Author Topic: star trek  (Read 331119 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2520 on: February 13, 2020, 04:58:32 PM »
"Clarence Boddicker" plays the President of the Federation, who LOOKS like he is a Klingon, but for some reason is not.

Kurtwood Smith. Also played the Cardassian head of security in DS9 (in that Odo flashback episode) and the captain of the massive time-travel cannon ship on Voyager.
ὕβρις

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2521 on: February 13, 2020, 09:51:06 PM »
Michael Dorn plays Kirk-and-McCoy's Klingon lawyer
Named Worf.

One of the later Worf's ancestors. A joke they made into canon. :lawd

bluemax

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2522 on: February 14, 2020, 03:18:40 AM »
NO

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2523 on: February 14, 2020, 03:32:27 AM »
Nah Normandy is still better
What

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #2524 on: February 17, 2020, 06:52:16 PM »
dog

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2525 on: February 17, 2020, 07:29:37 PM »


:rejoice

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2526 on: February 18, 2020, 04:00:11 AM »
mid season episode reviews yassss
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2527 on: February 18, 2020, 06:39:21 AM »
spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2528 on: February 19, 2020, 07:25:15 AM »
Was reading TVTropes (self inflicted injury, I know) for ST:Picard and saw this in the "Your Mileage May Vary" section :

Quote
"Endgame", the finale of Voyager, also ended with the strong implication that the entire Borg Collective had been wiped out once and for all

:confused It doesn't imply anything of the sort ?
ὕβρις

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2529 on: February 19, 2020, 12:42:16 PM »
It's just their network of transwarp shit being blowed up right?

What

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2530 on: February 19, 2020, 04:44:01 PM »
Yeah I remember it was made pretty clear that they destroyed a transwarp hub (out of 6 known to Seven of Nine or something). I guess you could infer that Borg efforts to reach the Alpha Quadrant would be set back from it.

I suppose the confusion is that Borg Queen get destroyed too. But didn't that happen in First Contact too ? And the whole body (at the very least neck down) is basically just expandable parts both in First Contact and Voyager ? And Voyager had the Borg Queen role go back and forth between two actresses, so it's actually fairly ambivalent that there's one Queen instead of a (or body avatars of) Queen out of several. Or that destroying her would wipe the Collective.

At any rate you'd expect a character to say out loud that the Borg Collective may have been wiped if that's what the writers are trying to say, considering how high profile and prominent they are to the franchise.

I thought that was a pretty outrageous thing to read on TVTropes (not that I think the standard is high or anything).
ὕβρις

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2531 on: February 20, 2020, 11:24:49 AM »
Picard EP5 finally a halfway decent episode.

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2532 on: February 20, 2020, 12:30:03 PM »
Picard EP5 finally a halfway decent episode.

Oh shit now im legit excited
What

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2533 on: February 20, 2020, 12:57:45 PM »
Nooooooooooooooooooooo

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Icheb :(
[close]



spoiler (click to show/hide)
Oooooooh Quark get's a mention! He's still killing business I see
[close]

 :quark
« Last Edit: February 20, 2020, 01:16:05 PM by MMaRsu »
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2534 on: February 20, 2020, 11:07:32 PM »
I just noticed that Maddox, looks like Jordan Peterson. :neogaf

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Commodore Oh (The head of Starfleet Security) 
[close]
« Last Edit: February 21, 2020, 01:23:49 AM by D3RANG3D »

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2535 on: February 21, 2020, 03:15:01 AM »
Pretty lame they didnt use the original actor but whatevs
What

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2536 on: February 21, 2020, 06:51:40 PM »
I just noticed that Maddox, looks like Jordan Peterson. :neogaf

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Commodore Oh (The head of Starfleet Security) 
[close]

Yeah, Oh is Tamlyn Tomita -- big crush for me, early on. I was happy to see her in Picard.

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2537 on: February 23, 2020, 06:19:59 AM »
She was also Jun Kazama in Tekken

What

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2538 on: February 23, 2020, 07:44:56 PM »

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2539 on: February 23, 2020, 09:01:30 PM »
She was also Jun Kazama in Tekken
Voiceover or movie?

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2540 on: February 24, 2020, 04:54:55 AM »
What

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2541 on: February 24, 2020, 09:36:24 AM »

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2542 on: February 24, 2020, 10:18:38 AM »
I dun gettit :(
What

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2543 on: February 24, 2020, 10:53:59 AM »
ὕβρις

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2544 on: February 24, 2020, 10:56:04 AM »
I know the loss meme but I still dont get it :(

Guess im just a dumb HU-MAN
What

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2545 on: February 24, 2020, 10:58:33 AM »

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2546 on: February 24, 2020, 11:06:40 AM »
Now thats funny
What

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2547 on: February 24, 2020, 03:04:21 PM »
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2548 on: February 24, 2020, 03:06:28 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Dax being left libertarian. Sounds about right and that sounds like me too.
IYKYK

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2549 on: February 25, 2020, 04:11:34 PM »

Yeti

  • Hail Hydra
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2550 on: February 25, 2020, 06:10:09 PM »
Where are the pictures of Quark being a top and a bottom then?
WDW

Madrun Badrun

  • twin-anused mascot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2551 on: February 25, 2020, 06:34:21 PM »
they decayed

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2552 on: February 27, 2020, 06:43:05 AM »
Picard Episode 6 another halfway decent one, and better than the last one.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2553 on: February 27, 2020, 06:55:39 PM »

