: November 11, 2017, 11:33:11 AM »
Yiiiiikes

I fucking reserved tickets for that Justice League shit show. At least ill be cringing from the comfort of a leather recliner and double arm rests.
:9

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28308 on: November 11, 2017, 11:34:43 AM »
They should have replaced Jessie Eisenberg with Christopher Plummer.
©@©™

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28309 on: November 11, 2017, 11:41:37 AM »
I'd be ok with Plummers recent body of work consisting of fixing miscasts and standing in for pedophiles
:9

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28310 on: November 11, 2017, 11:50:43 AM »
the leaker guy on reddit says whedon reshot most of the superman stuff?

 :drudge SPOILERS :drudge

also apparently superman and the flash have a race twice

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28311 on: November 11, 2017, 11:59:27 AM »
also found this mega accurate comment:
Quote
I'll blame Whedon for a lot of the third act bullshit since that's where he did most of his work. I'll blame the dumb hicks who thought BvS was too smart and got JL dumbed down for all the rest.
fucking backwater flyover country redneck hicks and their damn megaplexes forcing Snyder's brilliant art films off the screen for Whedon's mindless lowest common denominator trash kissfests

toku

  • 𝕩𝕩𝕩
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28312 on: November 11, 2017, 12:39:05 PM »
they'll understand one day comrade

 :'(

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28313 on: November 12, 2017, 02:05:16 AM »
Hannibal — We got to talking about the books in a different thread, and it was on Netflix, so…

It's a better movie than book. I guess a bunch of the corners which are cut don't really offend as much in a movie as they do in a book. I expect less from movies. I expect that they're trying to make everything fit into a theater friendly run time. So it wasn't as bad. It was an entertaining movie. Julieann Moore is as good or better as Starling, Ray Liotta is perfect (but typecast) as government black hole Kendler, and Anthony Hopkins is still definitively the character he established in Silence of the lambs. As a Ridley Scott film, the visuals deliver a consistent lushness that the base material doesn't necessarily deserve.

The later dining room scene in the book that almost made me pass out is just about as shocking in the movie, but the cognitive dissonance was absent, so I was fine watching it. I also had to pause and unpause it repeatedly as my son kept coming into the room for god-knows-why reasons, and it ended up stuttering the emotional impact out of that scene.

They took the airplane picnic basket scene out of the middle of the book, where it works, and put it on the end of the movie which makes very little sense, but had a kind of quiet charm.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28314 on: November 12, 2017, 04:03:08 AM »
they'll understand one day comrade

 :'(
We'll teach them the the world only makes sense if you force it to.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News/Reviews Thread
« Reply #28315 on: November 12, 2017, 04:21:13 AM »
no matter what, the ultimate cut of BvS's extra Alfred content really helped make this easily my favorite Bruce/Alfred relationship on-screen so far and at least that looks unchanged:


the other Snyder had/has started to toy with this (old but often ignored idea) a bit in his comics, of Alfred being an equal partner in the mission and their operations, not just an old butler who's also a sounding board and stitch-up man...i like the dimension it creates in BvS and a scene like this...them both being stubborn asses to each other but ultimately supportive and there for the other is a role he rarely gets as part of the Bat Family...it's also subtle in BvS and this and the other clip i've seen shows it, but you got them at the start a sense of Bruce and Alfred tired of their "lonely war" and its pressures (Robin dead who knows how long ago/Alfred lamenting Bruce throwing himself back into it in his vengeful way/etc.) and by the end of the movie and the clips for this they're reinvigorated by the mission reborn again with new allies even if at the end of BvS and start of this it's just Bruce and Diana and Alfred...and Bruce/Alfred are disagreeing about Superman

there was a bit of that in the Arkham games, especially Origins, but they still played the Alfred is old and feeble and whatever card...instead of being Batman's semi-Watson with the military background and all

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28316 on: November 12, 2017, 06:40:53 AM »
Saw Susperia's 4K restoration. Yowza. That is a heckava good looking film. It was a midnight showing, so there were a bunch of dickbags laughing their way through much of it (yeah, its a bit dated in some respects, get over yourself). But other than the urge to do bodily harm to some of my fellow patrons, it was a great time. I myself prefer Argento's giallos over his straight horror films, but this one is overflowing with such visual and audio spectacle (and a threadbare plot and characters, to be fair)
, that I cant help but be won over by it.

I mean, man. Hearing that soundtrack in a great theater. Shit, that was a treat.



« Last Edit: November 12, 2017, 06:49:06 AM by HyperZoneWasAwesome »

desert punk

  • ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
  • Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28317 on: November 12, 2017, 06:57:46 AM »
Saw John Wick 2 the other day and liked it. It's not terribly different from the first movie, tho quite honestly, I don't really remember the latter that much. Which is why I was confused at the beginning and had no clue what was going on, but I started remembering things later on and it got better. What I do remember is, that I thought the first one outstayed it's welcome a bit. This one kept my interest until the end, though not sure if that makes it a better movie than its predecessor.

