What do those three editorials by obviously biased people have to do with an editorial by the paper itself using hard numbers from the bill? Point out where its wrong. I already stated I'm open to other interpretations.
Except it's not simply pointing out the universally understood and agreed-upon significance of those numbers. It's making a series of arguments, some of which are transparently horseshit.
1) Corporate tax cuts count as stimulus but personal tax cuts don't.
2) Mass transit doesn't count because it doesn't turn a profit. Highways do count, even when they bring no revenue.
3) Buying cars for the federal government is bad because... well, they already spend like a totally big number on it! With no context of what they're used for, the state of the fleet, etc.
4) Electric grid funds count. Making buildings energy-efficient doesn't.
5) Medicare is something for "people who do nothing". Aside from the tastelessness in assailing "people who do nothing" in an economy like this, it's factually wrong. The money goes pretty directly to health care professionals and pharmaceutical companies who are providing a service.
6) Education apparently provides no returns on investment! This was maybe my favorite bit. It's plausible as long as you ignore the common school movement, the high school movement, the GI Bill, just about every international data point (y halo thar Azn tigerz!), and common sense.
But the biggest thing is the general approach. The author uses absolutely no arguments from economics. He doesn't explain or even try to contradict the reasoning behind the bill. No mention of "demand", "business cycle", "employment", Keynes or Friedman or any of that.
He (and let's not get so PC to think the WSJ would have a woman writing an unsigned editorial) never actually makes a case that this will hurt the economy. He just lists things that money is being spent on and gets outraged, assuming that the reader will share his outrage because all right-thinking people naturally hate teachers unions, tree-huggers, and the dirty poors.
PS Don't pat yourself on the back for "I'm open to other viewpoints." Falling completely for unmitigated bullshit and letting yourself get talked back to sanity by people willing to do the thinking is not a winning personality trait.