The King's Speech
Where to start? I suppose the most affecting part of this movie was the performances by the two central actors, Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush. I don't suppose the film would have been half as good if those two guys weren't at the top of their game. Firth's portrayal of the titular prince/heir/King is a lesson in capturing the essence of a character. All the film's themes and plot points revolve around the character's struggle with identity and sense of duty ("I'm a naval officer, that's what I know. I'm not a king"). Firth comes across as an ordinary person caught in the headlights of public service with no way out. In one scene, Rush's unassuming Lionel Logue remarks to the undercover wife of Firth (out to make an appointment for her royal husband, under the pseudonym "Mr Johnson"), "Can't he just change his job?".
The real gem for me though, in this picture, was Geoffrey Rush's remarkable turn as the Australian expat and elocution practitioner Lionel Logue. He has a kind of queer and tender motherly charm that really endears him to the audience. His subdued Australian accent befitting a man who practises the art of elocution yet cannot shake a long upbringing in his native land (in contrast, his wife sports a comparatively 'thick' Australian accent). His relationship with Firth is central to the movie, and it is never boring when both actors are sharing the screen. Add to this an inspired cast of supporting actors (watch out for a suitably gravelly Timothy Spall as Churchill) and the illusion of authenticity is never shattered.
The direction as well supports the drama and story. We naturally during the course of the film find ourselves in grand locations, yet the camera always focuses on the characters, often using close-ups, dutch angles and over-the-shoulder perspectives. There are no real sweeping shots of cathedrals or castles in the film, they're just the backdrops we find our protagonists in. As a consequence, we identify with Firth not as a regal, distant and stern entity, but as a human speckled with emotional folly. The plot never gets boggled in the politics of the time even though it precedes WWII, and though many a scene is shared with statesman and politicians. At its his heart it's a simple story of one man overcoming a difficulty and forging a great friendship with an unlikely fellow.