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2554 on: February 28, 2020, 11:26:03 AM »
yeah and its pretty good. the best star trek anything in 15 years.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2555 on: February 28, 2020, 01:07:53 PM »
its a little strange to be sure, but there's not too much of it and part of the motive seems to be them showing off that they are on a streaming service and can do whatever they want. also this show isn't really as bound by starfleet military stuff. so that's part of it.

nachobro

  • Live Más
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2556 on: February 28, 2020, 01:13:38 PM »
thats a good question

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2557 on: February 28, 2020, 07:15:00 PM »
At the Dabo table.
ὕβρις

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2558 on: February 28, 2020, 08:25:19 PM »
Alien underboob :rejoice
« Last Edit: February 29, 2020, 10:28:26 AM by D3RANG3D »

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2559 on: February 29, 2020, 07:08:00 AM »
What

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2560 on: February 29, 2020, 09:26:58 AM »

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2561 on: March 01, 2020, 03:12:44 AM »
Damn, RLM has gone full on bitch mode. It's like they just want to hate it to hate it rather than offer any salient objection.
IYKYK

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2562 on: March 01, 2020, 05:21:26 AM »
As much as I like Picard, they are right though. The show is fucking stupid compared to TNG
What

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2563 on: March 01, 2020, 09:23:29 AM »
I dunno, I feel like I'm not being spoon-fed the entire story. I feel compelled to do a re-watch of eps. 1~3 just to see if I can figure out more of the post-TNG worldbuilding.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2564 on: March 01, 2020, 09:31:11 AM »
Nah it's a fucking mess, I'm still like ok I have a vague idea of where we are and how we got here I don't care how many shill channels try to sell me on how this is plausible outcome of Star Fleet/The Federation it's terrible.

Leadbelly

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2565 on: March 01, 2020, 03:56:41 PM »
I feel like Patrick Stewart is too old for this shit. The way he delivers his lines seems clunky to me. Then again, I think the dialogue is clunky at times any way.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2566 on: March 01, 2020, 07:09:22 PM »
Fuck the haters. ST Picard is the most star trek thing in decades.
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2567 on: March 01, 2020, 07:52:17 PM »
Lol no.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2568 on: March 01, 2020, 07:55:50 PM »
:obama

Yes.
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2569 on: March 01, 2020, 07:59:56 PM »
No.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2570 on: March 01, 2020, 08:15:52 PM »
Alright. What in Trek in the past few decades is better?
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2571 on: March 01, 2020, 10:32:06 PM »
I seriously don't complaints about this show.

"The plot makes no sense!"

The back story makes no sense! The back story is explained episode by episode.

It really just sounds like people mad it's not the same kind of format as old Trek which is really just sour grapes.

"Why is Picard so different?"

In what way?
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2572 on: March 01, 2020, 10:58:47 PM »
The plot is explained but its nonsense.

Picard picked a fight with that Romulan Senator forcing Romulond to kill him that is not Picard, Picard would have been devastated that he caused that shit.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2573 on: March 01, 2020, 11:04:04 PM »
The plot is explained but its nonsense.

Picard picked a fight with that Romulan Senator forcing Romulond to kill him that is not Picard, Picard would have been devastated that he caused that shit.

It's like you didn't even watch the show. He didn't pick the fight. In fact, he tried to defuse the situation. The senator is the one that forced him into a duel. The first thing he did was throw the sword to the ground in defiance and refusal to fight. The fight thing Picard literally does when they're on board the ship is lecture Elnor in anger that there was no reason to kill him.

:lol

What happened on the show is literally the exact opposite of what you just wrote and yet you demand the rest of us believe that the story is nonsense. :lol
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2574 on: March 01, 2020, 11:06:40 PM »
Oh please he knew it would escalate to that and thats why its not Picard and its bullshit at most he wagged his finger at him and went about his business.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2020, 11:15:38 PM by D3RANG3D »

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2575 on: March 01, 2020, 11:06:43 PM »
In every single combat scenario Picard has had his gun set to stun. He has chided two crew members (Seven and Elnor) about murder. This is a completely nonsensical criticism and Picard has very much been in line with prior Federation principles of past shows.
IYKYK

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Bot
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2576 on: March 01, 2020, 11:09:19 PM »
Yet he gave Seven two phaser assault rifles with little to no hesitation.

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2577 on: March 02, 2020, 01:16:27 AM »
Anyways, let's actually discuss the show.

Episode 6 was fantastic.

The reunion with Hugh, the Borg reclamation project scenes were the most positive Trek in DECADES, the tension and build up to Soji's dream. I like all of the characters and how it's a show about the struggle to find good in a harsh universe. I love this show and I'm excited as FUCK for the next episode.

It also looked like Soji's father looked sort of like Bashir. I'll be giddy if that's the case.

"These aren't monsters, they're victims."

:bow

RLM complainers: WHEN IS IT GOING TO BE POSITIVE TREK AGAIN reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Also reusing the old Hugh actor :hyper

And this week we get to see Riker and Troi :hyper
IYKYK

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2578 on: March 02, 2020, 01:17:50 AM »
https://screenrant.com/star-trek-picard-tng-ds9-morality-idealism-better-explained

Quote
Picard Is About The Good In Flawed People In An Imperfect World

Quote
The Perfect Is The Enemy Of The Good

As per the article.

They've truly taken what was great about DS9 and are just exploring more of it :bow
IYKYK

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #2579 on: March 02, 2020, 01:26:33 AM »
Yeah this show is complete nonsense as a Trek show, but I'm going to finish it because I'm essentially a hostage to trek.