Anyway I enjoyed myself and I'm down for a third one. 

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28318 on: November 12, 2017, 08:55:15 AM »
Hannibal — We got to talking about the books in a different thread, and it was on Netflix, so…

It's a better movie than book. I guess a bunch of the corners which are cut don't really offend as much in a movie as they do in a book. I expect less from movies. I expect that they're trying to make everything fit into a theater friendly run time. So it wasn't as bad. It was an entertaining movie. Julieann Moore is as good or better as Starling, Ray Liotta is perfect (but typecast) as government black hole Kendler, and Anthony Hopkins is still definitively the character he established in Silence of the lambs. As a Ridley Scott film, the visuals deliver a consistent lushness that the base material doesn't necessarily deserve.

The later dining room scene in the book that almost made me pass out is just about as shocking in the movie, but the cognitive dissonance was absent, so I was fine watching it. I also had to pause and unpause it repeatedly as my son kept coming into the room for god-knows-why reasons, and it ended up stuttering the emotional impact out of that scene.

They took the airplane picnic basket scene out of the middle of the book, where it works, and put it on the end of the movie which makes very little sense, but had a kind of quiet charm.
This is a film I'm actually sometimes afraid to admit I actually liked when I first saw it. It's not really a mystery or even a thriller. All the tension is quite subdued. Ridley Scott came in as director as Demme thought it was way too violent and gorey to shoot. And Jodie Foster wanted some absurd amount of money. David Mamet apparently wrote a more true to the book draft and Scott brought in his own guy because they wanted to make it not only fit into a film but also be more subtle about things. I liked how there were little aspects of redemptionist behavior for all the characters but all in their own twisted ways. :doge

Gary Oldman plays the bad guy but did it uncredited to hide himself better.

Oh, and my favorite part, the BIG CAT AND MOUSE SEMI-CHASE SCENE where Anthony Hopkins just wanders around Union Station for five minutes and the whole thing looks like they filmed it without permission from behind trash cans and stuff. :lol

Quaker

  • Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #28319 on: November 12, 2017, 10:16:03 PM »
The Florida Project - Wonderful slice of life portrait of a seedy motel in the shadow of Disneyworld, most of it is told from the perspective of a 6 year old girl. It ends up playing out like The Little Rascals meets American Honey. Absolutely worth seeking out if you're a Willem Dafoe fan, he plays(a bit against type) the good-hearted hotel manager and he is fantastic in this.

Anyone catch Killing of a Sacred Deer? Worth it? May end up catching it tomorrow
Gorgeous cinematorgaphy and great acting(between this and Lion and Top of the Lake it's nice seeing Nicole Kidman get good work again) but I found it incredibly bleak and frustratingly obtuse(similar to how some people felt about Mother.)

I just rewatched The Lobster this week(hadn't seen it since it first came out) and felt put off by the bleakness in the beginning but even though the ending is really dark I thought it was also surprisingly...sweet.

The Coen bros. have a sterling record as directors, but a somewhat middling one as screenwriters for films they haven't been at the helm for themselves, Suburbicon joins the ranks of other honorable mediocrities like Gambit and Unbroken. Its a wannabe mean-spirited noir set in an idyllic (or is it?) 1950's suburban setting, there's an awkwardly shoehorned in integration subplot that never really pays off but is well intentioned. Well intentioned actually describes a lot of this movie, as the thrills often fail to materialize and only some of the jokes land (Coen-sorta black humor has got to be properly committed to). A Coen bros. script, in less gifted but certainly more handsome hands becomes the cipher-populated monument to production design that one could mistake an actual Coen Bros. film for with an undiscerning eye. All the same, its interesting to see a rough draft of ideas that they'd crib for other, better movies that followed the writing (right after Blood Simple) of this (there's that one scene from Miller's Crossing, and Burn After Reading...). Maybe next time Director person leave that stuff in the vault where you found it, if it was better those arch Minnesotan dudes woulda made it themselves.
Interesting, I didn't know they had written it that long ago. Yeah, it's odd. The setup feels very similar to Fargo, but with the tone of Burn After Reading set in the world of A Serious Man, but it never really comes together to become something as good as any of those or offer dialogue that's quite as precise or "punchy" as an actual Coen brothers movie. There's a subplot with a black family moving in to the neighborhood(which I found really effective at being upsetting) that plays a big role in setting up the plot but then it's just kind of set aside for large portions of the film and feels like it doesn't really fit. That being said, once I set my disappointment aside, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it. I would recommend it as a rental if you're a fan of really good period specific production design or OK with something in that Coen brothers ballpark.

Oh yeah, the trailer that I saw was not indicative of the tone at all, overall it's not nearly as "zany" as it sets it up to be.